AnCap Hate Thread

.

Other urls found in this thread:

mises.org/library/idea-private-law-society
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

They are okay.

welp, that about sums it up folks

thread's over

fuck you kike

sage

Let's remake this into an Ancapball thread.

... I just realized I don't have any saved. Shamefur dispray.

Fuck off kike

i love roads hehe xd

Nigger you WILL submit to the glorious new national socialist state or else

Anyone that thinks anarcho-anything is a good idea is a fucking retard

Ancap&Capitalism overall> Fascists and National Socialists

Bitch, ill enter ultra jew mode and Infiltrate the high ranks and tear down the entire fucking reich down single handedly

where we're going we won't even need roads

>B-bbut whom'st'dve will build the helicopters?

here you go, buddy

who tf hates ancap besides filthy communists?

Anyone have any actual criticisms? This is the most critical offering so far and its weak.

Is anyone down for answering various AnCap-related questions for me? I'm curious but unlearned.

the only way people can argue with an Ancap is being a stubborn fuck and using ad hominen

I can try

In an ancap society, what's to stop people forming their own laws and bodies/etc.?

Also what about people that can't work do they just starve?

why cant i get ancap muslim

wtf

>what's to stop people forming their own laws and bodies/etc.?

It's sort of the point to have people do that. We need many competing organizations instead of the monocentric systems we have now.

>Also what about people that can't work do they just starve?

Nothing stops the public from building their own safety net without the state. People are free to help out each other.

Ah gotcha, I think I understand that a bit better now. Thank you!

So Ancaps are not against law and order, we just dont want it monopolised by a state. Laws will follow the NAP and they will be enforced by private defense agencies, the punishments will be decided by consumer choices.

You will be earning ridiculous amounts of money because taxes and inflation will not exist, the likelyhood of starving is very low. However if someone does become poor it will be up to charity and employers to save them

So I can't blow someone up for stepping on my lawn, I've got to call the McPolice?

Anytime!

You can't blow them up, but you can push them off of your property line. Although you might accidentally push him over, he breaks his arm and then sues you. So it might be in your best interest to call the McPolice and have them handle it instead.

eat a fat one nigger

>Nothing stops the public from building their own safety net without the state.

> People are free to help out each other.

Remember, folks, it's only when state pressures you, it's bad, when it's other people/company, it's ok!

Just add trademark to the state and consider it a company, ffs.

>Nothing stops the public from building their own safety net without the state

Also, why the fuck should they do it.

>roads
:^)

yeah the thing its that if it was a company you can CHOOSE to participate in it

>when it's other people/company, it's ok!
Thats not what hes saying.
You motivate yourself to build a safety net, since it makes sense and is the responsible thing to do.

AnCap requires maximum personal responsibility, which is why so many are confused.

>Also, why the fuck should they do it.
This proves my point. Personal responsibility. Not relying on the nanny state to do it for you.

Spoken like a true commie

Private firms build roads today. The government does not build roads.

...

AnCap are such faggots

>Personal responsibility.

Yes, personal.
That means if you re not doing anything in my interests, you are a potential threat to me.

>you can CHOOSE to participate in it

you can CHOOSE to participate in state affairs as well, dumb ancap.

I chose to not participate in the affairs of my state, yet they still tell me what music i can and can not hear.

Sorry, thought you are talking about "public charity".

Still though, my personal responsibility will become yours once I will take YOUR posessions for myself.

You see, all people tend to do that, when they are starving. If you genuinely think that people, en masse, will just go "woe to me" and self-flagellate themselves, you are delusional.

No - no one is threatening you by keeping to their own business.
You think they are a potential threat because thats how YOUR mind works. A threat would occur if you steal or harm others and you have to be stopped.

Again this is commie thinking applied to an AnCap scenario.

And? It's still up to you.

I'd rather have a state tell me what music I can and cannot hear (while doing nothing) rather than """private""" persons forcing any shit for me (and actually going through with it).


You fuckers just grow in your greenhouse nanny states and don't even know what a true anarchy feels like.
I grew up in fucking Russia where everything collapsed.
Your "muh voluntarism by private persons" wet fantasies have NOTHING in common with reality. Not even to say that people barking about NAP get redpilled pretty quickly by the first faggot who doesn't give a shit about it.

You cant choose to participate in state affairs. They force you with threat of kicking your door in and removing stuff to the value they think you owe. Also, theres Civil Asset Forfeiture.

>1 post by this ID

...

Do you guys agree with slavery? Would you own slaves?

>No - no one is threatening you by keeping to their own business.

Yes, they are. At least, they force me to think about their interests and step aside ones of me with no profits for me. At most, they are straight up competition to me.
Sorry, mate, but I am not expecting everyone to behave on the NAP towards me and I am certainly not going to wait like a cuck and not interfere in any way to a competition.

>A threat would occur if you steal or harm others

Fucking simpleton, no wonder you believe in anCap meme.

>Again this is commie thinking

It's egoistical thinking. Commie thinking is all about "muh community" and "muh society".
Can't offer anything useful to ME? You can fuck right off - you are nuisance at best, liability at worst.

> They force you with threat of kicking your door in and removing stuff to the value they think you owe.

>Implying businesses didn't do the same shit if they are sure "nanny state" won't rape them dry for it.

No, I support physical removal of violent commies and non whites though

No because it would infringe their liberties. Everyone has liberties and taking anothers is not AnCap.

AnCap is not "doing whatever you want to make money"

...

I knew kikes supported Anarcho Crapitalism and Liberal tearyanism

>spotted the poorfag

what ancap is all about. explain me in two setntencies what it is?

Delusional idea of individuals and groups not behaving the way they did in Russia 25 years ago because of "Non-aggression principle" and unwritten rules of chivalry.

>while doing nothing
Problem is they will do something

Freedom to do anything you want as long as no gets hurt unless its self defense

No ones a threat if they are keeping to themselves. Its a fact.

If they are competition, let the market decide whos best. If you can offer a better product or service, people will buy from you and the other guy will have to think about how to improve his product or service. If he tries to sabotage your venture, you can defend it and yourself.

> I am certainly not going to wait like a cuck and not interfere in any way to a competition.
So you are forcing others to defend against you and they will be in the right.

fully automatic tomahawk missiles

First kike flag I've seen since the new flags came around. What have you guys been hiding behind?

We believe in the same goals, friend. Just different methods of pursuing that goal.

op is a faggot

...

...

...

I welcome our jewish overlords to take full control of our economy through relentless monopolies.

Awww are you mad statist? :(

...

...

T H E L E F T C A N ' T M E M E

...

check this out instead

Why do non-whites not deserve the same liberties?

>Taking anothers liberties is not ancap
It is. People can be owned just like private property, thus they don't have any liberties.

...

...

lolbertarians

No. the idea is to protect liberties for everyone.

>mixing Right Nationalism with leftist economy

Jesus fucking christ please no

> People can be owned just like private property, thus they don't have any liberties.

people have to giv their informed consent to it though.
you cant just go and try won someone, it violates the nap and people who are not involved into it and see you doing it will be ware about you.

We are just as antisemitic as natsocs buddy we just realise something you dont, The only way to get rid of (((them))) is to get rid of (((government)))

Yar ways o' life be damned, all who posted in this thread. Arrrrr.

Why bargain when ye may plunder? Why rule when ye may drink?

Thank you.

Whom protects the liberty of others besides themselves? If you want other people to protect the liberties and rights of certain groups why abolish/weaken the state?

i have a question for you.
People argue that Singapura and Hong Kong became very rich, even though that they have no natural resource, because of small state. However, both cities are in the middle of the busiest trade route of the world, and a small state is actually a need for them to stimulate commerce. It's the best for them, so it'd naturally develop due to social demand.

But if you take every other developed nation - the US, UK, France, Japan, South Korea etc -, they didn't have such privilege and had to produce something to get rich, and every single one of them needed the State to intervene on the economy in one way or another.

So, my question is: if those countries became rich by producing shit, why didn't they gradually became libertarian or ancap throughout the years? After all, the State is a burden to development.

...

People's self-determination is the goal.
If you're poor, then try to provide services for a community.

The jews in centeral banking make up only a tiny percentage. Most of them have wealth passed down through generations, gain income through market speculations, passive income from owning capital, they make up a high percentage of business executives both of profitable medium sized companies (most often media, law, advertising firms) and huge corporations. And there are plenty of them already hoarding cryptocurrencies to speculate on.

mises.org/library/idea-private-law-society
this would happen and it isn't bad because each society would be competing for quality of life and resource management
the private law societies with higher standings family values, economic freedom, non social degeneracy will have better more productive and more stable futures so in reality conservative and proud nationalistic private nations would thrive
socially liberal private states would have bad unproductive people who would only hinder the private state that they live in
things such as advocating bad lifestyles, being such as drug abuse, sexual degeneracy and welfare states who subsidise terrible practices will fall in comparison
not many people would live in there own privately owned homes but they would purchase housing in privately owned covenants
weak poor and generally lazy people would be punished economically and wouldn't be able to fall back on welfare for years
the covenants would provide insurance if for example a business failed they could use the insurance from the state to provide temporary income from the taxes this insurance will come from the people who live there
people will not be able to walk in as you will either have to be invited in and the good societies will have high standards of immigration
90% of today's libertarians are fucking idiot faggot degenerates who think being socially liberal is a good thing
so the nazis will be able to live in there almost natsoc private societies and be happy with there qt aryan waifus

>all drugs become legal
>severe hinderance on economy

this was so obviously made by a dirty commie

Free Helicopter Rides

Ummm, that burning flag an the pepe on the right are the same.

>the most jewish ideology ever

Why do so many people think capitalism and compassion are mutually exclusive? The individuals who donate the most to charity also tend to be the richest.

pic related

...

Because its all about power, they don't give a fuck about charity, all they want is for people to see they can do whatever they want with your wallet, if they cared about charity they'd let people who build wealth do what they're best at.

almost every ideology is created by jews you troglodyte

How mad were you when you made this lmao

>defending an ulta jewish ideology which basically is made to fool poor whites into going against their self-interest voting for parasites and which only really benefits the few jewish elites.

stay cucked, Koch brothers shill