Jordan Peterson: Why You Have To Fight Postmodernism

Jordan Peterson delivers non-stop Grade AAA redpills throughout this short video segment of a speech on postmodernism.

>"It's not optional to understand this -- it's absolutely crucial."

youtube.com/watch?v=MPojltjv4M0

realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/06/05/jordan_peterson_why_you_have_to_fight_postmodernism.html
Recommended book: Understanding Postmodernism by Steven Hicks
amazon.com/Explaining-Postmodernism-Skepticism-Socialism-Rousseau/dp/1592476422

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ON8N5bAjwsQ
youtube.com/watch?v=DAncrmE6YV0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

NEVER THE JEWS!

JOIN THE CHURCH

CLEAN YOUR ROOM TRANNIES!

BUY MY BOOKS

SAVE MY GOVERNMENT CAREER!

>not a shill here

More importantly
youtube.com/watch?v=ON8N5bAjwsQ

What are you trying to sell, OP?

I literally just made a post about this. Hell yes.

Burn in hell.

Not trying to sell anything, I just saw this video while browsing news like I usually do. Also he mentions that the most important/useful book for making sense of the current times is the one I listed. The video lays it out really well. People on this board constantly rage about these topics, and this synthesizes those issues and makes it accessible.

Well... I missed it, so here we are. lol.

Fact stands that Jordan Peterson is the most articulate, well educated, and rhetorically competent proponent of these views that I'm aware of in the public sphere.

That book is really great, I read it a few months ago

He's pretty out there. Just another conservative theocratician like Jarod Taylor, Pat Buchanon, or David Duke, who will never make an impact.

That he is.

>Grade AAA redpills
>extremely basic stuff

>The black community in the United States is the 18th wealthiest community -- the 18th wealthiest nation on the planet.

Holy hell that's good

He's nothing like those guys wtf

>Listening to a leaf like Jordan Peterson
He is sometimes right, but other times he is cucked. Like his pro woman stances. Women are less than animals and niggers, just look at how they vote.

In a world where we're fighting about gender and denying that men who pledge loyalty proudly to ISIS are islamic terrorists, grade aaa red pills are just well articulated basic facts.

Wrong.

u ok my dude?

Go get laid you faggot

he wont name the jew though

He has, except not in an ideological way because he's not a faggot about it like you losers larping as Nazis. He's got himself well put together

White women voted majority Trump fuckhead

The abzurdity of some faggot in his bedroom with no goals or aspirations trying to shame Peterson for not naming the jew, getting all worked up about it and acting a general histrionic faggot about it is the ultimate sign of someone who needs to sort their own life about before wasting away complaining about shit you have no power to change

> Just another Jarod Taylor, Pat Buchanon, or David Duke
Did I enter the Twilight Zone?

Based JP

We *iz* kangz, mah nigga

This, thank you. I know it would be great if we could all debate lofty high ideals of optimized perfectionist behavior, but unfortunately that just isn't the world we live in. Small steps until people are ready to accept bigger ideas.

Yes, and he doesnt "name the Jew" because he is intelligent enough to articulate real points rather than cast lazy, shallow insults. See my point here

Bump, good vid OP

>muh bloody gommies
>muh (((corporate democracy)))
>muh cuckservatism

He's a good speaker but he's obviously a lolbertarian. I was also a bit dissappointed in his explanation of postmodernism. It seemed short-shifted and basic. I wish Jung was still here to give us an explanation rooted in archetypes and the collective unconscious.

Ok and what would that look like? What archetypes are postmodernists? That just sounds like vague hand-wavy psychanalysis bs.

It was a plenty good explanation to understand how insidious postmodernism is and why it must be fought at every corner.

>Yes, and he doesnt "name the Jew" because he is intelligent enough to articulate real points rather than cast lazy, shallow insults
no, he is smart enough to know naming the jew will get him crucified publicly. it might not be something he will talk about, but i wonder if he understands the JQ

>what would it look like
Why don't you see for yourself. Actually just found a video where he goes into the archetypes of PM

youtube.com/watch?v=DAncrmE6YV0

Still don't agree with him 100% but I guess he's the best we have rn against the libs.

You are so wrong

They voted for Trump considerably less than men though.

he literally says everything Sup Forums says without naming the jew.
smart men see patterns, and the pattern points to the JQ

Just watched a lot of his videos a hour ago. I really respect the guy, he knows a lot of stuff.