Only 13 US congress people oppose arming terrorists

Tulsi Gabbard introduced a bill which says the US should stop fund radical islamic terrorism.

Only 13 people in cogress supported the bill
>Mfw the US congress is this shit

gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/video-rep-tulsi-gabbard-introduces-legislation-stop-arming-terrorists

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OPBcjsE7ADc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

youtube.com/watch?v=OPBcjsE7ADc

What the fuck is a Tulsi Gabbard?

A species of rare bird?

foreign policy is one of those areas in which the left is much better than the right

no reason for us to continue to be involved with the muslims, shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place. time to get out and solve our own problems.

just a socialist who hates muslims

She is a progressive democrat who is also anti-islam.

She has been vocally criticizing both Trump and Obama for funding terrorism

>double reddit space
>cringe joke

Based Hawaiian MILF

If she wins the nomination in 2020 and Trump doesn't stop the bullshit in the middle east. I'll vote for her

Phwoar
She could fund my insurgence if you know what I mean

>a bill which says the US should stop fund radical islamic terrorism.
>Only 13 people in cogress supported the bill

Because the bill itself would admit that USA DOES support terrorism. So supporting it would make it official that USA does support terrorism. Learn2politics.

Most of Congress is already owned by the Saudis but Trump DOESN'T support them.

The weapons deal that just went down was a made between Obama and the Saudis when he was still president, they're just getting shipped now and we're getting the check.

If Trump liked the Saudis he would have taken their money like everyone else does, but he didn't.

I can tolerate Gabbard.

you're thinking of qatar moron

They're about to have a civil war. We just gave them the arms to destroy themselves with.

She could get some acne cream, and plastic surgery to fix that fucked up face, if you get my meaning ;)

US congress is a joke. They don't really care about stopping terrorism, they care about economic growth and trade deals.

A countries first priority is ALWAYS the protection of its citizens. This shows you how much your "elected" men and women really care about your safety.

she might be infected after coming into contact with senile mouthbreather...if not then Ill vote for her over cuckerberg without hesitation

Trump seems to be taking the wrong approach in syria. I'm not a fan of her socialist-lite shit, but her foreign policy (on paper) is pretty great. I would vote for her too. I know her sjw shit wouldn't pass in congress, and she is most likely slightly virtue signaling to gain favor on the left. I hope she runs. Call me a faggot if you want, but I think she's one of the most sincere politicians we have right now.

Isn't this deal mainly for F-15s? When was the last time government owned jets were used in terrorist attacks? I know there was a $20 billion deal under Obama that people are trying to blame on Trump.

Allah, Saudis can't even fight the Houthis. They'd be better off funding terrorists than wasting money on weapons.

>Tulsi Gabbard is anti-Islam
>Vote Democrats 2020 Sup Forums!!

>So supporting it would make it official that USA does support terrorism. Learn2politics.
It is official, who do you think the 'moderate rebels' are? It all passes through congress already, it isn't a secret.
Learn2lurk

>Trump seems to be taking the wrong approach in syria.
When you hold no political capital against the Pentagonistas in the Deep State who are already doing what they can to try and engineer a coup and they promise to let you get your way on the economics stuff if you let them do their neocohen bullshit in the Middle East you really don't have much of a choice.

Faggots like McMaster and Mattis, those who subscribe to the American Empire idea, are the ones really running the show in terms of foreign policy and have Trump by the balls. If he so much as looks at them crosseyed they'll really start putting the coup into motion. We're looking at the same life cycle we see in all formerly great states: a shadow government apparatus that is far too powerful for the nominal leader of the state to do anything about as they can and will show one leader the exit (usually via assassination) in favor of someone they feel is more compliant. Happened in the Western Roman Empire in the last century or so of its existence, happened with the Ottomans and the Abbasids and countless other great empires. We are now in that stage as well. We may last another century but it will be as a weakened rump of a state where real power is controlled by the military class and the "President" becomes even more ceremonial.

honestly, tomorrow during peak hours anons should post a thread that tells everyone to write their congressmen.
They actually do kinda pay attention that that stuff.

>pulling a publicity stunt to try to win over potential voters
>expects us to believe its genuine.

i did it lads