Who is this man and why has he become a pol meme?

Who is this man and why has he become a pol meme?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RGkVsE8v2eY
youtube.com/watch?v=UGQNc1Nrvlo
patreon.com/jordanbpeterson
d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/therebel/pages/11815/attachments/original/1491578040/2016_Final_No_Personal_Identifiers.pdf?1491578040
pastebin.com/BiFE2fUX
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I don't know but when I was reading Jaques Derrida in the required reading for my Chicano Studies final, it sure made me think of him.

also seriously fuck them requiring an (((ethnicity))) course for engineering

Because forced meme ecelebs are one of the main tactics that have been used since mid 2015 to shepard and harness Sup Forums. Ask yourself, was there a 2013 Milo? Styx? Peterson? PJW? All of these clowns showed up recently, there were no ecelebs to lead the sheep until recently. The closest comparison is Ben Garrison, but we told him what to think, not vice versa.
Ecelebs are the new control system, now that we're basically immune to classical shilling.

The bane of post-modern, SJW degenerates

The anthropomorphic road map to save western civilization

The top lobster himself

Jordan B(ucko) Peterson

I was getting shit yesterday for saying this.

he is nothing more than a worn out college professor using long words to tell stupid kids the most obvious and basic life lessons. stuff most people can figure out with just a little intuition.

he is simply making a name and a crap ton of cash for himself doing this.

...

excellent point. I'll carry that message along. Sup Forums tels you what to think, not the other way around.

my personal favorite if russell brand, he got 1m subs in 5 months with his bullshit.

The system is corrupt to the core, we need to radically change the way we govern this country. We need a revolution!

VOTE LABOUR

broke: rational skepticism
woke: darwinian existentialism

But apparently those kids' hippie communist atheist fathers either aren't there or aren't teaching them, so somebody needs to. I appreciate what he does, I don't care if it's basic lessons, not everyone has an awesome ass-kicking hard working stone cold Steve Austin dad like me

I don't know what the hell that his, but the filename sounds like it's from Zeon.

Because while everyone else was bowing to SJWs he fought them head on. And because he gives better advice than people get elsewhere.

>stuff most people can figure out with just a little intuition.
Yet no one does.

overhyped sane guy living in 2017 canada

I just wanna see the threads stop, none of what he said need discussion.

>I just wanna see the threads stop, none of what he said need discussion.
Why not?

>wah only post what I like
listen here you whinging denizen of a rainy little socialist isle

can you tell me one thing he taught you? not a 'principle' but an actual FACT?

Stone Cold barely has a relationship with his daughters.

I'm not one of his fans. But he is useful for a lot of people here and elsewhere.

XDD

He's one of the few Sup Forums idols who I can take seriously since he's actually well-read and not just a faggot memester on youtube.

keepin this .jpg

Take the Jungpill

one day you will understand the only reason he is doing this is because of the boom of 'alternative speakers' which btw gives creedence to the opposing side(SJW). he knows that he can use right wing kids as cattle for a grand tour of lectures that will probably make him millions!

Mind reader? Why are you certain he is a manipulator in search for money?

well i consider him a waste of time for students. life is the only sociology lesson a person needs.

he makes it very clear he is into capitalism, so whats your point. if he can make money off of it, y not?

>life is the only sociology lesson a person needs.
Could you explain this better?

nice theory cuckboy let's see some evidence

Aww fuck - I love gormeh sabzi! Those dried limes are just money.

>the most obvious and basic life lessons.
Agreed. He sounds like he's talking to 5 year olds.

because there are a bunch of them on youtube.
they start doing lectures denying SJW politics. lectures that will attract right wing kids.so what youhave is a qualified professor re-hashing simple stuff to people who already believe in what he is saying. so you hgave kids learning northing new and professors not doing their real job of researching professors.,

consider him a bill nye of right wing colafge lecturers.

i am saying that is probably his primary motive considering his quick sucess in such a short time. he was been a lecturer for how kong??? why do you think he is blowing up only now???

>tfw you thought you were finally free of mind control
>tfw (((they're))) still brainwashing you with titty monster alt right girls

life will teach you social skills. it is a human intuition to have empathy. kids dont need these lesson in spoken word, they interact as a normal humans.

That's one of those types of dishes that looks disgusting but I bet tastes amazing.

i have no evidence for my suspition just obervation and intuition (he was on the joe rogan podcast for fuck sake, he know where to go for more views and followers)

This man figured out how to make money from bastards with daddy issues raised by single moms.

You know you would have a point if he was doing something radically different before he started reaching out more publicly but, that isn't the case at all?

One-line writing prompto one-posts, especially if they ask unanswerably broad questions or easily answered non-questions, are spam. Do not reply to spam. Demand better content.

Lecturing for a while, did his maps of memeing shit forever ago, but re did them? idk all i know is he is blowing up because more people are noticing, because of all the shit from last year, regarding the video's he put up. been putting in work building a following, still doing his classes, selling his Self-Authoring™ suite, etc etc
just more people are getting on to what he has been saying because of the greater network he has built.
not really sure what you want from me here

Basically social science is bullshit and unnessacery. Hard science is what answers questions. its sjw teir to say 'THERE ARE MANY STUDIES THAT SUPPORT MY ARGUMENT ACTUALLY' . fuck social science

He has a lot of fashy ideas.

I dont want anything from you. just saying he is not worth your time. im trying to help you in the long term. go look at slavov zizek for a lefty example.

kek

> B(ucko)

kek

i dont disagree with what he says, im saying if this constitues univerity level education,you right leaning students will end up closer to the SJW's that they would otherwise.

Because of his battle with SJWs about pronouns at UoT.

I like Petersen a lot, he isn't someone who sought fame and attention like your Lauren Southerns.

Science tells us "what", that's for sure. Hume posed the problem ages ago that you can't derive an ought from an is. Hard sciences answer some questions, but the humanities ought to be there to make the individual figure out how to use the things we articulate in science, literature, politics, etc. I think I get where you're coming from, because some people blow it up into "well, this discourse under this context is...", and it becomes some intellectual masturbation.

>He emphasizes rights and responsibilities
>Believes there is truth[s] in an age where we get fed there is no truth
>Blew Sam Harris out of the water
>Doesn't tell people what their purpose is per se, but helps guide people there
>Isn't some esoteric piece of shit
>Recognizes Kekistanians

>Quick success in such a short time
He's been lecturing for decades, and had 1 million YouTube videos before this all happened. His primary motive isn't money, although that is nice. He really wants a reformation of the Humanities, the survival of Western culture and to revivify his dead father, roughly speaking.

Wait
You watch titty monsters on youtube?

For fuck's sake, user, if it's that bad for you, just watch some porn and jerk it out.

thank you my dude, nice to see a pajeet on here again. we love you

Sup Forums at its finest-
On the rare occasion that an actual voice of reason makes itself heard you guys are so quick to start screeching about how he's capitalising on his situation and pretend like hes acting in bad faith.

And yet every day there are dozens of unironic /ourigirl/ threads about Lauren Southern or even Laci Green for fucks sake. Not to mention the Kekistani boys

inb4 le Sam Harris debate or whatever

sorree, you didnt seem to understand networking to expand your audience base and make a profit off of your work. Not worth my time in what regard? and Žižek as an example of what?

...

actually i would say he is doing the exact same as Lauren(i would never watch that jezabel). he is just doing it inside the schooling bubble.

the unsorted should fear the sorted

I don't think he's that impressive when it comes to politics, and he can give longwinded 30 minute explanations that could have been done in 5, but I really like his stuff on reading the Bible with an understanding of the Ancient Mesopotamian world view.

we are on the same page, i just dont like the person being idolized.

you fucking imbecile
it's not about this eceleb vs that eceleb, like some of them are acceptable just because they're not as bad as others
we don't want any of them, you fucking kike, get it through your head

all the people in you post and peterson i consider not worth pol's time. did'nt you cringe when he tried explaining kek to joe rogan???????

who's (((we)))?

You don't want to find yourself at the bottom of a lobster hierarchy but if you do you should consider anti-depressants so you can get all puffed up and go out and fight.

No, and he shouldn't. I have a season ticket to the Psychology of the Bible lectures, and we discuss that a lot, actually. Around 40 or so of us go and talk at the pub for a few hours after, and that issue has been brought up.

Part of it is inevitable, unfortunately. I think on the positive end, at least he is leading people on the right path, and he isn't posting clickbait tier things like LS and some of the double-SJW's do who claim to be fighting politically correct laws here.

Of course nobody wants him to be emulated. Part of the issue here is that he articulately went before our Senate with the issues on Bill C-16, and is actually politically involved. I don't like some of the cult of personality, as there is a physics student who is attending the lectures simply to learn how to argue like him. It's arrogant and stupid as far as I'm concerned. At least he is having people positively act, and not react. There haven't been any really big confrontations like some other speakers intentionally agitate for.

I do understand, pat attention. i m saying that is his primary motive!!! and zizek is a example of a pseudo intellectual, you could spend hours listening to and through all long fancy words and references to past scholars you will find no substance whatsoever.

How did you take that away from what I said?
I'm no advocate of e-celebs either, but Peterson doesn't fit the mold of your run-of-the-mill, quick buck(o) Gavin Mcinnes or Stefan Molyneux.

Just because he's sharing a platform with these idiots doesn't inherently make him an idiot too. This is how I know you haven't ewatched/understood any of his content when it makes you this irascible

maybe you'd understand what i was getting at if they taught you reading comprehension in your shithouse education system

people who can think for themselves....

>Self-Authoring
anyone have a free copy/torrent?

>17 posts by this ID
You need to sort yourself out bucko.
Seriously though all these posts looks like cries for attention and most importantly help. Take 5-10 min and just meditate, think your arguments through. And maybe, start cleaning your room.

mate that was jokes

youtube.com/watch?v=RGkVsE8v2eY
youtube.com/watch?v=UGQNc1Nrvlo

it appears he was a regular on tvo and the agenda. heard claims his work is well cited. him being more popular now as a opposed to before isn't necessarily true. the videos are just timestamps, no need to watch them for any particular message 2007/2008

that he's advocating for gibs is a bit disingenuous. if you dislike the way he presents his content that's one thing, to say his content has no value or substance is just dishonest.

its great you have discussion. i just dont trust anyone so far in the media spotlight. yes he is doing a good thing opposing the bill, i just think its funny a guy in england such as myself have even heard of him. considering i was never looking for him, he is just there in my suggestions. then all of a sudden he is discussing a bill. just seems fishy to me.

its kind of the fidget spinner thing, i never looked for it but it is everywhere and now it is huge. its the power of social media

fair fair, could watch hours of geordie shore and also find no substance, but people like what they like.
Whats wrong with trying to make a buck anyway? Even if you are right, like say he is 100% in it for the cash, doesnt care what drivel he slews, like what is wrong with that? Some people sell food and have never been to cookery school, i really don't get your beef with trying to make money?

A literal saint

Why are American universities such a smörgåsbord of random bullshit rather than just training people to become skilled in a certain field or profession? There isn't even a marxist government forcing them to, the universities are private businesses

related
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvICR8Evl9E

pol needs to stop turning into a shit show with all this ourgirl, ourguy shit. the idea is what matters. he is simply cashing in on the dicussions this very board started to begin with.

h8 to burst your bubble, but maps of meaning was published 1999 - and like idk my fellow, but like either just watch/read some of his shit or just don't.

patreon.com/jordanbpeterson

>$48k /month

Holy shit, good for him though

You seems to be suffering from something. You have problem discerning yourself from others. In your mind things learned is something everyone knows and things new for you is new for everyone.

Do you have legit autism?

my overall point is that it is a waste of these students time and should not be tolerated.

Similarly to how gender studies teachers spouting this poly gender non-sense is properganda so is telling people what the 'logical' way of thinking is.
.

>He's cashing in

Yes and no. There are a few things we know he is using the money from his Patreon for:
>Research which was denied by the government of Canada, which can be found in the link below
>The Isbel Bader Theater cost $60 000 to rent for the summer + security costs + sound and video crew there
>Video editing for his lectures online
>Applying for University accreditation for online humanities degree
>Costs for his post-grad students , some of whom I am working with

d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/therebel/pages/11815/attachments/original/1491578040/2016_Final_No_Personal_Identifiers.pdf?1491578040

The money he is raising is being accounted for. He isn't sailing the world in a yacht; he's even helped pay for the relocation of an event in Oregon[?] that got relocated after he made a joke about invading their safe spaces.

honestly, are you okay?

okay a challenge for you.
give me one thing he has taught to you that isnt purely subjective? that means a FACT

That to much rationality is dangerous as the rational people have a tendency to fall in love with their own ideas.

I swear, some of the stuff posted on here is just so inane.

Do y'all really think that all so-called "ecelebs" are just forced on people? That it's not possible for anyone to rise in popularity because people genuinely like him? I haven't seen any refutation of Peterson that does not come across as bitter.

People listen to him because he's engaging, well-read, and offers consistently valuable viewpoints. Yes, most of them are simple - but with commonsense in such short supply, that hardly matters. Moreover, Peterson explains old-fashioned values in a fresh way and offers justification for them, making them more appear more "rational" to the skeptically minded.

here it comes

>Agreed. He sounds like he's talking to 5 year olds.
Because mentally they are!

that rats can laugh

Where's the self authoring for free?

The stuff about how they measured motivation in rats was fascinating.

pastebin.com/BiFE2fUX

link?

Lurk and study moar.

Thanks swedebro. Do you have a link to the past authoring?

I bet he just laughs with people. One of a kind.

you asking for the link for where he said it?
because my friend, i hate to let you down, i am not looking for it.

oh, was it in Maps of Meaning or something? I just started watching some of his stuff this week.

Sorry, no.

so you never realized before he told you that, that the 'skeptic' literally do that all the time. like sargon will say somthing like 'I can disprove this purely useing logic and critial thinking'

again that statement is basic intuition.' people that think they are right tend to continue to think that'

And that is withough me mentioning your use of 'tendancy' 'to much' 'dangerous'
you undertand how these are subjective? danger could mean alot of things, 'tendency' doesnt specify regularity or severity.

so to conclude, this is him basically saying ' If you come to what you consider a rational conclution, you will beleive it to be correct.'

its really that simple.

wow, did you also know that dogs can't look up?

You also show signs of not understanding humour. Seriously, do you have legit autism?