US/Russia/Iran vs Merkelreich/China

Question

US/Russia/Iran vs Merkelreich/China

Michael Thomas

Since it seems like history is going this way. Who would win?

June 9, 2017 - 15:07

Other urls found in this thread:

Noah Parker

This post convinced me that the internet needs to be transformed into a meritocracy. Mongoloids like you shouldn't be able to access it.

June 9, 2017 - 15:09

Ethan Turner

the sand niggers already won retard
youtube.com/watch?v=MwfqHA4HfRA

June 9, 2017 - 15:12

Nathan Gonzalez

>Hurr my worldview is stuck in 1995
Sandniggers with IQ's below 120 should stay off the internet

June 9, 2017 - 15:13

Joshua Martinez

>it's another ww3 kingdom warfare fetishazation episode

Your world view must be in 2077, please enlighten me burger, how can you see that far into the future? an IQ of 160?

June 9, 2017 - 15:18

Jace King

>IQ of 160
yes
>how can you see that far?
Which regions are trending towards radical neo-liberalism, and which are going the opposite direction? How can the balance of power be evened out globally to escape the current unstable system state?

June 9, 2017 - 15:20

Zachary Thomas

>the only two political systems in which governments can move towards are either neo-liberalism or the opposite

>what is a false dichotomy

>he hasn't read the sticky

June 9, 2017 - 15:24

Jackson Diaz

>Russia not sided with China, but the US.
Kek not going to happen, papa Putin already said that they will never leave their allies for the US.

June 9, 2017 - 15:27

Isaiah Williams

China is more of a natural enemy to Russia than the US b/c conflicting interests in southern Siberia and Central Asia (the Stans)

June 9, 2017 - 15:33

Ryder Parker

Israel.

June 9, 2017 - 15:34

Robert Williams

Israel is a wildcard t b h. Jews like to switch sides

June 9, 2017 - 15:34

Lucas Nelson

That was my point.
As long as everyone around them is fighting, they are winning.

Hell, probably selling arms/ammo to both sides too.

June 9, 2017 - 15:36

Lucas Stewart

All I really want out of life is to see the EU nuked to hell.

June 9, 2017 - 15:36

Adam Roberts

Why would China be allied with us?

June 9, 2017 - 15:37

Robert Collins

China is opportunistic and has conflicts of interest with both Russia and the US. If ideological tensions arise between the US and EU in the future China is also the only alternative trade partner

June 9, 2017 - 15:38

Juan Bell

It's also necessary for an even balance of power, which is the overall driving force behind these kind of realignments

June 9, 2017 - 15:39

Ryder Parker

XD you stupid fools merkel is an authority figure sure but if she were anything like a quote nazi.. she would only help germans. I think you forget history people, merkel is close to stalin or lenin. you stupid fucks real national socialists are the good guys

June 9, 2017 - 15:40

Nicholas Wright

China is not strong enough to challenge US/Russia and Iran
And Merkelreich is an absolute joke. So we count as basically nothing.

June 9, 2017 - 15:41

Jonathan Sanders

>merkel is close to stalin or lenin
Lenin and Stalin are nothing like each other, Lenin was an idealistic ideologue and Stalin was a megalomaniac.

>youtube.com/watch?v=4Prc1UfuokY&t=1s
>youtube.com/watch?v=XMqPWqOCGJU

Is this bait?

June 9, 2017 - 15:43

Zachary Long

Militarily yes, but really this would be more like a cold war. No one is gonna risk nukes unless shit really hits the fan

June 9, 2017 - 15:44

Aaron Kelly

you're out of your mind if you think china will team up with a shithole like germany or any crappy country in europe

June 9, 2017 - 15:45

Jeremiah Diaz

>shithole
They're on their way to becoming a shithole but right now they're still very powerful scientifically and economically, and since the neoliberal/post modern virus has fully taken hold, they're very very dangerous.

June 9, 2017 - 15:48

Isaac Walker

>No one is gonna risk nukes unless shit really hits the fan
That's not even taking into account the fact that states like China and the UK have different nuke depots, some land based, some sea based.
>more like a cold war

wrong, there are several proxy wars between countries like Iran and Saudi already, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

>implying that any EU countries would independently align themselves with foreign super powers
>implying Iran has any reliant allies
>implying china doesn't already have secret treaties with Russia that have existed since before the soviet union collapsed.

June 9, 2017 - 15:49

Elijah Foster

>post modern meme

getting your political opinions from a Freud-tier "psychologist"

opinion discarded

June 9, 2017 - 15:51

Brandon Bell

...

June 9, 2017 - 15:51

Evan Barnes

we're talking about 20 years from now, not today.

June 9, 2017 - 15:52

Ian Ward

Freud sucked. Peterson is good, but nowhere near Jung tier.

June 9, 2017 - 15:53

Charles Smith

If you have no notion to how international systems work today, you cannot jerk yourself off to how you think the world will turn out in 20 years.

June 9, 2017 - 15:53

Ryan Sanders

>implying iran has any relevant allies
WTF? Iran is heavily within the Russian sphere of influence.

June 9, 2017 - 15:54

Austin Kelly

Why the fuck would we side with the niggers?

op stop being such a faggot

June 9, 2017 - 15:55

Henry Ward

Right now the international system is in a state of flux. Once again, there is no natural reason for Russia to be allied with China. They have significant conflicts b/c chinese expansionism in the stans and need for siberian resources. There is also no reason for US to be allied with continental europe when they are doubling down on neo-liberalism while the US goes into nationalist populism.

Right now proxy wars are being fought between US/Israel/Sunni-arabs and Russia/Shiite arabs but that has no bearing on future re-alignments just as the Russian conflict in Afghanistan had no meaning for future taliban relations with the US

June 9, 2017 - 15:58

Zachary Gomez

>he thinks Iran isn't a puppet state
>who funds apposing Assad forces
>who is fighting the people who funds those forces

really makes me think

June 9, 2017 - 15:58

Joshua Myers

>who opposes assad
Israel and the US
>who is fighting those forces
Russia and Iran

June 9, 2017 - 15:59

Jason Nguyen

>who opposes assad
Israel and the US

wrong, try again

June 9, 2017 - 16:01

Kevin Perry

If you're talking about the Saudis or other arab sunnis, they're nothing but nigger tier kike puppets so it's the same thing.

June 9, 2017 - 16:05

Isaac Thomas

>when they are doubling down on neo-liberalism
Neo-liberalism has (0) zero play into international politics, cultural marxism is the catalyst that gave spawn to "neo-liberalism" which is an entirely different realm of conflict, it has, once again, ZERO influence on pre-existing or potential alliances with foreign states.

>while the US goes into nationalist populism.

Also wrong, the US has been a corpocracy primarily with the advent of the military industrial complex since world war one.

The political philosophies of the general public is less than completely irrelevant

June 9, 2017 - 16:08

Chase Thomas

stop shilling your videos

June 9, 2017 - 16:09

Dominic Murphy

>they're nothing but nigger tier kike puppets so it's the same thing.
So how come Saudi has initiated secret alliances with Israel? How come congress is maintaining relations with wahhabi diplomats that Saudi sends?

June 9, 2017 - 16:12

1 2 ... 4 Next

US/Russia/Iran vs Merkelreich/China

Last threads