HAPPENING II

CNN CONFIRMED FAKE NEWS!
CNN Producer Says Russia Narrative “bullsh*t"
youtube.com/watch?v=jdP8TiKY8dE

CONTINUATION OF FIRST THREAD

ITT: Shills trying to blackpill.
>its nothing goy

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WOOYIa-sOB4
youtube.com/watch?v=jdP8TiKY8dE
twitter.com/JeffTutorials/status/879807103560536064
politico.com/static/PPM191_110808_bluman.html
washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-asked-intelligence-chiefs-to-push-back-against-fbi-collusion-probe-after-comey-revealed-its-existence/2017/05/22/394933bc-3f10-11e7-9869-bac8b446820a_story.html?utm_term=.fd41abec9af4
washingtonpost.com/....
youtube.com/watch?v=d8-Mewrnwio
m.youtube.com/watch?v=l31mGxitqbQ
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
thefreethoughtproject.com/fbi-impersonate-media-mockingbird/
youtube.com/watch?v=ForvEyNABs8
youtube.com/watch?v=VcA76lcXtwU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Memelyneux already did a video on it.

Its seems that CNN, like the NYT is passing thruoght a shitstorm right now.

youtube.com/watch?v=WOOYIa-sOB4

You obviously have it figured out. Just be careful that you don't switch the jewish cock in your mouth for the one next to it.

Burn them all down

The only one sucking off jew cock is you, dear shill, as you are doing their dirty work.

>We're ok

>CNN CONFIRMED FAKE NEWS!
>CNN Producer Says Russia Narrative “bullsh*t"
>youtube.com/watch?v=jdP8TiKY8dE
>
>CONTINUATION OF FIRST THREAD
>
>ITT: Shills trying to blackpill.
>>its nothing goy
Before another shill tries to say it's nothing good think about this: CNN and the MSM spread a fake narrative that could have started WW3 with a nuclear duper power for ratings

It's just a friendly advice kid.

404

...

huh nevermind, must've been a google server issue. loads now.

That's not why they did it. The jews in charge did it to blackmail Trump and lower his approval ratings.

Nope. The video is still online.

what a surprise lul

Works here, maybe for Americlaps it doesn't work

t. fox news subscriber LOL

This is fake news. The press is more important than ever in these times.

seems to work now, must've been a google server issue
thanks for confirming anyways

It's not nothing, but stop acting like this is momentous or some shit, if you had half a fucking brain, CNN being confirmed "fake news" wouldn't have been a fucking shocker.Because it wasn't for me. This isn't going to lead to anything, even if CNN gets dissolved, a majority of the people there will just be going to other media companies, probably on the DL. But hey, just call this a black pill, call me a shill, but try not to cry yourself to sleep when it turns out to be true.

t. Jeff Zuckersucker

Are you retarded? Even shills make more sense than you.

>it's nothing goy, we just did it for the money

Just because there's no evidence of Russian collusion doesn't mean shit. 6 million intel agencies confirmed it

> 6 million intel agencies confirmed it
I see what you did there

...

...

...

It's like the vault7 releases, it's one thing "knowing" about something and another having it confirmed with proofs.
Also it's more about the normies and libs who still actually watch CNN.
Even if it's just CNN that gets BTFO for now it will lower trust in the media in general among the general populace.

Time will tell man, I know it's a start, I just remain cautious is all.

american pple are sheep, they believe whatever their government plots them to believe.
that cnn guy is probably a CIA spy working under trump, what a coincidence after the last CIA director being fired, no more trump russia investigation, then comes the putin documentary showing him asawsome, and now this, shilling showing that CNN is "fake news" how convenient.
and drumpf lovers will swallow this massive blue pill like the shit they are

"there's no evidence of Russian collusion" means that there is no Russian collusion.
Did you hear something about "Presumption of innocence" ?

Back to /leftypol/, faggot

t. bluepill

>its nothing goy, go to sleep

kys shill

He was clearly intoxicated on liquor and drugs. The video was entrapment. Veritas will be sued and the person who recorded the footage will be sent to jail.

>0,02 shekels were deposited to your account

I can see your nose from here

Dude, give it up. You lost. You talk like some 90 year old japanese island dweller, thinking WW2 is still going.

A day kikes were BTFO and they are here butthurt over it. What beautiful day!

I'm assuming when you talk about press you are talking about project veritas. because cnn isnt reporting shit.

Remember that boomers grew up with the Cold War. The Russia narrative was a good way to exploit the subconscious memories of the boomer.

people dont make shit up because they are drunk and high, quite the opposite.

but o'keffe IS probably going to get sued, like he always does, he's ready for it.

nobody is going to jail except hillary, maybe lorreta lynch, and debbie w-s.

You have to go back

God, these threads have to be made by people being paid to propagandize everything that can be construed as undercutting the investigation into Trump.

The video is of an wealthy cunt expressing sever apathy to anything beyond making money. Whether it's ethics or the investigation. He iterates multiple times in the video that he doesn't know, and why the fuck WOULD he? He's a fucking producer for fucks sake, all he gives a shit about is ratings.

Give me a video of a top US official intimately involved with the investigation saying it's a bullshit hoax and I'll be duly impressed.

You could replace the faggot in this video with a hobo carried in off the street for all the weight his words carry.

>the investigation into Trump.
what are we investigating again?

you realize you cant sustain the witch hunt until september 2018 right?

its lulzy, and the bullshit will only feed trump an easy win in 2020.

>you realize you cant sustain the witch hunt until september 2018 right?
>its lulzy, and the bullshit will only feed trump an easy win in 2020.

Keep spouting bullshit, you shill. Your job depends on it.

>what are we investigating again?

Last I checked it was obstruction of justice with a side of foreign collusion.

>Last I checked it was obstruction of justice with a side of foreign collusion.
foreign collusion is not a crime.
obstruction of justice is a meme. he hasnt done anything that the president isnt allowed to do and comey said specifically that he did not whitness any obstruction of justice. Watch comey's testimony yourself, the only serious indictment he makes is towards lorretta lynch.

seriously, for CNN its raitings, for the Dems its their entire 2018 platform because they have no platform. The nationalist socialist bernistas will take over after the 2020 defeat, then you will know the true scope of our victory and you will share it with us.

They are deleting comments on a video not on their own JewTube channel

>ITT: We post fake news
FTFY

>foreign collusion is not a crime.

Holy shit, the double think is real. I love how quickly you shills are trying to move the goal posts too.

>Trump didn't collude with Russians!
>Uh, collusion isn't a crime!

>obstruction of justice is a meme. he hasnt done anything that the president isnt allowed to do and comey said specifically that he did not whitness any obstruction of justice. Watch comey's testimony yourself, the only serious indictment he makes is towards lorretta lynch.

Apparently you know better than fucking Mueller, and it's not just about Comey any more. Trump was trying to get the DNI and NSA to deny evidence of Russian collusion as well.

>seriously, for CNN its raitings, for the Dems its their entire 2018 platform because they have no platform. The nationalist socialist bernistas will take over after the 2020 defeat, then you will know the true scope of our victory and you will share it with us.

You know what a fucking witch hunt looks like you fuck? Impeaching a president because he had a consensual affair with a woman and wanted to quibble about the definition of 'sex' while under oath.

The number of parties from Trump's administration guilty of perjury and getting off scott-free is gobsmacking considering the charge was enough to impeach Clinton over.

And you fucking want to claim "obstruction of justice" and "foreign collusion" is nothing?

Go fuck yourself.

I watched the video, and it's really long and boring.

tl;dr, some guy goes in and gets a temp to say the Russian narrative is BS; despite there being mountains of evidence stating otherwise. I wouldn't be surprised if this guy paid the temp to say those things to get attention for his own website.

It's a nonissue.

of course they do it for ratings.
you won't get them to stop and at this point I don't think you'd be able to get old people to stop watching CNN all day

Shill GTFO

That was a CNN Producer, I don't think he's a temp. But it still doesn't matter.

They have as much access to the investigation as the rest of us. They aren't an authority on the subject privy to confidential information, they're just messengers that "Project Veritas" are trying to shoot.

Give me one (1) good reason to believe that the Russia narrative being fake news is not fake news itself. Im waiting.

B U M P
U
M
P

>Trump didn't collude with Russians!
he didnt, not that I've argued that here, but that allegation hasnt been made at all. Even the MSM frames it as "people in his campaign". Colluded with the russians

>Uh, collusion isn't a crime!
its not, name the statute. colluding to commit a crime is a crime, but simply working together with someone, foreigner or otherwise is not a crime. Unless hypothetically you want to go back to the logan act which has been btfo as a potential avenue of litigation. Even the prosecutory path for the logan act is hilariously thin, but there is more evidence for that than anything else.

>Apparently you know better than fucking Mueller, and it's not just about Comey any more. Trump was trying to get the DNI and NSA to deny evidence of Russian collusion as well.

mueller has not testified to anything, nor issued any findings. What mueller knows is not publicly known, nor is it proported to be anything more than nothing.

>You know what a fucking witch hunt looks like you fuck? Impeaching a president because he had a consensual affair with a woman and wanted to quibble about the definition of 'sex' while under oath.

ya, the clinton impeachment was a witchhunt, should there have been a special prosecutor? probably not... did he lie under oath? yes. but seriously check whether you want to bring up the conduct of past presidents in this, because you are about to open this argument way further than you want.

It wasnt about the definition of "sex", it was about the definition of "sexual relations" dont try to misrepresent the situation. A blowjob is clearly "sexual relations".

>The number of parties from Trump's administration guilty of perjury and getting off scott-free is gobsmacking considering the charge was enough to impeach Clinton over.
I dont think there has even been a claim that Trump has lied under oath, I dont know that he has even testified under oath.

The sessions perjury accusation is waaaay thinner.

Some videos get cyclical comments. Old comments get deleted to make room for the new ones. Might be the case here.

addendum.

>And you fucking want to claim "obstruction of justice" and "foreign collusion" is nothing?

foreign collusion is still not a crime.
obstruction of justice is a crime, but nobody will be charged because it is a witch hunt.

>The former US government said Russia hacked the election
>The media said they hacked the election
>Multiple sources said that Russia hacked the election
>FBI said Russia hacked the election
>Britain said Russia hacked Brexit
>France detected Russian hackers during their election
>Germany accused Russians of funding right wing movements throughout Europe

So either literally every western government including our own is untrustworthy or you are all Russian plants. What do you think is more likely?

Because reporting on fake news makes news about it being fake automatically fake?

>moving goalposts
nobodies trying to claim russia didn't attempt to hack the election. the claim by the lying press was that trump and co. colluded with russia. why did you not mention that?

>literally every western government including our own is untrustworthy
sounds about right desu

fuck off shill

that was obviously a troll and baiting attempt which you fell for

Imagine being a Democuck right now:
>the symbol of capitalism, racism, and exclusion won the presidency, catapulting ethno-nationalism and conservatism back into the mainstream
>your political party has been bombed back to the stone age, unable to do anything but obstruct increasingly fewer issues
>the one person on your side, the media, were just outed as liars, putting out your final hope for salvation
>all you have left is feigning smugness on a Saudi Arabian line-dancing forum while your worst enemies retake the new world

Wah waaaahh. Thanks Debbie Downer, easy to look on the bright side.

twitter.com/JeffTutorials/status/879807103560536064
the bots are on it lads

You mean like the James Comey hearing?

I dont think this is going to cause any legal implications, its just about influencing court of public opinion. But the exact same has been said about the russian investigation itself.

you are witnessing two sides fight for legitimization of their presentation of reality. This is a huge win for Dimension A's reality.

Producer, temp, same thing. Just like you're dick and a vagina.

im just happy we have Fox to rely on

seriously curious what these mountains of evidence are.

You're whole life is fake. You're mommy should have aborted you since it's her choice. Get a real job and claiming you are pro feminist is not going to get you laid shill. Be a man

>he didnt, not that I've argued that here, but that allegation hasnt been made at all. Even the MSM frames it as "people in his campaign". Colluded with the russians

Then you're implying Trump is fucking stupid because if he is innocent, then he's incriminated himself by obstructing an investigation that would have proved his innocence.

>its not, name the statute. colluding to commit a crime is a crime, but simply working together with someone, foreigner or otherwise is not a crime. Unless hypothetically you want to go back to the logan act which has been btfo as a potential avenue of litigation. Even the prosecutory path for the logan act is hilariously thin, but there is more evidence for that than anything else.

See:
politico.com/static/PPM191_110808_bluman.html

There might be several statutes, but at least one is the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Where a foreign national spending money to influence a federal election is a crime, and a US citizen collaborating with them in that spending is a crime.

>What mueller knows is not publicly known, nor is it proported to be anything more than nothing.

I've never claimed to know what Mueller knows, only that there's clearly enough material there to warrant an investigation. You were the one who claimed that there was nothing to investigate. And we do know Trump tried to solicit other department heads to deny evidence:
washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-asked-intelligence-chiefs-to-push-back-against-fbi-collusion-probe-after-comey-revealed-its-existence/2017/05/22/394933bc-3f10-11e7-9869-bac8b446820a_story.html?utm_term=.fd41abec9af4

>ya, the clinton impeachment was a witchhunt

I'm glad conservatives are changing their tune on this even if it's just to defend Trump in egregiously worse circumstances.

>The sessions perjury accusation is waaaay thinner.

Thinner than whether or not a blowjob constitutes sex? How is that possible?

youtube
"fox news ignores"....
fox is not for freedom. They just happen to have less spooks than CNN, CBS et al.

Are you comparing the once head of the FBI with some producer for CNN's health network?

>He was clearly intoxicated on liquor and drugs.
In vino, veritas

>1,000,000 view

US officials can still be affected by the media. Look at Bill Cosby and Hannibal Buress

That video is going viral

>thinks being a Trump supporter makes people a shill
I'd say kill yourself, but that's one less heathen commie faggot to throw off buildings during the 2nd American revolution

Every western govt is untrustworthy

You suck uncut cock? Gross.

get a load of this fucking guy:

[score hidden] 13 minutes ago
All this proves is that some people at CNN doubt the Russia story. And this is supposed to prove CNN is so incredibly one sided and biased how? They're clearly willing to employ people who doubt the Russia story. I thought this went against the conservative narrative about CNN.
oof

"Hack the election"

Anyone who even uses such a vague faggy phrase deserves to die.

>Then you're implying Trump is fucking stupid because if he is innocent, then he's incriminated himself by obstructing an investigation that would have proved his innocence.

he didnt obstruct, he didnt stop any investigation. The investigation will prove his non-guilt.


>See:
>politico.com/static/PPM191_110808_bluman.html
this is about $$$ paid to a campaign by foreigners.
no evidence of this, even if it happened the legal burden falls on the people donating to be american, not the campaign to verify the relationship of a donor to the united states

>There might be several statutes, but at least one is the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Where a foreign national spending money to influence a federal election is a crime,...

Sure, this is a crime, there is no evidence of money coming from russia to trump afaik. It wont be persued because money often comes from overseas and is poorly regulated. China to clinton, aipac to everyone.

>I've never claimed to know what Mueller knows, only that there's clearly enough material there to warrant an investigation.

The democrats in congress called for an investigation, so there is an investigation. There doesnt have to be any evidence for an investigation to be called for by congress.

>You were the one who claimed that there was nothing to investigate. And we do know Trump tried to solicit other department heads to deny evidence:
>washingtonpost.com/....
Trump tried to solicit department heads to confirm lack of evidence.
>>WaPo WaPo WaPo

>I'm glad conservatives are changing their tune on this even if it's just to defend Trump in egregiously worse circumstances.
I was like 10 when clinton was impeached.

>Thinner than whether or not a blowjob constitutes sex? How is that possible?

Thinner than whether a blowjob constitutes "sexual relations". Clinton didnt use the word "sex". Claiming he perjured himself by saying "sex" is fake news. Its misrepresenting reality.

Poor guy, lost his cozy CNN job because of some bullshit that changes a grandstanding 0 minds

>he thinks the British government is trustworthy
oh lawdy son I gots me a story to tell you bouts some WMDs now

Of course they can, it's part of the reason why Mitt Romney looked like an ass in the debates with Obama by spouting bullshit fed to him through Fox News' echo chamber. That doesn't somehow make a producer for CNN's health network the end all for matters concerning the Trump investigation. That's a ridiculous leap of logic and makes no sense.

In this political climate? When the guy is alienating our international allies, destroying US reputation abroad, making a mockery of some of our most esteemed government institutions. Putting people like Pruitt in charge of the EPA (where HE bizarrely lobbies coal companies to not back the Paris accords) and DeVos in charge of our Educational System. Trying to pass a healthcare bill which will cut a TRILLION dollars from medicare and the like, knocking 22 million Americans off of their insurance so he can give the trillion back to the most wealthy families in the United States as tax breaks. Passing a bullshit infrastructure bill that sells our public land, highways and national parks to private corporations at a discount price.

Honestly? Yeah.

I think you either need to be absurdly wealthy, fucking stupid, or a paid shill to support Trump at this juncture. The only thing I'm happy about that he's done was kill TPP.

>literally every western government including our own is untrustworthy

After all the lies about the Iraq war, you really don't think this is possible?

youtube.com/watch?v=d8-Mewrnwio


dont throw stones in a glass house.

what you on about lad? Blair is a war criminal, we all agree

...

yes I suppose that should be directed to the friend you were replying to.

chin up

MODS WE NEED A STICKY

It's been all fake news since the 60's and most people know it by now so anyone saying it isn't is an obvious shill considering the massive amount of video evidence.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=l31mGxitqbQ
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
thefreethoughtproject.com/fbi-impersonate-media-mockingbird/

Said mostly bs.. op is fake news.

>he didnt obstruct, he didnt stop any investigation. The investigation will prove his non-guilt.

Here we go being Mueller again.

>Sure, this is a crime, there is no evidence of money coming from russia to trump afaik. It wont be persued because money often comes from overseas and is poorly regulated. China to clinton, aipac to everyone.

Spending money to run propaganda campaigns from Russia or fund cyber attacks is more than enough to constitute the crime.

To be honest this conversation seems incredibly disingenuous to me. Do you honestly expect me to believe you have a hard time imagining how a foreign power flaunting the sovereignty of our country to help get a candidate elected is not illegal? Nobody is that thick.

>The democrats in congress called for an investigation, so there is an investigation. There doesnt have to be any evidence for an investigation to be called for by congress.

Hahaha, what? That's not how a special counsel works. Mueller was called in by Rosenstein, Trump's deputy attorney general.

>Washingtonpost delivers information which doesn't feed the propagandized bullshit I require, no way am I going to consider any of that shit valid

You should try expanding your horizons a little, I mean, that's why I come to this shithole of a board.

>I was like 10 when clinton was impeached.

So? I have strong opinions on Abraham, Teddy, FDR, Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr. I wasn't alive for any of them either, but how does that preclude my ability to form opinions on what they did?

>Thinner than whether a blowjob constitutes "sexual relations". Clinton didnt use the word "sex". Claiming he perjured himself by saying "sex" is fake news. Its misrepresenting reality.

What's thin about the whole fucking thing is that a consensual affair with an adult woman is not a matter of national security. Everything that Sessions, Pruitt, Tillerson ect. have been caught out lying about IS.

Essential redpills:

youtube.com/watch?v=ForvEyNABs8

youtube.com/watch?v=VcA76lcXtwU