Feminism

Hi Sup Forums. You know there are other versions of feminism besides the version you choose to hate. Or do you just prefer to hate on women because you can't pull a root?

>other versions of feminism
So, you know versions of feminism that are Sup Forums-tier? Give me examples pls.

Women are inferior, they belong in the kitchen

hairy armpits are fine if you look like her.

If you're a hambeast, kys

Sup Forums-tier? that inferior?

How's you sex life?

I mean those that have racist/homophobic/antisemitic/antiglobalist leanings or whatever.

(((Feminism))) has convinced women that marrying a top notch alpha and raising an incredible family is a failure of life. Only women can give birth and have an extra special bond with their children. Raising them properly means being there for them as much as possible which includes taking care of the house and cooking. It's not that women *can't* do what men can do, it's that they can do something that men can't. Something extremely important and rewarding. What's the point in having kids at all if you're just going to have them raised by someone else?

The good versions of feminism occurred in the past. The current version is known as the third wave. Women already have all legal rights so anything else they're protesting at this point is horse shit. The law already favors them over men anyways (lighter sentences, child custody, and larger settlements via divorce/child support)

I don't believe in feminism because women are inferior to men.

Good post, agreed.

>root
granma?

Some nice stuff here. But lets not exclude worthy actual Betas and Gammas. Not all men can be Alphas. But many man can be good men. Just avoid the omegas and deltas. Also, some men can excel at full time parenting. I do agree that parenting shouldn't be outsourced to augment one's ambitions. In this case kids become mere accessories.

Points taken, but the job is not finished yet, everywhere. There is at least fine tuning to be done, and in some places the work has barely begun.

A good woman would push her man up from beta to alpha and instill him with confidence if she were stuck with a pussy. She would push him to be a respected man. Maybe she's really ugly or was married off or something, so she didn't have better choices.

>can't pull a root?

Is that supposed to be a sex metaphor? If so I don't get it.

>You know there are other versions of feminism besides the version you choose to hate
All feminism is still bullshit even the first and second waves. All feminism is about is getting rights without tying responsibility to those rights so women could vote but not be forced on the battlefield like us men are.

Feminism should not be allowed to exist because rights are not tied with responsibility in it rather women just nag about rights and get rights while men are still forced to be responsible for everything.
>Or do you just prefer to hate on women because you can't pull a root?
It depends on what you mean by hate on women?

Women's value to me is purely sexual and i only take men seriously. A woman i cannot fuck has no value to me if my cock can't get up then i do not give a fuck.
Feminism had no good versions in it all feminism is the same and all women are like that.

Women always wanted rights but refuse responsibility for those rights thereby they should be revoked.

If you're not an alpha why would you deserve a woman? Clean your room and fix your life loser.

>If you're not an alpha why would you deserve a woman?
This implies women are actually valuable outside of sex and babies. Women are not magical to the point where only the so called alphas (a subjective term) get them but even so called cucks can get women (sure they are used up and have kids but they got them).

Women have lowered their market place value and all any reasonable man does these days is just fucks and dumps or keeps relationships only about sex.

So by alpha you mean what? I bet you aren't even alpha. You might be an upright man, but only a select few are alpha. your terminology needs re calibration. Betas are useful subordinates, not losers.

Urban dictionary says
>pulling root: the act of manually stimulating the penis, as with masterbation or handjobs. "I keep a box of tissues next to the bed in case I feel like pulling root before I go to sleep."
I'm guessing OP is accusing Sup Forums of not getting laid.

Only hate the commie side
Nothing real against woman

I'd say a man who provides for his family, doesn't get literally cucked by his wife because she loves and respects him, is respected by his kids, rest of family, and general work and social circle, and is able to defend and protect his family and himself is a decent start. You don't have to be a mega all-star in the eyes of anyone but your family.

Radical trans feminism is best feminism.

All cis scum get the bullet.

>being this retarded
Back to Twitter so you can #resist faggot

I don't hate women, I believe society was much better when it was more patriarchal.

Tip harder faggot

>Real men like us who respect women and their choices are the true men
>Only betas dare go against what women want or even think women are not that great (they have vaginas so that makes them better then a man).

all of a sudden white sharia sounds kinda nice if get to throw you of a roof

This.
Also, pic related.

society was better when we all knew our place and roles in life anons not the equal be whatever you want to be crap we were happier and society was not going down the drain

...

Just accept Patriarchy. Your experiment was a horrible failure. We love you, that is why we let you try, but now it is time to accept the truth and do your part in supporting the Patriarchy.

Australian for getting laid. to root is to fuck.

>Australian for getting laid

So this entire thread is bait posted by a fucking Emu?

Lurk moar

...

there is no good feminism
letting women vote was a mistake
mixed schools was a mistake
women studies is a cancer

women belong at home with the kids

How's your love life? scoring any roots?

happy family with 2 kids
the wife is a stay at home mom, the way it should be
I have more experience in the family area than any of you fucking losers, maybe you should listen instead of just throwing around that used up ad hominem

Friendly reminder that this bait thread is a sage thread.
Put SAGE in options field if needed to reply.

Classic Aussie move m80.

Fair enough about the ad hominem. But just because that works for you doesn't mean that is the only rendition of family life that is healthy. That is your rendition is not mandatory.
I'll raise you one kid. I.e. 3 kids and happy family. Share work and child raising with wife.

>How's your love life?
Arguing with holes
> scoring any roots?
Arguing with more holes

This is how i tell you are a woman as arguing with holes is your goddamned argument, Of course you cannot say feminism is bad, letting women vote is a mistake and women's studies are cancer without being a bitter virgin for going against the vaginas because sex is your only real power.

>But just because that works for you doesn't mean that is the only rendition of family life that is healthy
Yes a family without a mother can be quite healthy since there is no woman to lie to their kids and retard them (aka no woman spewing bullshit).
>That is your rendition is not mandatory
If the wife was taken out of the picture the kid would be better off then without the father being in the picture.
>Share work and child raising with wife.
No because he is the one making the goddamn money thereby she is the one raising the kid and unless she is making at least half of the man she does most of the child rearing.

sorry......for you

chill dude you're getting silly

Feminism has perfectly proven -- and surprised many - how underevolved, useless and inept women truely are

>pull a root
lel don't hide your flag you big faggot

>sorry......for you
Not an argument as it literally does not address any of the points i made at all.
>chill dude you're getting silly
This is not again an argument against my position. Does the evidence back me up is the question?

You're right, OP. Woman shouldn't have:
1) The right to vote.
2) The right to work.
3) The right to do anything else other than reproduce and take care of the home and family. Because they don't do anything else better.

>there are other versions of feminism besides the version you choose to hate.
No, there aren't. All feminism is the same socialist garbage. Every feminist victory needs to be reversed.
Cunts belong barefoot and pregnant, it's how they're happy.

my girlfriend is hot and she shaves her legs but not her armpits. It's fucking great

>If you could hold your own death in your hands, would you do it?

I'll pass on barefoot. Shit stinks.

>letting people wear shoes inside your house
No, please.

My bad, I forgot they wouldn't be leaving the house. Still, socks at least.

You don't want to see the she boons tits

Cultural feminism :^)

Jesus Christ,you do realise this is a board for sharing and discussing political ideas. You made a point in OP and have moved from discussion to, this crap.
Discuss your views faggot.

All feminism (including the most moderate feminism) leads to more extreme feminism

My family was never huge on this, and it took some time to adjust to families that disallowed it completely. It makes sense to do, but it was never expected if we were coming and going. I know taking off shoes inside is socially mandatory in Asia, but is it similarly expected in European countries? Also my family was lower middle class when I was younger and steadily became upper middle class, and I'm not sure if there was a big difference within that group. It's something I don't remember noticing until I was a bit older like 13 and up, but probably because we would nearly exclusively play outside.

Stupid argument,
All socialism even moderate socialism leads to communism
All capitalism even moderate capitalism leads to ancap
All men's rights groups will lead to patriarchy
Try harder faggot.

.png is better for that type of file if I remember correctly.
Do you have the original?

feminism is and has always been marxism in a skirt. the fact is it was egalitarians who got women the vote. feminists just hijacked the credit. even as far back as 1880s austria feminists were writing newspaper articles about men shirking their duty to marry young and how there were so many women being denied the right of motherhood by being single and advocating for the austrian govt to force men to marry. feminism is cancer.

hurr durr virign nice argument retard

The question is where do you draw the line? My bigger issue is (((them))) intensely pushing out the narrative that women are failures if they don't become high powered career women who wait until 35-45 to have families and that they should be the head of the relationship. Male-female relationships are a yin and yang, and women can still hold power without cucking their men and also women should be pushing out kiddos between 15 and 25 max. And also raising a good family is the ultimate success and literal meaning to life.

Hairy armpits are redpilled

any iteration of feminism is cancer

Very few women are good enough or the type of person capable of standing on their own merits.

bitch they chose to hate me first, the fuck am I gonna do just sit there and take it?

also I can't tell bait from the nupol so here's a free (you)

first wave feminism is fine. Second wave is where it gets iffy. Also only white women should be allowed to vote so that we divide sjw's forever

The question of the line is valid.
Imho sufferagettes got their right to vote, I'm fine with this, first wave feminism gained women the right to be paid the same for the same work as men and in my country gained them the right to earn superannuation, I'm also fine with this. Equality achieved.
What I'm not fine with is giving women a leg up in the world because vagina, everything should be based on merit, from custody of children to CEO positions. Feminism tries to tell men they don't have to be men anymore that they can be stay at home dads and be open about their feelings. Metrosexual movement failed, men want to be men, and that's why there is such a huge backlash about feminism in the modern day. Feminists want gibs and men out of the picture.

>15 to 25
Nope. 25-30 is prime breeding age. Earlier than that and you get uncultured hick children b/c inexperienced parent. Later and you get autists.

Women voting is fine? Ignoring that women became so degenerate that they normalized it after the first wave of feminism and opened the door for degenerate faggots and sjw freaks, voting was always a privilege tied to conscription.

Males who dodged the draft lost their right to vote, so why the hell should women who don't have to sign up for shit get to vote?!!

No I don't

i like hairy armpits on women. and theyre not part of feminism. they were the norm before the 1950s. and women dont grow much hair there usually unless theyre indian or negro anyways. some white women get bushy armpits but its rare naturally.

ignores evolutionary history. prime breeding age is between 14 and 25 fool. 25 is the high end.

You're a presumptuous idiot committing a no true scotsman fallacy. sage.

/r/GenderCritical

everything in modern society is unnatural. We live in a different world where parental intelligence and maturity is important.

>tfw armpit hair fetish

I'll compromise with 22-28 IF the woman isn't married to an older mature more educated (in life experience) male who guides her. Women bend to their man, but 16 year old males aren't exactly cultured and experienced.

It's not a big deal when a woman isn't a ham beast.

naturally most women arent. its a genetic abnormality. those women need love to. and theyll get it. just not from me. but i like my women pretty hairy. i like a big bush to match my majestic mane. and like i said, was the norm before the 1950s. has nothing to do with feminism and more to do with commercialization of womens beauty products.

What is up with hedonists, especially females, seeming to think the only important goal in life is to get laid, and that the value of someone's life can be measured entirely by how much they get laid. Aside from it obviously being a consequence of atheism, my theory is that females actually see themselves as sex objects, and thus the only say they really have in anything is whether or not we get to fuck them, and instead of admitting their weakness and existential worthlessness to themselves, they subconsciously feel the need to pretend sex is all there really is and all that really matters.
>hurr durr sounds like someone hasn't pulled any roots
I mean, it's actually really pathetic
>what that you haven't pulled any roots?
Oh fuck, I've created a stupid feminist mental companion. Send help.

not true at all. i never said it wasnt 'natural' but it really isnt, but you could make an argument it was, but then it would be cultural. and since armpit shaving was explicitly started as a marketing campaign, much like diamonds for marriage, you can argue more favorably that it is unnatural. and again has shit all to do with feminism.

I see nothing wrong with being a bit rugged. Plus, over time lust and new love develops into something much deeper. When you are with a good person for many years you tend to see them through a different lens.