Can anyone actually disprove this?

Can anyone actually disprove this?

I'll believe feminists believe that definition once they start actually acting remotely as if they do.

Women have every single right that a man does.

There are sane rational feminists who actually are aiming for this, and they are busy actually trying to make changes instead of complaing on their internet blog about how the white icing on their cake triggered PTSD flashbacks when a man raped them with their eyes.

The latter wants equity, not equality.

...

Feminism is about equality of the sexes in the same why that white nationalism is about preserving white culture/the white race. It's a token issue that sounds fine on the surface but when you look at the actual beliefs and underlying political philosophy what you end up finding is a bunch of supremacists.

Yes. Feminism is a form of political activism. If you are a feminist you are by definition actively attempting to advance the policies which advance women.
The is no way to imply that this advancement can be an equal treatment of the sexes. In order to advantage one sex, you must by reason of proportionality, disadvantage the other.

No form of activism can really be described as an equal treatment of all groups. Some needs to be taken in order to be given.

Does anyone here know of any feminist ASMR videos? I'm not a feminist, but I'd like to fall asleep listening to a girl regurgitate nonsense in an ear-to-ear whisper.

>social, economic, political equality
So just what exactly is "equality"? It's so vague it barely has meaning; and by what means do people gain social equality other than by totally uprooting a culture based in gender differences. Perhaps by demanding the government pass some sort of legislation? It leads to oppression and insanity.

Feminism is one sided. It never mentions the high prison rates among males, feminists never mention that women go to college more than men, feminists never mentions women do not get punished as often or nearly as severely as men for committing the same amount of crime. Dumb Whore = Modern Feminist

>In order to advantage one sex, you must by reason of proportionality, disadvantage the other

>making things equal is a 'disadvantage' to the people currently at an advantage

Yes, technically true, but not in the way you seem to be implying. If they are advocating for equality and the end result is equality, no group has been ultimately disadvantaged.

sage this dumb as thread created by a dumb faggot or skank.

This is totes about equality

>women
>equal

OP is probably a fucking leaf faggot hiding behind the now-hate-symbol rainbow flag, only they posted stuff like this

This, do it guys. Don't write anything else in the thread or the (((mods))) will ban you for a day, just write the four letters

If you are advancing the interests of one sex and not the other you are not treating the sexes equally, therefor the statement from OP is false. If one was acting equally testicular cancer would be as important as breast cancer.

It should also be noted that fair and equal are 2 different things.
Equal would mean that an employer should be able to fire a women for missing time even if she is pregnant. Fair would be letting her split maternity time with her husband.

In the same token, equal would mean a woman can decide to abort her child because she gets to do whatever she wants to her body and man can do whatever he wants to his. Fair would be giving a father a choice in whether or not his child can be aborted.

Feminism strives to be neither equal nor fair, it implies that it is solely a womans choice to take all the maternity time without risk of being fired and abort a child without consent of the father.

They want it to be only equal and only fair when it is in their advantage.

The same can be said for jobs where upper body strength is required (firefighter, police officer, soldier). Equal is paying someone based on their capability. Woman have already surpassed equal they now aim to redefine the term.

100% objective equality across any two populations is impossible. And the closer you get to r = 1 it gets exponentially counter-destructive.

>equality

Simple test: If equality is the real goal then you could take a piece of feminist dogma, wordswap "women" and "men", and *not* end up with something that sounds like the Taliban wrote it.

equal doesn't mean identical

feminists implicitly acknowledge this when they only demand "equality" in the good things, not things like the military draft, jobs like electricians, plumbers, truckers, loggers, etc.

it's selfish bullshit

read Susan Sontag and Andrea Dworkin and get back to me.

Feminism advocates for Women to have rights and men to have responsiblities.


Feminist reject the idea that women should be responsible and hate equality with men in the courts or receiving support from the government.

Feminist are like entitled children. They will tell men "Sharing is caring" while not giving anything up themselves.

Feminists don't want equality. They're just like like kids. When one kid sees another with a cool toy, they'll throw a temper tantrum and cry until they get one.

Why don't we see women demanding to be registered for Selective Services? You mean women can shape our politics, and even send our young men off to war, but will never be required to fight in these wars? That is not equality.

I say if we ever have a draft, we need to draft young women and start sending them to the front lines to die next to their equals. Let women earn their rights with blood and sacrifice. Only then will I respect them as equals.