America doesn't have a gun problem, it has a nigger prob-

>America doesn't have a gun problem, it has a nigger prob-

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/14/james-t-hodgkinson-report-scalise-shooting-suspect-campaigned-bernie-sanders/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>lem

It has a liberal problem.

this was the real shooter

It has a regressive left problem.

Liberals bring in niggers completeing the cycle

Liberalism really is a mental disease

He was a disgruntled communist revolutionary

anyone who kills kike enablers is a hero, i respect this true patriot

It has a boomer problem

He's a democrat. There's a nigger and democrat problem. Leftists in general.

Funny how leftists are against guns but use them for the purpose in which they are against them.

Cant make this stuff up.

How do you intend to solve isolated incidents? Something with a clear obvious pattern that happens consistently is addressable.

so im a leftist because I'm angry at the jews?

America has a boomer problem

Check'd

As long as you arent for diversity and "progress." No nigger lovin or gun hating.

So fucking close too.

...

He was one of yours jackass.

You'll be singing a different tune when his Antifa buddies burn your local Starbucks down.

>>America doesn't have a gun problem, it has a nigger prob-
First off, pleas stop this style of OP post.
It's a strawman, and you're making non-conservatives look bad.

Secondly, America has about as many mass shootings as Europe per capita.

I watched this clip on YouTube earlier, and when they released the shooters image that's exactly what I thought.

This desu.

It has a leftist problem.

Is that Margaret McPoyle?!

Radicalized by Kathy Griffin, time to open up the FEMA camps

indoctrinated, hypnotized useful idiot

No, he has a height problem. He'd be much better suited for Europe where the short beta males thrive from living off the government

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU FIND A STRANGER IN THE ALPS!

>strawman
>literally a line used by guncucks on here every day

>Secondly, America has about as many mass shootings as Europe per capita.

>muh per capita
also nice source

Starbucks is another kike operation it also deserve to burn. They shirk their national duty of paying taxes and intoxicate the white youth with their disgusting drugs.

LOL on what planet could you be attempting a fair argument while ignoring per capita

Noggers are Democrats, this guy was a Democrat.

There is a radical and violent left wing problem

>it's okay when we do it
You are the problem

what the fuck are you talking about about?

even white Americans have the worst violence per capita of any developed country.

SPBP

breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/14/james-t-hodgkinson-report-scalise-shooting-suspect-campaigned-bernie-sanders/

America has a nigger and a communist problem

No, I'm saying gunfags are the ones who say, "America doesn't have a gun problem, it has a nigger problem." Therefore, my post was not a strawman.

he's one of your own you niggerloving moron. If anything he proves the problem in this country is YOU.

Final solution to the nigger question, when?

>remove liberal

>>America doesn't have a gun problem, it has a nigger prob-
America has a educational problem. People are left in ignorance and some of them are even proud of it.

Wow. Dude is such a fucking faggot. I bet he'd never target a black dude. Liberal white people can be so fucking stupid.

White people are like Muslims. It's a race of peace. Once a white person commits murder, they're no longer a real white person.

No country for old men

>STEAMED THE RICE
>Paid the price
America has a WMAF problem

>Trumpriech

shows you are a larping faggot. Trump is undeniably a kike supporter. You are a fucking disgusting poser

It's got a rural and suburban retard problem

Bitch all you fucking want about guns. But you will seriously have to rip my gun from my COLD DEAD HANDS.

Deport all WMAF DEGENERATE couples

>implying Sup Forums won't forget about this in 2 weeks

nah this is only because they mislabel spics and muzzies
check out 89% white dearborn MI if you want a laugh

>Small minority incident that was politically motivated
>Lol dis equals niggers commiting a huge amount of gun violence thats extremely disproportionate
At least he was trying to accomplish something and it wasn't senseless gamg violence cuz
>Muh colors
>Muh hood
>Muh respeck
Gb2 plebbit

>posting with this flag
>shooter was a bernout antifa psycho boomer

Boy you shills really can't handle it this time can you all discombobulated as shit
Fucking hilarious

He's a socialist. That makes him a nigger.

He's a white nigger

>Be leftist
>Bitch about guns
>Take gun and shoot up Republican Congressional baseball game
>Leftists bitch more about gun control

This is why Trump won.

shitty b8t

Shooter's adoptive son has been identified as notorious at-large serial mass shooter Samuel Hyde.

Unfuckable old white guys with no kids at my office are all hard core leftist bernouts.

Why does most violence come from liberals then?Gun nut shootings are pretty rare.

kys niggerlover

...

HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

America doesn't have a gun problem, it has a liberal problem.

They're also referred to as the regressive left because they are regressing backward from liberal society to defining people based solely on their identifying group, be it race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or religious belief. They simply rationalize their bigotry differently; the bigoted right separates people by these lines but think that everybody should conform to the majority/dominant group. The bigoted/regressive left also treats people on the same lines but think that those in the dominant group should give special privileges to those in the minority in order to equalize.

This is also an important distinction. It isn't that they are just overzealous on equality; I don't think that's necessarily possible. They have redefined equality. For most of us, it has always meant equal treatment of all individuals by setting a single set of rules and judgment based on individual merit. The liberal ideal is to not even care what color, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or other personal identifier a person has, unless it is directly relevant. Thus which group you fall in is generally irrelevant. That you happen to be born with a certain skin color then gives you no personal benefit or hindrance.

The regressive left defines equality as a bulk statistic over the whole of an identifying group. Which group you fall in then is critical to how they treat you, the same as far-right bigots. (They only differ on how they treat each group.)
If you are white and male, for example, then you are seen as privileged because, statistically, white males have more wealth and power. That you may individually have no power or wealth is irrelevant to them, as if there is some big party where all the white males all go to divvy up the loot and push a single common agreed interest. By this reasoning, a homeless American white male murdered by police (like Mark Kelley) is privileged; a billionaire African black woman (like Isabel Dos Santos) is not.

To these regressives, the idea of not caring what somebody's personal identity is (such as race) is abhorrent. They don't see their blatant racism or bigotry, largely because they think it's ok as long as they're rooting for the group that is statistically an underdog (even if the individual isn't).

When challenged on this whole bizarre re-definition of equality, many will dismiss it as "reverse racism", meaning it's only racist against the dominant group, so who cares. (Again, regardless to the actual circumstances of the individuals.) But this is, of course, mistaken. They are stereotyping all people based on the groups they fall in, and dictating which groups are allowed to do what, across all groups, and to the detriment of many in those groups. Muslims are seen as oppressed in the West, so the regressive left oddly supports the conservative Muslims to oppressive other Muslims, like separating men and women, because that oppression is just part of their culture, which is an underdog in the West. So if you are a liberal Muslim woman seeking equal rights and treatment for Muslim women, the regressive left will actually fight against you, even trying to get you banned from speaking at a university.

It's this perverse redefinition of equality based on bulk statistics that leads to such bigoted reviews that the regressive left ends up with many of the same policies as the bigoted right. A fundamentalist religious group on the right in California sued (and failed) to have yoga removed from schools as a violation of their religion. A regressive left student union successfully stopped yoga classes at the University of Ottawa under the guise it is "cultural appropriation".

At Mizzou, the activists demanded blacks-only housing so that they could explore their culture. Racists on the right also want blacks in their own housing. In the UK, student unions have supported the right of Muslims to separate men and women in lectures as long as they are the same distance from the front. "Separate but equal" was also a policy of the American racist right.

The regressive left, led by Anita Sarkeesian, wants to stop sex and violence and scantily clad women in video games. The religious right, led by Jack Thompson, have long fought for this as well.

Same policies over and over. Just different rationalizations.
They aren't just an extreme version of the left; they've abandoned liberalism for a form of underdog authoritarianism via stereotypes.

SUBHUMAN LEFTSHIT KEKOLD NIGGER LOVING FAGGOT
>a literal fat fucking boomer that red too much Tumblr, WashingtonPost, BuzzFeed and watched CNN nonstop went crazy with hatred against Trump
>liberal propaganda now creates terrorism
HELICOPTER RIDES WHEN?

>Domestic Terrorism
>You should start calling it by its name
>Turn tables now.
>>>LIBERAL DOMESTIC TERRORISM

Post YFW Trump will declare liberalism a mental disease.