Post your unironic political beliefs and give at least one reason for it

>pescetarian diet is the true redpill against Jews
Why? Because Jews tell you to eat less fish because muh over-fishing, but that's just a Jewish lie to get you to not eat it. Also no hormones are injected into the fish and they are not fed corn shit. Jews manipulate Vegans and regular people against each other so that they think the other is disgusting, but in reality they are just being Jewed into believing what they believe.

>All leftists, LGBT, cuckservatives, and Jews are Pedarasts
Why? Because they all support Pedophillia either by accepting homo-ism, or they want kids to be fucked up in the head.

>People under 30 shouldn't be allowed to vote, and only land owning males should be allowed to vote.
Why? Because young people fuck themselves up with their political ideologies for the rest of their life. They are too argumentative, and then when they've went and argued used all their energy and then have been counter argued they then are disheartened from it. Plato said that young people shouldn't be involved in politics for somewhat similar reasons aswell.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YcZXbfp1oRk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I believe in National Socialism.

Because Communism is greed and Capitalism is laziness.

National Socialism ensures a Authoritarian Tribalistic leadership whilst still retaining the freedoms of the working man, National Socialists believe in free enterprise.

Its quite simple really, I want a free white Christian nation for the white Christian people who live there, with strong leadership, military and plenty of jobs all within our own nation and without the help of (((internationalism)), National Socialism will provide us with that future.

no one cares about your laughably naive non-factbased beliefs.

No need to try to ruin a thread.

>pescetarian diet is the true redpill against Jews
What about mercury?

Just eat some Greens and fast, cleanse that shit right out of you.

What about cesium and radioiodine?

>this

Is this a thing all bongs do? I've only ever seen bongs talk like this.

meh you'll get worse shit in you than that eating other food anyway.

I found your third point extremely interesting, about young people getting jaded from arguing about politics....

I like that, raising the age of voting.

As for me I saw it more like:
>people should vote in proportion to what they contribute
If they pay more than a certain amount of taxes they have more say in what the state can do with it.
Which means young people don't vote as much.

>abortions should become a two-part decision. Does the child get to live : yes/no, and that decision is the mother's only. Do the parents financially support the child: yes/no.
If you allow men to say in advance that they won't pay a dime, you'll see less kids growing up in single mother household. You might see less mixed kids because the woman cannot sue JayK'won or that beta she just tricked.

>vasalgel needs to be commercialized
with two small injections in the pipe that leads the sperm out of the balls you become essentially sterile while still able to ejaculate and it is completely reversible.
This would lower the risk of begetting children you don't want.
It might also diminish the amount of women on estrogens, which taints our water supplies and makes them have crazy partner choices.

I believe OP is a closeted pedophile.

>In order for a democracy to function, you have to let people be stupid. It's more important to change minds than to force them.
If you don't like someone's opinion or beliefs, it is up to you to change their mind. If you can't convince them, they're another vote against you. Go change someone else's mind. Changing a population from the inside through persuasion ultimately wins more minds if your ideas are right or attractive, and those ideas last longer than forcing them through violence or law.

>muh evangelicalism
If that worked, it would have by now.

HERE SON TRY FASCISM!

Who are you quoting?Also democracy is for political prostitutes.

yes

>Who are you quoting?
I typed that just now.

It works better than spreading social justice from the end of a bike lock.

>People under 30 shouldn't be allowed to vote, and only land owning males should be allowed to vote.
Well, you just fixed pretty much everything right there.

Barely an argument. Bike lock was part of the bourgeoisie anyway. Nothing of value is lost.

I should delete myself, I thought you were referring to my 30 year old thing. I've spent too much time on /s4s/ it looks like.

Do you believe that democratic systems are good in ways?
won't help western civilization right now though. Western civilization to survive in my opinion needs to go very far right, very violentylu, and then institutionalize a more stable approach like a Republic or something afterwards.

Hitler said in Mein Kampf that men shouldn't enter politics until the age of 30 as they aren't firm enough in their beliefs.
I understand that even if I'm only 19. I have next to no life experience. Even though I have convictions, I shouldn't be trusted with much amd I wouldn't be the best for debating my points I have too much to learn before that.

As for my own beliefs, I believe that doctors who have circumcised infants should all be lined against a wall.

I believe in National Socialism.

I believe that women should not be allowed to have jobs except for waiting tables if they need cash. Women should focus on building a home for a man. Women doubled the workforce and now have more than halved the wages (inflation adjusted) for men. Now a man can barely support hisself unless he was born into momey, much less a family. All because some bitter jewish women and a pointless war seven decades ago, our society was transformed so horribly.

I believe all men should live in a forest for a year of their lives, at around my age. Not necessarily full Call of the Wild, a hunting cabin or prolongued camping trip would be acceptable. I believe it would build character and men need to have a long time alone to develope their thoughts and introspective ideas as well as contemplate society. I think men have no perspective and that's why they are turning into simps and leftists. There are too many people and too much nonsense clogging our minds.

Regarding subjective moral ideas, specifically. In the "free marketplace of ideas," those that are righteous, just, persuasive, or (other nice adjectives) will be the ideas that win more minds. A lot of people are just stupid though, and you can't get through to them with persuasion or anything. Too bad. Doing anything to take away their right to express their opinion -- however stupid -- is not okay as you're removing some autonomy of another based on your subjective opinion. Convince someone else. Gain an audience. Your audience will find you if your ideas are worth hearing -- not the other way around.

If I were still in college, and I were in one of these College Republicans groups who were inviting right wing speakers like Milo, I would dare to invite a hard lefty. Make it clear they're welcome to express their ideas freely. It would send a message to the other side that we're willing to hear both sides, and not shutting ourselves in an echo chamber full of confirmation bias.

Good post.
+1

Voting should be restricted to people over a certain age.
It should be restricted to those who pay taxes.
At this point I'm beginning to think it should be restricted to men.

Part of me is starting to think we should start disassembling government.
On a Mechiavellian level, government is still expedient.
It's just too big is all.
I'd love to see a clause adopted in which people voted for the most loathed government official and he's literally shipped to an island never to be seen again.
Politicians need the fear of God in them.
Right now they know they have carte blanche with zero consequence.
Just imagine Merkel experiencing a consequence.
This is what's missing in the political sphere: consequences for bad politicians.

>I believe all men should live in a forest for a year of their lives, at around my age.
Kraut did an interesting video about mandatory conscription in Germany for young adults. He did social service in a home for the mentally deficient, and his brother went into the military. And it taught them both about their duty to society. And they both provided a service which benefited their country as a whole.

youtube.com/watch?v=YcZXbfp1oRk

I can't say I wholly agree with a mandatory conscription because I don't think you should MAKE somebody do anything. But creating incentives such as tax breaks or education to those who have done service is something I would be for.

What if you don't give a fuck of others opinions? I am not a believer in allowing anyone political power. I don't think the average person is very capable of thinking beyond their own materialistic possessions.

>Successful societies require institutional moral guidance
It's pretty apparent general populace is unable to follow even the most basic standards of decency without someone watching over them. The prime exhibit would be France, the most gaytheist and hedonistic of western countries.
Disregarding our own personal definitions of "decency" - even simply from a realpolitik point of view their lack of values leads them down the spiral as we speak.

The good example has to come from somewhere. Religion, ideology, an exceptional leader. As flawed as they may be, they're active entities, constantly battling for their values. A counterbalance to the force that is just as constantly eroding any sense of nation, moral code or identity. Personally i don't wish for any side to win, but without the balance you get a country so internally compromised, they have to deploy thousands of troops on their own streets. Just so people can get to the shops.