Can we agree on this?

can we agree on this?

Other urls found in this thread:

webdc.com/pdfs/deathbymedicine.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

WE

Suicide gets a little political depending on the victim

explain

ARE

>Born with a kidney disorder
>WHY DIDNT YOU JUST BE BORN WITHOUT ONE REEEE

Not really. In the "your own problem" field there are self-immune diseases, which you have little to no control over.

ALL

Diabetus ain't my problem if it was not aquired due to lifestyle choice. I have done all I can to diet and exercise and if that isn't enough fuck it.

>Overall I agree with you analysis.

Mental health issues could arguably be put behind politics. A lot of it stems from shitty policies, incorrect medical care and bad health practices.

Difference:
>A. people did it to people.
>B. nobody did it to you.

are socialists this retarded?

NIGGERS

>Genetic diseases
>your fault
Only if we can finally hop on the eugenics train

Interesting perspective, but health of citizens can be in "political issues category" too.

No. What the fuck? In what ass-backwards fucknation do we place a dividing line between "your own problem" and "political issues"? Are yout not aware that you live in a democracy? Political issues are our problem.

No, you'd have to be a fucking idiot to agree with that.

This. Type 2 is your own fault, but type 1 is a fucking coin toss

No I disagree. Most of those problems have environmental factors. Since we are not in complete control of our environment individually, we must tackle some of the problems commutatively and so some of them become "our problem".

It has nothing to do with fault. It's about who takes responsibility - you or the state.

As a matter of fact, type 2 has more of a genetic component than type 1, if I'm not mistaken. However, having the genetic trait doesn't mean you will develop 'beetus, of course, as lifestyle is still largely determinant.

The is perfect for when people try to tell me gun deaths are a real problem. Also, it's the food you're eating and your decision making. Make the majority of the food you eat be fruit and some steamed vegetables and then come talk to me about your ailments.

no, some of it yes, but you cant really help if you develop cancer, you can lower the risks but thats it

There's a genetic bit to type 2, but type 1 has almost nothing to do with lifestyle

>type 1 here
>not ideal

I disagree considering Trump is cutting a quarter of health science research grants (NIH) next year

>There's a genetic bit to type 2, but type 1 has almost nothing to do with lifestyle
All true.

>fear of dying
no we can't agree cause I don't care.

I don't want niggers in my country.

>agree on an image with arbitrary sized circles
>no values or percents

Sure goyem

"Suicide"
2 bullets go through 1 head.

He probably means leading people to suicide, but my answer is the real problem.

This statement is itself advocating a policy of "these issues are/should be irrelevant to considering appropriate government action".

That is, in itself a way to classify them as a political issue.

Literally everything on this is a political issue.

Good point op

We're you in a cyber conference in Memphis today?

This is wrong.

The estimated annual mortality rate for allopathic physicians adverse drug reactions, medical errors, among other things, is in the USA, 783,936 people a year.

And this estimate is conservative. See Table 1. This includes no disease. Purely medical errors.

webdc.com/pdfs/deathbymedicine.pdf