Piers Morgan Grills London Mayor Over Returning Terrorists

On Tuesday Piers Morgan grilled London Mayor Sadiq Khan over the tracking of terrorists returning to Britain from Syria

trunews.com/article/piers-morgan-grills-london-mayor-over-returning-terrorists

>(WASHINGTON, DC) Mayor Khan was subject to the litany of questions on the Tuesday edition of “Good Morning Britain”, which quickly turned from a friendly interview to focus on what steps are being taken to protect the British people from returning jihadists. As the interview took the combative shift, co-host Susanna Reid asked the mayor how many of the 400 hundred people abroad had returned to London. “The estimate is just over half,” Khan said while stuttering. “Where are they!” Morgan shouted. “No seriously, where are they?”

>Khan cited budget constraints as the reason behind the city’s lack of intelligence on terror suspects. “The Met police budget, roughly speaking, 15 to 20 percent is funded by me the mayor. The rest comes from central government” said Khan. “If the Met Police budget is being shrunk and reduced, they have to prioritize and use their resources.” Morgan interrupted Khan and questioned “what could be a bigger priority.” “What could be a bigger priority than people coming back from a Syrian battlefield with intent to harm British citizens?” Morgan asked. “How is it that not the number one priority?”

>Morgan expressed dismay that people leaving to fight in foreign jihad would be allowed back into the country. “Why are these people just allowed to come back in, in the first place and then the London mayor doesn’t appear to have a clue where any of them are,” he said. “I mean, no disrespect to you, but where are they?” Khan was caught off guard but responded saying, “That’s one of the questions that obviously the police …” Morgan interrupted one last time to remind Khan that the buck stopped with him. “You’re the mayor! You’re the mayor of London,” Morgan said.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WEnN6k8VZFE
youtube.com/watch?v=xcQo8C8bwKw
youtube.com/watch?v=l-DJPlccVL8#t=37m9s
hooktube.com/watch?v=WEnN6k8VZFE
youtube.com/watch?v=b814HQkzyKM
standard.co.uk/news/london/exposed-sadiq-khans-family-links-to-extremist-organisation-a3179066.html
standard.co.uk/news/mayor/sadiq-khan-shared-platform-with-five-islamic-extremists-a3231436.html
youtube.com/watch?v=TCw9_avTlYs
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_New_York_and_New_Jersey_bombings
standard.co.uk/news/world/new-york-explosion-sadiq-khan-says-terror-attacks-are-part-and-parcel-of-life-in-a-big-city-a3347891.html
thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Video for those interested:

youtube.com/watch?v=WEnN6k8VZFE

>BUT YOUR THE MAYOR!!!
>YOUR THE MAYOR!!
So.. that guy is London's mayor, eh?

They cannot find missing dead bodies, do you think they can find terrorists?

No, he's working for the caliphate

this is a bit silly.
he's hte mayor of london, not the head of MI5.

His main job is transport , foreign investment, housing, rubbish collection and street cleaning, night life, petty crime

the only thing he should be doing with terrorism is letting MI5 and other security services do their job

Video: youtube.com/watch?v=xcQo8C8bwKw

He's in charge of the Metropolitan Police though. The chief of the Met reports to the mayor.

But I agree in principle with what you're saying.

If anyone should be held accountable it's Theresa May. She was home secretary for 6 years before becoming PM. What the fuck did she accomplish during that time?

Not really, the Met police force reports to the queen, the home office, and himself, and the met is directly tied into anti-terror operations.

Piers is being an absolute autist in this video. What the fuck do you expect the mayor to do about a national security/immigration problem?

>Major
>it's not his job to oversee police force
>it's not his job to ensure they have information from outside agencies they might need

o-ok, whose job is it?

He cut police budget to pay for the air tickets to get the Terrorists home, then pays for the hotels

MI5? The home secretary? What do you think their job is?

The issue of ISIS fighters being allowed to return to the country is 100% the home office's remit. And who was home secretary for 6 years under David Cameron? Hmmmmmm....

Wow, I wish my city had someone that famous willing to ask our mayor hard questions.

I guess as long as he keeps terrorism and crime down, our media celebrities don't care about his personal corruption.

At least you got Brexit, right?
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Ok. Let's say it's not his job.

Do you think there's a reasonable expectation he would be aware of efforts to track these dangerous elements within his city?

Given he's in a position of power where he could easily obtain at least some basic information on this and perhaps even help in some way, it seems to me it is incumbent upon him to do so, instead he doesn't even know if these people are being tracked.

Holy fuck I'm angry and I'm not even British

>Do you think there's a reasonable expectation he would be aware of efforts to track these dangerous elements within his city?
Yeah there's a reasonable expectation that he would be briefed by Mi5 on their whereabouts.

Mi5 takes orders from the home secretary, not the mayor of London.

>Given he's in a position of power where he could easily obtain at least some basic information on this and perhaps even help in some way, it seems to me it is incumbent upon him to do so, instead he doesn't even know if these people are being tracked.

But that's not his fucking job. If there's a problem with the printer in the office are you going to ask the guy in accounting to fix it?

This is 100% Theresa May's fault and only now is she starting to acknowledge that we need new legistlation to deal with terrorism. She should have been on this 6 fucking years ago.

I consider politicians in favour of returning Jihadi's to be complicit in their crimes.

We have a lefty who didn't give two fucks about Jihadi's returning, preaching the soft approach. But when a guy who had fought for the Kurds returned, suddenly he turned into a hardliner who wanted to proscecute him!

The left is in league with the terrorists. Khan is a terrorist buddy.

>We have a lefty who didn't give two fucks about Jihadi's returning, preaching the soft approach. But when a guy who had fought for the Kurds returned, suddenly he turned into a hardliner who wanted to proscecute him!
>The left is in league with the terrorists. Khan is a terrorist buddy.

It's infuriating. This is a man who:
- made a career defendind islamic terrorists as a lawyer
- whose brother in law was a member of a banned islamic extermist group
- who's on video calling moderate muslims 'uncle Toms'

And we're supposed to buy his crocodile tears that he cares when this stuff happens? At best he has some sympathy with their cause, at worst he's a taqiya infiltrator

London is fucked

The Left are so fucking retarded

They don't realize that they will be the first to be purged if the Muslims ever gain majority power

>this is what Sup Forumstards actually believe

I thought Morgan wasn't allowed back into UK?

They're beyond reason

How else could you champion women's rights whilst simultaneously defending a religion that oppresses them

Homophobia is the worst crime possible (besides racism) but they lose their shit when you criticise a religion that stones them, whips them in public, or throws them from buildings

I think it's just that Paki Khan was there in the flesh. Someone real you can aim your questions at. The people of real importance might as well not exist in our dimension, seemingly evaporating into thin air every time shit happens. None of them will answer those questions, all you can hope for is an uplifting speech that's even emptier than Rooney's head.

I created the exact same thread yesterday with the exact same title.
>0 replies
Fuck you, Sup Forums.

I used to know the head of the local International Socialists. I asked him this question. He didn't get farther than "they're fellow oppressed". That's basically their reasoning. The SJW's call it the progressive stack, we call it oppression olympics. But they view muslims as inherently being oppressed by the West, and therefore muslims must be protected.

Why they move here in droves just to be oppressed, they can't explain. How they're being oppressed when pro-islamic left wing parties are in power, they can't explain.

Or rather, they can. It's just all nonsense that directly contradicts their other nonsense, or was debunked a long time ago.

>He didn't get farther than "they're fellow oppressed". That's basically their reasoning.
Yes, this is the only answer that is logically consistent.

It's not that the left particularly care about Islam or gay rights or whatever, it's that they hate the West. They're driven by a hatred of their own culture, not a concern for minorities.

Either that or some incredible mental gymnastics

The exact same rationalization I read on a commie subreddit where a guy asked why leftists support Islam even though it goes against their beliefs.
"Because they're oppressed" was the exact answer in bold letters.
Go to leftypol and ask these schmucks the same question. It's always the same nonsensical "muh oppression" bullshit. Basically, they're a bunch of indoctrinated, impressionable, low IQ fucktards who are immune to logic, reason and especially common sense.

>it's that they hate the West
This is the core of their ideology. Anything that is antithetical to western civilization they will support or at the very least sympathize with and make excuses for. And by "anything" I truly mean anything. Apply the same logic to muslims oppressing other people and they'll perform the most bizarre mental gymnastics.

These communists are beyond help. They're mentally ill. On top of that, they're lazy, unambitious, mostly unemployed, drug addicted, physically weak filthy degenerates. Look at any footage showing any congregation of commies/far leftists/antifa. That profile fits 95% of the people their. These are the subhumans that think they can run societies and strive for political power. What other result from that can you expect except complete and utter societal collapse?

The Left thinks they can "tame" Islam if they simply -- as Jeremy Corbyn puts it -- talk to them

>...The delusion is that they (The Left) think they can control it (Islam)... they think they can master the Islamic terrorists that when the job is done, they will be able to tame them and bring them under control and that's where it's going to become extremely bloody because the Muslims are not going to get back in the box

>youtube.com/watch?v=l-DJPlccVL8#t=37m9s

>this is what leftists actually believe

Grilled kebab? Is Piers /our guy/?

>Yeah there's a reasonable expectation that he would be briefed by Mi5 on their whereabouts.

How big would the shitstorm be if someone leaked proofs that Khan was leaking MI5 intel to the terrorists themselves?

FUCK OFF AHMED

>>The left is in league with the terrorists. Khan is a terrorist buddy.
You're just an uncle tom, faggot.

Don't give them views!!1!

hooktube.com/watch?v=WEnN6k8VZFE

>Parcel in quotes
>Standing on the tube
What did he mean by this?

Where that Norwegian bitch go, he's not doing his job today.

Kahn is an islamist.

He backed the 9/11 terrorists

And every terrorisst since then.

Islamist obama also helped him alot.

I know man, I'm just being sarcastic, i fucking hate muds.

Then why does he keep opening his mouth about the countries immigration.

youtube.com/watch?v=b814HQkzyKM

Yeah, what might be a chance of that?

Why are these people allowed back into the country to begin with?

...

Many more Britcucks will die for their collective sand nigger worship. We shouldn't be mad, we should laugh at the results of race treason as a culture.

Achmed isn't the real problem. Weak Bongs are the real problem. Achmed is like flies on a dead pig. Flies feast on carrion and what is Britain but carrion?

And I will bring distress upon men, that they shall walk like blind men, because they have sinned against the Lord: and their blood shall be poured out as dust, and their flesh as the dung.
-Zephaniah 1:17

>the only thing he should be doing is noosing himself

Totally agree.

Immigration is not a mayor's fault.

She was preparing your country for 1984 obviously

True, but his stance on immigration is weak as hell so he is still answerable for questions regarding migration since he supports it so much. He's a Labour guy and they have virtually no plan to cut immigration.

>comments are disabled for this video

At least you can comment here

He fire bombed Dresden into nothingness and you think all he would do is lock them up?

He wants visibility, a national profile to run for higher office in the future.

Hey, those Brits gotta start somewhere

I can say with complete confidence that the majority of you Sup Forumstards won't know who Pic related is. Let me tell you, she is the mayor of Paris. Paris has face a lot of terror attacks in the past year. Yet nobody criticzed Anne Hidalgo or "called her out" or blamed her for the attack. Nobody said that Anne was normalizing terror when she urged unity and resilience after the attack. Nobody said things like "these attacks are happened on the watch of Anne Hidalogo" or some nonsense like that. Most people understood that the mayor of a European city hardly has any real political power and certainly not incharge of intelligence community. Most didn't go full retard and started connecting the mayor being a woman as something to do with the fact that Paris was suffering from terrorism.

Fast forward to now and we have an attack happening in London. England. And everyone is on Sadiq Khan's arse, including the president of the United States. When will Sup Forums admit that Sadiq Khan is being attacked just because he happens to be Muslim ? And that is there no actual substance to the criticism of a man who is merely trying to do his job ? When you pieces of shits stop circle jerking each other and wake up to the facts of how things really are, You filthy degenerates?

This also proves one more thing, the right wing is apparently more islamophobic than mysoginist. Congrats to that I guess!

>This also proves one more thing, the right wing is apparently more islamophobic than mysoginist. Congrats to that I guess!

When radical feminists are responsible for the vast majority of terrorism in the world, that'll change. Until then, we know who the culprits are.

>ignores the autism which went into getting Khan elected in the first place

real talk tho - isn't immigration policy not something he would deal with as the mayor of one city?

>Regularly engages in guilt by association fallacy when it comes to Muslims, blacks, feminists
>NOT ALL WHITES ARE RACIST STOP THIS ANTI WHITE NONSENSE

Why is the right wing so retarded ?

I know it's pretty hilarious, the Christians will end up being spared if they pay Jizya but atheists will have to convert or die.

...

Are you one those politically correct brainwashed Germans or something? The so called mayor the actual toss pot has got connections with these fuckers. You need to wake up mate.

standard.co.uk/news/london/exposed-sadiq-khans-family-links-to-extremist-organisation-a3179066.html

standard.co.uk/news/mayor/sadiq-khan-shared-platform-with-five-islamic-extremists-a3231436.html

So all mayors are innocent until we accuse all of them? Why aren't you yourself calling her out as well? If anything, she and that mayor of Birmingham should be called out as well.

>Elect Muslim mayor
>Being surprised when muslims start taking over

The first article is engaging in guilt by association, do you not see that? If Sadiq Khan's brother in law has said controversial things in the past, does that mean that Sadiq Khan himself believes in those things?

TRhe second article is even more fallacious, a man "shares" a platform with somebody, does that mean that they approve of every single thing they have ever said or done? By that logic, Trump is a wacko conspiracy theorist because he shared a platform with Alex Jones, or he is a Wahabi Islamic fundamentalist because he shared a platform with Saudis. It makes no sense.

Also nice job using the SJW tactic of character assassination using fallacious as fuck """arguments""".

Mandatory Thread Theme Song

youtube.com/watch?v=TCw9_avTlYs

KKKKAAAAHHHHHHNNNNNNN!!!!!!

Well according to this fool it's more like

>Elect Leftist mayor
>Being surprised when muslims start taking over

Did Americans call out the mayor of New York when 9/11 happened ? Of course not, that would be retarded. A mayor has NO power over the policy of the country regarding extremism, he or she has no power over the intelligence amd security institutions. Attacking a mayor when a terror attack happens makes no sense. Unless people just hate Sadiq Khan because he just happens to be Muslim. Which is fine, people are entitled to their opinions. But stop disguising your anti-Muslim bigotry in concerns about how Sadiq Khan is not doing his job.

>Did Americans call out the mayor of New York when 9/11 happened ?
No, because since then we haven't had a major terrorist incident in NYC. Meanwhile in London...

Was the mayor of New York a shitskin and Jihadi apologist?

Was he tweeting about how safe London was?

Did he say planes flying into buildings is part and parcel of living in New York?

Fuck off cuckold.

>He doesn't know shit about his own country

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_New_York_and_New_Jersey_bombings

Taxis of peace.

How safe New York was**

I always fucking hated Piers Morgan, but for the last couple years he seems to be okay.
What happened to him? Is it because the left turned on him for not being far-left enough, and that made him swallow a few redpills?

>Can't read English

I said "major" terrorist incidents, all those terrorists got caught in nick of time because they didn't have a Muslim mayor

>Jihadist apologist

How is he a Jihadist apologist ? Provide evidence or fuck off.

>Tweeting about London is safe

He didn't Tweet that you retard. Look through his Twitter feed and find me a tweet like that. You won't find it because it literally doesn't exist.

>part and parcel meme

Bullshit out of context quote. Do me a favor and take 30 second out of your pathetic life to actually listen to what the man said.

standard.co.uk/news/world/new-york-explosion-sadiq-khan-says-terror-attacks-are-part-and-parcel-of-life-in-a-big-city-a3347891.html

Listen to it in context and you'll realize he is talking about security and vigilance and policing being part and parcel of a global city. NOT terrorism. Funny how you all get triggered when someone takes Donald Trump out of context. But then turn around and do the same to your political opponents. It's almost like your side has no intellectual honesty.

>Shitskin

About the only argument I can accept. If people want their countries to remain free of foreigners, I cannot argue against that.

Point being, dickhead, if his precious Quran and his family shares those opinions, then surely he would be less likely to act out against his own. After all the Quran states that its bad to side with a non Muslim. He is a risk to all living in the city of London.

Also, nice job using advanced terms to try and put yourself above me. Your clearly either brain washed or angered at what has happened to Germany, and want to see it happen to your biggest rival county.

>This is the core of their ideology. Anything that is antithetical to western civilization they will support or at the very least sympathize with and make excuses for.

ETHNOMASOCHISM

The Quran also says it's wrong to be a homosexual but Sadiq Khan is a supporter of LGBT cause. Boy, it's almost like people have complex religiousity and different interpretations of what their religion is supposed to be and judging every religious person by what their scripture says is what retards do.

>advanced terms

kek, I used the most normal english language, not my fault you failed grade school.

Shouldn't you be out bombing something acmed?

Protip: There's a huge difference between what people say and what they do

Libtards have an awful time telling the difference

>Everybody who disagrees with my political opinion is a Muslim terrorist
>Everybody who disgarees with my political opinion is a deplorable

Are you a libtard ? Because you are literally using Hillary Clinton's logic.

A libtard calling other people libtards, oh the irony

>The Quran also says it's wrong to be a homosexual but Sadiq Khan is a supporter of LGBT cause
thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx

As a member of parliament, Sadiq Khan voted in favor of legalizing gay marriage, he voted in favor of the equality act and has marched in London pride parade, duno what else he can "do" to prove he is pro LGBT.

Oh please, I'm not a liberal. Far from it. I'm leftist. Libtards deserve death if you ask me (not really, but still). You Burgers have weird defintions where everyone to the left is "liberal".

Jesus you are blue pilled. If he openly said he didn't support LGBT he wouldn't have been voted in.

As for judging them as a whole. We have given them a chance to intergrate and look at what its brought, dead children. Surely retard is not the right term for people using natural instinct rather than sitting preaching the same shit as what the pc society says is right.

And as for advanced terms, "Character assassination" is pretty much not "normal English" instead your trying to add a load of bullshit to make yourself sound smarter to seem more credible. I'm hardly 'character assassinating' all I did was point out why he was a risk, you cuck.

thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx
thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx
thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx
thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx
thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx

Plenty of muzzies will pay service to the hand that feeds them, until of course they gain majority power in a region, then wait what happens

They will massacre the gays, the atheists, the druggies, like never seen before

Whatever you are, you're clearly a moron

Soon kike, soon

>Oh please, I'm not a liberal. Far from it. I'm leftist. Libtards deserve death if you ask me (not really, but still).

>...The delusion is that they (The Left) think they can control it (Islam)... they think they can master the Islamic terrorists that when the job is done, they will be able to tame them and bring them under control and that's where it's going to become extremely bloody because the Muslims are not going to get back in the box

>youtube.com/watch?v=l-DJPlccVL8#t=37m9s

Oh yeah, he totally knew he was gona be mayor of London back in 2007 when he voted in favor of the equality act. And it's totes impossible for people against gay marriage to get elected to parliament, it totes wasn't the position of the majority of Tories for much of history.

Why is the right wing so retarded?

As much as I dislike the mudslime mayor, Piers Morgan needs to die in a fire tonight. I hate that piece of shit with all my heart and soul.

wasn't it literally the emir who started the independent london caliphate meme?

talk about autism

Oh yeah, you won't believe how many gays Sadiq Khan personally slaughters everyday ever since becoming mayor of London. They've nicknamed him Khan the Fag slayer lately!