I'm so confused. I don't know what to call myself, Sup Forums. Can you help me out? What the hell am I?
Basically I believe in traditional leftist polities (post-war welfare state) with a focus on changing to a "green" economy, but also anti-immigration & anti-open borders. On the face of it, Marine Le Pen is the politician most inline with my beliefs. Am I a literal Nazi, Sup Forums? A national socialist?
Other urls found in this thread:
bilbo.economicoutlook.net
nakedcapitalism.com
nakedcapitalism.com
nakedcapitalism.com
fabiusmaximus.com
twitter.com
I support:
>restricted, low immigration
>legal abortion & gay marriage, equal legal rights for all citizens
>single payer healthcare & strong social benefits for citizens (ie disability, welfare, parental leave, etc)
>high taxes on rich and big corporations
>gov investment in physical infrastructure
>public transportation
>focus on alternative energy (incl nuclear), & reducing oil consumption
>support for local industry, local manufacturing, for the good of local economy & also the good of the environment
>real environmental protection (not "carbon credits")
>total free speech
>public secularism & freedom of religion
>Western values & culture - European art, culture, heritage should be celebrated
>current "anti-white" trendiness is starting to turn me into a believer in "white pride", but I don't believe in discriminating based on race
>love Camille Paglia
>love Marine Le Pen
>love a lot of what Jordan Peterson has to say, but hate his shilling for the Conservative Party
>love a lot of Bernie's policies, hate his pandering to Muslims & immigrants
>ditto for Elizabeth May & Green party of Canada
I hate:
>Islamification of the West, mass immigration, open borders for people & for corporations- very anti-migrant
>SJW mentality, "cultural appropriation", political correctness
>Neo-Con, Neo-Lib type politics where corporations & the rich benefit, shameless pandering to immigrants & Muslims & average people lose out (ie most mainstream politics- Tory, Liberal, Labour, Dems, GOP)
>the idea that healthcare should be private business, that gov should not help citizens when they are in need
>free trade in its current form
>Trump, Clinton, Macron, Trudeau, May
>foreign aid, unless it's spent on sterilization & birth control
Something approximating national socialism which can be summed up as the same basic structure as the Scandinavian countries only with the added component of ejecting all minorities, preventing new ones from entering, and keeping mostly traditional values while still encouraging economic and scientific progress.
>I'm so confused. I don't know what to call myself, Sup Forums.
A faggot mate, a big faggot.
You're a fucking leaf, boy. Just another leaf.
Take the political compass test.
Yeah, I thought maybe like a Denmark, Norway, Finland type thing. They're pretty strict on immigration, aren't they? And told migrants to fuck off?
You are confused.
...
Doesn't seem to fit, though. I am totally against mass immigration & globalization.
Old school social democrat.
Today that is ar right, which means exactly two things: opposition to immigration, and opposition to the EU for eu members.
I agree with you. Only an idiot would think that you can keep the borders closed by giving money and power to the people who benefit from open borders. Right wilng policies also hurt the population, so they are a losing game unless you can get the rich, who support open borders and LGBTSPQR politics to propagandize for you.
I suggest looking into MMT and job guarantee. That is a winning policy, that combines opposition to welfare leeching with taking care of everyone, and maximizing the productivity of society and giving people opportunities.
bilbo.economicoutlook.net
Meanwhile the centre of capitalism of mostly brown, and when Canada gave up its lefty economic politics, it has quickly turned brown.
Literally the only reason state borders even became a thing was the state welfare system. Without welfare, there is little reason to have borders.
Yer a libertarian, 'Arry.
Radical centrist. Basically means you're too stupid to have consistent beliefs
Meh
Actually no you sound like a social democrat. Typical leaf
Thanks for the link, user. I will look into it. I'm also interested in the concept of a Universal Minimum Income, which as you say and like other social benefits only works if a country has a strong border. I believe a country should be like a family, you take care of your own first.
I also believe the drive towards globalization & mass immigration is a drive to eliminate things like public healthcare & other public benefits. I don't think there's a conspiracy to replace or eliminate whites, but I do think there is a focused effort to destroy any gov. spending on the public good.
> I don't think there's a conspiracy to replace or eliminate whites, but I do think there is a focused effort to destroy any gov. spending on the public good
The coherent belief system impoverishes and poisons the working people so they can't reproduce, gives all the power to the rich who benefit from non-white immigration and then calls itself white nationalist.
>Universal Minimum Income
I'm personally not a fan. But here are some discussions on it that I find honest:
nakedcapitalism.com
nakedcapitalism.com
nakedcapitalism.com
It just turns doesn't do what it is supposed to do. I could be wrong of course, there is an experiment in Finland going on, so that might privide useful data. Just be careful, most people in the debate are dishonest ideologues.
You may also be interested in Fabius Maximus' viw on immigration:
What? I'm not the best at expressing myself clearly, what I mean is this push to open borders and flood Western countries with migrants is about pushing down wages, weakening labour laws, overburdening healthcare & social benefits systems to hasten their collapse. It's a race to the bottom, so big money can get richer & more powerful. It's part of the drive to privatize everything.
And anyone against it gets called a racist bigoted nazi fascist. It's actually quite incredible how so-called lefties are now just shilling for corporate interests with all their refugees welcome bullshit.
>I don't think there's a conspiracy to replace or eliminate whites, but I do think there is a focused effort to destroy any gov. spending on the public good.
It's more fundamental than that. It is to fractionate the population, social spending is mostly irrelevant. Nigeria is an example, the country is weak, unstable and impoverished. It provides subsidies, to buy votes.
But the general population has no power. They fiught with each other, and the powerful get away like bandits. Social spendin is kind of a red herring. Power is the real issue.
Kind of like regulations. Corporations constantly push for more regulations to prevent competition. Yet you have idiot saying more/less regulation is good. No, who does the particular regulation serve?