Well?

...?

Other urls found in this thread:

glassdoor.com/research/ceo-pay-ratio/
archive.is/Fkeb3
socialistworker.org/2011/09/28/what-do-we-mean-exploitation
aei.org/publication/new-bls-data-show-that-for-all-chief-executives-the-average-ceo-to-average-worker-pay-ratio-is-less-than-5-to-1/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I dont see anything wrong???

>wah noone should be allowed to earn more than me gommunism now wah

are you retarded?

We will all be millionaires soon and they deserve that money because they made it wholly on their own.

Also, 'murica.

I use to think this was bad until I read Thomas Sowell and his thoughts on greed and high salaries. I can try to find a video where he talks about it a little if you want but I am on mobile right now.

> being rich is evil

When will this meme end

The 354 number has been debunked so many times...

Average CEO in the U.S. makes less than a dentist.

Incorrect stats, and also
>It's not fair that people make more than my useless NEET ass

>they made it wholly on their own
best joke

>earn
someone doesn't know what words mean!

Source?

Whoo boy. Lotta deluded wagecucks in here today. Also you asked a question and the answer, as always, is Jews.

being rich is not bad. exploitation is bad.

>higher ranked people have higher pay

woah

>less than a dentist

glassdoor.com/research/ceo-pay-ratio/

>exploitation
AKA "being rich" in commie-speak.

Everything is bigger in the US

Including the STEAKS

haha get it?

because CEOs take more risk than a burger flipper?

So.. a bunch of shitty low revenue corporations in those countries and the US has tons of multi national billion dollar coorporations whos CEOs make millions.. yeah thats gonna skew it, but i wouldn't want it any other way.

>muh risk fetishism
Actually, they don't. It's because boards keep ratifying above-average compensation so their feefees don't get hurt.

Protip:

all of these countries combined still dont have the same population as the USA.

The USA also has the largest capital and one of/if not the largest productivity rate on the planet.

You're a dumbass if you honestly think there's no difference in the risk.

What's your motive here commie?

Only because they've been jewing the employees out of their share for the past 45 years.

YASSSSS

Risk? Whose risk? The owners have very limited rights to complain.
I'm sorry, am I interrupting your cum-guzzling train with the Koch family?

You failed to answer my question.

What's your endgame you stinky commie?

Freer the market, freer the people. Wageslaves can get fucked.

Is your question why we win at everything?

lol compared to who? I live in a province where over half of your wage goes to the government via taxes...And have the balls to call themselves anything but communists.

That's because Americans are retarded and accept jobs with 60 hours worth of work and 40 hours of pay.

Go read some real economics you pathetic little choirboy and come back when your anus stops bleeding all over the place.
archive.is/Fkeb3

you are rewarded more for being at the top

quit fucking whining faggot

So I assume you don't intend to answer my question you filthy commie?

Don't you have some priests to suck off?

I told you to drink bleach you cocksucking nigger.

>60 hours worth of work and 40 hours of pay.
There is no objective "fair" pay rate. It's a meme.

>Thomas Sowell
You realize that economics today are entirely different from when Sowell was born in 1930, right?

I want it 50000 to 1

end public school

women infitly overpaid, most work welfare jobs

354 times more.Quit being an extreme mongoloid will ya?

Is that your endgame, commie?

Depopulation?

>risk
if the ceo is sick and calls in is he fired? Is he living paycheck to paychek?

because brits are retarded and accept jobs with 40 hours worth of work and 20 hours of pay.

I don't have one, abo. I don't need one.

You just made the argument that those at the bottom are extremely replaceable while those at the top are not. Good job.

it must hurt a "totally not a leftist SJW shill" like you to even type out the word nigger

absolutely no. read this article about what exploitation really is socialistworker.org/2011/09/28/what-do-we-mean-exploitation

>Is he living paycheck to paychek?
No, because he is more intelligent and makes better choices than the wageslaves.

>socialist worker
>literally has socialist in the name

oh boy, I bet this is super unbiased

I'm pretty sure you can sue for that.

WELFARE STATE YALLLL

He'll most likely go into work sick anyways, if he's in that position he's obviously a hard worker.

>pimple face burger flippers working 10 hours a week deserve the same as CEOs who run billion dollar companies and work 24/7

Liberals need to be gassed

Per capita GDP over 50K in a country with over 300MM people. I'd say US CEOs are doing an excellent job. Yeah, most are egomaniacal sociopaths, but that's what it takes to drive the global economy. Once you accept that, you can start making personal progress on your ratio.

cut gov spend 99%
cancel welfare and pensinos

If you think you'd be just as good of a CEO offer to make the job for just 353 times of the amount of a burgerflipper. Every profit oriented business will hire you instantly.

itt: bootlickers

...

>Too dumb to even quote.

I can live comfortably on 50k GBP a year between my wife and I. Americans would be balking at the idea of that amount.

You work to death and still can't afford a good life.

Interestingly, Poland has one of the smallest Jewish populations in the west.

Cream of the crop comes over here dumbass. Not a huge fan of Elon Musk but the fact remains he didn't go to Poland to get shit done.

How many people does each ceo have working under them?

ITT: temporarily befuddled billionaires

IKEA came over here because the US labor force is just that cucked.

>someone voluntarily gives you money, not out of the kindness of their heart, but because they see value in paying you to do something

That's what earning money is. That's what CEO's get.

why are you so dumb?

If the CEO makes at least 300 some jobs through his actions why isn't he compensated like the people working 300 jobs.

Who defines "earn", cuck? Earning is a social decision, not a private transaction.

>what is Microsoft, Apple, Wal-Mart, McDonald's, everything you dumb fuck

Bill Gates couldn't stop making money if he tried. A lot of these CEOs rake millions in on interest alone. The beast cannot be stopped and if you make yourself applicable, relevant, and indispensable, you can easily make a living wage in USA. Not necessarily a lavish wage 4u but one proportionate to your with nigger. Even if you go full Marxist and seize the means of production, you still have to work to benefit. I think some faggets forget that

hehe xD ya man noobody making more than minimal wage earnt there cash xD

>mfw muricans spend all their money on big macs and fidget spinners and wonder why they aren't successful

>all these countries make more money than Poortugal
>besides Poorland of course

>oh shit, they realise im a shill
>wait a minute, I'll just say HE is the one being a shill
>its perfect

literally "no u"

itt: intimate servants of the rich and famous

because people cooking fries dont deserve the same pay as people running billion dollar international companies

It is if they fucking agreed to it.

I don't understand why this is bad. Are people this jealous? The us is the most developed nation and its people enjoy one the highest standards of living. What's to whinge about?

>defending ultimate jewery and big business monopoly in the name of "free market"
Amurrilards are really this dumb

a symptom of a sick nation

I'm sure $28 is a lot of money in Poland.

Actually, no. You receive money in a consensual transaction. Tell yourself whatever little self-esteem stories make you feel better, but it is society and not you that decides whether you have earned it.

Oh really? How so?

Do these ratios only include famous CEOs? I bet you could name 10 that sqew the numbers off the top of your head. famous has nothing to do with it... except for Elon.

50k good boy points is enough to live comfortably for years here, and investing in some dank memes wisely would allow you to sustain yourself for all eternity

>companies in the S&P 500
>average CEO
pretty sure these are different things

If you know how to make money you become fiscally valuable, and get paid well. A good CEO is worth it, they can grow your company exponentially or, if they're terrible, can run the company into the ground. If the business does well, all employees benefit and can create more jobs.

It's not my snippet. Ask the OP.
There really is little to no performance difference. That's all mythology.

In my experience the vast majority of people that are assmad poorcucks are either developmentally retarded or such unlikeable anti-social losers they don't know anyone. Since he can spell and use the internet OP could literally go get drunk, wreck his car, do month in jail and with the contacts he makes in there have an $18/hr job lined the week he gets out.

Almost every person that's poor here is their own fault then they get asshurt we don't coddle their ass like some European states.

SHUT UP AND GET TO WORK GOYIM MY NEW YACHT ISNT GOING TO PAY FOR ITSELF NOW YA KNOW

...

Terrible CEO's usually get several million dollar "golden parachutes" when they're sent packing. It might be rough on their reputation, but that lessens the blow.

You understand an American in "poverty" lives like a king compared to most people in poverty on that list right?

>it is if they fucking agreed to it
>You receive money in a consensual transaction.

Are you retarded? You seeking employment and AGREEING TO YOUR WAGE is a CONSENSUAL TRANSACTION. Are you saying that you should earn money based on what you THINK you should own? That's about the same as saying "I want free stuff and I want it now!"

You must be a NEET who gets angsty at the fact that people hate your miserable ass cause you steal their hard earned tax money to fund your supposed """Autism"""

You're citing the most successful companies in the world and claiming they are representative of all companies? That doesn't make sense even without outside data.

in any case, this claims that it's less than 5 to 1, using actual BLS data
aei.org/publication/new-bls-data-show-that-for-all-chief-executives-the-average-ceo-to-average-worker-pay-ratio-is-less-than-5-to-1/

If you knew how demanding, tiresome and high stress CEO positions are compared to your low-stress, low-effort, set schedule job you'd quit your whining.

Any person who's stuck working low end jobs all their life simply lack the skills and IQ required to be a CEO or otherwise high stress demanding job.

I wish my father had not aspired to climb to the top of the business ladder and instead spent more time with our family and me. All I knew about him for years was that he woke up at 6AM to go to work and got home at 10PM, would eat dinner and go to sleep. On weekends always stuck to the phone and computer, always doing something. Sure he earned lots of money, but the jobs were too demanding.
That's why I myself chose not to try and climb up too much, I don't want to be tied to my job 24/7 365 days of the year. Always busy. No thanks.

>Wtf are we and Poland even doing there?

Its actually worse because we sure as hell dont have "Google" or "microsoft". Hell, not even a car industry!

You understand what "oecd standard" is right?

Also..

>greed fucks who dont believe in meritocracy and never fucking invest as long as they have their income

The mother fuckers.

Are you cucked? Do you understand knock-on effects at all?
>flag checks out
>CONSENSUAL TRANSACTION
With whom? I own shares in this piece of shit and I did not authorize the board to dilute my fucking position.
There is literally no difference between you demanding that people recognize the character of your exchange as "earning" and fucking trannies making up new genders for xerselves.

They choose to do that because they have an addiction problem. I don't see why they should be paid for having an addiction problem.
>skills
>IQ
Doesn't sound like the intelligent choice is sucking up to the top of the ladder. If nobody made that choice, we'd all be better off.

Portugal has like 10 people that can actually call themselves CEO's, but sure

>if you don't give the rich more money
How much money have you given them so far?

Wage isn't based on how hard you work, it's based on how much value you add, plus labor market conditions. The reason the US has the highest ratio is because we have a lot of successful companies with high stakes decisions.

additionally, according to this , it isn't even 5:1.

If a CEO makes $1 billion worth of decisions per year, and you find someone that can make the right ones, it makes sense to pay him at least $500 million, if they were all binary decisions, even if making the decisions doesn't take much effort for him.

as for severance packages () those are often times either negotiated in the employee contract, or are in exchange for not filing any lawsuits or other favors. companies don't just give them for shits and giggles.