Was Christ an Aryan?

> The view that Amorites were fierce, tall nomads led to an anachronistic theory among some racialist writers in the 19th century that they were a tribe of "Aryan" warriors who at one point dominated the Israelites.

> Houston Stewart Chamberlain claimed that King David and Jesus were both Aryans of Amorite extraction. The argument was repeated by the Nazi ideologue Alfred Rosenberg

> The best characterization is provided by the product of this religious education, the Jew himself. His life is only of this world, and his spirit is inwardly as alien to true Christianity as his nature two thousand years previous was to the great founder of the new doctrine. Of course, the latter made no secret of his attitude toward the Jewish people, and when necessary he even took the whip to drive from the temple of the Lord this adversary of all humanity, who then as always saw in religion nothing but an instrument for his business existence. In return, Christ was nailed to the cross, while our present-day party Christians debase themselves to begging for Jewish votes at elections and later try to arrange political swindles with atheistic Jewish parties-- and this against their own nation.

Other urls found in this thread:

iupui.edu/~msaiupui/prophetdescription.html
journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003316
youtu.be/HS0WSEuousE
archive.org/details/JNVVol1Archive
archive.org/details/TheWorlds16CrucifiedSaviors_86
archive.org/details/paganchristsstud00robe
churchandstate.org.uk/2016/05/demolishing-the-historicity-of-jesus-a-history/
hubpages.com/religion-philosophy/forum/42035/the-parallels-between-jesus-and-horus-
jesusneverexisted.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Nope, kikes aren't white.

Muhhamed was.
iupui.edu/~msaiupui/prophetdescription.html

Your opinion is immediately invalid.

>le kike on a stick meme

Lamentations 4:7

Christ was a Jew and christianity is a the completion of judaism. I know this hurts to hear for you Sup Forums nazis, but your messiah is a Jew who's against anti semitism. If you don't like that then at least stop calling yourself a christian

>WE WUZ SEMITES

>purer than snow
>whiter than milk
indisputable really

Jesus was Sicilian

...

...

No, he was a jew.

...

Yeah the synagogue of Satan are our allies, don't worry about that little detail in which they reject the truth of His death and resurrection

...

Yes Jesus was white. Semites weren't in the area until the arab conquest in the 600's. Most white europeans are descended of white neolithic farmers from the levant and anatolia.


journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003316

genetic study determines "pre-Islamic expansion Levant was more genetically similar to Europeans than to Middle Easterners."

nothing fishy here

you Sup Forums "christians" are funny you like to rip a religion and twist it to a setting that you prefer. You know why the orthodox Jews don't even argue about Jesus? Because for nearly 2000 years anti semites like you have been persecuting them in the name of christianity so thats what they think Jesus was about. They literally think that the New Testament is one big anti-semitic book with nothing but jew hatred and nazism.

The Jews are blind to their own messiah, yet you "christians" are blind to the character of Yeshua (Jesus) as well.

There really isn't any dispute that Jesus is a historical figure. You can decide to attribute divinity or not.

see

Why do they guess Jesus looked like that Arab guy and not a slightly differently looking one. ("They") are that sure or is this a biased pic?

aight Im done with this trash. You guys either believe the Bible or you believe anti-semitic inventions that serve your nationalistic agenda better. You clearly choose to believe the latter.

Read the OT, that's the most valid history book for a christian

Nice digits

Read The Antichrist, faggots. Christianity is just more kikery. "Sin" and "revelation" are the basic Jewish mind control tricks. The priest claiming to "clean" (absolve) you of an imaginary stain is another. Just a web of neuroses imposed on you by a parasitic class of men.

FUCK PRIESTS
and
FUCK NONWHITE PEOPLE

I like the part where virtually all humans and landborne animals drown in 2304 BC. 10/10 accuracy, would believe again

We're talking about self proclaimed christians here. Of course for an atheist/agnostic/unbeliever like yourself it's gonna sound foolish. But for someone who claims to believe the Bible it shouldn't be an issue. Except it is, because these so called Sup Forums christians say that they are christian yet deny their holy book when you look at their ideologies and attitudes towards the jews, Israel and even Christ. They go as far as to deny that He was Jewish or if they don't they still make Him out to be anti-semitic nazi. Which He wasn't.

Christianity was hijacked by jews at the very beginning.
Christian world is like a battlefield between the original meaning (Revolt against jewry) and the later (((subversion.)))

> Saul was a Pharisee Jew, a descendant of the tribe of Benjamin and educated in Jerusalem under the school of the famous rabbi Gamaliel, citing this as something he was proud

> Saul was an extremely astute individual who takes advantage of the effects of Christian preaching to subvert the values and traditions of the pagan world.

> After his great revelation, narrated in New Testament as a mystical vision during his journey to Damascus, Saul decides that Christianity is a valid doctrine to be preached to the Gentiles, i.e., to non-Jews (goym) and claimed for himself the title "Apostle to the Gentiles". Saul, now Paul, sets numerous Christian communities in Asia Minor and the Aegean (very multicultural places), from which he preach the "good news" and where the Jewish sect begins to acquire Hellenistic influences.

Everything makes sense

read Romans 11. So much for anti-semitism and God cursing the Jews

Where is this text coming from user? Looks interesting

((( Rabbi Schaul Scripture )))

Thanks for confirming my point.

It didn't happen dude. The flood is an issue b/c it would have produced unmistakable physical evidence. You're wasting your life and harming those around you by "believing" this baloney (you don't really). It's bad to lie all the time! Stop!

Very likely he wasn't.

Christianity is Paul jewing jews. It was not hijacked by jews; it is originally and essentially a jewing.

Christ is a composite of every Aryan conception of the Divien:
>Mithras
>Ixion
>Odin
>Baldur
>Horus
I think Christ has 42 similarities to Horus. The Romans plagiarized every Aryan myth they encountered within the known world, then glued Judaism on top of it in the hopes of tricking the Jews into assimilating into the empire. it didn't work, so they smashed the temple of Jerusalem and made the Jews nomads. It's obvious that Christ is a Roman fabrication, made from other Aryan myths and tropes.

>Joseph Atwill's theory of Christianity as Roman in origin
>ORIGIN OF CHRISTIANITY: The Piso Flavian Dynasty
youtu.be/HS0WSEuousE
>Mythicist positions:
>Jesus Christ: A Pagan Myth by Laurence E. Dalton
archive.org/details/JNVVol1Archive
>The World's 16 Crucified Saviors
archive.org/details/TheWorlds16CrucifiedSaviors_86
>Pagan Christs: studies in comparative hierology
archive.org/details/paganchristsstud00robe
churchandstate.org.uk/2016/05/demolishing-the-historicity-of-jesus-a-history/
hubpages.com/religion-philosophy/forum/42035/the-parallels-between-jesus-and-horus-

jesusneverexisted.com

>Christianity was hijacked by jews at the very beginning.

Other way around. Christianity originated as a kike cult but it was hijacked by the gentiles very early on thanks to Paul of Tarses.

Houston Stewart Chamberlain works. He was right:

The ultimate aim of the Jew according to Chamberlain was to create a situation were "there would be in Europe only a single people of pure race, the Jews, all the rest would be a herd of pseudo-Hebraic mestizos, a people beyond all doubt degenerate physically, mentally and morally".As part of their plans to destroy the Aryans, Chamberlain claimed that the Jews had founded the Roman Catholic Church, which only preached a "Judaized" Christianity that had nothing to do with the Christianity created by the Aryan Christ


The other quote is Mein Kampf.

In the 16th century, Chamberlain claimed that the Aryan Germans under the leadership of Martin Luther had broken away from the corrupt influence of Rome, and so laid the foundations of a "Germanic Christianity".Chamberlain claimed that the natural and best form of government for Aryans was a dictatorship, and so he blamed the Jews for inventing democracy as part of their plans for destroying the Aryans.In the same way, Chamberlain blamed capitalism-which he saw as a very destructive economic system-as something invented by the Jews to enrich themselves at the expense of the Aryans while at the same time crediting the Jews with inventing socialism with its message of universal human equality as a cunning Jewish stratagem to divert attention away from all the economic devastation wrought by Jewish financiers.

Prophet.

There's something to this if Jesus was really a Buddha type, as Nietszche argues. But "Christianity" is kikery regardless of the real Jesus's unrecorded words. The important parts, the expiatory sacrifice and future revenge, are Semitic horseshit, so there's no reason to dekike Jesus; you'd just get a way dumber precis of Yoga or Buddhism.

You're fucking rambling incoherently about "anti-semitism" and that's all you've been doing this entire thread. It hasn't been clear once whether you're referring to the race or the religion. The religion is Phrariseeic and categorically denies Christ as the fulfillment of the prophecies. It doesn't matter if they get "persecuted" or whatever, they have made the choice to reject His truth all on their own. Memebers of the race can choose to accept Jesus's act and become Christians.

The point is, it's not anti-Semitic in the same sense as racism to hold in contempt a group of people that reject the central pillar of your beliefs.

>So there's no reason to dekike Jesus

Christian religion represents power over Europeans and Western civilization in general. The whole "refugees shit" are heavily accepted because the latter (((foundations)))

My point is that we don't need to "reclaim" Jesus b/c there was nothing notable about him to begin with. We certainly need to expose the Bible character Jesus as a bundle of kike lies, but just to break down Christianity, not to recover "real" Christianity or anything silly like that.

Wow. Ouch.

This would cast turmoil, because it would lead the jews into the absolute advantage over the religious aspects. The right thing to do is what the national socialism tried: Recover Christianity then morph it into something more positive. Annihilate Christianity (which is have been tried since ever by the infiltration of freemasonry) would be the triumph of jewry over the metaphysical aspect.

Notable theories like Julius Evola ones (Of reclaiming the spirituality of the west through the "ancient royal german-teutonic tradition of solar warriors") would fail bigly because we're negative influenced by humanitarianism ideals and so on.