Massachusetts has their "alt-right" senatorial candidate going against Warren for 2018. Dr Shiva Ayyadurai
>Glad the Paris accords are de-legitimized (whiteboard vid) >Anti-monstanto, GMO, patent trolls >Against big foundations controlling innovation >Born in a shithole, graduated MIT at 17 >wants a more efficient govt model based on open-source and democratic technology >yoga teacher, redpilling yoga chicks in NE >encourages Indian-American kids to share culture with whitey >east meets west candidate >left will shit once they learn about this guy youtube.com/user/drvashiva/videos youtube.com/watch?v=N5XoMUIV5so
This is the kind of leadership we need to see. The end of the two party oligarchy allows us to be much more self-deterministic, let do this shit New England.
Also, worth talking about. >New England's path towards statehood >Developing NE's recently birthed Hemp industry >New England's geographic location and beauty >Infrastructure projects for NE >Civic nationalism(civic regionalism) vs ethnic nationalism.
Do you really think democratic open source technology is a good model to go by? Talk about stagnating innovation, especially if it's the government leading the charge.
Julian Thomas
I think it a start. I don't think we need one model to go by. I'm not suggesting that only govt use it, but private companies taking over some of the responsibilities of govt.
I see it as a way of people self-organizing themselves better. A small association of rural towns could benefit from new coordination, open-source is a good way to do this without investing tons of cash.
But I'm not an expert in open-source governance. I'd like to hear what people have to say about it.
>This is the kind of leadership we need to see. No.
Mass does not need an immigrant senator. Fuck chinks, indians, haitians, cape verdeans, and all other the other scum they ship in by the boatload.
I just got back from work where I was renovating an old house in lexington. One of the richest places in the entire country and where the first shots of the revolution were fired. Now they are trying to impose even stricter gun control than the already draconian state laws. 20% of the population is foreign born and that's where the money comes from. Chinks and their overinflated monopoly money drove out the middle class locals long ago and this is happening on a large scale across the state.
Ban chinese immigration and make mass great again!
Ethan Rivera
>scum >graduated MIT before age of 20 >worth over 10 million user, you're welcome to build an enclave of racial purity. Literally no one has ever stopped you. Yes, I agree assimilating immigrants to the American way of life is a desperately critical process,.
Kevin Hughes
>wants a more efficient govt model based on open-source and democratic technology Need more details on this.
Joseph Campbell
see I think it's more of a goal, I'm not sure he has specific methods written out for doing this. It's the sort of thing a large mass of people need to strive for together, each person bringing their own expertise. But in terms of software that is out there, there is a bunch of implications from blockchain/proof of work that could be helpful for anyone with similar ideas. This guy is part of the MIT universe and I'm sure there are a lot of smart people there who agree with him about open source.
Brayden Russell
>le based brown man
no wonder rhode island is the number one searcher for cuckold porn
Connor Collins
Bump Anyone know anything about the Hemp industry?
Aaron Peterson
So he wants technocracy? I'm on the fence about technocrats, but with incompetent and corrupt politicians it's hard to not go that way. There's some major, major issues that go along with that though, that none of them seem to have a solution for.
Evan King
I think you are looking for an answer that doesn't exist. Stop trying to see this as a completely formed revolution. It's a mixture of our shared opportunities combined with leadership and the need for common goals. We are in the problem solving stage of our history and have been given new tools for production and organization, I think we'd be silly not to take inventory of what we can use to be more self-deterministic. Warren is a technocrat IMO, she offers nothing in terms of productivity besides managing people and money to her ideals.
Kayden Cox
>Stop trying to see this as a completely formed revolution. Maybe I didn't explain it well enough. Technology is the reason for the mass privacy violations we have today. Without addressing that or blatantly ignoring that fact means that technology will continue with their business as usual attitude towards it and the people who abuse it will continue to do so.
Ryan Ramirez
LIVE - Rick Wiles: Blockchain: Is It a Way to Assign Government Debt to Citizens?
Blockchain: Is It a Way to Assign Government Debt to Citizens? Will Central Banks and Governments use Blockchain technology to assign debt and track their populations? Today on TRUNEWS, Rick Wiles discusses the prospect of mass digital identity, implemented through Agenda 2030, and the concept of Silicon Valley corporations being treated as sovereign nation states. Rick also shares his analysis of the tense standoff brewing between the U.S. and Russia, and the latest from the Trump administration’s struggle with the Dark State elite.
Jayden White
What exactly about this person is alt-right
Nathaniel King
>Indian senator in New England
r/the_donald needs to leave
Bentley Green
The banks have already adopted blockchain technology. Blockchain itself isn't inherently bad, but translating that to governing a people means it will need a mass amount of data on those people in order to compute a decision, or outcome for those people. Without mass surveillance you have no data and without that data it won't take all variables into consideration.
Matthew Foster
fair point about privacy. I think it's all about who is in control of the tech and what purpose it is used for. I think there is a major opportunity for a third political party to use some new technology in order to self-organize. The problems comes from the top down approach of governance. It's a big topic, it's going to require a lot of different people joining the discussion. Nothing, Alt-right has some defined meaning from years ago, but now it's just a label used to marginalize adversarial groups. I'm assuming he will be lumped into that category once the race heats up. He'll be able to defend himself, (I doubt he called himself alt-righ, but still, neither party seems supportive of him) >claim T_D is here >doesn't offer a better political solution >slide
Landon Allen
>I think it's all about who is in control of the tech and what purpose it is used for. I think there is a major opportunity for a third political party to use some new technology in order to self-organize. The problems comes from the top down approach of governance. I agree about the potential and I personally do think we need a new political party. They just really need to take into consideration that people who want to abuse it will, despite if the intention of its origins were good. Right now, I don't see many of them (I'm talking technocrats which I don't view as all bad) addressing it, but I do hope they have that foresight.
>It's a big topic, it's going to require a lot of different people joining the discussion. Agreed.
Owen Morgan
I think this guy shiva would be a good way for the right to reconnect with the libertarian techies who helped build what we have today. They are a group of people who don't really have a voice in politics.
youtu.be/0hC_CenCnbo?t=1h15m41s this woman mentions some ideas, she is talking to a group of leftist and it falls on deaf ears.
Matthew Martinez
Masshole here, Warren is the Indian of my choice and it is pretty clear she isn't going to lose.
Evan Hall
18 months
Robert Turner
I'm about 20 mins in right now. I'm laffin at the Sup Forums talk. They don't know it yet, but they're here for life.
David Brown
I was hoping someone on Sup Forums would make notes about what they talk about in this video. It's kind of amazing on many different levels.
Carson Davis
I was actually considering it. The point I'm at now >battling the cultural aspect of society is a losing battle Essentially, they're thinking that focusing on economics is a better approach to controlling people over culture, even though it's more "boring." Historically speaking they aren't wrong as we've been back and forth on social and economics issues throughout the decades. I think a way to real change that will stick battles both of those fronts though.
Im 40 mins in so far, so that could change in the next hour and a half. It's a good discussion though, so I don't mind.
