How fucking stupid do you have to be to want to have children?

>Many studies have found a small to moderate negative correlation between IQ and fertility rates. However, these studies have been limited to the United States and some European countries. The present study was a between-nation study using national IQ scores and national fertility rates. There were strong negative correlations found between national IQ and three national indicators of fertility.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289607000244#

>The relationship between IQ and fertility was examined at the state level within the USA. As predicted, SAT-derived state IQ scores were negatively correlated with three different indicators of state fertility rates.
scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?partnerID=10&rel=3.0.0&view=basic&eid=2-s2.0-57249083991&md5=15db5176c1e7f321fef2ebb6b7b486ed

I always wanted to fuck the redhead to be desu

The system thinks swedenyes is spam so here's some fluff

>not fulfilling your biological purpose

It's like you're too stupid to exist, OP.

Smart people wear protection, dumb people accidentally have kids. That is my assumption as to why this is. There's a lot of accidental babies.

>too smart to have kids

What are you, a fucking worm?

Clearly stupid people are more evolutionary apt, they pass on their genes more readily. Therefore, they're superior based on a natural perspective.

>How fucking stupid do you have to be to want to have children?

Sorry mate, thousands of years of evolution tell me to ficki ficki, without a contraceptive barrier.

To para Darwin,

Not the strongest, or most intelligent, but those most able to adapt.

The rest of humanity already does not need your genes to be passed on. You must be far to clever.

So do us a favour, and KYS. I mean that without a pun. Genes, not Memes.

Anglos of truth

I want 5 kids minimum so I must be pretty fucking retarded. I also have blue eyes and want to have at least one kid with them.

huh, never looked at it this way

>muh genes
I love how people pretend any of this shit matters when you're dead and gone.

If you think that nature is intelligent, or that evolution is a flawless process, You're objectively wrong.

Intelligence is not evolutionarilly selected in modern society. Yet, intelligence has proven to be able to create designs that rival and beat nature in one iota of the time required. This is the biggest argument for eugenics going forward to be honest.

Superior isn't a scientific term and has little to do with evolution. It is usually (and should be) used in a cultural context

>flag
3 billion years of continuous organic chemical reactions honed over time into the diversity of life and somehow you're too full of yourself to continue. I'm glad the future will look more like me and less like you.
>flag

Stupid people can't think about anything higher than their basic primitive urges.

People with higher IQs can see how pointless and miserable life generally is, and what a useless burden children are.

>superior based on a natural perspective
you're not considered a reproductive success until your grandchildren are born desu

There is no such thing as a "biological purpose"

Clouds don't EXIST for the purpose of creating lightning

The moon doesn't EXIST for the purpose of pushing and pulling the tides

Fire doesn't EXIST to burn things

They're just natural phenomena with no metaphysical "reason" behind them

nigger detected

>comparing nonliving things to animals that have BIOLOGICAL need to procreate
Kill yourself

If genes (genetic living material) do not matter once you die, and memes (intellectual material, e.g. thoughts, philosophy, etc.) also do not matter then it means nothing matters once you die.

Seriously then, please KYS. Again, not trying to be harsh.

All I can say is depending on your religious stance, your ancestors date back to 3.5 billion years ago, or ~10,000 years ago.

Each one of them had offspring. Looking at each of them, no offspring means no you. But don't forget, all along that ancestral trail, there are 'uncles and aunties' that DID NOT have children. For example, they died too soon, were losers in a battle for food, mates or simply accidentally tripped on a rock and died.

It therefore stands to reason that if you have siblings, they will breed and you are just another unfortunate dead-end, a useless branch on the tree. If you don't have siblings, it means (and this is the bit I love) you are making every single ancestors life before yours a futile waste of effort, regardless of their success. Because all you want to do is wank into a sock over anime porn and blacked.com.

Shame.

Yeah mate, I second this guy.

>Be too smart to have children
>grow old. Least I gots my spending money!
>Be terrorized and abused daily in a nursing home by the children of retarded darkies

Yeah, you're smart alright.

>How fucking stupid do you have to be to want to have children?
I smell a faggot.

>There is no such thing as a "biological purpose"
You are correct. The term you're grasping for is 'biological imperative'. That said, women find arrogant ignorance sexy so you should keep it up to improve your chances of reproductive success.

>There is no such thing as a "biological purpose"
I wish your mother had gotten an abortion.

...

You think there's some magical Goddess of people who makes organic processes have more "meaning" than physics? Stop romanticizing.

A) They're dead, what do they care.
B) It accomplished absolutely nothing anyway. It's like your argument is a logical fallacy of circular reasoning or begging the question.

When you hit 30, it starts to get old and empty to do everything for yourself. This is why so many n. euros are suicidal. After youve had a few threesomes and travelled a bit, youre like, "is this all?"

Kids are an adventure, and although I gate all other children, I love my 3 more than myself. There's something bigger and more meaningful out , canons. Only thing I would change is have them at 25 not 35. Be young with your kids-youll thank me.

I want the White race to survive. Apart from being opposed to mass immigration, I think it is my moral obligation to at the very least gave 3-4 kids.

Now control for education.

...

In theory it's the contrary but we distort nature's role with overloading the poor with too much welfare. It's called the dysgenic effect and it's recent in human history.

You never read Shakespeare?

Hamlet: ... for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.

To make it clear, you life is driven to continue living. Hold your breath for long enough, you pass out and breath automatically.

Hold your hand into a flame and you can "feel" the purpose of life to survive.

That might be true, but all the suffering the child has to go through in this shit world compared to all the suffering it doesn't have to go through if it's not born is like 1 to 0.

All living things desire reproduction tough. Clouds don't desire lightning, the moon doesn't desire tides. They don't need those things to continue existing. If the moon was moved far away and had no effect on the tides, it would be fine. If the atmosphere changed and the clouds no longer made storms, they would continue. If an animal species has all of its members seperated, the species would die out.
Also the fire burning things is stupid. That is the only thing Fire does. You cannot have fire without burning things, you moron.

>Sweden
>arguing that you shouldn't bother to reproduce
your people and culture will soon be a distant memory. thousands of years of strong men beating back the elements and carving out a place in the world wiped away by the hordes of niggers your women wanted to keep as pets.

Nice strawman.

>arrogant ignorance
A good summary of what breeding is all about.

Only whites shouldn't have children.

I'm 32, nigger.

No. It's the result of cold organic process. Not like some intentional programming leading to something. A person who moves away from flame is one descended from a previous organism with a random mutation to avoid pain. This organism had better reproductive odds.
It's not conscious desire, it's instinct
Learn to read

>It accomplished absolutely nothing anyway.
That says more about you than it does about anything else in the conversation so far. If you truly believe that I suggest you KYS.
(You wont, but that's because you feel that there is something to be accomplished with your life, whether you realise it or not)

Anyway I doubt I'd be able to convince you there is a purpose to life on an anonymous board.

>They're dead, what do they care?
Spot on, although the question is wrong.
>They're dead, why should I care?
Perhaps it opens new avenues of thought.

However, to compare LIFE to PHYSICS, is a false analogy. Which is the point we're trying to make.

>spend more time in college and kissing corporate ass
>Less time for children

Why do Americans need studies for this shit?

It did accomplish nothing though. There's is nothing of value in this life.

But user almost everyone has blue eyes.

I think there for I am, 420 blaze it.

> It's the result of cold organic process. Not like some intentional programming leading to something. A person who moves away from flame is one descended from a previous organism with a random mutation to avoid pain. This organism had better reproductive odds.

All True.

Let's apply that to your other argument,
> The moon doesn't EXIST for the purpose of pushing and pulling the tides

The moon is the result of a cold organic process. Not like some intentional programming leading to something (like the pulling of the tides) . A Moon who moves away from the earth is one descended from a previous Moon with a random mutation to create tides. This Moon had better reproductive odds.

Oh wait NO! It's not. It's because you can't compare the purposes of a life form to an inanimate object.

If nothing else, you should now be able to see the distinction and why your first post was so retarded.

Did these studies differentiate between races? It sounds like they determined that those with less IQ tend to have more kids without factoring in that they might just be mexicans.

Then politely KYS.

Also, don't make the mistake of the End of history Illusion. What you feel now is not the way you will feel forever, despite the human instinct to see the world this way. Otherwise, there would be no progress anywhere, else you would not grow from a new-born child!

How can an intelligent person expand the scope of their experience?
Dunno, but having a child helps.

What's your point?

The moon is not an organic lifeform

But they are both the result of mechanical processes that would happen one way or another due to the laws of physics