How do you guys feel about Milo making his comeback?

How do you guys feel about Milo making his comeback?

He was bad for the movement (alt-right or whatever you want to call it from day one.

Milo is a cucked civic nationalist faggot and needs to be instantly gassed.

How so? I understand why folks on here don't like him personally, but how was he bad for the movement?

Both civic and ethnic nationalists need to be anti degeneracy. A faggot being allowed to mince about under the flag of conservatism shows ceded ground.

civic nationalists are pro multiculturalism, and with that comes pro degeneracy.

BASED BLACK NIGGER CUM IN MY JEWISH BUM

FUCKING BASED

I don't think the right should have people who want to fuck kids anywhere near our leadership.

he should retire gracefully

Milo's a Kike and doesn't belong in the alt-right. Jews killed the alt-light and they'll take over the alt-right if they get the chance

Civic Nationalists are anti-Multiculturalism by default, maybe more so than ethnics because they cannot exist without a unified culture.

Civic nationalism is ok in my books. Milo-tier degeneracy is NOT.

But why shun those who share a lot of your beliefs? I don't approve the race-mixing faggotry, but he speaks out against femenism and Islam, so does that not make him an asset strictly speaking?

I feel like the reddit takeover of this place is really starting to piss me off.

I hope he gets aids and dies a slow and painful death.

He is at least honest about the JQ.

quit pushing this worthless cocksucking faggot

If he dropped all the race-mixing I SUCK 50 BLACK COCKS LAST NIGHT BLACK DICK IN MY ASS shit it would be fine.

Let me rephrase it, civic nationalists are okay with diversity.
Civic Nationalists are okay with immigration, as long as the immigrants are willing to accept their new countries culture so you are right about that. They don't care if France is 80% African as long as those Africans speak French. If the country is 80% African and 20% ethnically French, the country is NOT French.

To give an example, the American Civil War was literately the result of cultural drift between the North and South. Both areas were "white" but had very different values.
The United States cannot function as an Ethnostate as it was "mixed" from day one, the glue that keeps it together are the Ideals of the Republic.
>Not to say an ethnostate is a bad idea, there is no such thing as a perfect system and it is not my place to tell other nations how to govern themselves.

>they'll take over the alt-right
They are the alt-right you retard. There is no real alt-right, it was subversion from the very first mention of the term. Why do you think the fucking emblem posted on Sup Forums is a fucking kike?

Who?

that's pretty stupid, by that logic you're not canadian because the only canadians are redskin indians.

That's what the ideals of national socialism try to cultivate. Unity culturally and identity wise to the point of autarky. Kind of similar to why socialist policies work so well in nordic countries. They are, or were, highly homogenous. They share common background, history, culture, identity and future. So they are more than happy to assist their fellow volk with reasonable social policies such as healthcare. As soon as you add millions odf fucking mexicans and niggers into your nation, it's no surprise Texans and other states dont want to pay money they earn to give healthcare to these hordes of foreignes who will use their democracy that was ONLY intended for them, to literally steal their country without a fight.

Let's say I start a movement with 10 core beliefs.

10 people come along and want to join my movement. They each agree with 9 of the beliefs but disagree with 1 belief. They each have a problem with a different belief.

Should I get rid of all 10 core beliefs of my movement to appease 10 people to "grow" my movement? Thus defeating the purpose of even having a movement?

A civic nationalist will tell you the answer is yes.

He is a degenerate drug using race mixing faggot.

Source?

I like how much Milo despises women and can openly talk about it. Most gay guys were abused by their mothers

Every movement has diluted itself to grow. Compromise is part of creating change. The zeitgeist is always going somewhere. Better to move a cm right than an inch left

No compromise amigo.

>It was mixed from day 1
America as a nation was legally 100% white on day one, because blacks and natives were both denied citizenship. The laws explicitly stated that no nonwhites were allowed to be citizens in America, until The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 when the law changed so nonwhites were allowed into America and the floodgates were opened. America has room for 'multiculturalism' as you say, but doesn't have room for diversity because that glue was only applied to the Republic in 1965.

>A civic nationalist will tell you the answer is yes.
how so? isn't civic nationalism precisely about the movement at the root of it, while it disregards the varied origins and ethnicities of those who make up that movement? Otherwise, how is it "nationalism"?

I have no problem with it, unlike the rest of these fags.

The_Donald and Milo-esque reddit fags are useful for right wing politics. They get young people interested and involved. Much like Lauren Southern. I started lurking Sup Forums four years ago, as a right-libertarian. I hold similar political views by my feeling as to race and culture have dramatically changed (in what ways, you could imagine like the rest of you). If people like Milo, Redditfags, and Lauren Southern are just a gateway to get people on the right in general, and potentially they end up full on red pilled, it is worth dealing with Milo's race mixing degenerate faggotry. Ideological purity is for people like Ted Cruz. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Milo supporters will vote right wing. Good. That's all I need to know he is worth keeping around.

Lauren Southern has been seemingly going full 1488 the last two weeks and my dick is getting hard watching it happen. She has been toeing the line between "Islam is a problem" and "non-whites are a problem" the last few months.We want more people following that line of thought, because even if she doesn't, some will cross over to being red pilled when they inevitably hear that Sup Forums is where rare pepes are or something.

Setting the stage for failure. If you aren't in the culture you can't change it. Milo doesn't have to represent your exact values, but if he gets on television doing something outragous, and uses the opportunity to shift the dialogue and make othes sympathetic to your argument, why would you oppose such a thing?

I'm pretty excited for it. I hope he comes somewhere near my town. Ignore the edgy LARPers ITT.

>AKA not pure enough

This shit will end our movement you idiot.

May as well not have one, compromise is how you get neocucks

I see your point, it's just that I don't see how our movement will prevail without getting support from people outside our niche.

>compromise is how you get neocucks
Neocons usurped and subverted the republican party. There was no "compromise."

>White nationalists, nazis, and traditionalists form a group
>"We must allow race-mixing homosexual jews into our group to grow!!!"

Regular cuckservative already has plenty of room for milo and his merry plebbiteers

They only want to "join" us so they can co-opt and destroy us.

>OKAY GUYS I KNOW YOUR GROUP IS FOUNDED COMPLETELY ON HATING THIS ONE THING BUT YOU SHOULD ACTUALLY EMBRACE THAT THING SO YOUR GROUP CONTINUES TO GROW

Do you not realize how utterly retarded such a mindset sounds?

Very well put. 10/10 post.

>compromise is how you get neocucks

No, not everyone is required to have the exact same opinion as you. Its great that milo can agree with the other portions of the alt right, but he doesn't need to conform to the more elitist portions of it to be alt-right

Canada was as a nation created by English colonists, so yes, as a descendant of those colonists I am Canadian. You are thinking of the Cree nations and groups such as them, which were conquered by the nation of Canada.

>No, not everyone is required to have the exact same opinion as you
Not yet anyway.

>Elite portions

He literally contradicts every major portion of it.

It would be like calling me a vegetarian even though I eat beef, chicken, pork, fish, moose, rabbit, etc. But I don't eat roadkill so I am part of the vegetarian movement.

My views have undergone a massive change since the day Trump announced his candidacy. At first I found outlets like Milo or rebel media and Steven Crowder to be insightful. It eventually led to me coming here and doing my own research.

Still think this holds true. There is no "group" by the way. Just a direction. All this "alt-right" stuff is how the media is pulling the whole thing into conflict. It's a mistake trying to form a little club if you want to influence anything. Are we gonna all vot on if PJW and Alex Jones represent our little club? Why do we have to take responsibility for individuals who happen to agree with us on some issues?

>I'm pretty excited for it
Does you neghole need some poz my dude?

>Allow homosexual nigger-loving jews into your white nationalist, traditionalist, anti-zionist movement or it will die.

At that point you don't even have a movement. What do you even represent or stand for if you support everything you oppose?

This is why they push for Milo specifically. He is literally the antithesis of these views and the poison pill of the movement.

They couldn't push for us to accept a nigger. Or a jew. Or a race-mixer. Or a homosexual. They had to push for us to accept all fucking four at once.

Uh-oh, looks like someone is triggrd. D:

Alt Right = non mainstream conservatism

Milo is a libertarian who want's secure boarders. He being a faggot is somewhat degenerative making him be very far from a traditionalist or a nasoc, which really isn't even a right winged ideology.

HAHAAHA TRIGGERED

PRAISE KEEK SHABADOO

He's a pedophile, black loving, gay, kike....
I would not call it a comeback but whatever Americans are up to that level of degeneracy

>Alt-right = non mainstream conservatism

I understand. But Milo is not that. He is a leftist who agrees with the right on one or two issues. His views are not cutting edge or any farther to the right than the Republican Party.

t. someone who's never heard milo at any speech