How do bongs feel about this

how do bongs feel about this

Like none of us fucking voted for him. He's a twat.

THICC

How about starting with all the Queen's homes first.

Finally those rich twats can put their money where their mouth is.
For those who oppose immigration I guess this is communism.
Please take Rowling first!

>literally going against the jewish overlords now
tip top kek

Glad he lost.

Obviously it is jarring/shocking as it goes against everything we've known but it makes absolute sense when you think about it in logical terms.

You have very wealthy people, many of them immigrants, who buy houses and leave them vacant. It is called land/house banking. They just sit on them to park their cash and in some cases for cap gains.

They should retain ownership but the state will forcibly use them for a prescribed period (5 years?).

labour obviously doesn't want to get elected ever again

Fuck off not your country.

All Anglo colonies should be entitled to UK citizenship and a passport. It should be our birthright.

he is the most hated politician atm

FATTY

For the 30 people who survived?

Honestly the commonwealth shoulf just go back to being one country

that makes no sense

isnt australia the original public housing?

>state should forcibly
Fuck off commie.

Someone tweet this to that cunt, shes rich and has like 5 homes.

It would need to be a bit more selective if it did that. Perhaps have a GDP per cap. cut-off or something

this is how you become venezuela

fucking idiot

That isn't commie. That would mean all police forces are commie because they use force on behalf of the state???

Not a bong, obviously, but this pisses me off. On one hand, I despise how rich people horde empty property and support multicultural philosophies because "I'm a good person muh cheap labor". On the other I equally despise that shitskins are even in our country and now apparently we can have our land seized to accommodate them.

Such is the arrogance ingrained in these fat cat's personalities. Will they learn from this?

>government can't be bothered to pay house owners to provide shelter for disaster victims
well shit we ought to punish rich people to fix this

*in our countrIES

>prices in London rose up so high literally no one will buy/rent them
>government steps in with the cash in hand and buys those overpriced homes for niggers, pajeets, and muslim child rapists with tnt up the ass.

Good job UK but don't forget to pay 200Bn to the EU, we don't want pounds we want euros btw.

The kikes say things like this not because they actually want to do them (though if it went through, the kikes would evade it). The kikes say these kinds of things to force white people to say "no" and create another time "whites be ray-cis" for the niggers.

...

that "logic" only works if you convince rich people that their houses will be their own, and then you steal it from them to use whenever you want.

that's like the "logic" of hiring someone to do a job, and then not paying them because the money can be used on starving african children instead. go fuck yourself.

if you're not insured, if you're not connected to friends and family who can help after a disaster, eat shit and figure it out on your own. i can name plenty of alternative countries where you can live under the impression that the government will always wipe your ass for you.

did he really say that tho? Some user said the other day that Corbyn merely stated that there is a loads of houses in london bought by foreing milionaires and left sitting empty

>House requisition against owners’ will
>All in central London
>Refuse to pay a compensation

Literally a filthy communist. How could brits vote for such a retard?

No thanks, I'm fine not being British.

In the first place foreign nationals should not be permitted to own property in Britain.

Oh I'm sorry, did you work hard for something you wanted to eventually hand down to your kids? well not anymore, BIGOT

This is the logical next step. Our campaign against national borders is working well, it's only logical for property borders (and therefore property rights) to go next. Well property rights for citizens anyway, obviously the state needs to retain those rights in order to decide what is allocated to who.

He's the embodiment of what the voting right for women leads to. Empty phrases with no hard plan behind them and a couple of photos where he hugs someone.

All feels with no substance, because they worship harmony. And the moment you have any concrete plans rather than just meaningless bullshit, people can't project their own desires onto your empty phrases anymore.

This. Rowling has a huge mansion in the whitest town in the UK.
Time for virtue signalling celebs to put their money where their mouths are.

Why not just house them temporarily in Hotels and Motels until the government can find them suitable public housing? I don't think the businesses would mind as they're getting paid by the government for it and they show a bit of a charity at the same time too. The only other alternative I can think of is if they government provides incentives for those house owners to rent out their empty homes (at the governments expense) to those people. That and find some people in London or in the general area willing to share their homes with the effected families.

I don't like the empty investment properties but I don't think forcefully taking them from their owners is such a good idea.

Commie kike confirmed. Activating gas

Requisitioning is not buying. They would be taken, property prices are only so high because of people buying properties and then not using them

There's nothing wrong with this. Rich people have a shit ton of houses anyway, they're not gonna become homeless

I totally agree with the fact that foreign investors shouldn't be allowed to empty the housing market and let it sit around to accumulate value.
But you cannot just retroactively punish them for something that was totally fine when they did it. That would destroy all trust anyone has in your nation, over night you'd see all but the most risk-happy investors pull out of your commie-shithole.

If you want to change this, make it illegal for the future and try to somehow re-obtain the property that was grandfathered in via repurchase programs and so on.

I approve. The rich are almost entirely in favour of importing arabs to replace the native population, so they should have to foot some of the cost for once.

Never defend the rich, they hate your very existence.

Just to be clear here, the government CANNOT do this during peacetime.

It would require passing legislation through parliment, and Tory/DUP majority would scuttle it.

And even if it somehow made it through the Commons, then the Lords certainly wouldnt have it.

>none
That seems to indicate a recount is in order

Better yet, how about all the bureaucrats and politicians that are in favor of it house them at their own homes. It is easy for them to spout all this nonsense when it is not in their backyard.

This I can agree with, particularly in London where there's no fucking room

May those who voted for him be the first to relinquish their houses

>Jeremy Corbyn: lmao how about some communism guys?

>lets take the shit from rich foreigners and give them to the useless poor foreigners that form a constant security risk in any are they're in.

Why would anyone want to put a bunch of crispy dead bodies in their house?

>>prices in London rose up so high literally no one will buy/rent them

That situation will only ever exist for very short time frames due to the way how supply and demand works. If no one buys your property because it's too fucking expensive, you have no choice but to lower the price if you really want to sell (which is generally what you want to do, because owning multiple properties is worthless when you only really need two at most).

For any situation where the state steps in and buys the overpriced property, it's clientele policy to reward those property owners for their loyalty towards your party.

There were multiple labour shills before the election. Sad how much Sup Forums has fallen

as much as I hate leftists, the Labour Party
and mr Corbyn
he is a confirmed anti-Semite
so if he was elected he would rid us of merchants
then we throw his party and muzzles out
the Jews have always been the enemy within
they play both sides of every battle
to keep the goyim killing eachother
we can only secure our future when we cut
the strings from the puppet masters

>Requisitioning is not buying
They will pay and I was saying it's a scheme since the prices can't rise further and the future of bong economy doesn't look so bright so rich people will cash in. WHO DO YOU THINK IT'S BEHIND THIS YOU STUPID CRAP? NOBODY GAVE A SHIT ABOUT THE POOR TILL NOW. WHY?

>That situation will only ever exist for very short time frames due to the way
Prices in London always rose cause owners would rather have their homes empty and see the appreciation in value than renting/selling them.
You have empty homes and an artificial price.
Now that the financial center is moving away from London the only direction the price can take is down so THE GOVERNMENT STEPS IN AND BUYS AT THE HIGHEST PRICE IN BULK SO NO MARKET CORRECTION.

If you think for 1 second that this was a social measure YOU ARE COMPLETELY BRAINDEAD.

>he is a confirmed anti-Semite

No he is not he just dislikes Israel because it bombs brown people.

>If you think for 1 second that this was a social measure YOU ARE COMPLETELY BRAINDEAD.

I think you misunderstood my post (and I may have misunderstood your post I was replying to).

My entire point was that the government acquiring this overpriced property is done for the sole purpose of handing over tax money to the property owners.
The "there is too much empty property in London because no one can afford it" is utter bullshit when coming from the government, because their wasteful spending is what keeps the prices up. If they'd just stop interfering the prices would adjust rather quickly.

kek, you think Mayor Kang will repeat that statement now that a bunch of his Muzzie friends have been targeted?

>because their wasteful spending is what keeps the prices up
That's an odd way of saying because invaders

Disgusted, but also relieved: Corbyn has practically committed political suicide this week by going full Marxist retard.

This wednesday the group that campaigns and promotes Corbyn, Momentum, will organize a "day of rage" on wednesday with an attempt to topple the government.

He wont last too long.

The invaders are just an easy excuse for it.

>Oy vey, look at this poor brown 6yo with a full beard who lost his parents due the horrible war raging in Egypt. We need to spend tax money to rent the most expensive property in our capital for him, because nothing else will be sufficient.

If the government would stop enabling them with tax money the problem would disappear. You think Machmud could afford housing his 20 heads family in London without a job if it wasn't for the government just using other people's money to enable him?

>If the government would stop enabling them with tax money
That's an odd way of saying race war

There won't be any race war. At least not in my country.
I have lived in or close to Muslim neighborhoods for long enough to know that 90% of them are all talk and no bite, they are fucking craven.
If you would cut the supply of gibs or forced them into a more rural area they consider to be boring, they'd just go back.
These people took the easiest route they could find for life (i.e., "do absolutely nothing and let other people pay your expenses while you LARP as proud Muslim"), do you really think they'd suddenly risk losing their lives?

Sounds fine to me, you know all these rich faggots are liberals who support mass immigration because it brings up their housing values

how bout we drop them off on your country

>socialism is fine
>you dont need that much

>Such is the arrogance ingrained in these fat cat's personalities. Will they learn from this?

If they don't have to learn (because other people instead of them suffer for their decisions) for what possible reason would they need to learn.

The only way they can learn is with violence, Nature's great equalizer. It's been that way throughout all of history. Anyone who denies the beauty of violence may as well deny math or all logic.

Natural law trumps all man made law when you get down to it. The beauty of violence and power is having some politician instill bullshit laws on you, saying you have no right to defend yourself, no right to self determination, no right to exist except in the specific way they allow you, then realizing the only reason you obey is because he has power over you and crushing him with your own power.

Might makes right isn't an opinion, it's a rule of the Universe.

Doesnt matter who owns them, it's not right for them to take what isnt theirs, and considering that buildings problems and development occurred during labours watch he's a fucking cunt putting this on others.

>If you would cut the supply of gibs
If the moon were made of cheese

>forced them into a more rural area
That's not how communism works. Everyone is supposed amass in metropolises, and those who don't are deprived of resources.

>do you really think they'd suddenly risk losing their lives?
When I hear about raids on mosques uncovering weapons caches, yes.

why is sadiq still employed tho?

I think the rich should be requisitionred for Grenfell tower residents. Roling should put up several in her mansion.

HALAL'D

It's a third world, failed state, end of civilisation type policy.

You cannot just undermine property rights in a democratic and civilised society. It's utter madness and irresponsible to suggest we should.

If an opposition proposed this solution 5 or so years ago, it would be front page news. Now, no one bats an eye. I'm pretty worried about the future of this country desu.

Completely reasonable.

He is talking about all the empty properties bought to launder Russian money. The oligarchs themselves will never step foot in them nor will anyone else and it has nothing to do with "homes" or "the rich" (and certainly not anything anyone worked for), they are just trying to wind people up.

Requisitioned and given back afterwards, just like every country house in the UK was 1939-1945, its really not a big deal. The people involved wouldn't know the difference, they are going to be on their superyachts for the duration anyway and should count themselves lucky they've been seized (the would be in the US, I think you have racketeering laws around foreign nationals).

>just like every country house in the UK was 1939-1945
A block of flats burned down, this isn't World War 2

He should be strung up in the street.

Ed Sillyband wanted to seize empty homes from the rich during his election campaign.

Look what happened to him.

No, you can't expect people to give up their private property. Primarily because you'll have no idea who'll be moving in. If people want to offer help off their own backs though then it's up to them.

On the other hand, these rich cunts keep the houses deliberately empty and off the market to inflate the value of available properties. So I'd happily if they got smacked with a large tax bill after six months of keeping a properly empty, I think they do something similar in the Netherlands.

>No, you can't expect people to give up their private property.
If they are owned by non domiciles then yes the state could in theory seize said properties.

But no one really cares for it.

we're too busy mowing down mussies with vans to care tpbh

its WW2 on muslim refugees every day, evil racist white bigot

surely jk rowlings got a few rooms to spare

Exploiting death and tragedy to push his own Marxist ideals and virtue signal

If Britain ever falls into the hands of Corbyn and McDonnell, this country will be destroyed beyond any hope

What a retard, free stuff, always

I think rich Arab princes and Russian Oligarchs shouldn't be allowed to own thousands of properties on our land

this. some make a fake sjw acc and ask her nicely and with hope if she can take some families in her home. something like this:

Hey j.k you are always fighting for the poor and minorities, you are our hero not only because of Harry potter. Can you take some resident or families from grenfell towers? It would be such a nice gesture towards those poor fellas

Litterally what is wrong with this policy, an empty house that isnt being used can be used to house the victims of this disaster. The government can just issue tax credits equivalent to the median price of housing in the area and expropriate the houses.

This is ridiculous if a bunch of actual white british people died in a giant tower they wouldn't do shit.

I agree. Its time for the upper middle class to suffer. Normally the ones suffering are only the lower and middle class.

People who own two houses tend to remove themselves from shitskins while being progressive pieces of shit

>its just this house
>whats the big deal
>its only temporary
>its just

hey, there are atleast 6 confirmed white natural brits who died in that fire, show respect

bait or retard?

>What is wrong with giving the house that you bought for your children to be given away to someone else

>What is wrong with your childhood home being given to druggies and immigrants so they can destroy it in 5 years

...

>but fuck the homeless white people

Prove it. I dont really see any Brits in death toll.
Also if they lived amongst nonwhites they were most likely traitors so fuck them

14th and 15th floors had 1 each you heartless bastard

just think of what they had to deal with each day all around them

Good he's right

You know very well thouse houses are owned by speculating investors and not old couples who want to give them to their children.

I voted for him, prick