Why is there no good right-wing art?

Why is there no good right-wing art?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifesto_of_Futurism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascist_Manifesto
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis-Ferdinand_Céline#Antisemitism.2C_collaborationism_and_exile
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Openness_to_experience
youtu.be/8ABa4RdNPxU
youtube.com/watch?v=dF4iLmuU_bM
youtube.com/watch?v=8k41D9por6c
youtube.com/watch?v=6yy3eQwu63A
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Go fuck yourself, ignorant faggot.

modern right wingers are human trash , left wingers are trashy artists

Why is there no good art?
Because cultural marxism.

Cultural Marxism.

Ben Garrison

/Thread

Cultural Marxism isn't real.

No good right-wing art, huh?

eno is left wing?

May Allah shield from the turmoil this information may bring.

There isn't good art in general anymore, it got taken over by (((them)))

What do you mean? Here is good right winged art here.

yes

Salvador Dali adored Fascism.

>art has a mind of its own and political opinions of its own
U wot

FYI, Dali counts as right-wing art since he was a Fascist sympathizer.

Because at a certain point anything deemed beautiful or classic was instantly deemed to be bad art.

Blocks your path.

Being anti-Trump does not mean anti-Right Wing.

Trump is a Neocon cryptojew.

Trump is a yutz though. You don't need to be left wing to have that opinion.

Most Italian Futurists also adored Fascism.

Some even called their manifesto as "fascist".

True artists don't give a rat's arse about politics.And when they do it's to be edgy.

source?

All the good Italian art was by partisans like Calvino.

>everything that is more than 20ish years old is either too much misogynistic, too much racist or not endorsing LGBT enough
>The last 20ish years of SJW approved art is better that anything produced before
ok

No one on the right is smart enough to save up their money and put it into animation where we can control the story and characters. All we get is stormfags shilling muh honour stifling others to even bother making money.

If I could, Murdoch Murdoch would receive 100k. I would like to do some myself, but again, no money.

L.F. Celine produced some amazing and very influential novels. He might be called right wing. Ironic that he had such an influence on the beats, come to think of it.

he's blackpilled
he despises trump but sees him neccesary as a tool for the destruction of the establishment and 'make people think'
basically '4 the lulz' shit

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifesto_of_Futurism

"Their explicit glorification of war and its "hygienic" properties influenced the ideology of fascism."

You're brainwashed and programmed to respond this way. You're blind, dumb and deaf.

Being able to draw and paint don't make your political views superior, before modernism people used to understand it.

>implying

>National Socialist
>Right wing

I don't know if this is "right wing" but I'm trying to make some good art.

Dali is my personal favorite.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascist_Manifesto
"The Manifesto of the Italian Fasci of Combat (Italian: Il manifesto dei fasci italiani di combattimento), commonly known as the Fascist Manifesto, was the initial declaration of the political stance of the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento ("Italian League of Combat") the movement founded in Milan by Benito Mussolini in 1919 and an early exponent of Fascism. The Manifesto was written by national syndicalist Alceste De Ambris and Futurist movement leader Filippo Tommaso Marinetti."

What the fuck is National Syndicalism?

Just google it up. He was a staunch supporter of Franco.

There's no good art at all, because we live in the age of mob rule

Back in the days of Sup Forums-approved states, there was tons of good art

Did you make that user? If so, thanks, I really like it.

>Who is Richard Wagner

But the loony left are the fascists

This. Perfect example

I'm Spanish and I confirm, that's your source

...

DEMOCRATS ARE THE REAL FASCISTS

>L.F. Celine

Always eager to shill this writer. I'm not sure if I've ever seen him mentioned here. His wartime trilogy has no parallels, the subject matter is very far from any of the orthodox memoirs of this period.

A juicy teaser below, although remember, it is wikipedia.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis-Ferdinand_Céline#Antisemitism.2C_collaborationism_and_exile

I did, and I appreciate it.
Instagrammy is "KelthorPower." Hopefully get a lot more stuff like this out there.

99% of historical art has to be classified as right-wing nowadays.

EMAJIHN MY COOOHKKK
ESS JAY DOUBLE JOOS ARR THE REEL RACISTS!!!

They're too busy making and maintaining civilizations to get drugged out and menstrual bleed over a canvas and call it art.

>who was picasso
>who was dali
>who was pound
Etc., etc.

fuck eno and fuck his elevator music too.

Also, OP's question is a loaded one. Left Wing "art" is just more popular right now because the (((oligarchs))) in control of the media are pushing this shit. Popular =/= better.

The loony left are communists. Why not give communism a bad connotation like it had in the 50s and 60s?

Stop being a faggot OP. Rare Pepes are the greatest of all art.

Real question is why are all artists left wing?

Damn how could I forget Richard Wagner. He even published an anti-Jewish pamphlet called "Jewishness in Music".

You need to be left wing to be considered an artist, if you are not, you are just a drawer or entertainer.

He was fucking evil tho

i really really like this picture

I'm a standup comedian but it's certainly not art.

He was WW1 serviceman, and wounded in action. So he was a hero. He was a doctor, often providing care to the poor and underprivileged. So he was virtuous member of society. etc

...

Watchu talkin' bout ya dirty hippy? Ocarina of Time is just about one of the most wholesome and redpilled pieces of art that ever was.

Why not, just because Establishment don't control it.

because there is something called (Openness to Experience) in psychology, artists usually score high on this, people who are high on Openness usually have liberal political views: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Openness_to_experience

Anything backwards of the 1920s is pretty much right wing art you dumb fuck. Good art rests on a principle of aesthetic beauty, which fundamentally rests on order. The right as a political sphere is an embodiment of this principle principle.

youtu.be/8ABa4RdNPxU

1:09:00 says it all

The whole conversation is amazing, and he prefaces the part in question for several minutes before that, but 1:09:00 or so answers the art question well

What I don't get is why the leftist correlates openness with wanting to install a giant government with it hands in every aspect of people's lives, from money to free speech.

keep it up, great work

Everything pre-1800s would have been done by right wing people anyway

It would have been done by left wingers paid by right wingers.

Well lefties score high on Neuroticism, that explains why they are so easily triggered and also restricting "hate speech" cuz' tey are afraid that these racist ideas will spread, they want to control money because they score high on Agreeableness, so they want all equal and shit...

Most modern art is pure nihilistic garbage, sometimes literally. Most forms of western art I follow wasn't very political until now. Take marvel comics went left, saw huge drop in sales. The Longest Journey was apolitical, went left, got cancelled. I see a huge sales drop given e3's year of the nigger .

ok garbage creating shadows is pretty fucking cool desu

desu*** wyf why did i write "desu"

To Be Honest****

Right but this by nature make them hugely contradictory; they, from a position of great freedom, are literally burning up the constitution and their freedom, all for "more" freedom because feels? It makes no goddamn sense.

the message, to me, is life and humans, amount to the garbage we produce, sounds like satanism to me.

They write nigger in the bathroom stall.

Right wing art is an extension of the right wing philosophy of picking on people when they can't do anything about it

Maybe. It might be left wingers historically skirted the rules and social norma, and this way of thinking gave their art a unique look. I think with todays society, we'll see the opposite development in the present/future

t. Alexis de Tocqueville

You're not wrong though

idk man but here is scores for all five factors
Conservatives: Openness: Low, conscientiousness: High,
Extraversion: Moderate,
Agreeableness: Moderate,
Neuroticism: Moderate
Liberal crybabies:
Openness: High
conscientiousness: Low
Extraversion: High
agreeableness: high
Neouroticism: High
Libertarians:
Openness: High
conscientiousness: Low
Extraversion: Low
Agreeableness: Low
Neuroticism: Low

Proves my point, they are open to all kinds of things, but they have no knowledge of their true meaning, I cannot think of a more dangerous combination desu.

i did it too I'm a newfag I thought it was a term of endearment lol what's the other one?

As a writer who scores very high in openness, this isn't quite right. More of it has to do with how most creative people are raised. My parents are very conservative, and it was only heavy, but healthy, debate with them over many years that I became in some ways even more conservative than them. The problem is conservatism is primarily concerned with how the machine works, and open people are generally more concerned with where the machine is going, and how everybody is feeling. By being open to and experiencing and desiring a greater variety of stimulus, we tend to see what is common between different things, instead of seeing the differences. If an open person is not socialized well, is not raised to see the value of tradition, they will quite naturally see it as an oppressive force instead of the liberating force that it really is. Most open people don't understand that other people are fundamentally different than they are, and what is good for one person is not good for all people. Plus, in the US, cultural marxism has dominated the arts. A creative/open person without strong parents will get swept up into this radical ideology without ever knowing it. Unconcerned with the rules of life, and encouraged to break them, they will go on supporting and proselytizing their entire lives without ever knowing what it is they've done. All they know is that it made them important. Really, it's not that there are no good right wing artists, but rather that the right wing stopped caring about artists. Conservatives do a bad job appealing to creative people.

Memes ARE Art.

youtube.com/watch?v=dF4iLmuU_bM

youtube.com/watch?v=8k41D9por6c

youtube.com/watch?v=6yy3eQwu63A

All great art is right-wing fundamentally. Great art is the manifestation of a culture's aesthetic and even moral ideals; leftists have no such ideals. Since the left-wing instinct is to destroy and defile, their art tends to be concerned not with beauty, but with the subversion of beauty.
See: Jeff Koons, Marcel Duchamp, Tracey Emin, Cy Twombly, Chris Olifi, etc.

He did. Both his art and his persona are degenerate, though.

...

Lets me tell you a story: know a girl, nice, funny open, good to talk too. Find out she's a full on communist. Push her as to why, tells me i'm brainwashed when I tell her it's not that simple, to fix everybody's problems.

Find out that she had no father growing up, and her mother was poor. She basically raised herself. While I sympathize, I found that her ideology stemmed from her hatred of society and (from her lack of a father) a hatred of god.

I feel this is the backbone of the left, who see life as only pain and suffering, and as a result want to hide truth that there is more knowledge than what they think they know.

What is fashwave?

it does not necessarily exclude high openness and conservative views, studies just say that majority of people who score high on openness are liberals, and probably you score high on conscientiousness, there are many factors

This is so true it hurts. Couldn't have said it better myself.

Side note: why do you align with the Republican party? Trash tier.

...

Last self-shill.

Billy Corgan supports Trump. He goes on Infowars sometimes

Why hasn't anyone brought up Wagner yet?
>made good non degenerate music
>wrote an opera about how the end of the world was caused by greedy (((dwarves))) fucking around with the Gods and humans
>was anti-Semitic in real life

This is actually good lol

ikr

sorry but Wagner is shit compared to Bach, Mozart and Beethoven (my opinion)