Can someone actually explain what Ancap is and how it would work? I've read the wiki article and am still confused

Can someone actually explain what Ancap is and how it would work? I've read the wiki article and am still confused.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=VIs5r3ujBmw
mises.org/library/pennsylvanias-anarchist-experiment-1681-1690
infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionF
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

you take singapore and multiply it with hong kong

then you rest cancer

and that's how ancapia looks like

Physically remove communists and homosexuals.

Low tax utopia.

Women are property.

The belief that the best way to control a plane is by ripping out the steering wheel.

Something like this

Roads.

It's basically Escobarism

Ancap is 2 parts autism 1 part virginity.

>how it would work?

It doesn't.

Not really.
I mean his whole rise and fall had to do with either govt. corruption or govt. cockblocking him.

I mean at least they have food.

Ancapism starts from the simple realisation that the State isn't the only institution in existence and that other institutions can, did and do exist without being enforced by the State.

It's a theory of social order without a State, and not a theory of social disorder, contrary to what memers would have you believe.

>Can someone actually explain what Ancap is
Anarchism with a dash of yellow
> and how it would work?
it doesn't work

At it's base, it's FMC without any kind of central government to regulate it, meaning that literally anything can be bought and sold, which is where the McNukes and roads memes comes from.

This obviously leads to difficulty, as there is no central body to set the rules on what can and can't be bought and sold, which would result in rampant fraud and a whole lot of other bullshit that will, thankfully, never see the light of day.

pic somewhat related

Shit system that would just result in another government worse than the first one. They also pretend to be pro-white when they're about as anti-white as you can get.

In order for that to be true ancap would have to have been tried, at any point ever.

I mean yeah most socialist states are RIP but at least we had socialist revolutions. To this day ancaps have accomplished fucking nothing.

ancap is not a "how it would work" proposition because anarchy is not a system. the "it" already works. you can look anywhere in society to see market functions that regular human behavior in a rational manner, and you can also see that whereever that is most lucrative, there is a gang taking their cut of the action; a "government" attempting to maintain a monopoly on violence.

ancap is pointing out that you already have the warlords and the chaos you're worried about, you already have the shitty roads, you just also believe in a mafia gang simply because it calls itself government -- and implicitly also pointing out that you either aren't even trying or don't have the IQ to understand what you're seeing.

and this is why it is unpopular. we have a huge hurdle to overcome: the lack of a sales angle that doesn't insult the customer.

but, it's still a fact. people are self-governing. anarchy is the actual state of the world. youtube.com/watch?v=VIs5r3ujBmw

This. I'd add that the existence of the state is in many ways a monopoly that often suppresses more organic social institutions and replaces them with inhumane centrally planned bureaucracy

It doesn't.

It's an ideal.

...

...

Typical of state worshipers, being confused about how not to initiate aggression against your neighbors.

...

Ignore AnCap and other false ideologies. Follow THE ONE TRUE IDEOLOGY.

mises.org/library/pennsylvanias-anarchist-experiment-1681-1690

must be embarrassing to have to constantly repeat that nobody's tried "real communism." literally every attempt to just be left alone is a kind of attempt at anarcho-capitalism, and unlike communism these have never failed for being ideologically inconsistent with reality.

...

We really need a monarchist flag desu.

...

No government based around a strong authoritarian government?

Am I reading this right?

...

...

...

I don't disown historical attempts at communism. They were legit attempts, they didn't accomplish their goal but they still tried.

> literally every attempt to just be left alone is a kind of attempt at anarcho-capitalism
Brilliant. At this point of reaching we may as well say every attempt at sharing is an attempt at communism.

...

...

...

lol

...

isn't it?

It's pretty much Fallout: New Vegas

implying monarchs ruled instead of serving their kingdom

socialdemocracies rule infinite more than most kings

there were retarded kings at some points tho

Not really. Both communism and anarcho-capitalism are systems to be applied to society as a whole based on a number of principles and methods. Putting some of those principles or methods to use outside of the context of the greater system isn't an attempt at the system itself.

>100 000 000 were killed because of communism
>MUH REVOLUTION

wew

>MUH HUNDRED MILLION GORILLION

infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionF

This is why it's an oxymoron and can't work/

>strong
I always cringe when I read this "strong" crap. The right word is big. You want bigger government not stronger. It's like a fat guy calling himself strong. It's not. You're making the government more bloated and bureaucratic.

...

Isn't the name of an area ruled by a person who also owns it better called a king or feudal lord?