Can anyone explain (without being rude) how this wouldn't make for a fairer society?

Can anyone explain (without being rude) how this wouldn't make for a fairer society?

Other urls found in this thread:

tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html
youtube.com/watch?v=tACU5aKqMIo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

it's exactly like star wars when harry was being monitored by his tv

>liberals can't make analogies that don't involve some kind of media

no aspect of the natural order is fair

"fairness" is a purely human construct that exists nowhere else in nature

I never realized this before, but it's true.

Mario cart is the worst game around

>Battle into first place using good technique and nice passing moves
>Out in front about to cross the line
>Some faggot launches some shitty attack they were awarded by chance
>You sit there and watch as the competition flys by

Fuck marioshart, fuck Nintendo and fuck your commie dogshit.

Mario Kart's "the more skilled you are the further you get ahead, the further you get ahead" system is an ideal model for how our economy should work

"It's not fair" - like any lefty would take this as an argument

But this isn't fair at all. The first place probably spend a lot of time playing mario kart and really loves this game while his casul friends and family aren't even trying and thus don't deserve 1st place.

ohhhhhhhhhhh

I play Mario Kart a lot.

The funny thing about this idea to me is how it's inevitably going to be received by different categories of Mario Kart players.

Good players who typically finish first understand that this idea is ridiculous because it means you can be fucked out of a perfectly legitimate victory which you earned through real effort and practice by literally ANY retard in the race.

Bad players love it because they can be that retard, and because they're bad players and have never won a race, they don't understand that the point of the game is to win - not to cause someone else to lose.

That's why it's called "Mario Kart" and not "Kart Simulator 2017". I don't see any italian plumbers or monkeys (kek) running the country.

because i assume this will only apply to white people who live in the west

Those being ahead would quite trying, since no matter how hard they do, they can't improve their lot anymore. And those people who already are ahread, tend to be the most productive people we have, i.e., the most productive people we have will lose their productivity. I'm sure that wouldn't be a problem at all. Read about kulaks, if you want to understand why this is retarded.

>I deserve a Bullet Bill, but I'm not willing to put in the effort and skill required to get first place.

it rewards mediocrity and failure, while punishing people for being successful

Disadvantaging more capable people isn't fair.

Simple, those with skill and effort make it to first place, only to get fucked at random by some cunt who's too retarded to figure out which direction to drive without the cloudy thing bitching at them.

12th place blueshells 1st place, and the 2nd place driver takes 1st and wins. The original 1st is now left in the dust, probably several places behind, simply because he was too good for the rest to keep up with.

This is what affirmative action looks like.
THIS is not fair.

By the way, how much money on yeahbanero-bells being male?

^^^pretty much this

Well the karts at the front actually reach the powerups first, and can take all the boxes leaving none for the people close behind.
Giving the people at the front a blue shell is pointless, they are in the front anyway.
'Lesser' powerups usually just means mushrooms and traps for people behind.

This is exactly why Mario Kart is an overrated game. There's no point in even trying to try to get ahead until the last lap. Just hang back and get gibs and wait for the opportune time to fuck the leader over.

Give me Wave Race 64 any day of the week.

And the blue shell is affirmative action?

Isn't that system the biggest complaint that everyone has with Mario kart? It's pretty much the one thing people hate.

>Can anyone explain (without being rude) how this wouldn't make for a fairer society?

Because society is much more complex than a Mario Kart game. There is no way to implement it that does not involve very arbitrary definitions set by bureaucrats on how to make it harder for people that are ahead, how to define who is ahead.

What happens then is called regulatory capture. Only very big companies and very wealthy can afford to hire lawyers/accounting firms to coply with all the regulations. The people that are poor find it harder to make money, as the never ending regulations make everything expensive, so welfare state becomes more appealing.

Therefore, in the end, people that are ahead get even furher ahead, and people below have less motivation and incentives, and find harder obstacles as well, but people that suggest Mario Kart like strategies do not percieve it to be so, requesting more and more intervention, leading to more inequality, as in a vicious cycle.

bigots! 11 million jews died in the holocausts and you want to gas the blacks!

Because in real life you get an assassin's bullet for being in first place or an army invades your country and reduces it to rubble, not a slap on the ass that makes you slow down so the losers can catch up.

wtf i love rubber band ai now

>11 millon
More like 11 quadrillion you nayzee

It's 20 million nowadays you fucking racist.

Because like Mario kart it will turn your society into an uncompetitive socialist piece of shit.

This is just an attitude for losers. I'm not first, so let's punish those who are. They wouldn't feel that way if they were ahead. Pathetic.

>implying "1st place" is quantifiable in a society with hundreds of millions of people

And these retards think they're smart.

Dumbledore warned me about evil wizards like you

Why do you want a fairer society?

It'll fuck up evolution and everything that made humans great.

These people have probably never been successful in life and just want a shortcut (blue shell, bullet bills, stars & lightning bolts) to reaching a better position. Get good at the game and then you'll be complaining that the system isn't fair. Being at the top, EVERYONE is against you for being BETTER than them.

Gibs me dat blu shell.

last time i went to Auschwitz they were still burning innocent jews.

I just read this out loud to my FUCKING A WHITE MALE and he said hurr durr me dumb dumb women smart me just get it now!!
Then he said for his white fucking a male white friends to sit down. Be humble.

Because it punishes people for learning the fastest paths and timings, and rewards those who fall off the map five times. That is what is actually unfair.

That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Bitch is basically saying that if I invest more time and effort in achieving and being more financially secure than the majority of the population that bec you haven't you deserve more... for being a fucking dummy/lazy/etc.

But in Mario cart, when you are in the middle of the pack, everyone is ruthless and trying to destroy you.

Your strategy should take into account the fact that you will get blue shelled if you're out in front for too long. Stay in second place, close behind the leader. Keep a green shell on hand to knock out objects targeted at you.

You know
I kinda feel like
uhm
We need stay together
n feelings
ehm
you know
make love no war
you know
I am, ehmmm
Yeah
I feel like
Love, knowhatimean?

>tfw you become successful through hard work but it only lasts for a couple of days before somebody blue shells you 3 times putting you at the very back with nothing and justifies it by saying you were part of the 1% who didnt earn anything and so life in society is perpetually challenging and full of hardships where no goal is even remotely worth working towards because it will only get taken away from you almost immediately and so production grinds to a halt while all the stupid kids thinking it was a good idea swim in their big money pools that used to be worth millions but now are only worth 2 dollars and 25 cents as the dollar has collapsed with china invading the west and east coast

So what incentive would there be to work hard and get to first place???

desu i just assumed they meant that the higher your income then the higher % you pay in taxes, im not sure how else to interpret what theyre saying

That's how it worked in ancient times. But the same government that protects SJW faggots feefees is the same government that keeps me from going up to my neighbor and raping his wife and stealing his car that I am envious of.

>Mario Kart

>I am not winning so no one else can

FPBP

Is this why hoodlems always get bullet bill?

The more successful you are the less money you make? So the highest paying jobs would be the least skilled? That wouldn't last long.

>Fairer
>Handicapping people who are ahead
Really makes me think

so are 'morals'

Mario Kart is a closed system that is administered by impossibly efficient software (by human standards). Scaling up such a system to human society would consume more resources than it could provide.

Also, fucking statists.

>blue shell the 1%
I remember exactly how often the blue shell fucked me and let my retarded brother win.
That analogy made me hate socialists even more.

More like give niggers unfair advantage when theyre in last place to suddenly place first with a broken power up.

ITT delusional kike worshippers demonstrate their belief that the monetary system is some kind of tangible resource that you pull out of the ground and not some system top kikes designed to force them into a lifetime of meaningless labour while they claim ownership over the entire world leaving you with nothing to aspire to but buying the latest call of duty weapon skins.

It literally rewards failure and punishes success. What's the fucking point of trying to make a bunch of money if I know that the government is just going to take like 70% of it away if I make 'too much'?

Haha ayyyo fuck freedom lmao XD

This is how things work now. The more you do, the less gibs you receive.

It kind of already works like this. Except this individual is approaching it from the wrong angle.

>be in 7-12 place
>items are heavy and do a lot of damage to the people around you making it extremely volatile

>6-2
>items are more appropriate for racing and not just for fucking shit up

>1st place
>items ensure you are safe and the only thing that can stop you is someone who outplayed you or some act of god (blue shell)

Libs are honestly just lazy and want everything handed to them like usual. They can not and will not understand hard work and dedication at this time

Pyramid scheme. Just have those guys in last place support you in return for some shekels.

As long as greed is a thing, this system can't work.

kill yourself

It, in theory, would make easier for competition to grow, preventing monopoly/oligopoly.

>Not being Waluigi
>Not experiencing WALUIGI TIME all day, every day

WAAAAAAAAAA

LEFTISTS NOT LIBERALS YOU FUKING CUNT

>can't

media analogies are an effective way to communicate an Idea and create interest. The Mario cart analogy is the reason why that tweet has gained so much attention.

I do agree with this though. But I'd like to point out that the continuation of the Mario theme makes the point much more interesting and therefore better than simply explaining it in a matter of fact way.

>hey lets instate a system that everyone hates in our government, because we know nothing about either

Constantly fighting to stay ahead is not something that anyone wants to do.

hmm indeed. what IS the point of making a lot of money. It's almost like it's been proven time and time in the literature that above a certain low dollar value, additional material wealth does not improve life quality; family, personal achievements, will-exertion etc.

it's a weird coincidence that the absolute object - (((money))) - of all you capitalfags is the one that the jews control. almost like you were tricked.

There is no such thing distinct 'power up' and 'place' in real world. So what it says is:

>the richer you are the poorer you should get

Which is self contradictory.

A better thing to wish for would be to wish that life was more like a loot factory game. There's ample resources for everybody to go around. Some ultra rare valuable loot available for some lucky and/or particularly dedicated people as a bonus to make things more interesting but overall everybody who plays the game and at least puts in a bit of effort gets good enough loot to progress through the game. There's no reason for them not to.

Well, would you consider Mario Kart to be a serious, fun racing game?

No? Just something for kids? There you have your answer.

> poor people need more benefits!

> proceed to abuse the fuck out of the system

Except that's nature faggot. In nature if an animal hoards way more than they need they attract challengers and risk losing it. Whereas our system is designed to create unbreakable monopolies. To shield hoarders from challenge.

Either that or

>Poor people should randomly recieve billions

Which doesnt provide jobs or competition since that money will likely be spent on drugs and cars

This is why:

tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html

Even Gran Turismo had internal handicapping to make the races closer. If you find winning on god mode exciting you are an autistic pile of garbage.

>Can anyone explain (without being rude) how this wouldn't make for a fairer society?
by annihilating the 1%... how can you be that dumb user?

The economy isn't strictly zero sum. Mario style power-ups don't let the guy in last become first, they just let the guy in last fuck over the guy in first and have an impact on the game that isn't winning. In gameplay terms this makes even being behind 'fun' in a sense, as you have something to do, but that fun is built around spite and if you just wanted to win the powerups aren't going to make up for your lack of skill, they're just going to tear down those better than you and let those slightly less better than you come out ahead.

No, nobody should get powerups.

Powerups shouldn't exist, then the only thing seperating people will be their skill

the issue is, unlike mario kart they also want the one who ends up in the first place to lose too

Final Destination. No Items. Fox Only.

Real life isn't a race where you win by becoming 1st and finishing 1st. There's no finish.
So when you get 1st place and people keep destroying you and getting in your way of being #1, eventually you're going to step out of the 'race' with all the traits, skills and possessions that made you #1 and stop bothering.
When all the top dogs have vacated the venue and all that's left is the impoverished and untalented, they will start using these methods against each other.

Everyone loses.

That's not my point. My point is that if the government is just going to shit all over my hard work once I succeed enough, then what's the point in trying in the first place? It takes away the most basic incentive to work hard; to be able to provide for yourself and your family, and give your children a better life. Why should someone who does no work receive money for their lack of effort, but someone who puts in a ton of effort has their money taken away in greater quantities as a result?

It's like if a group of 3 men go on a hunt, and the one who put in the least effort gets the biggest share of the meat for his family. Why shouldn't each man put in as little effort as possible to ensure he gets a bigger portion of meat? But then with all of them putting in little to no effort, they don't even get the deer and all starve to death.

News flash, most people hate that in Mario Kart and get frustrated by it.

>not taking the red shell

NO!

People shouldn't get punished for being successful.

People shouldn't get rewarded for failures/fuck ups/laziness/etc...

no, your parents work hard so you can go to college and work hard. you should not be penalized for working harder

youtube.com/watch?v=tACU5aKqMIo

It's almost like working hard and actually get good pay off somehow
Also fuck welfare drafters

Slowing down the people in the front doesn't make anyone in the back move faster. Equity is a concept for mental infants who only think about things in terms of "WAAAHHHH THAT GUY HAS MORE THAN ME". The fact is that if you don't drag the people down at the top, they'll move faster and you'll be able to ride the draft they create to a faster speed yourselves. I'd rather be a "poor" guy in a rich society than a "completely equal" guy in a poor society.

you aren't understanding what I'm saying. Additional money above a certain amount does not improve life satisfaction - that includes the satisfaction of providing for your family. Working isn't free - you are exchanging your time for money, and sometimes the use-value of that time would be higher doing something else.

the answer to your question of why an excessively hard-working person should have their money taken away - they are acting (literally) irrationally, and producing more value than is necessary to their own detriment. They should be corrected like any other mono-focused autist.

Liberals are leftists. Where the fuck have you been?

Can anybody explain why a fairer society is desirable?

It already does work that way for government benefits (Items not "Power-ups") to individuals. We just need to make it work that way for government benefits to businesses as well.

Except in reality when you're talking about the highest of the high in society you are talking about people who have used governance as a method of defending monopolies at the cost of the idea of hard work = reward. You're like one of those retards that thinks
OH LOOK ,THE DOW IS UP 5 POINTS. A NEW GOLDEN AGE IS UPON US
But the stock market is horse shit now. It doesn't mean anything. It has nothing to do with investing capital in the latest greatest idea. It's almost entirely occupied by automated computer scripts short selling on margin in order to skim off the top on behalf of front companies that will just go bankrupt and disappear if they make a mistake. That's where all the big money comes from. Literally from contributing nothing to society. Because of retards like you who put a dollar value on mental gymnastics.

T. Guy with no defensive game

which is ok, because society, which is what we are talking about, is not part of the "natural order". it is am emergent system from the natural, which can have different operating mechanisms - fairness is one of the basic operating mechanisms of all stable societies - if fairness is lacking the society falls apart.

The blue shell is 100% liberals idea of fairness.
>get the blue shell when you are near last place
>blue shell seeks out player in 1st place
>blue shell hits 1st place player dropping them back several places and letting 2nd move to 1st
>player who launched blue shell is completely unaffected by it, It doesn't speed them up or slow down the players near by. All it does is shuffle around who is in first. Somehow the player who launched the blue shell feels good about dicking someone over without getting any benefit for themselves.

penalizing winners is never a good thing it empowers losers..... Equality by law is not equality at all