Is Sup Forums statist or anarchist?

Is Sup Forums statist or anarchist?

statism to endure bad times

anarchism to enjoy good times

Doesn't statism also create the bad times?

Sup Forums is both of those things and more.
Which is why i like it. You see the true anarchy not the bulshit in your pic.

no, liberals do

Old Sup Forums: libertarian
Neo Sup Forums: totalitarian

Statist.

Anarchy eventually devolves into a state. The minute a social contract is signed between neighbours to peacefully associate a state has developed

Tfw I am an Ancap 1776 Pauls

Statist, but with rights and a Constitution protecting free speech, due process, and the right to bear arms.

ITT philosophers of freedom

>i didn't know freedom meant people doing things that suck

anarchist so I can steamroll other anarchists and form my ideal state

Sup Forums is not a collective, retard

People shouldn't have "Freedom" they should have responsibilities, but not obligations.
Freedom is total chaos. Responsibility is tempered freedom.

I believe violence is a way to solve problems, so I guess I'm a statist

I'm in Pinochet faction which makes me a statist I guess.
You need strong and ruthless state to remove leftists and other excrements.
Other that that freedom should be preserved.

Anarchy depending on the type waries from utopian to plain retarded.

Taxes are the bedrock of civilization.

I don't know when exactly it was that people mistook race realism and hatred of niggers for actual national (((socialism)))

Sup Forums is a mob of teenaged shitskins that can't decide what they are without rubbing their faces all over a plate of tendies.

Oh shit don't wake up the AnCaps!

Statism, but with limitations on government.

What's preventing a powerful "statist" state/military from subjugating you? Good luck forming any reasonable form of resistance without rulers.

The point is that that Reich soldiers themselves would have been better off with anarchism instead of dying in the Siberian tundra.

every society that has been made has crumbled because humanity can't be contained.

the only constant is change yet conservatives exist.

All failed ideologies like communism and nazism, base their utopias on agreement, while humans will never agree, that should be the basis for politics (them not realizing it is just another reason why politics isn't a science)
A system should thrive on disagreement, and we should choose it based on its worse possible outcome, rather then its "hopefull" best possible. There is a reason communism and nazism failed.

Sounds like you

lolno

old Sup Forums: natsoc
new Sup Forums: LE TRUMP AMIRITE? xD $0.02 HAS BEEN DEPOSITED INTO YOUR ACCOUNT! SAGE AND REPORT SLIDE THREADS! NAZI LARPERS ARE SHARIABLUE SHILLS! PRAISE KEK! SHADILAY! SLAVS ARE WHITE!

>inb4 "dem jews mah nigga"

The state military at the very least consists of our people so there's chance of them not going openly against their own kin.
Doesn't work every time to be sure but there's nothing better you can get.

And what's the chance on anarchy not being subjugated by foreign power which won't give a shit about your people?

The idea that the sum total of advanced human organization rests at the lone stipulation that we do no harm to each other cannot possibly have anything to do with civilization and greatness

Being stateless just means that the first unified nation of people who comes along is going to fuck you up and take your shit.

there has never been any historically claimed instance of An-Cap society.

What is your ideal state annon
Sounds like a anarchist shithole
My great grandad went into the anarchist side of spain in the civil war (anarcho syndicalism) my grandad told me it was a total shithole to live there

I choose Christian State

Fascist

It's the only right choice.

>no BBW Christ-chan pr0ns

Maximum sadness.

aslong as people choose their shithole i don't have any problems with it. My ideal state is local direct democracies, and they can come together by making a national collective community ect.

The 4 principles are a fact no matter how one looks at it
1. no one agrees
2. change is constant
3. humanity can't be contained
4. its the worse possible outcome that one should look after, not the best possible. As every society can be an utopia, the question is how bad it is when it all goes wrong

In the end the ideal world might look alot like the wolrd today, some stupid niggers and white niggers fucking up, and you being forced to move to a country/community that fits you better.
I just hope people realize that anarchy is the state we live in, and that its visable when one looks at the internaitonal community rather then their authoritarian local community. You are never free within a society, and thats fine, just choose your chains rather then letting them being force on you.

Good luck Sup Forumsacks with your ideal soceity, people will vote with their feet or their strenght when they disagree enough
pic ironically related

That's degenerate as shit user, I know the pain of having a fetish but Christ-chan is off limits.

>reactionary militarist dictator
>anarchist
Pinochet was a capitalist but he sure as hell wasn't an anarchist

its statist right now but when september rolls around i figure it'll probably go back to memeing an-cap