Open Borders for Israel!

I think there's a resurgence of anti-Africanism because at this point in time, Israel has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and Africans are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Israel is not going to be the monolithic society that it once was in the last century. Africans will be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Israel to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Africans will be resented because of their leading role, but without this transformation, Israel will not survive!

This isn't 1950 anymore. These blatantly racist policies need to change. Israel must take their fair share of migrants.

If Israel was part of the EU, they would be sanctioned. Israel is so close to Syria, but Israel is still keeping these racist policies in place.

#WeAllBleedTheSame

How do we stop the Racists Israeli hate and invite them to partake in our greatest strength, diversity?

are you ok bro ?

Yes, I'm well. Thank you.

Now, why is your country so racist? Is it the whole 'God's chosen people' thing, so you think you're immune to any questioning? You guys treat the Africans like shit!

#FuckHate

preach

That's a load of horse shit. Fuck off back to r.eddit.

...

preach it brother

I think they should. God said to love everyone equally did he not?

God said that the Jews are 'God's chosen people'. Every non-Jew is simply 'cattle' that work for the chosen ones.

What the fuck kind of pants are those?

This kind of makes me wonder (((who))) actually wrote the old testament. Almost as if it originated in the desert where Jews dwelled...

I mean if God said so... who am I to judge? He is The Lord after all

I agree that the bible laid out a set of rules to better control the behaviors of humans. Especially the 'New Testament' that, from a psychological perspective, gives way to the ultimate human ideal. Sure, it's great, but if the Old testament (((peoples))) are in charge of all media, then what's the net result?

There's probably some realism to this, in that if Assad is ousted, then the pipeline can be run through Syria into Europe (probably why Russia is involved in the conflict because the new pipeline circumvents 80% of Russias' exports (oil to Europe)).

Once this happens and Syria is destabilized; Israel will grab land in Syria to "Protect the pipeline from terrorists".

The thing is, why does Israel get away with all of this racism in the first place? It's like we don't hold them to the same standard as our 'guilty' white cousins. We must stop the hate and integrate Israel; for if they don't become multicultural, their society won't survive! It's not sustainable!

...

I too hope to one day expose Jewish supremacy.

(you)

Economy stagnating? There's only one solution: open borders. That's what they've taught us, after all.

I endorse this policy.

>(Rom. 10:1-3)
>Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they may be saved. For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge.

>For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and seeking to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted to the righteousness of God.

In these verses Paul denounces the Jews as the chosen people.

>Paul denounces.
That's Saul Goodman, and you damn-well know it, goy.

Those are weird borders. In the East, why not have the border align with the river? Why divide Cairo, but not take Baghdad? Why the straight line?

Geo-political regions aren't the same now as they existed at the time the bible was written. There was no "saudi arabia" and the like.

What they've focused on is 'ruling over the world' so the Messiah comes. This here is what divides the orthodox and common Jew for example..

want to be Christian again but vArg / Nietzsche have put it in my head that it's a Jewish conspiracy. crosspill me anyone?

isreal doesn't want more shitskins.
They learned that lesson in the aftermath of the six days war.
Their borders strategically carved to keep them out

Christianity, in its infancy WAS an ideal that gave way to the slaves of Rome to "turn the other cheek" and all of that.

The problem came, when White peoples mass-adopted the ideal (in that psychologically speaking; Christ is the ideal man). There is great merit to this, and I'm speaking to you as an atheist/agnostic. Yes, in in the early days, it was a construct, but the benefits we've reaped from this ideal-man have over-shadowed and over-come any subversion on the base-line.

What questions do you have? I'll try my best.

Right wing Hebremist your time is over!

my philosopher professor tried to rebut nietzche's argument that Christianity facilitates slave morality in that real Christian humilty isn't being obsequient or sycophantic but rather having a more platonic sense of wisdom, admitting what you don't know, and justice

it makes things more complicated because I'm 19 and I've just rejected atheism / Marxism, after being an avid follower for a number of years, but now I feel somewhat conflicted about embracing Christianity

walls are evil, tear it down kikes.

Stay atheist, reject marxism. It's not that hard ffs. If you understand evolution you understand why races are not equal. You don't need (((Yahweh))) to realize this.

...

>Nietzsche
Not a conspiracy, a conquest. Not of jews (the nation), but of their ideas and spirit. Rome was an idea, and it lives on with Christianity - Roman Catholic Church, but also Russia. The completion of his thinking from the Christian perspective would be to state that the Jews of today are Edomites, and we are of Jacob.

Ignore Varg. He is eaten by guilt and grudges. He sees no flaw in his own group, it always has to be foreign. This is a leftist way of thinking, "it was the environment, not me".
But the vikings did rape, the vikings did pillage, the vikings did murder, the vikings did sell whites as slaves to Muslims.
Varg doesn't care. He ignores that. He simply adds to the leftist idea the notion of evil jews lurking behind Christianity/patriarchy/capitalism. Of course, he doesn't care about civilization, culture, language.

We have been educated by the leftist mindset to detest and feel guilt over the crusades. Why on earth did the crusades hit Europe? The same reason they hit Muslims. He ignores this.
So ignore Varg, read history and don't be lured by your emotions. All the evil of mankind is in all of mankind.

So, bucko... Nietzsche was 100 years ago, and thus the evolution of common-knowledge regarding Christ wasn't put-forth into our lens of scrutiny.

This being said, there is plenty of 'plausible-deniability' in your statement, and I think that's what it is at this point (given you haven't said anything further towards the theory).

I'm interested, so please go-on. This is no vacuum.

for

problem I find however is that Marxism/socialism is the systematic instantiation of atheistic ethics. I realized that for any objective morality to manifest itself, which I believe it does, it can't rest upon some kantian human construction or another but has to rest on some metaphysical, immutable grounding. not sure where the race thing is coming from but I obviously agree (we are on Sup Forums)

..and herein lies the NAP. Non-aggression principle...

NAP doesn't exist. Especially if competition does.

The NAP doesn't state that you can't strike back.

powerful last sentence, totally agree. thank you.
also a fan of porden jeterson. my understanding is admittedly inchoate at the moment but it's something I hope to further study throughout the next three years here at (((college))). also, reading the Brothers Karamazov gave me partial evidence of "assertive" or "fuck-you" (let's say unapologetic) Christianity which I find rather appealing

I'm a bit more hobbesian politically speaking and wouldn't necessarily advocate for the NAP, I think humanity is innately corrupted and I'll natured and has to be directed morally someway or another. I am also an advocate of letting people learn from their failings though so leaving room for that may be of some import.

>Brothers Karamazov
I'll look into that, friend. Thanks from myself.

Firstly, I'd ask you how much of this corruption was relegated on the fact of religion, itself, in the first place? What was the original influence that gave way to the directive and perceived righteousness of their brutal acts?

Catholics specifically would say "original-sin," which again, I have a less than comprehensive knowledge of, metaphysically and epistemologically speaking, but I would say secularly, this impulse towards evil (or perhaps even just a neutral ethically apathy) is observable in be evolutionary psychology of man as an animal. this isn't to say that man is equitable to other animals, many philosophers say that he is distinguishable in his capacity to "reason," some even take a religious position on this (aquinas specifically) but that this reason is in constant conflict with his primal instincts, waring over dominance (plato's antagonism in the "tripartite soul": man's appetitive, spirited, and natural faculties. so in summary, I would say man's "wretchedness" ( as Blaise Pascal out it in Pensees) is an evolutionary product, that is rather important to remember when drafting legislation, but may also be engaged theologically, if one so desires.

sorry for hijacking this thread Jewish diversity is still very important....

>Marxism/socialism is the systematic instantiation of atheistic ethics.
Not really. Only people blue pilled on egalitarianism eventually fall pray to marxism.

Das Rite

This, it's bs. Genesis 15:18 would imply that a way larger piece of land would be Israeli, including the entire Arab peninsula and a large part of Africa. Reminder that Yemen and Ethiopia used to have rather large Jewish settlements

Stalin wasn't an egalitarian. More of a Machiavellist. Masses are egalitarian, top dogs are egoists. That's how every communist country is.
You just identify as the masses.

it fundamentally comes down to replacing God with the state and enacting policies based around a postmodern/deconstructionist/relativistic ideology that often flows from atheism

NIGGERSRAEL

>Stay atheist, reject marxism
this

what are your thoughts on establishing objective morality through reason alone? do you see this as possible? perhaps, rather, you don't see value in a standard of objective, immutable, ethics? it really does make sense for me though that socialism would be the logical consequence of atheism.

>Stalin wasn't an egalitarian.
Correct. So while Stalin was a commie, Stalin was not a marxist. Your post is irrelevant.
>flows from atheism
Nah not really. The bible has plenty of egalitarianism about everyone being equal in the eyes of (((Yahweh))). I think it comes from people being well intentioned but misguided bubble dwellers which we know Karl Marx to be. If Marx had to live through Detroit he would have never wrote any of that garbage

I disagree with Marx being well-intentioned (see his necessity of violence) and the "egalitarianism" of the bible differs from that of communism in that it rejects the kind of authoritarian "equality" that limits an individual's right of anatomical sovereignty. I suppose we will have to agree to disagree on this.

anatomical is the right word, was thinking of autonomous. another point is that given that you can't find absolute objective meaning in atheistic thought this leads to the conclusion that man is nothing more than a clever animal that can be satiated on the most basic material sustenance with no need for "bourgeois" pursuits of the mind (Marx himself railed against such things in a similar fashion to Roussea's likening of the liberal arts to chains)

wrong* word fuck I need to sleep for once

Well intentioned in the sense of being a starry eyed utopian. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Also going to have to ask for source on your second claim because the bible is pretty clear on how Jesus wants you to pay your taxes and share.
>man is nothing more than a clever animal
As far as we know this is correct. Look up rising beast vs fallen angel. You seem more fixated on the mysticism of finding some objective morality versus what is useful and true.

Got shut down by the power-grid Jew for the past hour (despite no storms), so again I rise.

If you're looking at society in a lens that relegates itself upon religion in the first place, then sure, your argument makes sense, and it's great, but what you replied to was based upon the per-supposition that religion was a construct in-whole in the first place.

See: NAP

That kike and the Angry Muslim guy look absolutely nothing like each other. Shit image.

...

You earned this.

>starry eyed
his writings come across as far more vicious and ruthless than than that
if believe in a purely materialistic phenomenological interpretation than sure, man is nothing more than an evolutionarily "lucky" animal. but then again, what is the mathematical equation for love? I don't mean love inspired by a procreative impulse, but love of literature, music, art? they transcend such interpretations. finally, I would argue that accepting objectivism/structuralism, especially morally speaking, is not only useful and true, but absolutely essential to the survival of any civilization
again, there is a tendency in socialists to cry that Jesus was of their following, however, he never said that the state should rule your life and be the sole arbiter of what happens with your money, but that the more aleffective avenue of aleiviating poverty is through individual acts of charity that are born more organically out of love than through authoritarian measures
this is why I focused my reply on secular evolutionary psychology

riddled with typos again, alas

>this is why I focused my reply on secular evolutionary psychology

I wasn't replying to you. We have IDs on this board. Did you forget to change back to your original proxy?

or are you feeling sleepy? Jeez, we should all take a nap and call it a night, goyim. Let's be tired and shut it down. Let's have some sleep.

>Geo-political regions
>a straight line over 1k kilometers between 2 random points

Why are stormtards always so dimwitted?
>low test boy mad because the jooooz have more spine then the so called superior race

kek

Oy vey! Delete this thread!

Are you really that desperate to stoop to the Spaniard cock-cleaning level?

C'mon Shabbos-Goy. Really? That's your argument? That's it? Insults?

Something tells me that you're mad, so why don't you show us on the doll where the bad Gentile touched you...

Pls spread OP's message.

Ha love it.

Barbara lerne spectre..... filthy jew whore with fake name......your beloved israel will become blacked big time.

You do know that Jewish girls love black cock, right?

There's lots of Jewiss' -vs- BBC porn growing right now. Israel must accept multiculturalism and immigration, because without them, they won't survive!

>what is the equation for love ... they transcend such interpretations
That sounds like great mental masturbation but no they don't. Just because we don't have the answer yet doesn't mean it transcends explanation. You are literally appealing to the god of the gaps fallacy.

>calling something mental masturbation is an argument
you just regurgitated hegelaian progressivism claiming that because science hasn't fully explained something yet, love in this case, that it MUST explain it in the future. that's not how things work.

>aleffective avenue of aleiviating
>hey guys upboat muh alliteration xD
This isn't reddit. Cut that shit out and ease up on the thesaurus abuse if you want anyone to take you seriously here

Don't blame him, he's high on foreskin. It's the great resurrector.

why did I get the (You) then
switched from LTE to WiFi if that makes a difference

meant to say effective avenue of alleviating

hardly alliteration, not that it was intended

how about addressing my argument instead of green texting Le Reddit

You won't change anyones' mind. Those that have been on this website for 2+ years have seen all fuckery this way of Sunday, so good luck.

You're not going to take the place of a well-written user and attempt your jew-jitsu :^) and succeed with a 5th-grade level of English.

Here, take this.

I do agree though that if I spoke more like a retard I would fit in better around here.

How about you McFucking kill yourself you easily mystified brainlet? If by your own admission that you are a minor it's obvious by your "I'm so deep" word salad post. You don't have a user name to attach eDick points to so cut that faggy language out or fuck off

He can't. He is God's chosen people.

I mean calling me a Jew is a pretty good argument

I'm not a minor and this is a really great way of detaching yourself from any intellectual responsibility

soooo kys fag boi xD
Goyim hate us because we are genetically superior and not horrifically inbred

Let me clear: If we don't know now we may or not in the future. That doesn't imply any superstitious explaination. Your post and line of thinking is the god of the gaps fallacy. Dressing it up in language doesn't change that

you can't interact with an exterior logical system (let's say mystic thought) within the boundaries of your own

so no, science can never prove or disprove any aesthetic or metaphysical essence of love, irrespective of Brain patterns, chemicals, etc


also this really isn't dressing things up

right here you fucking kike
>it makes things more complicated because I'm 19
Compared to the average user here you are a child so shut the fuck up

you are clearly smarter than me

Top meme. Greatest of all memes.

I mean yeah this is the point in life where one usually goes through similar ideological throes so it does complicate how I see things

That is a slimey, disingenuous, and huge logical leap to imply some external logical system even exist in the first place. Does it? We don't know.
Your second point is another leap. You don't know if it can or cannot. You'd like to believe it can't because that's more fun to believe, but again you simply don't know.

I can't begin to understand your appeal to emotion based upon one internet post on a Vietnamese basket-weaving tutorial forum. I suppose that's why you're so invested in this thread. Right?

Maybe you're a bunch of baby-dick suckers who have been BTFO of European countries 100+ times in history and have to cling to anything that perpetuates your shallow existence?

...

>that's more fun to believe
I would say that this is disingenuous or maybe just ill-understood (i.e. the opposite is true, see: Kierkegaard)

can I "know" within this logical system? no, not really, I never said I know for certain, just that existence of platonic forms and things existing within themselves (math, physics etc) that can't be materially dissected (an equation being observed "as it is" and not merely its physical instantiation) give me reason to believe that systems exist beyond our immediate sensation and perception

really pol of you to assume I'm a Jew and not having the infinitesimal brain capacity needed to understand sarcasm

dry your tears with your kekistan flag you pitiful faggot

Christianity is the good got religion, of course that's why Jews have attacked it at every turn and tried desperately attempted to wipe put the diaspora that particularly adhered to it in Europe...

I literally cannot believe anyone on Sup Forums is actually this fucking retarded and believe that paganism of the time was anymore formidable... Cause its not like there was any infighting in monolithic Europe right? If you reject Christianity because you can't swallow it morally and stated so, I'd respect you Varg posters a lot more but stating that Christianity has irreparably damaged Europe when it's the only thing that established it is just fucking sheer retardation.

>16 posts by this ID.

Why are jews incapable of running a fucking country? I thought they were the master race?