DRUMPF ETERNALLY BTFO
iflscience.com
#resist
EU Will Ignore White House And Work Directly With US States On Paris Agreement
Kayden Cook
Other urls found in this thread:
heritage.org
usconstitution.net
unric.org
wattsupwiththat.com
breitbart.com
thehill.com
usnews.com
video.cnbc.com
cbsnews.com
washingtontimes.com
ec.europa.euclimapoliciesstrategies2030_en
www4.unfccc.intndcregistryPublishedDocumentsUnited
c2es.orgdocUploadschinas-contributions-paris-climate-agreement.pdf
cnsnews.com
twitter.com
Kayden Miller
Technically allowed
Kayden Rivera
? States can enter into agreements with foreign countries?
Logan Torres
Oh Drumpfy this is just sad.
I think we should stop embarassing him now or he might fire some nukes ...
Jonathan Foster
No, it's forbidden by the constitution, states cannot enter into any agreements, etc with any foreign parties.
Luis Hill
Can Americans be this idiotic? Would they purposely screw their own economy just to send a message?
Jose Morgan
No, it's not. The US gov doesn't care though because it doesn't matter, if it made any difference then the governors who signed would go to prison.
Anthony King
No it isn't.
States can provide their own laws, but they can not deal with outside influences without government say.
heritage.org
It's illegal as shit and would be considered betraying The U.S. talking life in prison.
Caleb Rivera
>liberals now support states rights
holy shit trump is literally playing 4d chess
Jaxson Brooks
Nope
John Cook
>haha me and mammy merkel will rule da world :^))
fuck Macron, gerontophilic cuckold.
Nicholas Foster
Wrong. How can you not know you own constitution?
Adam Evans
Are shills really this dumb about the peris agreement? Why do shills think it's so important to them?
Thomas Thompson
Depends.
It isn't like they can form military agreements without the Federal government's say, or something like trading with Cuba or shit like that.
I am curious to know if states can also break off agreements with countries that DC has an agreement with.
Hudson Edwards
Muh climate coalition with Washington California and Jew York
>mfw our disgusting legislature, AG and Governor Gay Inslee all Go to prison entering into deals with foreign parties
I am so ready
Angel Parker
This why liberals don't deserve state rights. Only Republican states deserve rights
Gabriel Carter
it isn't states rights
these are corporations that are usurping the power of the federal executive
it's just more growing international corporate power
companies like General Electric and Microsoft were the biggest ones pushing for Paris and now they are exerting their power and going around
Michael Carter
Trump has tricked the left into supporting states' rights
Xavier Davis
...
Ian Lee
Agenda 21 was all about bypassing Federal and State (Provincial) level jurisdictions to implement that agenda at the Municipal level.
>Sustainable development
and such things like changing local building codes to force green shit
Gavin Collins
Why should DRUMPF be BTFO? This is all part of his agenda to give states back their right to conduct business as they see fit.
Nolan Gonzalez
OK
SO let's say the Federal government ignores these idiot states doing this BUT cut off federal funding
NY CA WA would be broke in a year
John James
states cannot do anything with federal tax dollars.. cry more
Bentley Johnson
Its specifically prohibited in article 1 section 10 paragraph 3 of the US constitution
Jackson Cruz
>Trump has tricked the left into supporting states' rights
hey, dipshit, liberals are using state's rights to push their agenda for some time now
>weed legalization
>sanctuary cities
>protecting abortion and PP
get your shit together, retard
Bentley Collins
See
Try again
Ian Moore
It's like the USA doesn't exist as a single nation.
MAGA. Brexit please.
Christopher Gomez
muh codes and whatnot
Blake Ramirez
>This is all part of his agenda to give states back their right to conduct business as they see fit.
bullshit
states want to allow weed and not arrest mexicans and the federal gov immediately slams their tendies down and shits their pants
Luke Richardson
You mean not allowed at all. Treaties are up to the federal government and can't be undertaken by an individual state. We're a Republic, if all 50 states had treaties to different countries or even the same country under different terms we'd be in a mess of shit.
Justin Carter
:^)
Only pretending, etc.
Adam Gray
This is EXACTLY what Trump (and libertarians) want. This is what the constitution sets up. Article Four and Article Seven.
The whole idea is that each state ratifies its own laws and way of doing things without federal controls.
Just because the "USA" pulls out of the Paris agreement doesn't mean that the individual states can't implement the ideas. In fact that is how it should happen. The states are supposed to govern themselves.
Luke Gutierrez
Any agreement they come to will not be funded federally and can be shut down federally at any time
Luke Reyes
oh no states' rights what a horrible thing
Lincoln Morales
People will immediately shoot this down as soon as these states propose raising state taxes to cover the third world wealth transfer payments outlined in the Paris Agreement
Josiah Long
They will regret cucking him like this. It's like they don't get him at all
Juan Lopez
>can't make treaties with individual states
>trying to balkanize the US
EU is essentially declaring war here.
Hudson Brown
There are ways that states can conduct certain types of dealings with foreign governments, it's not like state leaders can't talk to foreign leaders, but that's what the state department is for and it would be very weird for Pennsylvania to enter into any treaty with Germany for example. More like the states will try to implement some of the terms of the Paris accord in their own states, but really that just Germany sharing legal ideas with states.
Austin King
Fucking wrong. States can't conduct trade with foreign nations individually. They must consult the Fed and if they don't, the governor of whatever state gets prison.
Mason Fisher
This would be a direct violation of Article 1, section 10, paragraph 3 of the Constitution. And a violation of the Logan Act for any government official to negotiate with the foreign governments.
Parker Cox
But your former country must be cleansed with holy radioactive fire
Gabriel Phillips
Nolan Stewart
>This is EXACTLY what Trump
>leaf-posting really shitty theories
stay gay, canada
Hunter Morris
Regardless of it's legality it's foreign government collusion.
Isaiah Allen
More like Trump has tricked the left into committing treason and they'll all be thrown in jail. You'd have to be an idiot to think an individual state can enter a treaty.
Christian Clark
So it is treason then
Lincoln Perry
It would cost states money that they do not have, now with no Federal subsidy. This is a nothingburger going nowhere.
Austin Rogers
Re-read my statement.
> "doesn't mean that the individual states can't implement the ideas"
I am referring to the overarching principals of lowering emissions etc. Not the transfer of money.
Parker Sanders
All that means is more democrat failures across the country, states & local elections
Why EU think Americans give a fuck about their fucking American job killing bullshit?
Fuck off faggots
Josiah Campbell
Implementing ideas and entering a treaty are two entirely different things.
Can NY and CA decide to reduce emissions? Yes.
Can NY and CA sign a deal with the EU? No.
Oliver Turner
No. Those who do will be kicked out of office.
Bring on the state level agreements.
Dems btfo
Jackson Green
There's not going to be any treason if the government of Pennsylvania takes its ideas from Germany, they can't enter treaties with Germany but if Pennsylvania wants to ban sauerkraut because Germany thinks they should, then Pennsylvania can do that.
Jack Watson
States can choose to do whatever they want as far as implementing constitutional laws that promote environmentalism, but they cannot collude with other governments or enter any otherwise legally binding agreements with foreign nations.
Joshua Sullivan
Face it: DRUMPF IS A SITTING ORANG UTAN ALREADY !!!
Now would be the perfect time for the world to come together and end US opression! 60% of americans would be on our side!!
Cameron Thompson
>"or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."
Drumpftards BTFO
Josiah Diaz
No, it's explicitly illegal. So what the governors/legislatures/corporations involved will do is work out informal, nonbinding guidelines with the EU and treat them like laws.
Jeremiah Williams
>www.iflscience.com
LOL it has nothing to do with science, it's economic redistribution. In their own words:
unric.org
"The Top UN Climate Change Official is optimistic that a new international treaty will be adopted at Paris Climate Change conference at the end of the year. However the official, Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of UNFCCC, warns that the fight against climate change is a process and that the necessary transformation of the world economy will not be decided at one conference or in one agreement.
"This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model, for the first time in human history", Ms Figueres stated at a press conference in Brussels."
IPCC Official: “Climate Policy Is Redistributing The World’s Wealth”
wattsupwiththat.com
"Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with environmental protection, says the German economist and IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer. The next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world’s resources will be negotiated."
Ryder Hughes
>supports states rights
>lowers national unity
>stops costing billions and billions of national dollars
Sounds good to me, what's BTFO about this? This is Sup Forums wet dream material.
Owen Collins
I guess I was wrong:
breitbart.com
thehill.com
video.cnbc.com
cbsnews.com
washingtontimes.com
Jacob Miller
>Dems btfo
states having the authority to legalize weed and prostitution
>repubs BTFO
Asher Clark
Yes, but EU is saying work directly, which isn't an exchange of ideas but collaboration, which is illegal.
Lincoln Gomez
See
Jackson Ortiz
See
Asher Cooper
Literally treason, good luck liberals.
Jace Johnson
>the state of the DNC
Joshua Clark
>>supports states rights
Negotiating agreements with foreign powers is a right reserved for the federal government.
Jace Robinson
The main thing about the Paris accord isn't actually lowering emissions, it's about taxing emissions and giving free shekels to nigger countries. Without the shekel transfer the headline basically reads "stupid nigger lefty states continue pushing environmentalist legislation", not technically fake news, but pretty much non-news
Gabriel Ramirez
This Paris Agreement generated so much hysteria, it is truly unbelievable. Nobody ever fucking read that shit. Trump also never said that he would sign it, but he said that it needs more work. If you read it you know what I mean. He could also sign it, it wouldn't even matter because it's not binding at all. You can sign it and double your emissions. It is truly amazing how blind people are and how much they trust mass media instead of their own fucking common sense.
Anthony Flores
>States have the authority to legalize weed.
Actually they technically don't since federal law is superior to state law, but nobody want to increase the burden on our over-workered court system.
Ryan Baker
"Imminent"
Didnt Al-Gore say the ice caps would be gone by 2014?
Ethan Perez
They can only write cute little letters of "hey we're buds." With the individual states like they are with Cali.
States cannot sign binding treaties etc with foreign powers.
Who's BTFO now?
Also, shut up and turn a blind eye to some guy raping your women because he didn't know it was rape. Fucking swedes are cucked all hell.
Anthony Bennett
>donald trump TELLS people he's giving back power to the states
>in practice donald trump is expanding the reach of the federal government to control states
how are you so fucking dumb?
Kevin Davis
Trump should ignore the EU and start making trade deals with countries.
Christopher Edwards
I'd like to see California sink their economy with this low-carbon nonsense. These clowns talk as if there was no possible way to create some kind of technology to suck the CO2 directly from the atmosphere and address the so-called problem directly. Instead all they want is taxes, taxes and more taxes.
Adam Foster
Watch as all the blue states join, and Frau Merkel and the other EU cucks cry that evil red states are killing the planet.
Jeremiah Parker
The world was supposed to end many times now. You dont get to make up the danger.
Brandon Fisher
I find it so amusing how white people use #resist while supporting globalist anti-white filth.
Easton Murphy
When all your friends expect you to pay for your ridiculous ideas and you say no so they act like they are still going to do them anyway
Zachary Collins
>federal law is superior to state law
and here we see how trump will say one thing and do another
Joshua Foster
Trump is making federal law work the way it's supposed to. Immigration control is up to the Feds, not the States.
Liam Morales
Nothing binding can be signed. Just "we're besties" type of documents. So sure, that's technically allowed. It's also technically for show.
Lucas King
Did Jerry Brown just unconstitutionally sign an agreement with China?
Yes.
Luis Barnes
who cares
Sebastian Lewis
This is completely fake news.
Brayden Walker
>The main thing about the Paris accord isn't actually lowering emissions
well it is for "industry" countries
china can even increase emissions till 2030
>goal of the EU drop of TOTAL EMISSIONS by 40% of the level from fucking 1990
>ec.europa.euclimapoliciesstrategies2030_en
>goal of the USA drop of TOTAL EMISSIONS by 26% of the level from 2005
>www4.unfccc.intndcregistryPublishedDocumentsUnited States of America FirstU.S.A. First NDC Submission.pdf
>Goal of China drop of TOTAL EMISSION INTENSITY by 60% of the level from 2005
>c2es.orgdocUploadschinas-contributions-paris-climate-agreement.pdf
>Emission intensity is tied to GDP, so when GDP grows the intensity shrinks automatically.
>China can keep their Emissions at the same level and it will shrink automatically, they can even increase their emissions by a modest amount as long as it stays below GDP growth.
this shit doesn't even include the climate fund that
Ayden Lee
I don't really see a problem with this. States should be allowed to attempt to reduce their environmental impact should they so wish.
Andrew Collins
Now you know why we call those American's "Cucks"
Lucas Ortiz
That is illegal though.
Treaties need to be passed through congress or else the EU will violate US Federal law.
Owen Flores
Here is a sauce if someone can't actually believe that he would say something that retarded.
Nicholas Brown
Jaxson Thompson
Actually you're wrong. You can't sign any type of agreement whatsoever without approval of Congress. It doesn't say binding or non-binding in the Constitution.
Jaxon Diaz
No it is not. States are explicitly forbidden.
Samuel Hughes
>the main thing about the Paris accord isn't actually lowering emissions, it's about taxing emissions
I have not read the Paris agreement at all. I thought it was primarily about lowering emissions and trying to find clean/green sources for...everything and huge taxes on countries that have huge emissions.
Thanks for Correcting The Record.
> Without the shekel transfer the headline basically reads "stupid nigger lefty states continue pushing environmentalist legislation"
They alt-left just wants to watch the world burn.
The alt-right just wants mass genocide. Nice fair balance, lol.
Lincoln Bailey
I will call to mind the case decided at the US supreme court when the State of Arizona tried to merely enforce existing federal immigration laws, and was prohibited from doing so because the court determined it was solely the federal government that held plenary power when it comes to immigration policy and enforcement.
Kayden Russell
This.
So this is just lip service to (((them))) and it's to give liberals a pat on the back while doing literally nothing. pay it no mind.
Austin Reyes
What's the point of the president anymore when everyone goes against him?
Ian Price
>President Donald Trump will take a “ruthless” approach to people who violate the nation’s drug laws.
>muh war on drugs
i'll start taking trump's "state's rights" shit seriously when he starts letting states actually decide their own futures
Aiden Gomez
>in practice donald trump is expanding the reach of the federal government to control states
Is this true? Which bills/acts/executive orders increase federal control?
Austin Miller
Trump promised a greater emphasis on states rights, if you know anything about our legislative system the fact that federal law overrules state law is an institutional law that has been in since the 10 amendments. Grey matter is what the states can regulate.
Adrian Hernandez
Instead of reading bumper stickers. Read the
constitution. I hope you have the IQ to process this factual information...
Article 1 Section 10:
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
10th Amendment:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.