Jerry Brown Violates Article 1 Section 10 of the US Constitution

>California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed an agreement to work with China to lower greenhouse gas emissions Tuesday, just days after President Trump pulled the United States out of an international climate change agreement.
>The agreement, though nonbinding, aims to expand cooperation between China and California on renewable energy, zero-emission vehicles and low-carbon urban development, Brown’s office said. It will establish a joint working group of Chinese and Californian officials to come up with ways to work together, and to invest in programs that would cut carbon emissions.
>Brown signed the pact with Wan Gang, China’s minister of science and technology, before meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/336537-california-signs-deal-with-china-to-combat-climate-change

>Article 1 Section 10:
>No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec10.html

>10th Amendment:
>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
usconstitution.net/xconst_Am10.html

Get the word out that California is in violation of the Constitution.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=fG8UuZ0NZGY
cnsnews.com/news/article/annabel-scott/california-senate-passes-bill-allowing-third-gender-option-ids
archive.is/0D2pu
calwatchdog.com/2013/12/18/actually-jim-jones-cult-was-bay-area-democrats/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

California BTFO

send it to breitbart, washington examiner, and drudge
and hannity

California is in the right here, we have to resist this Nazi president before he ruins our mother earth.

Jello Biafra had this faggot's number back in the 80's
California is the Canadian Germany of America

Way to get Wang Ganged.

>California is the Canadian Germany of America

lmao

Article 1, Section 10, Paragraph 3

also,

Logan Act

Where the FUCK is AG Sessions?

>>The agreement, though nonbinding

He can violate the constitution all he wants since the law does not apply to elites.

CIVIL WAR NUMBER TWO ELECTRIC BOOGALOO HERE WE GOOOOOOOO

>Article 1 Section 10:
>No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation;
>any
Still unconstitutional.

Bumpity bump

We need to get this shit trending on twitter.
I'm so glad I didn't apply to any job openings in such a retarded state.

They will say it's not a treaty, alliance, or confederation.
A non-binding agreement. Don't states work with foreign nations? Like trading with Canada and stuff?

PARAGRAPH 3 YOU FUCKING DOLT

ANY agreement. ANY. Without the approval of Congress, is unconstitutional.

No. Private companies can, but States have to go through the Federal government for everything. It's why we have a Department of Commerce.

motha love me long time
>long time
suckysucky fucky fucky wan time

But seriously we can't let this guy control our carbon emissions.

CALIFORNIA UBER ALLES

Hahahaha
youtube.com/watch?v=fG8UuZ0NZGY

>they will say it's not a big deal because it's non binding
You mean exactly like the Paris one was?

retard-tier levels of virtue signaling

everything is fucking virtue signaling these days

Still doesn't stop these faggots from violating all the rest of the Constitution. They do it on a daily basis. Fuck brown and the rest of these niggers.

bomb china

So why isnt Trump cracking down on this traitor?

entirely illegal

A State has to go through the U.S. State Department first.

I hope this cocksucker gets arrested. I know he won't because democrats don't have to obey the law.

>make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts

LOL, the dollar hasn't been backed by anything for almost a century.

Because it is a non-binding. It is as legally binding as a promise from a 3 year old to clean their room.

>commiefornia selling out to China

Sasuga.

Everyone is quiet as fuck...

The Constitution makes no distinction

>Don't states work with foreign nations? Like trading with Canada and stuff?
Look what happened with the Keystone Pipeline delays, the individual states wanted it but obongo said 'muh global warming' and that was that unit Trump came along.

*until

>California lawmakers voted to pass a bill Wednesday that will add a third gender option — non-binary — on state identification cards.

>Senate Bill 179, introduced by Sen. Tori Atkins, will now move onto Assembly after the 26-12 Senate vote. If it passes Assembly, California Gov. Jerry Brown can sign the measure into law, making California the first state to add a third gender option on IDs.

>The bill, if signed into law, will allow minors to apply for a gender change on their birth certificates with parental or guardian consent.

>Senate Bill 310, if signed into law after passing through assembly, guarantees prison inmates the right to ask the court for gender change or name change. In addition, the bill states that if a name or gender change is granted to an inmate, then correction officers must refer to a prisoner by their new alias.

cnsnews.com/news/article/annabel-scott/california-senate-passes-bill-allowing-third-gender-option-ids

How can one state be so awful?

You guys are just children that crow "PERJURY, UNCONSTITUTIONAL" like fedora wearing faggots.

Like there doesn't exist one conservative idealogue smart enough to sue or bring legal action.

You're literally acting like retarded children in a secret club house.

>BASED TRUMP HILLARY FOR PRISON ANY DAY NOW
>we won't be prosecuting Clinton
>BASED TRUMP. SETH RICH. MAGA MAGA MAGA

It's crazy watching you guys voluntarily shill your dicks off for a globalist power broker because he pisses the left off

>How can one state be so awful?
Commies and jews

I'm just Californians are thrilled..... How disgusting.

Yeah that's it, faggot... Go spread your cheeks for Tyrone.

While, to my knowledge (and I don't feel like poking through Westlaw right now), there is no case law defining agreement as it is written in the Constitution, a SCOTUS ruling in favor of California would be highly volatile for the US and would possibly plant the seeds of fragmentation.

>climate deal with China

LOOOOOOOL yeah and then what prison do these new special inmates go to?

>ANY agreement. ANY. Without the approval of Congress, is unconstitutional.

A non-binding agreement is not an agreement, legally speaking. I doubt a state governor and the respective attorney general would stick their asses out as far as you suggest.

More like a bunch of Democrat-voting Latinos, which is weird because I don't believe Latinos are generally more pro-tranny than whites, but it hardly matters when they're such sheep and vote Democrat regardless.

Funny isn't it. How they get to make everything, pollute the world, and ship their ugly people across the globe, but fuck no, don't you dare think about making anything or burning some coal. Here, read this article about how great it is not to fuck or have children.

>People still pretending China isn't the biggest most evil scammers in the world.
Jews wish they were chinks.

Just like the Paris Agreement

>40bn in weapons to Saudis
>Sup Forums applauds
>Gobbles Israeli cock
>Sup Forums applauds

Gimme that sweet ass. I'll fuck you til you love me faggot. You'll be shilling sissy culture on pornhub forums in days.

You're crossing your steams, my man. While contract law might specify that a non-binding agreement is not an agreement, no such decision had been made as it pertains to a constitutional question. And to preempt a potential response, no the two are not so similar as to necessitate similar definitions. One is more concerned with mutual it of obligation, while the other is concerned with stability amongst the states by restricting lone wolf allegiances. I will be supremely shocked if this does not reach SCOTUS.

it's negotiation with intent to influence. that's all you need to prove to show a violation

They stay in the prison of their biological sex, which is fucking hilarious.

Even reality-denying, far-Left progressive California politicians know the voters won't tolerate them putting a convicted rapist man with a penis who identifies as a woman in a womens' prison, so they're reduced to just making hapless correction officers call them by their chosen gender/drag queen name.

Mutuality of*

Phone posting during the day is suffering.

The Federal Reserve is as unconstitutional as you can get, yet nothing happens.

It wouldn't matter if California was right (their not) its still illegal.

>a bunch of Democrat-voting Latinos
Fair enough, but the kike media spewing out pro-commie, Trump is Hitler and wants to deport EVERYONE has to be a factor. The eternal globalist jew has been in propaganda overdrive for the last 18 months+

oh man, I feel for the prison guards on that actually

Hmm, never realize how logical it would of been to build that pipeline.

So was the Patriot Act.

>Just like the Paris Agreement
?

somehow because Congress "has the purse" they were able to vote to give that power to the FED. Which also isn't in the Constitution lol it doesn't say that a branch of gov can give their authority away...

The archive has arrived.

archive.is/0D2pu

>Article 1 Section 10

Good luck with that.

Update: I've heard claim that there does in fact exist such a case extending this contract principal to this constitutional provision. However, no citation was provided so I'm uncertain as to the veracity.

>no such decision had been made as it pertains to a constitutional question.

The preempted powers refer to treaties and the like. That which is not reserved to the feds are left with the states. Nothing here rises to the preempted powers and is therefore within states' rights.

no one believes you, sissyboi

Nothing, in this example, counts as negotiation.

>nter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
None of these are being done though.

At best this is a trade agreement, which states have historically done for years.

It explicitly violates the Constitution as it is written. This is an open and shut case.

>6th largest economy on the planet.

>Personally responsible for feeding at least 4 other states.

>Muh Moonbeam, muh Governator.

>Has the largest stockpile of activated almonds on earth.

Remain distressed, flyovers.

>Sup Forums lawyers

>treaties and the like
So they are in violation.

>Brown later held a closed-door meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, during which the two pledged...

hmmmmm

Individual states do not make trade agreements. That has to go to the Fed.

PARAGRAPH 3
I don't know why everyone keeps referring to paragraph 1...

This. It wouldn't of mattered if he were just signing things by himself, but that meeting is key to showing negotiations occurred.

Whelp boys, looks like we won't have to wait for Commifornia to secede before we roll in and put a foot up their ass

Got you.
>No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
>No State shall enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power

None of what took place could count as anything reserved to the feds in Article 1 SS 10.

prove me wrong

yep. would have to testify as to what was said during the meeting too

When is trump going to drop kick CA?

>6th largest economy on the planet.
>>Personally responsible for feeding at least 4 other states
Don't worry, we here in the Gunshine state could easily pick up your slack and you would not be missed.

Jim Jones and Jerry-
“Governor Jerry Brown sang the preacher’s praises. Congressman John Burton, Phil’s brother, lobbied the governor to appoint Jones to the high-profile board of regents, which oversaw California’s sprawling public university system. San Francisco Supervisor – now U.S. Senator — Dianne Feinstein accepted an invitation to lunch with Jones and to tour Peoples Temple.”

calwatchdog.com/2013/12/18/actually-jim-jones-cult-was-bay-area-democrats/

Negotiations? Please prove that negotiations took place. Nothing of value was exchanged between to parties. Neither did talks of such take place.

>Compact
def 2: a -->formal agreement

See >No State shall enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power
>any Agreement
A non-binding Agreement is still an Agreement.

Negotiation: discussion aimed at reaching an agreement

They obviously came to a fucking agreement didn't they?

>lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
>>No State shall enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power


Again, none of this took place. Pull out a legal dictionary and look up "agreement."

Doesn't matter. See It's on Brown to testify that he didn't.

>formal agreement

>none of this took place
>there is now an agreement between CA and China

How so? You're saying Brown is guilty until proven innocent.

Again, See

>>there is now an agreement between CA and China

Prove it. See

does your stupid ass deny that they reached and signed an agreement?

>agreement - Legal Definition. n. A mutual understanding between two or more legally competent individuals or entities about their rights and duties regarding their past or future performances and consideration.
An agreement on green house gas emissions falls into this.

Brown bending over in private

>carbon faceplant

Negotiations aren't a pretext. The agreement is all you need.

>No State shall enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power

If someone is reading the Compact Clause this literally, they'll be sure to note it actually says:

>another State, or with a foreign Power

That means states can't enter into agreements with other states, not even considering foreign countries. We should know better than that. Virginia v. Tennessee (1893) pretty well settled that the feds don't have to greenlight every single agreement.

cool ad hominem, bro.

You have yet to prove that anything non-binding creates parties that are bound to anything.

>The agreement is all you need.

Yes, but there is no agreement. You need a legal dictionary to understand what "agreement" means in this context. It's mainly in reference to creating parties to a contract or treaty. None of that occurred.