Why do you consider homosexuality unnatural when it is found in nearly all species...

Why do you consider homosexuality unnatural when it is found in nearly all species? And why do you deny that there is a spectrum of sexualities? I am 3 for example.

Other urls found in this thread:

yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's not unnatural, it's just not healthy behaviour you silly goose.

I know in my HEART that traps are straight

>incidentally homosexual
wtf does that even mean

Kinsey was a hack who got all of his data from criminals and pedophiles

Roll

They mean when you accidentally suck a dick

Drunk, etc

they don't have a reason.

>MUH when gays have sex with each other instead of making women pregnant, society shrinks!!!

yeah better lie to your wife your entire life and live a totaly miserable life, I am sure that has only good effects on your offsprings.

Exactly. Addiction is natural too, but it isn't something we should encourage. Schizophrenia occurs naturally too, doesn't mean it's a great and positive thing. Cancer is naturally occurring, too: not positive.

How is it more unhealthy than feeling strong exclusive attraction to the same sex but choosing abstinence or a life of misery with an opposite sex partner?

Having genuine intimate connections with people is probably the healthiest thing a person can do for themselves and for society.

>Why do you consider homosexuality unnatural when it is found in nearly all species?

Because it goes against the logic of evolution and thus the logic of any existence: survival and reproduction / Darwinian fitness.

All behaviours are found in nature, not all of them are natural.

I don't deny that there are faggots and bi people and normal people, and nobody does. What we're saying is that any amount of non normality is despicable and deserves the harshest punishment.

kek

Homosexuality is part of human live for liteally ever and 'encouraging' (what ever that means) doenst make more people gay.

how exactly are gays harming anyone? silly shilly

y a w n

>burger steals from the Balkans
I'm glad to see the more things change the more they stay the same

Is there any proof of the validity of the kinsey scale?

Man was given free will. Most men choose not to suck dick.

I know in my heart the earth is flat and there is no corruption in government.

i cant see anything wrong with fucking both woman and men. Its all about plesure. Dont create some ideology for sex.

yes, (((proof)))

Purge everything except 0.

>Because it goes against the logic of evolution and thus the logic of any existence: survival and reproduction / Darwinian fitness.

In nature, most of your genes would actually be passed on through siblings and cousins and their partners. It's not the 1-3% of the exclusive homosexual population that's a genetic dead end, it's modern heterosexuals choosing 0-2 children families. It has never been "natural" for the future of any particular gene sequence in a human population to fall upon the destiny of a particular individual's reproduction.

spreading disease
molesting children

you're telling me you don't want some boipucci?
or some awesome trap action?
I don't believe you.

Quite simply because nothing productive comes from it. You caremore about genders and sexuality than building great works, curing diseases or exploring space.
You are hedonism, that is your core

>Appealing to nature
>Cancer is natural

Go home reddit

Serial killing is natural in nature. Animal torture is natural. Cats will torture and kill mice, bunnies, etc.

Rape is found in all species, that should be allowed to then huh? Or pedophilia?

I think I'm about 2

Kissing guys does nothing for me compared to girls

Dicks are top tier tho

Are you suggesting that the only way to have a genuine intimate connection with someone is through a sexual relationship?

Plenty of bisexuals did great things, from Alexander to Turing and beyond

I myself work at a factory and do a better job than 75% of the married with children men

Don't put all of us into the hedonism slacker box when the ones you see at pride parades represent less than 25% of those who like dicks in our mouth and ass

>any amount of non normality is despicable and deserves the harshest punishment
Yes, which is also why we should kill anyone born with any kind physical deformity or mental illness. Gotta preserve that normality, bro.

There are no homosexual animals. Female animals do not scissor, eat each other's pussies, or bang each other with strap ons. Male animals do not blow each other. Some male animals may mount others and attempt to fuck them as a show of dominance. Male animals do not form sexual partnerships with other males, nor do female animals form sexual based relationships with other females. So stop. Homosexuality is found only in mentally defective humans.

Rape is found in all species. An killing of cubs.

why shouldn't we?

>it is found in nearly all species
As a form of dominance or replacement in the event of failure to acquire a mate.

Why do you consider rape unnatural when it is found in nearly all species?

The bisexual dolphins laugh at you while performing sexual acts on anything for pleasure

Because normality is relative and those conditions may in future be adaptive.

Mild autism is increasingly a benefit and not a hindrance, for example.

>Yes, which is also why we should kill anyone born with any kind physical deformity or mental illness.

You realize that idea is pretty frequently supported around here right? Or sterilization at least.

Isn's bisexuality a social construct, huh?

Well I used homosexuality to cure trnasexuality

You know. Lesser evil and all that
Was hard to do but you just swallow it and force yourself to bot give into to mental illness

Homosexual is not natural. It doesn't occur in animal species, and is a very recent phenomenon.

Same-sex sexual activity does occur in animal species and it also has happened throughout history. Sure. But "homosexuality"; the idea that someone is born with a set, unchanging sexual preference directed at one gender and remains so for life is unique to this moden time period.
Everything we know about human sexuality points to the fact that it is fluid because of the complex social structures of human society coupled with human's monogamous nature. It has to be fluid to accomodate the physical changes of our one partner across our lifetimes.
At different stages in our lives, we can be attracted to tall people, and short people, and dominant people, and submissive people, and people of certain races. It isn't too hard to see how this fluidity can cross over into other genders, considering how sexually monomorphic human beings are. So the argument that people are born gay really holds no weight.

What religions argue is that it is better to control your sexuality and live a life of temperance. The modern homosexual community is essentially based on a fetish and is a poisonous lifestyle of shallowness, judgement, promiscuity, etc. People are chewed up and spat out by that lifestyle, and the mental illness statisics show it. It is better for people with same sex attraction to not just redirect their desires, but quieten them and find a worthwhile life outside of lust.

And people's sexuality does change. You can't choose to be have same sex attraction in the same way you can't choose to be fat. You can't wake up one day and decide that you aren't fat anymore. All you can do is make the lifestyle changes necessary in order to set you down a better, healthier path. Same goes for same-sex attraction.

because fags try to rationalize their gayness with acronyms and made up sexualities. if you're not straight you're a fag, plain and simple

unh-huh. Tell your self that

homosexuality is almost always a symptom of a deeper mental problem

Every faggot complains about their NPD or depression, yet never connects that to their lifestyle of degeneracy

Gays and liberal literally combed the earth for that. They did actually find it. Search elephants and dolphins you literally get 30 million hits total, people literally had nothing better to do.

The fuck is incidental homosexuality? Srs question

What I find fascinating about this picture that it implicitly shows you that heterosexuality is 'normal' and homosexuality is overtly degenerate and indecent, even though it was probably made by a fag.

Kinsey was a psychopath sodomite whose lies should be ignored in all cases.

Using this argument would also make rape, pedophilia, murder, assault, theft, and other degenerate behaviors acceptable.

It's called degeneracy because these acts degenerate (or un make, regress) society that we've built and accepted.

>Why do you consider homosexuality unnatural when it is found in nearly all species?
Yeah, animals also eat their own shit and kill their babies.

Well, humans do the last one too, but by your logic, it's perfectly natural to eat your own shit. Why are you grossed out by people eating their own shit? Look, I even made a scale

1: Doesn't like eating shit
2. Interested in eating shit
3. Kinda likes eating shit
4. Really likes eating shit
5. Exclusively eats shit

thousands of species practice rape but only one species prosecutes rapists. Now tell me what is natural.

have you ever seen two horses having sex? I don't think it's ever been consensual at any point in history

nah bonobos fuck anything that moves whenever they dont have anything else to do and they dont care what holes are involved either

plus there are regions in the brain that may be abnormal to the sex your morphology appears to be but fits the opposite one. no obvious evolutionary cause there but there's a lot of randomness in genetics that can play out successfully in species that are socially complex enough so it doesnt even classify as a disorder, just rare variation.

unnatural means "not in its nature". Some livers break down toxins. Some livers do not. Both occur "naturally", but the properly functioning liver "naturally" breaks down toxins. Get it?

In the same way, your sexual reproduction system has a natural function as well: having children. Your asshole is not a sexual organ. People who fuck assholes have a moral disorder. People who have been ideologically convinced they can only fuck assholes have a mental disorder.

Pic somewhat related. Its congential syphilis, and extreme, pathological faggot behavior has breed antibiotic resistant strains of it again. Its the begining of the end for the sexual revolution.

The problem is too many people care what others are doing with their lives, I don't care unles it affects me or my family.

Homosexuality in itself doesn't "regress" society, it just doesn't move it forward. Homosexuals can easily be hard workers upstanding members of society. It only becomes a problem when it becomes an identity, i.e. gay pride.

fpbp

Homosexuality is found everywhere in nature, just like: pedophilia, pooping wherever you want, rape, murder, cancer, tornados

Mind controlling brain parasites and lions who literally eat the cubs of the former pack alpha also exist in nature. Nature =/= acceptable human behaviour.

Compared to trans feels it's a cakewalk

I'm just glad repression exists

im truly impressed with how many widgets you produce per hour faggot.

The spectrum of sexualities is a piece of propaganda designed by the marketeers for homosexuality to cover up the fact that they were wrong. Lets look at the views of sexuality through time.

Most ancient cultures believed that homosexuality was a type of behavior. This behavior could be practiced, in theory, by anyone, and a homosexual/sodomite was someone who practiced this behavior. The urge or desire to practice these sex acts was present in varying degrees in everyone with most having barely any such desire, but it was viewed in the normal light of a motivation and a behavior. Just as some people have hair-trigger tempers, some are raging faggots. Others just need to learn to keep their cool under stress, or accept that traps are gay. This was the ancient view.

The modern view of sexuality was that homosexuality's core component was not its status as a behavior, it was its motivation, the urge to do gay shit. This was conceived of as solid and innate. You were BORN gay, you had no CHOICE in the matter, and your options are be a fag or be celibate. There was a search for a gay gene, or a source of homosexual desires, a biological root. No such root was found, and there was little to substantiate the idea that homosexual desires were innate and binary.

[cont]

Which brings us to the postmodern view represented by the Kinsey Scale, which is really just a piece of propaganda to cover up the reality. The post-modern view is that sexuality is fluid, and that homosexual desires vary on a spectrum among most people. This view should sound familiar, as it is JUST THE ANCIENT VIEW REBRANDED. Instead of focusing on the fact that homosexuality being a spectrum means that its just a controllable urge present in various people in varying degrees just like every other emotional or biological drive, they instead CLING to the Modern View's notion that homosexuality is innate and unalterable, but instead create fifty different sexualities each as their own interest group. All to hide the fact that they were wrong and the men of old were right and this whole system has people so confused that when they see something like the Kinsey Scale they see more perversion to be resisted, instead of the smoking gun against gay propaganda. The Kinsey Scale [while flawed in that it presents itself as though every point along the scale is equally distributed, in reality in holds hard to 0 and 1] is the ultimate "Fuck you you were wrong" to the gay community.

roll

Rape, cannibilism, and ifanticide is also foind in a lot of animals

also
Romans 1:26-32

No one (I hope) is claiming that it's impossible for a gay person to be a productive member of society. The problem is that in general, homosexuality has a net negative impact on society, and therefore it should not be normalized. Of course, there is nothing we can do about people being gay. Sterilizing or killing them is obviously not the answer. But nor is teaching children that it's normal and healthy, and flaunting sexual perversions in popular culture and in our streets.

Why is 2 the gayest looking one?

homosexuality only exists as identity. There is nothing physical about them that makes them homosexual. Homosexuality refers to their ideology.

Basically you have done something that might be gay, but you didn't do it with "gay intent". Like giving your friend a hug or kissing a guy on the cheek. Alternatively, although you are straight, you can acknowledge when another guy is attractive, or if you can find traps attractive but not actually want to be with one and do not fantasize about them.

Im 0 on spectrum, nice.

Curiosity killed the cat. In other words, he is the most degenerate, because he is the one most likely to fuck a dude in the ass, get AIDS, and then spread it to a woman he fucks,

It's not an identity, it's a chemical imbalance. You don't choose to be a homosexual.

>Kinsey

if the relationships r based in love, its all the same...& i couldn't possibility give any less of a fk what u do at that pt; so long as u leave me alone to let me do what i wana do, then ill do the same 4 u

There's reason to believe that a mother's hormones during pregnancy have a significant effect on a baby's future sexual orientation. Look up finger digit ratio. Though that's not to rule out the possibility of environmental factors being an influence. Either way, to suggest that it's no different than choosing a political ideology or religion is plain dumb.

Sticking your cut dick in a mans anus is healty in your twisted sick degenerate mind.

It's not unnatural but that doesn't matter. Murder is natural. Animals kill each other all the time. There are base things that we strive to pull away from because there are higher things than base level behavior.

I was talking specifically about OP who identified as 3 genders and only seems only to care about homosexual politics

Stealing is also "natural." Animals steal from each other. You could go on with this "natural" justification for all things. And let me put it for you this way;

Punishment for misdeeds is also natural.

Dolphins murder the kids of females to force them to sex. It's natural

It's not because other, more frequent behaviours are unnatural that homosexuality isn't.

>Why do you consider homosexuality unnatural when it is found in nearly all species?
appeal to nature

You argued that because something is 'natural' it is therefore valid, justified, inevitable, good or ideal.

Many 'natural' things are also considered 'good', and this can bias our thinking; but naturalness itself doesn't make something good or bad. For instance murder could be seen as very natural, but that doesn't mean it's good or justifiable.

yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature

Sure it's "natural" but it can still be bad.

I don't know if it is bad, I'm a pretty degenerate nihilistic relativist myself, so I don't really care about the moral arguments either way, I just land on the side of freedom, even if it is the freedom to be degenerate.

Also the Kinsey scale is probably not what modern gender-marxists mean by "spectrum". I mean the Kinsey scale still pretty much just works within the binary, just the degrees to which you prefer more or less.

Also Darwinian fitness is not only about groups in aggregate, it's also (and even mainly) about individuals. A guy who has shitty genes making him want to put his dick into another man's anus or take another man's dick into his anus is an evolutionary dead end and this unacceptable behaviour should be called out by normal people.

zero evidence for this position
political ideology and religion obviously have enviromental factors as well.

its not a physical thing, its an ideology

We shouldn't even allow their birth. Why let inferior people live and pull their group down when everyone could be a tall bodybuilder with 150 IQ and no disease?

Remember all those anti-gay politicians who turned out to be closet fags? Also the bible belt is home to the largest consumption of gay porn in the country. If homosexuality was a choice then why would there be so many closet fags?

Homosexuality is not part of a healthy society.

>political ideology and religion obviously have enviromental factors as well.
Maybe, but there are no biological factors involved, at least beyond the basic rightwing/leftwing dichotomy.

>its not a physical thing, its an ideology
It's both, actually. Not all faggots subscribe to the ideology, just as not all normies reject it. I know a Jew fag who's a devout Christian conservative.

You know what we're even having this debate?

Because of endocrinian disruptors in tap water, plastic, kitchen appliances etc. Any man with high enough T levels hates and bullies faggots naturally even as a child.

Everyone past 0 is a faggot. No exceptions

Homosexuality is not a choice, it's a disability.

Free will doesn't exist.

>bullying the weak
>masculine
wew

Dogs eat their own shit too so why don't you start campaigning for that?

Very much so. The only place where faggots and other deviants don't end up being bullied are the least masculine places - fags don't last long in prison, Silicon Valley is another story.

Bullying is based, scapegoats are a healthy way to enforce healthy social norms by example.

So many closet gays deny their sexuality ITT.

So many Germans deny their scat fetish ITT.

I don't hate gays. I don't buy into absurdity like "kill all the homos!" or "gas em till der dead!" sinking to this level is even more degenerate.

I do have an issue with "gay pride" though, and shoving that idea down everyone's throats and getting them to repeat the mantras. I have a problem with gay marriage being a thing as that opens the door for a lot of pedophiles to adopt kids and abuse them.

There is more I could say, but...

Every faggot's mum is a failure and POS parent. The end.