Reminder that : MARXISM IS INEVITABLE

Corbyn will win soon and societies are heading towards hybrid models of social democracies.
1) Nordic countries with systems like these are having insane development
2) Free healthcare and college will happen in the US within the next 30 years
3) There is no god Atheism is the truth, and everyone in modern societies is realizing it.
4) Ethnocentric movements are dead, alt light exists because none is truly a nazi like u fucks
5) Corporations are going to pay the price

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/vLqHv0xgOlc
youtube.com/watch?v=FNtyV0CXfzU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
m.youtube.com/watch?v=r9No8kVSXqQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

shameless bump

PAY

>greek

Your next prime minister already supports deleting my debt. Its over bro

So what you're saying is that the Caliphate is inevitable?

then why is it never really REALLY tried?

I don't see how this could work if subhumans are shitting out 3 bastard children by the time they are 25 meanwhile the people who are sustaining the current systems are not. White people or asians may be able to set up a system like this but look at any institution founded by white people and taken over by niggers or mexicans here it's like hell on earth

If he's our next Prime Minister there won't be enough money for ourselves let alone fucking Greece.

It'd be nice if there was more leftist stuff posted on Sup Forums instead of the monontonous right wing drivel that gets spammed and is leaking onto other boards.

Fuck you.
Fuck communist collectivists


"In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property(Capitalism) - Communist Manifesto


"Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. " - Communist Manifesto

This

You aren't welcome here and you never will be. There's a place for you on 8pol though, leftypol.

Race Mixing and education will raise the average IQ of those races as humanity moves forward.

>why don't other people do things for me
Typical Leftist

we're regressing though. I've seen it first hand, institutions taken over by barely literate niggers. Half black kids act like niggers. White people are not having replacement levels of population growth while Mexicans are having five to six kids on the teat of welfare and blacks are too. Honestly if there was some sort of eugenics program with it I could see it being viable. Not that we need to be doing anything crazy but we should seriously be sterilizing crack addicted aids infested niggers. I could see how free healthcare and college could be a good thing potentially but if niggers are put into a system where they could contribute and be succesful and have way more or just do drugs and take down society they will take down society.

Its not abut being welcome or not, its about being right. The moment Berniecrat's policies prevail... its over for pol.

My gramps was killed by communists and my grandmom harboured christian nuns in a secret part of her house from the grasps of the commies.

There's some prime anti-commie blood in my veins so if that pathetic iddology wins popular vote again I'll take as much comrades with me to hell as I can.

You could get off Sup Forums you newfag cancer, you were never welcome moot just fucked up

t. butthurt antifa

>bernie
>the guy who is so cucked he doesn't even contest his party STEALING the primary from him
>he ends up unironically supporting the candidate that stole the primary from him
JUST

>newfag lefty tries to call me a newfag

Another stupid thread, holy shit, there is too many lately

just sage it right away

Seize the means of production cumrag

>leftypol thinks he can call others newfag
You have to go back.

...

Yeah you're right, Inca

>Being so new you don't remember when >saying something racist or rightwing >was a joke

Kill yourself furfag

Sup Forums was literally created as a dumping ground for vocal right wingers on other boards you nigger. You're making shit up.

1) Marx is dead.
2) His theories are not based on the realities of our times.
3) His stuff was tried out all over the world and didn't work.
4) Only retards refuse to draw the conclusion out of points 1 to 3.

Look mate. An utopia where everyone is equal and poverty does not exist sounds good but in reality it's impractical. It's part of the human nature to try to surpass one another. Take examples from ancient Sparta, USSR. China pre-90 and Columbia. We all know how everything turnet out.

Ah, Karl Marx. Inventor of the most effective weight loss program in the history of humanity.

the question you should be asking is

why is his hand in his jacket like that?

you will see the same pose by Napoleon and Stalin and others.

The hidden hand.

NI am not talking about utopias. I am talking about more solid wealth distribution and effective social programs. Billionaires should exist, the game just has to be more fair for all the players.

What the capitalists fail to understand is that the root of their system is based off of two fundamental principles:
Profit
Efficiency
With the rise of automation in key industries, it won't be long until the gentle laborers are replaced by machines who are able to perform at a rate greatly more efficient than any man would be able to. What do you suppose will be done with these jobless laborers? You cannot simply get rid of them, and the capitalists will Nash their teeth before completely doing away with currency, so a universal wage would be the most obvious choice. And with a key Marxist principle like that in place, the resistance of any other socialist reform would be considered baffling.

In those Nordic countries where they have the great social healthcare mothers get paid leave and the family gets some sort of money for an allotted amount of time. This would never work with niggers and gibs. My understanding is that the major flaw in communism is that people tend to lose the will to work and contribute, niggers already don't and this would just stem their already growing levels. I wish you could see how stupid they are, you would never support giving money or redistributing wealth to people like that

...

...

>Societies are heading towards hybrid models of social democracies
Yes in EU, socialism has proved its effectiveness. It has the best of the both worlds.
Anyways liberal capitalists like anglos don't want to be associated with any form of communism, and if they do for healthcare/education/public infrastructure or whatever, they will call it a different thing even if it's the same (see "obamacare") so in the end their changes will be much slower or even paralyzed by their right wing rulers.

>5) Corporations are going to pay the price
We wish. They only pay to keep clean their corporative image, or make advertising out of social demands. (rainbow emojis for new iphone, etc)

Congrats my dear useful idiot. You'll be one of the first marching to the gulag, and you can't even realize it.

Can's say I feel sorry for you, or even pity.

You're doomed.

You'll be in denial of everything at the last moment, when the communist soldier aims the gun to your skull and pulls the trigger.

youtu.be/vLqHv0xgOlc

>Nordic countries with systems like these are having insane development.

They're having insane development due to superior genetics. The more shitshins that flood their region, the more they decline.

> Free healthcare and college will happen in the US within the next 30 years

It won't because it won't work at that point. Who's going to fund it? Unemployed niggers and pacoshits taking week long siestas?

>There is no god Atheism is the truth, and everyone in modern societies is realizing it

You cannot disprove the existence of spirituality.

>Ethnocentric movements are dead, alt light exists because none is truly a nazi like u fucks

Isn't your literal fascist party polling at 10+ points right now?

> Corporations are going to pay the price

Sure, go the way of Zimbabwe. Let the niggers and sandmonkeys dominate our countries and "seize the means of production", dooming us to starvation and squalor, due to being subhuman inferior animals incapable of anything beyond smacking rocks together.

true dat

Kekd

The fascist party is stuck at 6% for years now, its ot getting any higher.

Address the rest of my points, double digit iq turkroach rape baby.

It's your consistent belief in this utopian society and "impracticality" that makes this so difficult. We are not speaking of a utopian, magical society. We are speaking of a society based off of scientific approaches and humanity. To not strive towards that, to continue with the system where the working class outnumbers the elite 99/1 but is consistently taken advantage, is foolish. To not strive towards a system of innovation through the enrichment of man, one that is consistently thwarted by the elite, is foolish.

Constantly on this board I see men dissatisfied and disallusioned with their work. They wail at how disconnected they are by their work, and constantly lash out at anyone they deem responsible for their problems. They point to the very system which put them in their place, but then revile any thoughts on destroying that system.

...

Evolution will eventually move shitskins towards the right direction. There are some smart africans, eventually more will appear.
Religions are jokes with shitty ideas either way
Taxing corporations to pay their fair share is not going to starve anyone.,,,

>Nordic countries with systems like these are having insane development
No they aren't

>There is no god Atheism is the truth, and everyone in modern societies is realizing it.
Literally the opposite is happening

>Ethnocentric movements are dead
Except they're not

Also social democracies aren't socialist.

And you think we do not have systems in place designed to keep that from happening. Stop basing everything you see in the world off of race. Do you really think an educated black human, for whatever you view him as he is that, could not perform to the demands of a communal system? And if not, if they do end up failing, let the removal happen naturally. I doubt it would come to that, but if it did, you could clearly point to evidence of the black mans decline.

The cia lied to you. Your country has even bigger numbers than this believe me.

>superior genetics
Your a fucking moron. Read the Marxist principal of dialectical materialism then speak to me on the plight of the poor minority. Stop being a fucking liberal and actually put in research to your claims.
The evidence given
>shit
The research done
>shit
The effort given
>shit

you could use niggers interchangeably for black people, mexicans, trashy white people. They are all subhuman. No shit we have systems in place stifling their growth that is the purpose of having such systems. It promotes the most fit people to run society have kids. An intelligent black person would actually be ok under capitalism because it favors the more intelligent people in general. Also "educated" black people are illiterate nigger subhuman trash that are pushed through the system and given better grades for being black by cuck marxist professors. Point to me one institution where affirmative action type pushing retards through has ever worked out

>Read the Marxist principal of dialectical materialism then speak to me on the plight of the poor minority

> maybe they are not poor because they are "subhuman, but subhuman because they are poor

Research historical materialism pls

daily reminder that the final redpill is to become the jew

also a daily reminder that israel is a sacrificial country full of shitskins and ashkenazis are interbreeding with arabic jews more and more

oh look a greek wanting free stuff, how novel

>the plight of the poor minority

lmfao

>1) Nordic countries with systems like these are having insane development

Stopped reading here, nordic countries have stagnated since the 60's and are riding off their free market ventures. Go look at the data you imbecile.

for people too lazy

youtube.com/watch?v=FNtyV0CXfzU

>Research historical materialism pls

>Nordic countries with systems like these are having insane development
Yes, I noticed Scandinavia has insanely developed the highest rape rate in Europe, and the governments in charge of those nations insanely fine and imprison their citizens for pointing it out or complaining about it.

Every commie should be put down. Every last one.

>maybe they're subhuman because they have shit genetics and people with shit genetics don't plan ahead to have kids and raise a family but just have 3 or 4 bastard kids who have shit genetics
Notice how arabs being imported into these nordic countries where they are so "progressive" and give them whatever they want isn't yielding shit but more Muslim subhuman babies, and less intelligent white babies that will go on to sustain this system?

agree

I think samefag is newfag is summerfag
I think same

1) Nordic systems aren't marxist. Most Nordic countries owe their strong situation to a combination of factors. Namely: Former colonial wealth, high resources compares to small population with relatively high IQ.

Let's just look at the history of Sweden. It's highest period of growth was in the early/mid 1900s when it had a very free market after gaining its independence. It also had plenty of residual wealth from colonialism. The economy took a dive when the socialists came to power. The economy has recently recovered a bit due to opening up the markets. However, it is not in a good situation for the long run:

It will suffer the same fate of all other countries abusing debt via a central bank. However, it will be twice as bad for Sweden (and other scandavian countries) because they are chiefly exporters. They will have their own crash and will be largely effected by the crash of the people buying their stuff.

Not to mention that having a welfare dependent society will always make the crash that much harder. (+all the refugees they have decided to start paying for)

The best thing the Nordic countries can do for their longevity is to continue to open up the markets, reduce government social programs, and remove kebab.

2) Free healthcare and college will happen in the US within the next 30 years

With what money? We can't even pay for the current system of medicare. Hell, implementing Obamacare just sped up the rate at which it will go insolvent.

Look at California recent virtue signalling. The senate passed a single payer healthcare bill. The cost is $400 billion. The current budget of California is $150 billion. From what I can tell California is already spending more than it's budget.

The bottom line is that the US needs to pay off its debt before it even thinks about free shit.

3) Most likely true

4) They aren't dead at all. Tribalism is the nature of humans. The worse living conditions get, the more tribal people will get.

5) Corporations are going to pay the price

I'm not sure what these means. Corporations are simply a more efficient means to get you your stuff than Marxism could ever provide.

The major issue we have with corporations is cronyism pushed by the neo-liberals (Hilldawg) and neo-cons. A lot of the supposed "problems of capitalism" are not problems of capitalism, but in fact issues of state mandated cartels. Free the markets and living conditions will rise as they have always done.

The only way that something like Marxism could possibly be efficient is with high level computing technology and robots running everything. That of course brings about it's own problems.
Presently, putting humans in charge of directing an economy is a disaster. The free market is the naturally most efficient producing wealth and getting people what they want.

Marxism is simply idealistic nonsense that does not work in the real world. The best example is given by Thomas Sowell in his book Basic Economics: The leader of the Soviet Union, faced with widespread starvation asks Margaret Thatcher how she feeds her people. Here answer; "I don't."

...

Marxist banned genetics because it was "Bourgeoisie pseudoscience"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

why Greece is dying: the thread

Don't take Sup Forums seriously they all are full of hate and special snowflakes. Marxism will work when everything is gonna be soon automated. This is the true way of the future. However we need a regulation on human population. There need to be control on that. because we don't have infinity resources.

Stupid economics breeds stupid economics. Brazil is an over-regulated shithole with less economic freedom than China, but what do the people always vote for more of? More government, more regulations, more taxes. Meanwhile, the Nordic countries continue to be among the top nations in terms of economic freedom, a fact which is ignored by dipshits like because commies cannot into economics.

>he thinks we were joking
I've said it before and I'll say it again. You faggots will believe anything.

>marxism can only work when we are post-scarcity
>but we gotta regulate population
>cause we won't have the resources
>ergo we won't be post-scarcity

Then stop mentioning it and bothering me.

>summerfag
Get with the times nigger.
That term finally died. You've been gone too long.

>Ethnocentric movements are dead
Without this, no system will work.

Turks did nothing wrong gayreeks mudt die.

.1) Their social programs are highly effective they arent going anywhere
2) with the money they keep stealing from you for useless wars
4) Race mixing is also the nature of humans, most of the people today are a result of several different tribes

And this is where I see fallacy. Your ability to call arabs subhuman denies all logic considering for more than 3,000 years they were the leaders of modern civilization. You see the poor, destitute Arab and assume his genetics weaker than your own as if put in the very same situation, you would be any different. You have developed a racist haze do to experiences (if you have even met an Arab and have not been exposed to them only through Sup Forums) with those who are poor and uneducated. You have no proof to any of your claims for any evidence given would have two given in contrary. This is the failing of your claim.

That only regresses the superior race and makes a miserable future for humanity an inevitability for millennia.

>a free press is non-optional for a free society
>a free press is not possible without private property
>thus communism cannot, under any circumstances, be anything but total tyranny
Liberals don't understand this. Their argument is purely emotional
>some people have more than others
>some people die because of healthcare >we cannot let this happen and capitalism is responsible
It doesn't matter that capitalism creates almost infinitely less suffering and injustice because hey at least everyone automatically gets food.

These people just need to be dropped from helicopters

>Read a few lines into the article
>See it was something under the traitor Stalin
I laugh

I am turk now, time to kill gayreeks.
Gayreek liberation was a mistake

m.youtube.com/watch?v=r9No8kVSXqQ

2/3 correct I suppose

>Taxing corporations to pay their fair share is not going to starve anyone.,,,

And just who decides what is a fair share? You, the "government"? What exactly is a "fair share"? I hear this kind of bullshit terminology all the time, yet I'm always struck by how it implies theft from some nameless disadvantaged group.

This is the language of communism. The language of the simpleton who thinks those with little or no ability and, subsequently, little or no value, should be granted status, things and respect because "feelings" and "equality". If you are poor, either individually, or as a group, it is for a reason. If you are oppressed, it is because you choose to remain oppressed. Communism is the manifest philosophy of the pathetic and weak, masquerading as strength through mob appeal. Disgusting.

HOW EXACTLY CAN WE BE SOCIALIST AND SURVIVE IF NHS RESOURCES ARE STRAINED SO MUCH TRYING TO ASSIST NATIVES AND IMMIGRANTS FROM UNSANITARY UNHEALTHY SHITHOLES AND LET'S NOT FORGET ABOUT POLICE RESOURCES TOO

PLEASE EXPLAIN

Was about to start refuting this post but as I read it I basically realised that every point is either a vague baseless speculation asserted without evidence or debunkable with a 10 second google search.

...

>3000 years ago they were smart so after years of inbreeding under Islam, intellectual stagnation and breeding with 60 iq africans they are the same
You realize white people are intellectually superior to niggers in general is because of thousands of years of evolution right?

>real communism has never been tried

kys

>Corbyn will win soon

Stopped reading there

You could start by getting rid of the royals...kek

>life is materialism
Hey schlomo

wat?

>commies cannot into economics
First.... *sigh*
I think your pointing to the fact that Brazil is a.... I don't even know
So Nordic countries are nice, eh?
The lack of regulations leads to countries like Brazil and China being so bad because they are the fools of an economic system based off who will work for the cheapest price. How do you expect anybody to strive off of something like that?

>btw what the hell did any of that have to do with previous mentioned statements?

DEBTS!

You do have to regulate human populations in any system but what does that have to do with post scarcity. Do you really think our current system can survive a 15 Billion plus population?

>Your ability to call arabs subhuman denies all logic considering for more than 3,000 years they were the leaders of modern civilization.

Really? 3000 years, huh? Arabs? Tell me, when was this, which specific groups are you claiming as Arab?

Given the the Arab's, as a distinct group, only came into existence around 600 BC, I find it hard to understand how they were the leaders of Modern Civilization for 3000 years. Of course, you undoubtedly are grouping anyone from somewhere in the region as an Arab because you are a fucking peon who actually knows nothing of middle-eastern or semitic history.

>I think your pointing to the fact that Brazil is a.... I don't even know
A fucking mess of government over-regulation is what it is. Seriously, it's 140th in economic freedom, which is consistent with most 3rd world nations, while Sweden is 19th, close the the top of economic freedom like most of the 1st world.