Africa

They had an 8000 year head start how did they not advance past stone and mud?

Other urls found in this thread:

npr.org/sections/parallels/2013/11/01/241895965/how-one-kenyan-tribe-produces-the-worlds-best-runners
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

More than 8000 mate lol

>implying

because niggers

read guns germs and steel

Africa's a land of plenty; basically Eden. They had no evolutionary reason to.

top b8

...

>mud houses

The climate they live in didn't demand for better housing, whereas in europe the cold winters always drove people to improve insulation and water proofing.

>stone weapons

Like above it just worked, most tribes probably didn't get beyond wooden spears well into the stone age. They didn't wear armour so they had no real need to advance their weaponry.

why don't they settle around water springs instead of walking an entire day carrying water...

Advancement is a long term result of adversity. Many parts of Africa are a literal garden of Eden where people want for nothing. Those that do, have not developed a culture yet to adapt to it.

Need. They had none. Not for food, not for the weather, not for shit but fucking.

They did. That's just how we'll end up in 8000 years as well.

They wuz kangz, man.

People poo in the water, water not drinkable. #niggproblems

>Settle near water source
>get robbed and killed by warlords if you ever manage to get your shit going

>Lack of clean water
Africa would have clean water if niggers didn't pollute it with garbage and shit in it
Also we are to blame because we donate a lot of useless garbage that ends up in that water

Africa has a lot of natural clean resources but Africa has to be a poverty continent because that's the narrative and if Africa was striving then (((they))) wouldn't have an excuse for immigrating them here

For the same reason Nordcucks were still living in mud hits until the Christians civilised then?

Because They were to retarded to look for better Land

Head start? They aren't even human yet.

Africa would have clean water if only it wasn't polluted with niggers.

>to retarded
Oh God.

Didn't a recent study show that humans have been alive in Europe longer than they've been alive in Africa?

...

this

change in animal behaviour only changes with environment

humans evlolved in africa and change in their behaviour will be most static there

They are very very stupid. Unequivocally, unimaginably stupid.

Not sure whether this is a troll thread or if OP actually wants an explanation.

The tl;dr version is that the climate in Africa did not require the Africans to evolve to a high level of intelligence in order to survive. In Europe, in order to survive through the winter, people had to develop the abstract thinking skills that would allow them to effectively plan ahead. Food and firewood were stockpiled, shelter construction techniques were refined to trap heat and keep out the cold, and animals were domesticated to assist with agricultural work and to serves as livestock so that extended and potentially fatal hunting expeditions needn't be undertaken during the winter months.

In contrast, no matter the time of year, Africans could just wander out of their mud huts and pull fruit and shit off trees to feed themselves. No abstract thinking such as the envisioning of possible future conditions which would necessitate immediate action on their part was needed to survive.

In short, Africans didn't need to be smart because they could survive just as well in Africa by being stupid.

>why are niggers niggers?

Genius question, OP.

>Current year
>STILL haven't figured out water filtration

This is the white man's fault somehow...

I'm sad to see racism is so prevalent even on a Saturday morning.

Let's see Europeans try and evolve or advance when there are Lions, hyenas, wild dogs, cheerahs, hippos, crocodiles, and other monstrous beasts killing them daily. Not to mention the warlords. This is another reason why white provelage is thrown at us so often.

but they did.
one of them manage to be your president.
the present one is not even human. an orangutan.

Africa didn't develop agriculture until around 2000 BC, about 3000 years after Europe and Asia.

So they had a pretty huge handicap, not a head start

>serbian education

Some of them migrated to Asia, get raped by Neanderthals then built computers and now you posting on Sup Forums. The oldest civilizations like 5 000 years old but the migration take place like 50 000 years ago. May be niggers didn’t make it by a thousand years, may be sexual selection by genitalia size rather than communication ability hampered them more than that. To put it outside the field of fancy speculation one needs extensive worldwide genome data to see what genes were under positive selections; then you could speculate on causes.

>the present one is not even human. an orangutan.

Nah man, we got rid of that one a few months ago.

Yes blame us for the pineapple serbs.

>Axum or Aksum (Tigrinya: ኣኽሱም? /axsum/, Amharic: አክሱም? /aksum/) is a city in the northern part of Ethiopia. The town has a population of 56,500 residents (2010), and is governed as an urban wäräda.

>The original capital of the Kingdom of Aksum, it is one of the oldest continuously inhabited places in Africa. Axum was a naval and trading power that ruled the region from about 400 BCE into the 10th century. In 1980 UNESCO added Aksum's archaeological sites to its list of World Heritage Sites due to their historic value.

Sup Forums BTFO

niggers

[pali traktor]

tfw to intelligent to use too

Remember how every group of white people who settled in South Africa built water filtration systems on top of sewers, sanitation systems, subways, etcetera yet blacks still managed to turn those places into rundown shit holes.

Too busy being KANGZ and QWEENZ

>put fluoride in the water we give them
>turn everyone gay
>no more procreation
>population control
>????
>profit

Africa in general*. South Africa is just an example, my bad.

>yfw evolution isnt real and none of the posts itt matter

>Black people are stupi-

>The Nok culture is an early Iron Age population whose material remains are named after the Ham village of Nok in Kaduna State of Nigeria, where their famous terracotta sculptures were first discovered in 1928. The Nok Culture appeared in northern Nigeria around 1000 BC and vanished under unknown circumstances around 500 AD, thus having lasted for approximately 1,500 years.

>Iron use, in smelting and forging for tools, appears in Nok culture by at least 550 BC and possibly earlier. Data from historical linguistics suggest that iron smelting was independently discovered in the region prior to 1000 BC.Scientific field work began in 2005 to systematically investigate Nok archaeological sites, and to better understand Nok terracotta sculptures within their Iron Age archaeological context.

All the smart niggers were bullied away

>liberals are this delusional

WHAT ABOUT THE COMMUNITIES WITH CLEAN WATER? WHY ARE THEY STILL THIRD WORLD SHITHOLES?

genetic disposition for being unintelligent

We dont they brew beer and drink beer just like we did when lack of clean water

Why wasn't war a catalyst for teleological advancement like it was in Europe and Asia

More like 140,000 years. Humans left Africa 60,000 years ago and we have been on earth for 200k

The white man killed off the sabers tooth tighter and the wooly mammoth because they were superior have good hunters

It's simple.
When it's warm without rain and bananas simply fall on your lap and you have a lot of wildlife you dont need to be inventive or adapt to anything

Disproven now. Human Biodiversity (HBD) is now the going theory with more evidence. Oldest remains found in Mediterranean. This means those that traveled to Africa simply never evolved.

>Oldest remains found in Mediterranean.
They werent human remains

They just like living like simps

Literally, because they had everything they needed within easy reach and never had to really advance in order to survive.
Plus, they were stuck on the other side of the desert and in jungles with big predators and megafauna and they had to focus more on day-to-day survival than "OOH, WHAT DOES THIS THING DO?"

Yes they were

Africa was every bit as technologically advanced as Europe through the Middle Ages, probably more at times

Well if you want the real answer. Its because europe is the only continent with a climate and geography that can promote growth of any kind. Every other continent was, and is, completely shit. For civilizations to flurish you need the ability for year round agriculture/food storage, acess to water year round, (the above mean only places with salt and rivers could form civilizations at all) as well as a stable temperate climate, too hot or too cold food and water aquirement take too much time for anything else. Beyond that you need extensive mountain ranges to prevent constant campaigns. The reason the middle east suchs so much is because it is almost entirely flat. Armies could just go from town to town for hundreds of miles in every direction. The war and death, and subsuquent civilizations built around submissiveness are not good for growth. Finally you need broken up coast lines. You can not have a powerful country without a coast. Problem is powerful countries are very good at stomping out progress, they like to keep their power. This is why asia is shit, or was at least, the only power in asia was china, while europe had 8+ regional powers at any one time competing thats too its broken coasts. Course this wasnt true during the roman empire but they stopped progressing at a certain point too. These are the reasons european civilization alone was not shit. This is why europe needed to bring civilization to the rest of the world, poor bastards never stood a chance.

Now if you want the pol answer.
Because niggers.

Plan a trip to Africa and see for yourself.
Big cities with modern buildings hotels and restaurants.
Rural areas fucking destitute.
Its just a wicked case of rich holding all the power and money while fucking over everyone else.

>They had an 8000 year head start how did they not advance past stone and mud?
No winters = no evolutionary pressure to develop preparatory foresight + honor codes for surviving peacefully in closed quarters. There's a reason the Starks are the best house.

is this actually how people answer ?

You mean some small parts of the middle east, but I understand you are american.

Too much war does the opposite. Mountainous areas limit how much war you can do in the region and lets the civilizations recover from the periodic destruction.

Good shit right here, sounds feasible to me.

We had lions in europe. We killed them.

if the middle east sucks and europe is so OP why did civilization start in the middle east?

Google Great Zimbabwe. The real history has been suppressed.

>/r/The_Donald

Congratulations, Second Grade Grammar Bee Winner!

Well, the Middle East is the location of the first KNOWN civilization. The hot arid climate is perfect to preserve things. There just might be something older in other areas that is decayed to the point that we would have to really look for it before we could find it.

Because it has all the requirements for civilizations to form. Just like asia. It just doesnt have the requirements for civilization to flourish.

Settle around water, retards bathe, shit and piss in the water making it shit, niggers so can't figure out how to treat water properly to make it safe to drink. Also it's Africa, so Miskitos gather around water and would give everyone malaria.

Literally all you had to say was
>Because niggers

Unpolluted water holes are a breeding ground for mosquitoes, which then results in an increased risk of getting malaria.

Because of the white men

Listen dumbass. Saharan Africa used to be civilization more advanced than ours even. But the bastards did it, they blew it all up with their crazy ancient technology, and it sank beneath the sand. The only survivors were the equivalent of slaves, so it took them thousands of years to approach anything remotely close to civilization, and that was Sumeria, Greeks, etc.

And another thing, homo sapiens is a slave race. We were enslaved and domesticated over thousands of years, and the masters interbred with some homos and that's how we got white people. Then the masters all killed themselves in a big fight, we killed whoever was left and destroyed their instruments of rule, technology. Thousands of years later, we're getting back around to rebuilding shit.

DAS RITE

They was good boys.
But there was no one they could ask for gibsmethat.

I mean thats wrong though. If you switched the places whites and blacks evolved in you would see the opposite results. Saying because niggers does not explain the cause. The cause is entirely the environment they evolved in. Remember, whites started out as blacks, took us 10s of thousands of years in europe before we got to where we are now.

You clearly have not been to Africa

>radically understating the civil and technological advancements of China and India

Everything you said about Europe is correct, but it's expressly wrong that only Europe made it possible for these civilizations too grow. Just because Asia had fewer civilizations does not mean it's incapable of fostering any.

Europe didn't have clean water either you retard.
We just figured out how to clean it.
People feared water in medieval Europe, due to its disease spreading potential.

>but Woolie, lacking a basic understanding of morality, thought they were all being silly
>"I lack a basic understanding of morality" said Woolie, "you're all being silly".

le nigger xdDDXD

Well theres a lot more to it than i wanted to go into in a single post. Livestock also plays a big role in civilization which is why north america never went anywhere and neighbors you can trade with also matter a great deal. There wasnt really anything for china or india to interact with that wasnt filthy savages. Their focus moved inward instead of outward which for reasons i cant articulate slows growth. Europe having many different city states to interact with meant they had reasons to look outward.

And not to say they cant grow. It just doesnt happen as quickly without those pressures.

Yeah, 'cause Europeans and Asians didn't have to contend with any of those issues. Non-blacjs had it so damn easy with wolves and bears and freezing cold weather.

>whites started out as blacks, took us 10s of thousands of years in europe before we got to where we are now.
How do you explain the Moroccan fossils?

Different groups will take different paths of evolution--even though they're both dogs, I can guarantee that groups of German Shephards and groups of poodles would adapt to the same environment differently.

To be sure, environment is a factor, but the starting point is, too. Basically you're saying that "before niggers were niggers, they could evolve without becoming niggers," which is obvious, but it sounds like you're saying "niggers could just live in Europe and they'd eventually sort themselves out," which is hopeful speculation at best and easy fodder for leftists at worst.

>Lions and tigers in India and Persia, as well as crocodiles in parts
>Bears and wolves in Europe, also WINTER
I know this is bait, but for fuck's sake.

Overpopulation leads to bad genes

Whats the next step, having white tax payers thrugh UN push rabbits into building water irrigation for the rabbits so they can breed faster and one day populate space and become space rabbits? Whats the point, let niggers be niggers.

A mud hut and a banana tree and life is great. Dont disturb the evolution process!

Theres a difference to adapting to the environment and evolving in it. Drop an african tribe in europe and you wont see much. Come back 40,000 years later, thats a different story.

And yes our evolutionary roots are fuzzy but not that fuzzy. The Homo genus is still the Homo genus, Homo sapiens is still decendent from homo heidelbergensis. Which was the first species of Homo to have complex cultural interactions. Which is largely the most important part here. Because the point is cultural growth not genetic growth. We move too fast for that now. Cultural evolution has long since taken over genetic evolution as our primary evolution system.

Oh vey, racism on the day of the sabbath!

But for real, do you honestly think that Europe had/has no dangerous animals or dangerous conditions? Also, those things have helped Africans "evolve". Implying that whites never had warlords. Go back to stupidtown.

Most of it is biologically determined. No winter + relatively plenty of food to hunt and gather + relatively harder land to farm means they evolved in a different direction. Most people have been so conditioned that they can't truly appreciate just how much intelligence and brains could have evolved differently among different groups of people, even though you have people who are black as tar and white as snow. The largest organ (skin) is so vastly different, hair and facial structure are so different, yet that large and complex organ that consumes a shitload of energy (the brain) is the same in all humans?

npr.org/sections/parallels/2013/11/01/241895965/how-one-kenyan-tribe-produces-the-worlds-best-runners

>He says that while we tend to think of Kenyans as really good distance runners, all these runners are actually from the same tribe of Kenyans known as the Kalenjin. They number around 5 million, making them a small minority, even in Kenya, yet they dominate most of the world's long-distance races.

>"If you look at it statistically, it sort of becomes laughable," says David Epstein, senior editor at Sports Illustrated and author of the new book The Sports Gene.

Now, for the complete opposite, Jews:

>Von Neumann's ability to instantaneously perform complex operations in his head stunned other mathematicians.[158] As a 6 year old, he could divide two 8-digit numbers in his head.

>Von Neumann was also noted for his eidetic memory (sometimes called photographic memory).

>One of his remarkable abilities was his power of absolute recall. As far as I could tell, von Neumann was able on once reading a book or article to quote it back verbatim; moreover, he could do it years later without hesitation. He could also translate it at no diminution in speed from its original language into English.

The comparison is less compelling when one is a population and one is an individual.

Of course, since intelligence is normally distributed that means that the most hyper-intelligent outliers are most likely going to belong to the most intelligent race, but it would still be better to conduct it via an average.

kek, Jared Diamond is an absolute kike
In the preface to the book, he mentions the race IQ hypothesis and then dismisses it in ONE FUCKING SENTENCE by saying it's "unscientific" and - get this - morally wrong. I put the book down at that point.

And they were still using the same shitty iron smelting techniques to make assegais to stab each other 3000 years later.