Why do leftist cities have good public transportation?

Why do leftist cities have good public transportation?

Other urls found in this thread:

dailywire.com/news/17846/maddow-tries-blame-rain-and-money-ossoff-loss-frank-camp
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Aid_Highway_Act_of_1956
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

They have to do something with the money they drain out of the host state/country, and welfare monkeys can't get to the welfare office without it. Construction projects are great for skimming off government money, too.

Because we actually spend the money for the good of the people, unlike corrupt republicans who use it to give tax breaks to their friends

Because there are lots of conservative people building and maintaining it.

This is why you pay taxes. For things like public transport and more. Believe it or not it doesn't just vanish; it goes to the good of the people.

>cities
>good public transportation

lmfao

conservatism and liberalism has nothing to do with it. Capitalism and communism has.

LA resident here. What now?

They need somewhere for people to gathered to be enriched by the Muslims they import

Is japan leftitst?

You're only leftist because of all the non-whites. Clearly this thread is directed at real leftist cities.

Gridlock fucking sucks ass that's why, city traffic and city driving is a bigger fucking grind than your actual job in most cases. It's a serious sociological and even economic problem when everyone needs to drive into the city all at once in the morning and nobody can get to work on time without waking up 4 hours early.

Also the vast majority of cities are "leftist" so a better question would simply be "why do cities have good public transportation" and the reason is as stated above.

Because leftists are reliant on public transportation. They all live in the city and they have no car.

Because it's paid for by conservative taxpayer dollars

To control the goyi- I mean citizens' freedom of movement.

>LA
>leftist

m8

>Also the vast majority of cities are "leftist" so a better question would simply be "why do cities have good public transportation" and the reason is as stated above.
Exactly, tried to write this

also counterexample: one of the most leftists countries in the world - Venezuela - and their fantastic transportation

lol, is your public transportation all paid for by the government?
its mostly private here and its great

Oh, I almost forgot the added benefit of making it easier to ship niggers around to commit crime in white neighborhoods.

Public transportation isn't left or right it's merely a necessity of a large metropolis. And to be totally many mass transit networks are falling apart because they only hire affirmative action niggers who don't know what they're doing to make $90k a year.

>good public transportation?
Clearly, you are the one in a billion that thinks public transportation is good or you have never used public transportation and are delusional.

>Why do leftist cities have good public transportation?
Similarly, with Communist era construction the public option for transportation, housing, and so on are the most efficient when you are busy making sure everyone is following the Communist guidelines.

>Capitalist America: Everyone can buy their own car, live in their own house, and own their own property.
>Communist Country in Eastern Europe: Everyone rides the bus/train/subway/ride bicycle, live in block housing/apartments, and the government manages all property.

Basically, when you are busy scheming up new ways to tax your population into poverty the population are not going to be able to afford their own cars, housing, and property.

All of this is very clear in large America cities today with most left leaning, high taxes, block living, and mass public transportation. Practically, no one owns a car unless that have to and are perfectly fine limiting their movements to public transportation options.

Tl;DR: It is efficient to use mass public transportation but you limit your populations freedom of movement which is fine as the leftist governments want total control and the leftist drones are fine giving up their freedom.

>Why do leftist cities have good public transportation?
To transport all there chetp labor duh

>Because we actually spend the money for the good of the people, unlike corrupt republicans who use it to give tax breaks to their friends

go to Japan. I thought transportation was pretty decent in Hong Kong but Japan takes it about 9 steps further.

Because they live in ancient towns that were not built for sedans and crossovers.

>this just in, public transportation works well in areas with a high population density
Of course you can't make some asinine left vs right argument out of this very obvious fact, so I can see why you are confused OP.

>Of course you can't make some asinine left vs right argument out of this very obvious fact
Wrong.

Black lives do matter, but when you put that flag up it kinda turns me into a racist asshole. Fuck I do not like progressives one bit.

In NYC it's only good if you're a pervert and even then you have to be an advanced specimen

Cities have good public transportation because at high population density it's an efficient way to move people around and free up the roads from traffic. The fact that cities are leftist is an independent factor. Believe it or not, Moscow has an amazing public transport system that I would say easily beats most of the European capitals. And yet we're not leftist.

>public transportation
>good
HAHHAAHAHAHAAAHHAHAHA

They dont. Leftist cities are full of vapaid genderfluid yeswomen who we of the normal world are not allowed to criticize.

Artyom, the mutants are invading your station.

>Russia
>Not Leftist
Are you serious now?

But Tokyo, Kyoto, and Osaka aren't liberal.

The Soviet-loving grannies don't count. They are nostalgic for their youth and mistake it with the ideology, but they are dying out. Russian communists are a joke. Meanwhile, Putin is clearly in the right-wing both economically and socially.

>Black lives do matter
>when you put that flag up it kinda turns me into a racist asshole
You racist liberals pretending that "Black lives do matter" are literally AIDS. We would rather you whites just say what you think rather than pretend like you care.

(((Putin))) is right-wing.
Nice joke, comrade.

>big goverment
>big taxes
>Moscow steals tax money from the rest of Russia
>70% of Russian GDP is now in the public sector

>universal healthcare
>heavily invest in education
>public transit
>vending machines with used panties
>rampant prostitution
>age of consent is 13
By American standards they're worse than Bernie

Name one leftist city?

They are also anti refugees and pro tradition.

Just like Bernie.

Jew York City

>Washington DC
>Super Left
>Metro is routinely on fire

why not make more false statements?

>why not make more false statements?
I am sure he will if you give him some time.

RIGHTWING RAILS MOTHERFUCKER

LETS SEE A MUDSLIME TRY TO DRIVE THIS INTO CIVILIANS

Paris
London
Toronto
Seoul

Trains are fucked all the time here.

Japan is super right wing, super racist, super conservative, super capitalist, is literally ruled by corporations. And got flawless public transport. Explain this.

>big goverment
>big taxes
True, but corruption and tax evasion are big in Russia, so bureaucracy is avoidable.

>Moscow steals tax money from the rest of Russia
m8 companies deciding to reside in Moscow doesn't mean Moscow steals your money. Still, Moscow is a net donor to the federal budget.

>70% of Russian GDP is now in the public sector
It's lower actually, I'd say about 50-55%. Still shit though, I hope they privatize more companies soon enough.
The reason you see this 70% figure on the news is because they take all the companies where government owns a share and consider all their economic impact as public sector. Meanwhile, those companies are often semi-private, or even have a larger share of private than public owners.

They also don't allow guns

They are non-white

where is that? it looks like glen park

*by public I mean government, by private I mean individuals and corporations

Good riddance. Keep your leftist cities.

Heck even Tokyo is pretty shitty.

Most of the metro was made under communism though.

>Explain this.
Asian

Think of Asians like bees or ants that live in a hive or mound.

Do not think of Asians like whites who have faggot leftist that bend over to the Jew or niggers who can barely survive without government gibs. Asians are a whole other different creature and Japanese are the top.

I remember how fucking happy and excited SF fags where when BART threw a poopy fit over some shit and went on strike and they couldn't go anywhere.

>Paris, London and NYC are undoubtedly the centers of the western world
>fuck 'em all

Tax evasion is a normal situation where there are more taxes than in Western Europe, and the quality of life is 3rd world tier.

Just reduce taxes, dismiss useless civil servants and everything will be fine.

Leftists have good public transportation because public transportation is a soft robbery of individual freedom.

Instead of having your own vehicle to take you where you want, when you want. You must wait on public transit that takes you only to a pre-determined location and on their terms.

Public transit is anti-capitalist and anti-freedom.

That's why leftist cities have good public transit.

Tokyo is not leftist tho, read the news

And their infrastructure is still very good, it's just that it is too overcrowded

I will still give it a 10/10

Well, Soviet communism was a bit different than the modern leftism. Still true though, most of the Metro stations were built during Soviet era, as you can see on the chart (amount of stations by year). But there is also another line that was added recently: the big circle that you can see here , and also they are building another circle right now, it's gonna be finished in 3 or 4 years. So it's developing quite quickly anyway.

Forgot pic

Ahh you are just as racist just like me. You are just a sanctimonious racist who feeds off a political movement empowered by dissimulating wealthy hippies. You are a fucking hypocrite.

Can't argue with that. Putin is trying to avoid firing so many gov officials to avoid turmoil, but I think he will soon realize that it's necessary in order to boost economic growth.

>Why do leftist cities have good public transportation?
Because they forced right wingers who don't use it to actually pay for it so they can use it without paying for it. The socialist dream OPM.

>honorary aryans

>good

They dirty, dilapidated, dangerous, and full of spics/niggers/subhumans in general.

The left is obsessed with public transportation because they don't want people independent. While Nancy Pelosi is being chauffeured around in an armored SUV motorcade with armed guards, she wants you packed like a sardine in some nigger tube that smells like urine, unable to go where you want, being dependent on where you're taken. This over time also conditions the mind to not want to explore, instead be led by big government, the purveyors of your mass transportation. It's also a means to mobilize the dirty, smelly minority masses to easily reach polling stations.

dailywire.com/news/17846/maddow-tries-blame-rain-and-money-ossoff-loss-frank-camp

The left knows their own base are mostly worthless niggers and spics who want free shit but are so lazy that if it so much as rains on an election, they likely won't bother to go vote for free shit. Public transportation gives them one less excuse to not go out and vote.

Mass transportation largely benefits democrats and their cronies like Warren Buffet who owns train companies.

To be honest, public transport is great idea.
Personal cars in the city - just a useless waste of space.
Traffic jams, problems with ecology, hitting pedestrians...
In my city I can get from one end of the city to the other for only 25 rubles (0.42 cents)! This is less than the price of 1 liter of gasoline (40-45 rubles, 67-75 u.s cents), on which my Toyota Prius 20 can drive 20-30 km.

There is a distinct difference between "can" and "should".
The fact that public transportation works well in areas of high population density has more to do with logistics than politics.

>Personal cars in the city - just a useless waste of space.

I agree.

That being said, I think cities and centralized population centers are also a bad idea and a waste of space.

lol the fuck, it has nothing to do with the left

any city has that, left or right

>Ahh you are just as racist just like me.
Fuck you you AIDS infected faggot "liberal" who only says you care about black lives just to keep from getting your ass kicked.

Just another bandwagoning liberal who does not want to be shunned by other faggots.

Cars in the cities are about comfort. You don't give a shit if it's cold or raining, you don't have to worry about getting a seat, you have your space, you can put whatever amount of bags or other bullshit in the car, even carry some clothes for change, etc.

Because civil servants and pensioners are the main electorate of (((Putin))) and (((United Russia party))).

That's why he will not do it.

But young people like other leaders. I think that the 2018 elections will resemble the 2012 elections, but with a large and much more organized number of protesters.

And it's not very good.

>piss smelling subways
>bo smelling busses
Yeah, fucking fantastic.

>Believe it or not it doesn't just vanish; it goes to the good of the people.
Lol.

>ATTACKED BY NIGGERS ON SUBWAYS AND BUSES.

>GOOD TRANSPORTATION

LEFTIST CITIES HAVE SHIT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION.

Because leftists love collective projects and daily humiliation.

>it has nothing to do with the left
That is just wrong. Clearly, you do not know history.

Mass transportation has been a leftist boondoggle for its entire existence. Joe Biden was a non-stop proponent of rail mass transportation to the point he earned the nickname "Amtrak Joe". Amtrak is total shit tier so it makes since.

The push for individual car ownership and freedom of movement has been a classic right wing position since Republican president Dwight D. Eisenhower.

You faggots clearly have no since of US history or world history.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Aid_Highway_Act_of_1956

>homogenous society
>anti-refugee
>tech oriented degrees
>never apologize for brutality or give war reparations
>women aren't "feminists"

I don't think so

>leftist cities
>good public transport

Have you ever been in SF and NYC? I live in NYC and MTA is a shithole infested with niggers. Uber-masterrace all the way. I'm not sharing my space with niggers.

Los Angeles.

> centralized population centers

People have always tried to settle in big communes.

I also do not like big cities, but in big cities there are jobs, food, entertainment, hospitals, schools and universities,which can not be said about villages or towns

I agree, but for this you pay expensive insurance, gasoline, maintenance, winter-summer tires, problems with parking spaces, looting and other things...

Calling a taxi more often goes cheaper than keeping a car.

Japan would like to have a word with you

>implying Boston has good public transit

Then those same leftists refuse to institutionalize crazy people and deport immigrants who are prone to crime and antisocial behavior which renders them unusable to normal people.

>Good public transportation

Its like coming in first in a shit eating contest.

>This is why you pay taxes
So I can pay even more for a ticket?

>Why do leftist cities have good public transportation?

Hahaha

No.

you're so oppressed!

>Calling a taxi more often goes cheaper than keeping a car.
True, I sold my car in March and it caused me little discomfort, because Uber and other services are always accessible. Then again, I had an old BMW that drank gas like a starving bitch, so it was costly to keep it anyway.

Name one

Most of country doesn't even have public transportation. Our stuff is shit compared to Europe.

More insurance money when Muslims blow themselves up on it.

San Francisco

he's not wrong

I love California, but you have a good point.

BART is wretched, and it's obvious you're being sarcastic. It would be nice if we had better infrastructure, but I'm sure with all the money we've been saving it will be put to good use, espcially if Brown can put through pension reform.

There is no such thing as "good public transit."

The train may be pretty and take you where you need to go, but you're still forced to ride with the scum of the Earth. Seattle has heroin addicts harassing you for money 24/7, Manhattan has homeless people who piss and shit while riding 1ft away from people, and the Bay Area forces you to ride with fags who fuck in public.

Funny how you corrupt, slave keeping faggots refuse to do that for education and medicine.