Political compass thread

GET IN HERE

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleolibertarianism
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

...

...

...

...

Unite the right!

A lot of the questions are useless because they are too context-specific or too vague to represent radical views.

>I'd always support my country, whether it was right or wrong.
Nothing about your folk, only your country. Creates misleading results if you are a nationalist but don't like your country. It assumes that country = people.

>Our civil liberties are being excessively curbed in the name of counter-terrorism.
If you agree with this it rates you toward libertarian, even if you're a fascist who just hates the American deep state but would support the same policies under a different regime.

>Although the electronic age makes official surveillance easier, only wrongdoers need to be worried.
Same problem.

>It is important that my child's school instills religious values.
Wouldn't matter if it were Buddhism or Wahhabi Islam, you get rated toward authoritarian if you agree.

This test is nearly worthless but everyone loves being neatly placed in a literal box.

...

>there are still people who believe in libertariansim

I always feel disappointed when I take these and find my results relatively close to the center.

Actually my position is more paleo-libertarian/hoppean than classic libertarianism.
I'm ready to physically remove the degenerates.

dunno why im put where i am consider im not an ancom or a socialist

...

That's the outdated one, fags.

what the fuck does that mean

...

...

yup

It's a suicidal political ideology. Your enemy doesn't even have to divide you, you've let your self-centered, individualist mentally do that for them.

>Paleolibertarianism is a variety of libertarianism developed by anarcho-capitalist theorists Murray Rothbard and Llewellyn Rockwell that combines conservative cultural values and social philosophy with a libertarian opposition to government intervention.

Have a good read
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleolibertarianism

>28
>British immigrant in Texas
>married no kids

Rate me

How does this conservative culture maintain itself without a unifying body like the state?

...

But I believe the State need to provide me with:
1)Protection form internal treat (police-esque service)
2)Protection from violation of private contracts (courts system)
3)Protection from external treats (an army based on national spirit who defend me from invaders)

I also want a tax cap in the costitution (range 5%-20% for emergency)

You don't need to have the exact same interests, you just need to have similar ones. Look at what happened with the Trump election.

...

How would your country deal with:
>immigration
>manipulative media
>plutocratic influence (de facto rule by the rich)
>moral laws like consensual child sex

When people had similar interests in policy and could only choose one person to determine it. How does that parallel to an ancap where there are no presidents or central legislative bodies? How will those similar interests remain similar if there is no state around which those interests revolve? What's to prevent your population from eventually being displaced like in America today?

...

I'm a private owner property: I dont want to associate myself with degenerates, kikes, left wing hand users and niggers. If my district can assure me these rules will be enforced (because we property owner all agree) or i'll change my location. As simple as that.

...

...

...

only correct answer

I have moved farther to the right, and above the line, since the last time i took the test