Why do european leaders believe immigrants are good?

Memes aside, what did he mean by this?

Seriously, what is the motivation behind importing migrants into Europe?

Cheap labor? Is it an effort to undermine union-backed wages?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OxAKmkO_Ojw
youtube.com/watch?v=C5jUavMXQrs
theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world
un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.shtml
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_of_the_future#cite_note-1
ft.com/content/022de0a4-54f4-11e7-9fed-c19e2700005f
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/nyborg-2011-the-decay-of-western-civilization-double-relaxed-darwinian-selection.pdf
ihr.org/books/kaufman/perish.shtml
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

We will never know unless they tell us.

-There is the possibility that these people genuinely feel guilty about colonization and slavery and really want to make it right.
-There are people who are pathologically altruistic, really nice people, who want th best for others even at their own detriment.
-People who are very malevolent and want to exploit their low IQ for cheap labor
-People who genuinely want to be muslim
-People really want more people to vote for them

I remember some lefties in the early days arguing that we should see America as an example of how you prosper and become rich. And America is multicultural af

Politicians and people who like to be in the public spotlight have mostly strong pathological traits. In other words these are very evil people.

Evil people don't understand what does it mean to be really good or altruistic.. that's why every time an evil person tries to be good he fucks everything up.

Evil people can't do good deeds.

Its not that multiculturalism worked, it was our prosperity and freedom to become wealthy that worked. People think we like all races but that is not the case, we worked together to make money is what made it all work. Not to mention it was competitive immigration that helps. We only took in the best of the best. We didn't import everybody and said do what you want.

Votes

(((Martin Schulz))) literally looks like the merchant rubbing his kike hands together

They don't. They know mass importation of sub 90 IQ population with a violent and un.-assimilateable people will destroy Europe, they are (((paid))) off and they are fine about committing high treason and genocide. This one is on the people to solve.
Always kill a traitor before an enemy.

You literally took in at hell of a lot of poor people from Europe

He means "my jewish overlords told me to flood europe with muslims"
They are mere puppets, nothing more.

quads of truth

Yeah. From Europe. Europeans.

youtube.com/watch?v=OxAKmkO_Ojw
skip to 4 minutes

>refugees
>doing labor

Good one. Nice joke there.

>Cheap labor?
Exactly. They need young unskilled workers to make up for an aging population, and the cheaper, the better

Delete this immediately, Goy.

youtube.com/watch?v=C5jUavMXQrs

Damp rag low grade bank clerk

We did but here is the thing you miss;

They were put to work and integrated.

exactly this

Yea, but now we're down to eugenics, which is a big no no here you know.

Because he's a leftist and leftists are retarded.

Immigrants = more sold goods and more loans, all paid for by the taxpayers.

>poor people from Europe
That started their own businesses or farms, and were able to assimilate to a certain degree. They didn't come here to live on welfare.

because whites no longer reproduce

no babies
=
no tax payers
=
no money for their socialized society
=
societal collapse

they have somehow managed to delude themselves into thinking these shitskins will have children who manage to hold down a job and pay taxes.

not gonna happen

>europe and us demographics by 2050
theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world

>Yasmin Alibhai-Brown of the Foreign Policy Centre, who arrived in London from Uganda in 1972, said such fears are basically racist: 'Only white people worry about this. It's because for such a long time the world has been their own. To talk about it feeds a particular type of racism that says that blacks breed like rabbits. There is an underlying assumption that says white is right.'

>She added: 'There is a white panic every time one part of their world seems to be passing over to anyone else. But it's foolish to panic about it. So what if we do become a majority? What difference does it make?'

>For Alibhai-Brown, the decline of whites is a question of redressing the balance after they colonised much of the world. 'The empire strikes back really. There was this extraordinary assumption that white people could go and destroy peoples and it would have no consequence. It astounds me,' she said.

>UN's plan on replacement migration
un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.shtml

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi
>this man is highly respected by members of the EU and is seen as the father of the European Union. he is also responsible for promoting this:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_of_the_future#cite_note-1

Green Party Leadership was recorded talking about getting shitskins to europe to get the votes they can't get from the native population.

-people who value virtue signaling and other peoples opinion on their "kindness" more than their or others well being

Did somebody meme "cheap labour"?

So is the solution to deny genetic reality and just pretend that importing millions of violent 85 IQ savages will turn you into America 2.0, and arrest anyone who calls out the government on it?

"Most refugees to be jobless for years, German minister warns"

ft.com/content/022de0a4-54f4-11e7-9fed-c19e2700005f

they dont work

>Seriously, what is the motivation behind importing migrants into Europe?
Socialism failed again. There is a need for a huge crisis so sheeple will not see that pension funds are filled with IOUs and so that they will accept sacrifices asked of them.

>Seriously, what is the motivation behind importing migrants into Europe?

The only explanation I could think of that is not some crazy conspiracy about satanists or some other nonsense is

-They honestly believe that shit. I think that most politician's really are not redpilled on race & iq, multiculturalism etc., which leads us to..
-They don't give a shit. If you're Angela Merkel, think that nurture is everything and have and old population, "assimilating" new people is a reasonable thing to do. But that also does not make a lot of sense since she said multiculturalism has failed in 2010.
-Altruism combined with being bluepilled.(Sweden)
-Economy. Like I said, Europeans are old and importing young people would be good. What they don't see is that the migrants have an iq of about 80 and that Europe will become a caliphate by 2100.

No, but you're talking to the wrong country. We make statistics about this all the time, but noone seem to care.

lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/nyborg-2011-the-decay-of-western-civilization-double-relaxed-darwinian-selection.pdf

...

I agree with this because of the type of immigration that is occurring. The EU and US liberals want a free-for-all system with no quality control. They think everybody is equal in ability and all differences are cultural, but this is wrong.

The immigrants aren't working, aren't paying taxes, and refuse to integrate. The plan to bring in more workers only brought in more debt.

Control.

The black death brought about the renaissance.

Less people = more land and infrastructure for those that remain

= more value/bargaining power for workers

= greater social mobility

= more intellectuals and artists

= golden age

European countries have poor birth rates so the age pyramid is slim at the bottom. The EU leaders are anticipating no baby boom so they're expecting the age pyramid to flip upside-down in a matter of decades. The reason they're inviting so many young people is to avoid ending up in an economy full of retirement-age people and few working-age citizens.
tldr; only going back to the 50's gender roles wise can save Europe. Refusing to accept migrants will bite us in the back later

Many of them are either mentally handicapped or ideological zealots, but the key problem is oil capital in EU dictating its policies.

Kalgeri Plan. They are crypto jews who want to do to the rest of Europe what they did to Russia 100 years ago, except we can't come back from mongrelized genetics as we can from communism.

It's an attack on the unity of any possible opposition to (((them)))

Yeah and if they weren't a bunch of retarded commies living in a bubble, they might have noticed that the Greens in Belgium had the same idea, and it later backfired in spectacular and completely predictable fashion.

Your post sounds reasonable but none of the reasons you've mentioned explains why they want to flood eastern countries too.
We didn't colonize.
Dumping rapefugees here doesn't help them, in fact they don't want to stay here.
If they were the valuable cheap labour that West wants, the West would keep them but they don't want to.
At this point the white genocide theory seems like the most likely one. We've seen a lot of academics advocating for the replacement of whites, didn't we?

On the contrary, the aging population works to pay for their expenses.
Everything is about money. As in it will be "better" for the economy, because the middle class will be forced to give up their money in the form of taxes to be redistributed on the low intelligence, high spending snackbars.

>false equivalency

The leople who went to the USA were from the same race, culture and religion. Most were European Christians. Plus, there was no established culture to compete with.

Keep in mind it's mostly women who want refugees. I think it's because their maternal instincts are acting up and seeing refugees as helpless babies.

Western men can't disobey women sp they can't object to this.

>European leaders
>European

You have your answer.

Because they want to genocide white Europeans. They are traitors.

>the female symbol combined with the male symbol combined with the cockring symbol
??

Crypto kike implementing white genocide.

You are part of the EU aren't you?

There is your answer.

kys, Bauman. Importing shitskins will only make the situation worse. Not only would we have to pay for the old but also for the shitskin criminals and NEETs.

>Memes aside, what did he mean by this?
Violence and social division which encourages/excuses steps to strengthen the state and weaken the people. When they say "diversity is strength" they're thinking in the "divide and conquer" sense.

He's a mouthpiece of the Jews. He hates Germany, Germans, white people, but he loves Israel and the Jewish parasite.

eurojewcong.org/ejc-in-the-media/14538-eu-parliament-head-martin-schulz-to-jews:-europe-is-your-home-today-every-day-and-forever.html

This is not the answer. Nobody signed for this and it's nowhere to be found in the treaties. The EU is supposed to protect its broders but it does the opposite.

no. that can't possibly be it

>>poland
>>good neetbux
pick one

I saw a german middle aged childless woman run after her child surrogate pitch-black pet refugee who was screaming at the top of his lungs threatening to, and i quote, "fuck everyone's asses" because he was upset that the gibsmedats office was closed that day.

That horrified look on her face made me smile for weeks. Traitors, all of them.

Average prisoner costs us 3000 zlotys a month. This is the NEETbux they'd be getting.

All of this desu. At least in part. And they are helped by clueless do gooders who lack any foresight and instead prefer to indulge self gratuitous,shallow altruism

this

I personally like what Poland and the other eastern countries are doing to the EU by refusing to lay along. You guys are making Germany's plans hard by blocking their policies yet staying in the union. Its getting to the point where the EU wants the eastern countries out.

This is why. Even Goering was impressed

ihr.org/books/kaufman/perish.shtml

>Kaufman's fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman's plan a "sensational idea."

>The Harvard University professor's proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. "The objects of this measure," wrote Dr. Hooton, "include reduction of the birthrate of 'pure' Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals."

>This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. "During this period," he went on, "encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males."

>In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany's population and immigration policies. Since the nation's defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.

Check my post on kaufman

>Refusing to accept migrants will bite us in the back later

That's why we're accepting Ukrainians, compared to them muslims are subpar in almost every way.

Replace the labor with social rights and a residual opposition class consciousness with a new manpower that has neither one and the other, and is willing to survive. Immigrants are also willing to make for 3 euros per hour what labor maneuvered by the season of class struggles and the "social state" would never accept.
Capital law is always one: find someone willing to do the same at a lower price.

>but none of the reasons you've mentioned explains why they want to flood eastern countries too.
>People really want more people to vote for them
this one could work. Blind followers that will ensure that EU stays in charge of everything. Distraction also sounds plausible, people will be too busy with them to go against EU itself, though that is kinda backfiring.

with the birth rate of 1.3 childer per woman, it's a lose-lose scenario anyway. see

None of them have kids so to them people are just abstract concepts.

>At this point the white genocide theory seems like the most likely one
White genocide is the whole point of it for most of these people.

Sure they have other fancy utopian delusions about the benefits of a mixed mongrelized society, about the wonderful brown communist world which will be produced in the end.

But eradicating whites is the #1 agenda here.

Also, no taxes = no more fat paychecks for governing (((elites)))

As with most things, follow the money and the answer becomes self evident.

What happened? I guess a Sharia party formed? Our greens are basically Maoist, sorta like Labour is in Britain right now. They think their socialist utopia can only be reached once the third world populations crush the first world.

Eastern Europe still has time to change their fertility rates iirc.

Relying on the muslim votes would be very short-sighted because they're going to start forming their own parties soon.
I don't buy it. There's too much shilling, billions of fucking dollars being wasted just to buy some extra votes? They'd be better off spending this money to convince the normalfags.

If you want a serious answer the reason behind importing refugees is the Jewish fear of racial nationalism. The diaspora believe by undermining racial homogeneity in a location that they will undermine nationalism. Ironically this just increases nationalism, but they don't actually understand nationalism anyway since they don't experience it.

Make incentives for people to make families then. Immigrants are a temporary solution that will bite you in the ass.

The nose knows. Jews are an invasive sub-species who are in the process of exterminating Europeans. They have tried many times before throughout the ages and failed but this time I guess we will see.

Its very suspicious that they dont tell us their reasoning. Instead if you question the mass migration or doubt it for a second you're racist.

More ironically they do this by importing large quantities of Muslims that hate them.
Kikes tend to outsmart themselves.

Because they maneuvered them self into a catch22 situation.
welfare state requires constant funding and they expand it in some countries like germany to a point where you will get more money from collecting welfare then working 100% in some fields
they killed their entire lower middle class in the name of environmental protection yet keep on importing exactly that goods from countries that make them in a even dirtier way
companies threaten them to leave the country if they don't get free slave labor
better make them happy, subsidize wages, allow unlimited temporary contracts that undercut the min wage, allow 3 year long unpaid internships for skilled workers with a professional degree and if everything else goes wrong we import a few million apes as they're such skilled workers some of them can even write their own name to work for free
>just look up those "work integration programs" that are literally slave labour where you use 4 unskilled people to replace a single skilled worker but it doesn't matter as they do it for free and you don't have to pay them a single cent and the best part: you get fresh free replacement every 12 months.

...

Are you guys going to remove kebab?

Yeah, Andrew Joyce has a good summary about this relationship on Red Ice. In the middle ages Jews used to be the middle man between the rulers and the population, they were responsible for lending money and also collecting it (with military backup by the rulers if needed). Of course, the population only put up with usury for so long and you got pogroms. Jews of course never recognized how that whole usury stuff pissed people off and only saw the evil goyim killing poor Jews.

Now we are in one of the biggest debt bubbles ever and we get a massive migrant inflow, the hope being that Hans and James will be busy fighting Muhammed and Ahmed while Shlomo keeps on lending money.

There's definitely a lot of hubris in the higher classes, as well as a "who the hell cares what comes after me". From interacting with billionaires and government officials, I can tell you none of them see themselves as evil. They have lived through an unprecented era of human prosperity, and silly as it sounds, this affects psychology. When you're used to the abundance mentality, it's extremely hard to break out of it. Same reason boomers care much less about the environment than millenials.

There are many very intelligent people in the higher ranks of society. If you present them with facts regarding racial IQ, problems with minorities, reasons for discontent and debt unsustainability, they will agree and even demonstrate better knowledge of these topics sometimes. Yet they expect things to work out, because how could they not? Things have worked out for them their whole life, with minimal effort.

Exactly, they improted migrants, migrants voted Greens, when there was enough of them they formed their own party, migrants started voting them. Shocking eh?
Greens then decided to import even more migrants, but the new ones didn't vote for Greens, they voted the islamist party.
I mean, who could have predicted this, right? It's not like there are dozens of clips on Youtube where Imams in the middle East instruct their flock to do exactly that. They are backwards, but not stupid.

...

>they killed their entire lower middle class in the name of environmental protection
More like in the name of economic liberalism my AnCap friend.

...

>natality
>cheap labour
>humanistic (and suicidal) values

(((Leonid Bershidsky)))

...

Europe is fucked. V4

Yeah well, the thing is the goyim or more specifically the rulers keep falling for it or maybe don't even care. Jews get driven out a lot but a while later they are allowed back in by a new ruler down the line.

Europe tried to expulse them and get out of debt before and during WW2 and the anglo powers fought basically for global finance, even after they got their own shit wrecked by it in 1929.

I don't doubt for a second that even if the whole scheme collapses as long as the USA is capable they will send their soldiers to fight fellow European countries just to enforce banking and immigration.

What about encouraging natality?

I can understand why they're pushing for it from a fear perspective. The poor creatures will descend into total nihilism, denying culture, family and every social structure they have to to escape nationalism. Unfortunately it's a natural desire to form a tribe. And by putting themself between the individual and their tribe they might as well be between a bear and her cubs.

>-There are people who are pathologically altruistic, really nice people, who want th best for others even at their own detriment.

I wouldn't call them good people for importing a people that literally rapes them, kills them, takes their housing, forcibly shifts the culture of their host country, and takes their hard earned tax dollars on the off chance that maybe there's a family that actually wants to adjust to European culture and is grateful for what they're given.

I suppose you can argue that they're misled with good intentions, but I'd call them idiots rather than good people.

>What the refugees bring to Europe is worth more than gold (((that is not currently in my possession as it will move that gold into my possession))).

I always assume that politics are majority narcissists or psychopaths, with share of fanatics and opportunists. But fanatics always give a way to other written groups and are eliminated (night of long knifes, Stalin purges...).
So first two reasons are highly unlikely. Third is plausible, forth is no-go and fifth is very characteristic.
In my opinion is mix of three factors:
>They feel no loyalty to any group, and care little about "the people".
>Their goals are short termed, as they do not adhere to any ideology.
>Work surplus and political instability are good for exploitation and maximisation of profits of top social echelons.

So we have narcissistic politicians who want temporary personals pleasures and gains, who profit from this scenario. They have powerful tool, media. Since little of population explores their political beliefs, it is easy tom manipulate. Since majority of European population subconsciously feels guilt over their over-consumption (lets be honest, on average European worker has it better than others) so their compassion kicks in. And since feelings are irrational, they prevail in certain part of population. Virtue signalling does the rest of the job. And here you have it, population and politics, open to immigration, each for completely different reasons.

...