Why Whites get so butthurt when a few Brown people peacefully come to their countries...

Why Whites get so butthurt when a few Brown people peacefully come to their countries, while have been invading all other countries on Earth for a millennium?

Because browns are disgusting

Because whites didn't become dominant by letting brown people into their communities and fuck their daughters. We fuck your daughters.

Wasn't Ethipoia never conquered?

>Why Whites get so butthurt when a few Brown people peacefully come to their countries

I don't

PROTIP: Those brown people are a pawn in other "white" peoples game.

Mussolini ended their Independence streak but it was only for like 9 years

Ethiopia Was Mussolin'd in 1936.

>North Korea
>South Korea
>Never colonized by Europe

Different people.

the same reason you wont let in a stranger into your home, the same reason you dont give your earned money away, the ame reason you wont stain your shirt, the same reason you wont let your daughter date a subhuman, the same reason you wont let your neighbor use your lawnmower, the same reason you dont adopt an african
its their country and they do whatever the fuck they want with it you fagot

Because when we peacefully go to theirs and bring them gifts like agriculture and civilization, they butcher us and forget how to grow food

"Peacefully"

>king leopold
>peacefully

Madagascar always closes their port.

It's not like shitskins weren't hostile

Poland didn't have any colonies, don't expect that I'll take criminals into my country because of "white guilt". My conscience is clear, my focus is my nation and I don't give a shit about other people and certainly not people who want to come into my country and be a burden to it because they want better life. I don't care if it's "unsympathetic" to them. I care about my own more than about others.

The key word in your argument is peaceful. For whatever reason, say I want to bring 100,000 Australians in to the middle east. If we started committing terrorism at 1000 times the statistical average based purely on our race, what conclusion would you expect the natives to reach? We could do a million interviews where we say "Not All Aussies!" and scream racism. The bottom line would be that before we turned up, terrorism was at a factor of 1. Now we are here, its at 100. Could you blame them for saying "yes it isn't all of you, but it is your people causing it. they are your people, they speak your language, they come from your homeland, and it is your fucking problem, not ours". Every race has the right to its own sovereignty, and protection of its own people comes before the rights of others.

Colorblind here..what countries did the euros miss?

> Ethiopia
It was under Italian occupation for only five year (1936-1941)

No, we didn't invade your shithole so now Ahmed you have to open your kebab shop somewhere else.

>Belgium colonies
kek

Liberia by definition was a colony of black people. It was literally an American colony. Why is Vox so shitty?

>Why humans get so butthurt when a few roaches peacefully come to their homes, while they have been going outside their homes for a millennium?

When You Get The Brown, Your Stand Of Living Goes Down.

Koreas (though there was Korean war), Japan (US was there too, and before WWII) and...
...Thailand, I think. Liberia doesn't really count.

because we know what an invasion looks like ya fucking moog

You mean go to other countries, advance them, leave and they turn the technology to trash because they won't maintain it (at least in Africa's case)

we didn't invade countries we invaded shitholes and made them into countries. and here's your (You), faggot.

The only reason the brown people wouldn't be but hurt would be because they were fucking dead.

Nice try jew!!!

WHY? Because we have had 200 years of trying to simmer down when genetically white people are the most violent, aggressive, serial killer type murderers in history... our genes are just itching to use our superior intellect to wipe all from the Earth. To torture, mutilate, and dominate. And you shitskins are poking it. WE ARE TRYING TO BE NOT THIS.. but shit make it hard.

So many kykes here

Take an English class, you sound retarded shitskin

it's a shame europe is under jewish control though. say what you want about third worlders but at least they are free of much jewry (for now)

Italy got BLACKED in the 19th century by Ethiopia though

FPBP

>polish
>white
Pick one

lol they are not free of jew influence. They are shipped in by jew NGOs fronting as charities, they are the pawns of the jew. After we kill the mudslimes, we WILL have to kill the kykes

>arab using jewish divide and conquer tricks
pottery

...

White rule in a brown country improves things overall and doesn't destroy the gene pool.

Brown rule in a white country worsens things overall and destroys the gene pool.

Simple.

Also using Eastern European girls, they come in handy

Browns don't look very peaceful at all. In fact they're openly hostile. I'd love to be a fly on a wall in average brown's dwelling when a white libcuck rushes to defend his conquerors on national TV they must be laughing their ass off.

When the white boomers start dying off and the demographic shiock is in full effect all those nice white libcucks are going to be in for a rude awakening but by then it will be too little too late.

not free but more free. free from jewish media at least, not from usury (microfinancing).

they don't have to comply with carbon regulations which will bring the west down.

Lol stfu, your english. You don't know shit

Context?
>inb4 just nigger babysitting

FPBP
Because with your logic you can flood almost every single country on this planet with ethnic foreigners. Those are countries OUR ancestors built for US

Also
>few
>peacefully
Laughing hard

Lol who the fuck knows. I think it was his albino kid and he ate it for super powers or some shit.

Probably one of those war rituals where they drink the blood of babies or something

>North Korea not colonized by Europe
Funny.

>peacefully

USSR didn't really get involved there.

It was mostly China.

We did that in an age of conquest and empire

We now maintain that invasion and subjugation of other nations is wrong

>French guiana is in Europe

how does that work.

>10 million dead memes
>"fact" still based on numbers brought by english propagandist that wanted Congo to be part of the British Empire.

Belgium ended the rule of sharia in the north of Congo and stopped the muslim slave trade aswell.

Because when we invade brown people we bring hospitals, medicine, art, prosperity, etc, and then the second we leave the 80 IQ subhumans destroy everything. Rich former colonies are those that were predominantly white. In the black ones the """humans""" destroy everything and then come to fuck up our countries where, God forbid, whites are the majority and have built powerful economies and much better infrastructure. If Europeans had left Africa alone they would be much farther behind with regard to technology while the influx of Africans in the west could threaten to destroy the development of further sciences.

TL;DR: THEY ARE FUCKING SUB-HUMANS.

Because when Europeans colonized a place they made it better, and these shitskins are only making things worse and they were brought in knowing they would do that.

Sup Forums will never be able to answer this properly.

It is a fact that the reason for mass immigration from Latin America to the US is literally directly due to Spaniards creating nations of mestizos that now number in the hundreds of millions.

It is a fact that the European colonization of Africa is the primary reason for the immigration of Africans. The same for the British Empire.

This is a problem that people on here refuse to see, that the very conquest of the world is the true reason for everything you call globalism today.

All the Jews in the world couldn't have done what Europeans did, it's the price you pay for wanting to be at the center of geopolitics.

Because unlike how white folks build and trade black folks tend to rape and destroy instead.

a few? In America we are almost half brown and its celebrated.

How many Africas can you fit into a small UK island before it sinks anyways?

Open borders while the world breeds behind closed ones is genocide.

Does the death train look like just a few brownies too you?

#AfricaSoBlack btw

they haven't been invading other countries for "over a millennium" colonialism as we imagine it only started in the 1400's. Many of the countries that cry about Europeans abusing them were only occupied by europeans in recent history.

The other issue that is never discussed is how europeans going to these places was much like immigrants coming here...they were accepted by a small amount of the native population, who allowed them to conquer and expand throughout the territory, they allied with tribes, cheifs, sheiks etc. etc. this is no different than international organizations, or people like george soros lobbying politicians to allow in immigrants. The majority is the nation is not asked whether they want people coming, it's literally no different than colonialism, instead of East India company lobbying its some far left international organization or the UN.

Except you can vote for parties that are anti-immigration or conservative, and they existed prior to any kind of mass-immigration happened.

The Norwegian people voted overwhelmingly in the 50's and 60's for socialist parties that introduced mass immigration, while they were parties who would stop it at the ballot too.
To claim this is the same as colonization is dishonest, the political system in Europe has given Europeans 50 years to correct their politics, and only in the recent 10 has it gone anywhere.

dont forget that everything in orange only exists by the grace of white people

Even with countries that did have colonies - how is that the fault of those who never left?

Also, England hasn't had an English King in centuries. Let Saxony take all the refugees.

Immigration from latin america isn't due to "spanyards creating nations of meztizos" it's happens because these people cannot create a proper society that is worth living in, especially when the most advanced society is only a hop, skip and a jump away. It's obviously a better option to just go to america than stay and attempt to take the time to create a stable livable society in Latin America, which at least will take another few generations.

Why can't they create a proper society? Well because not that long ago, in their natural state they were living in the jungle injecting rotten fruit in their ass, eating magic mushrooms and skinning people. unfortunately that's them....without us, that's the peak of their society, tribal warfare. In the state we found them they were basically jungle savage tier, without our presence they would have been living like that for AT LEAST another 2000 years if not more.

None of this has to do with colonialism, it's a game of CIV.......why spend 20 turns actually trying to create your own civilization when you can just invade your neighbor and literally adopt all of humanities accomplishments in 5 turns? That's the way non western people are thinking. Some of these people were building stick houses, and would have been building stick houses until the year 4000 if we didn't not grace them with the opportunity to partake in our civilization. And that isn't hyperbole, that's the exact reality of the situation, it's like a fucked up movie plot.

>we colonized fucking Africa but never japan

Why were whites so stupid? Went for ugly nigresses instead of qt japs.

Turks and Mongols were historically far worse and far more murderous.

How about we demand they open their doors to floods of migrants and pay to feed and house them instead?

Completely irrelevant.

The fact is that Spaniards spawned a new type of nation (or race if you will) that consists now of hundreds of millions of people.

This is a fact, and it does not matter if their IQ is 20 or 200.

There are no 'they' anymore, whatever race you are talking about died a long time ago or is currently.

'They' are now a hybrid between European and native, whatever it is you are talking about is irrelevant now.

Because I feel offended.
t. every cuck ever

Ohh... The poor Arabs... It's not like they were fighting for dominating the whole world since islam started.

I don't recall any government ever saying "we are going to change the entire make up of this country by bringing in immigrants, this will happen by the year XXXX....that never happened so what you are saying is being dishonest. Yes we should allow immigrants, but what is happening is a complete takeover exactly like colonialism, nobody agreed to any of that, you are being dishonest.

Basically saying because nobody voted for a xenophobic immigrant hating party, it must mean they want their country completely taken over and given to other people who aren't from the nation. Silly.

I would say japan is at least "under the sphere of influence" as is every other country, since 1 we own the planet, and 2 people with european decent dropped 2 Japfixers on them.

Yeah, Japan is a US puppet/proxy state.

That's not the case at all. There are millions of native non mestizos all throughout mexico and the american southwest. You are acting like the entire mexico is a bunch of cholos in khakis, those are the people you are thinking about, and most mexicans aren't like that. And the rest of south america is just the same, guatamalans, salvadorians etc. don't look like b-real from cypress hill, they look like native americans who speak spanish, and the reason why they come to america is because they cannot set up a stable society because it's like throwing a plate, knife and fork to a pack of wolves, they wont' know wtf to do with the shit.

People like you don't even believe what you say anyway, always playing the "well this is the way it is so you will have ot accept it" game, when if western people played that game it would be an outrage.
.

I agree with what you are saying in principal, but this equalization of mass immigration to colonization is silly when they are done under completely different systems.

It's probably true that nobody "asked for this", but then again, the majority of people accepted the paradigm and has done so for decades, and now we see a swing back.

But the fact remains that in my country, there were serious conservative parties who never would have agreed to the introduction of socialist politics that paved the way for mass immigration.

Were the colonized nations offered a similar path? No, they were conquered by a superior force.

What? Latin America is 95% mixed in various percentages. The idea that there are pure natives running around Latin America as anything but the last remains of a race is pure nonsense.

That's actually pretty simple OP. When white people colonize your countries, we make them better.
When brown people colonize Europe and North America, you make it a shit hole like your part of the world.

>when a few Brown people peacefully come to their countries
>peacefully
Because that doesn't actually happen.

How many brown people have you invited into your home to live with your family. None? That's what I thought faggot.

Immigration is almost impossible without roads

...

you aren't being honest though. Yes people have had a chance to elect anti immigrant parties.....who also dragged in a bunch of other bullshit. Like i said, nobody was expecting a complete takeover, people shouldn't have to deal with that....you shouldn't have to vote for a fucking nazi just to stop the complete takeover of your country by immigrants, but thats damn near where we are at with it. What type of shit is this? Nonsense.

There is still millions of native people living in south america. I don't know what else to tell you. Don't you remember when they "found" like 5 million of them in the jungle in the 90's and they started invading towns wanting some type of revolution.

Your argument is basically because some spanish generals invaded the place and interbred with the population 400 years ago that they should be allowed free citizenship to america.

Also with all this immigration stuff you apparently agree with, how do you feel about western people migrating to other countries to use their systems? Would you accept western people moving to say india to live off welfare in the future because they cannot get it together in america?

Sins of the father are not paid by the son.

No you didn't. Singapore
>illteracy at 90%
>unemployment at 30%
>virtually no industrialisation
>still using buckets to carry shit

Why did you mark Russia as Europe?

Yeah they are.

I'm not being dishonest, you are the one who is trying to equalize colonization to mass immigration. This is ridiculous regardless of what kind of result it leads to.

Yes there are a couple of millions natives still living in Latin America among the 500-600 million people living there, 95% of which are mixed to various degrees depending on location.

The rest of your post I don't even understand, I've never talked about any kind of right or anything. All I said is that European dominance of the planet, and the literal creation of hybrid races is the reason for most of the immigration to Europe and the US, and that is a fact Sup Forums refused to deal with.

Instead it dives into victim narratives of "genocide" and "colonization", completely nonsense made up by people with a dissonance to reality.

Just to make my stance perfectly clear, I'm 100% anti-immigration and a nationalist. I just refuse to buy into this bullshit victim narrative that is pushed around here.