The Shah of Iran - Whos side was he on?

or was he his own side

Other urls found in this thread:

books.google.com/books?isbn=1439630763
youtube.com/watch?v=nYk_hgnsgo0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

American/Britbong puppet.

Johnny Sack's side

Fun fact, His son live sin the US and is technically still the head of the family

The Jews accelerated his removal. Right after Israel was founded, Iran was the natural existential threat for the Jewish state. Iran had over 10x the population and in the following decades more US Military bases and support than Israel. In fact, Modern USA-Israeli relations really cemented after the 1979 coup, as US had lost it's largest ally in that area. Then Saddam went, etc. It's the Jews, man.

the the jews contorl the mullahs who want to destroy israel AND hated the Shah?

or were the mullahs their own

what about the far left groups that were anti shah and islamic regime and still are anti israel

Two out of three of his kids died tragically (I think it was suicide?) And the one left lives in Virginia he is a graduate of Air Force academy. Yes, royal family in exile. Sadly doesn't mean anything other than that the USA helped kill his father and gets to keep the heir "on ice" so to speak. Same thing with Libya's heir, kinda. Qaddafi's son was recently revealed to be alive and some wonder if it isn't part of a CIA plan to recreate a dictatorship or two in those areas. I doubt it would work.

this is an interesting theory ive been hearing

if the CIA was responsible for removing the shah then were they also behind the embassy seige

and how did they loose control over iran later on

...

Israel's

I don't know how much the Mullahs were directly controlled by Israel, but I can tell you that Mizrahi Jews who left Iran for Israel in the 40s and 50s later became the heads of Mossad and Israeli air Force in the 1970s. The Jews had it pretty good in Iran so I don't know why they would hold a grudge against the Shah or his dad Reza Shah. What I do know is that some of those hard line Zionist from Iran would brag saying "our children will be the first to be born in our state of Israel but ethnically they look and speak Persian, so 20-30 years we send them in there as Mullahs (not the highest leadership, middle and lower level)" I am not sure if this plan ever happened, but the whole Mullah class was build up by the Brits for about 100 years. The anglos even designed the outfit the Mullahs wear. So anglos and Jews are very much responsible for 1979, I just don't know how directly. But yea my general thesis is that the Israelis originally viewed any MENA ethnic group larger than them as a threat. So, azeri, Kurds, Persians, Turks, etc... They're all a threat on an ethnic level. Besides Turkey, Iran pre-1979 was getting lots of US military money and troops, moreso than Israel ever did (from the USA specifically) in that time period.

My Uncle was good friends with the Shah of Iran seems he was just a regular guy in America didn't try to act special

>the USA helped kill his father and gets to keep the heir "on ice"
Need a rundown nao

What makes you say that?

>From the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 until the Iranian Revolution and the fall of the Pahlavi dynasty in 1979, Israel and Iran maintained close ties. Iran was the second Muslim-majority country to recognize Israel[13] as a sovereign state after Turkey.[14][15] Israel viewed Iran as a natural ally as a non-Arab power on the edge of the Arab world, in accordance with David Ben Gurion's concept of an alliance of the periphery. Israel had a permanent delegation in Tehran which served as a de facto embassy, before Ambassadors were exchanged in the late 1970s.[16][17]

After the Six-Day War, Iran supplied Israel with a significant portion of its oil needs and Iranian oil was shipped to European markets via the joint Israeli-Iranian Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline.[18][19] Brisk trade between the countries continued until 1979,[20] with Israeli construction firms and engineers active in Iran. El Al, the Israeli national airline, operated direct flights between Tel Aviv and Tehran.[21] Iranian-Israeli military links and projects were kept secret, but they are believed to have been wide-ranging,[22] for example the joint military project Project Flower (1977–79), an Iranian-Israeli attempt to develop a new missile.[23][24]

Taken from wiki

>Shah gets sick of cancer, tries to keep it a secret
>tells closest friends and family and staff, likely not kept a secret
>USA/UK/France/Israel had been pushing Khomeini and his cassette tapes into Iran for a few years by the time the Shah got cancer. The secret police were probably not really in his control, since they had been trained and run by the US and Israelis in the 60s. Anyway it seems like the cancer diagnosis kind of accelerated things. By this point you've got the large communist student groups and the large growing Mullah movement.
>Shah's son went to Air Force Academy in the USA, which is something you can't do unless you're a citizen or a VIP or a USA client state
>Iran was a US client state since 1953 to 1979
>when I say "on ice", I mean they have him waiting and ready, a royal family in exile. In this case he probably doesn't have much of a chance of retaking Iran, heh.

you know that pee pee poo poo in jars meme? Well the CIA has been doing that since at least the Cold War. They'll collect urine samples or fecal samples and look for diseases. As you can imagine with the advent of recombinant DNA and other biotech stuff, this is way more useful now than it was back then.

Fucking what, Israel was a great ally of the Shah, its why the islamists within his country hated him

Well like I said, the head of the Israeli Air Force as well as Mossad at one time has been a Persian Jew (Mizrahi) and there were quite a few super zionist loyal who viewed themselves as the perfect way to overthrow Iran's government, as they knew the language (region specific) as well as had the ethnic makeup to look Persian, and that their children could be raised in the first truly Jewish state of the modern era and thus would have the higher capability and whatever to carry out such a task. Just like Israel has their agents within ISIS, same thing happened with the Mullah's, but they grew up and were trained in the 50s and 60s to do this in Iran in the 70s.

Yea I will agree that the Shah basically did whatever the USA told him to do, since they deposed his daddy and sent him to a leper colony. Even before 1953, the Shah would have listened to what he was told to do. He was not a real leader, more like a puppet leader. He was very westernized and not like his father too much. He wasn't degenerate IMO and somewhat tried to walk his country through modernization without total moral debasement.

Did your ally control your secret police for 5 years? That is what Israel got to do. I don't think allies act like that, that is how empires and their subjects will act. I am sure some Israeli's considered themselves to be allied with the Shah, of course, but that doesn't mean that the same anglo zionist ideas that led to Israel led to Khomeini being supported. Also, can anyone here explain Baha'i to me and why so many of them were notorious for torture and other terrible things in the Shah's secret police? Baha'i is literally the most globalist-NWO-zionist sounding religion I've ever heard of. And every Baha'i I've talked to is about as doomsday and apocalyptic as orthodox jews. They believe all the world religions have to merge and that all the prophets were the same prophet.

In short, I think you are right that Islamists used the tactic of calling the Shah a zionist puppet. Look they even drew the wheel of life, albeit poorly shaped. Where have we seen that before... hmmm? But look at those two faces... I am trying to tell you, they look like Jews. 1979 was due to a narrative pushed by Anglo Zionists, Israelis, plus American and French Zionists helping. Maybe Zionist isn't the right word... Spawn of Satan, there we go.

bump

Khomeini was supported due to Russian Communist influences in the area(read Afghanistan). The Russian ideology cannot survive against religious fundamentals. If you notice the timeline it's about the same time that the CIA was training the Mujahedin and Osama bin Ladden to counter a Russian invasion.

This is correct, for anyone interested that wants to look into this, take a look at Kermit Roosevelt and the Anglo-Persian oil company.

You guys do know that bin Laden was educated here in the US and even attended the war college at Langley.

Yes, I found once thru google books that Bin Laden was living in San Francisco in the late 70s living at 1177 California St (Where the Philippino dictator Marcos and his family lived in exile) for at least a year while working on a masters degree in city planning from San Francisco State University. I do not know if he attended the war college, but I don't know if he was very religious while living in San Francisco. I honestly have no idea if Bin Laden was always religious or just became radical at some point after his graduate school studies. I don't know if he finished the degree, but yea you never hear the US media talking about he lived here for a while.
>not related to Iran

Interesting, the source I mentioned above, I just looked it up again, it is still on google books. It mentions Charles Manson and the assassination attempt of President Ford on the same page. I guess because it was around the same time? The book is published 2004. Anyway I lived in SF at one point and confirmed it is true, he was there for around a year. Nob Hill neighborhood, just up the hill from the trannies. You know how Osama liked it... just like Obama. They probably met in the early to mid 80s when Obama went to Pakistan for two weeks. Who knows man, these globalists are baller gangsta nigga types.

San Francisco Police Department - Page 1975 - Google Books Result
books.google.com/books?isbn=1439630763
John Garvey - 2004 - True Crime
It was during this time, in 1976, that thenstudent Osama bin Laden lived at the Gramercy Towers at 1177 California Street. (Courtesy of San Francisco History ...

At first, a puppet, at last, on his people side. Its just a shame he got on his people side a bit too late.

Classic buffoon with all those fake medals that he gave to himself.

>if the CIA was responsible for removing the shah
Why would they remove him?

Great for business, bad for leading a country to fight off a Russian invasion. Plus he was getting greedy. He hadn't screwed his handlers yet but it was only a matter of time anyway.

Yes.

I agree with this the most. I think he got increasingly red-pilled and they viewed him as a liability. I think the removal of Mossadegh in 1953, even tho he couldn't have really stopped it, I am sure that left a huge impression on him, at first guilt and then nationalistic pride for his people. Too little and way too late.

That is true, the medals were dumb.

The US and that ´s why he lost.

SOB killed even Germans. Thankfully Iran runs the show now and the US and Saudis have no power.

>Why would they remove him?
youtube.com/watch?v=nYk_hgnsgo0

LeL

Why did Israel want Iran to suffer? Because while they got gassed in World War 2, Shah's father was receiving gifts from Hitler...

This was while many people were aware of Wilhelm II's speech in Damascus in 1898 calling on all Muslims to rely on him as a true friend.[7] By the early 1930s, Reza Pahlavi's close ties with Nazi Germany began worrying the Allied states. Germany's modern state and economy highly impressed the Shah, and there were hundreds of Germans involved in every aspect of the state, from setting up factories to building roads, railroads and bridges.

Iranians were immune to the racial Nuremberg Laws on the grounds that they were of Aryan Decent. In 1939, Nazi Germany provided Iran with what they called a Germany Scientific Library. The library contained over 7500 books selected "to convince Iranian readers ... of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the Aryan culture of Iran".[9] In various pro-Nazi publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn between the Shah of Iran and Hitler, and praise the charisma and virtue of the Führerprinzip.[10]

From 1939 to 1941 Iran's top foreign trade partner (nearly 50% of its total trade) was Germany, which helped Iran open modern sea and air communications with the rest of the world.[11]

In 1941, the Allies forced Reza Shah to abdicate the throne to his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. His pro-Nazi followers in the Iranian government such as Fazlollah Zahedi [12] and Mohammad Hosein Airom shared similar fates. The British believed that Zahedi was planning a general uprising in cooperation with German forces. He was arrested, where he was found with German weapons and correspondence from a German agent. He was interned in Palestine.

Yeah, but whose side is he on!?