Would you restrict voting rights if you could? To who?

Would you restrict voting rights if you could? To who?
Native-born citizens? Property owners? Families? Non-welfare-using taxpayers?

Other urls found in this thread:

americannaziparty.com/news/archives.php/


archive.is/ome51
differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/the-differences-between-socialism-and-national-socialism/
archive.is/80pgh
archive.is/7CUMq
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Yes.

I don't Vote, it only encourages them.

>Would you restrict voting rights if you could?
Yes.
>To who?
Whites only.

if you restricted it to only natives Only Indians would be able to vote.

*annnd jews.

White property owning male protestants.

25, pay directly more in taxes than you directly take out in welfare for the current year, and pass a really simple civics test, something like 5 questions, multiple choice, questions like when was the declaration of independence written, etc., have to get 3 right.

Everybody would be grouped into various categories. People like landowners, property owners, business owners, etc, would get some bonuses. People of particular good standing like doctors or police officers would get priority. You'd still have to be approved on a case to case basis though.

Also only particular offices.

interesting question. I would suggest perhaps
>land owners
>property renters
>employed people

People who should Be able to vote.
> everyone except convicts.
It's a Right people.

I have a better idea How about everyone is allowed to vote aside from convicts.

a valid point. it would be good if the US could enforce even that much

I'd restrict voting to electoral princes.

Exactly.

>*annnd jews.
Fuck the kikes. The kikes don't deserve to be in any White country. They're also not White.

I'd vote to have them deported for all time.

Also...
>kekistani

White men over 25 years of age who pay taxes, aren't on benefits, and who are currently married with children.

Find a flaw.

One vote per tax dollar spent

Please leave Sup Forums isn't the place it used to be.

I'm a Jew and I'm white as shit!

I've thought about this a lot:

- People with higher IQs votes should count for more
- People who can prove they are educated in the subject (degrees, experience) and know what the vote is about should count for more
- People should vote sometime after how well the vote worked out for them, if its negative, the people who voted for that things future votes should count for less

Loads of other criteria about how well the individual makes decisions. We could use a computer program to determine with all this data how much the person vote should be worth.

^ This by far would lead to the best results possible for the whole country.

> unironically federalist.

Voters should also have to own guns.

...

>Please leave Sup Forums isn't the place it used to be.
Go fuck yourself you anti-White kike lover. You'll never belong here.


>I'm a Jew and I'm white as shit!
You can't be White. Jews are a non-White race and Judaism is inherently an anti-White religion.

>anarcho capitalist
oic. You're retarded as well.

Pretty sure this is the demographic who got us into this mess to begin with.

>Whites only.
Whites brought their shitty situation on themselves by embracing liberalism, a European ideology. Just limiting votes to whites wouldn't change anything as long as the liberal ideology is widespread.

No provision that specifies jews as nonwhite.

> white
Just abolish democracy and the republic.
I'm a Individualist But It's not a Option

You can only vote if you show up with a tax form from the previous year showing you paid taxes, and paid more in taxes than you recieved in earned income tax credits by atleast 50%

Actually changed my mind, no one should vote.
We should plug all decisions into a super computer AI system that can determine the best course of action.

>AI is completely unbiased, only works on logic that benefit the majority
>Can't be bribed into making decisions
>No need to re-elect, with every decision is gets smarter and makes better ones (deep learning).

We already use computers to drive our cars, fly our planes and handle almost everything in our life, why not let them run the country?

I'd even throw in military service requirements (think starship troopers) on top of that, although I currently wouldn't do that simply because in the modern era, our military is just a tool of ZOG.

But in a theoretical /ourcountry/, I'd have that as a requirement too.

also waaaaay better than natsocs.

>I have a better idea How about everyone is allowed to vote aside from convicts.
I'd be more comfortable with a murderer voting than I would a welfare leech. At least the murderer knows how to get shit done.

I don't need to specify jews as nonwhite, just I don't need to specify niggers as nonwhite. It'd be a tautology

> hacks the computer.
This is a Problem now.

>Whites brought their shitty situation on themselves
That's the Jews, newfag.

>by embracing liberalism, a Jewish ideology.
FTFY

>Just limiting votes to whites wouldn't change anything as long as the liberal ideology is widespread.
Non-Whites wouldn't be voting and therefore we'd eventually purge White countries of sub-human filth.

>I'm a Individualist But It's not a Option
You sound like a typical Jew aka anti-White to me.

>also waaaaay better than natsocs.
That's because you believe the lies of the Jews. Capitalism is just as Jewish a Marxist Socialism is.

Murder can be Justified aswell.

If I had my way it would be restricted to adult men with at least 2 years direct gov service (military, police, firefighter, etc) shit like working as an aide to a politician wont count, don't live with parents, and pay more in taxes than they recieve in direct government benifits. Also widows of at least 35 years of age with 2 or more children who meet the other requirments.

Only people with military service can vote - enlist today!

I'm not anti-white or black. or any race.

>Actually changed my mind, no one should vote.
>We should plug all decisions into a super computer AI system that can determine the best course of action.

I like this idea.

> unironically a natsoc.

1 vote per taxable household, no votes for well-fare except disability.

fatal flaw.

Yes. Only property owners and members of the military should have the right to vote.

>I'm not anti-white or black. or any race.
You're a Jew. Therefore you're inherently anti-White.

Jews are born nation wreckers.

You saying you're not anti-black just proves it.


Yes.
There's literally nothing wrong with National Socialism you judeo capitalist.

Only the head of the household who is also a citizen property owner should vote. One voter per property. Veterans of all wars automatically get a vote.

>Yes.
>There's literally nothing wrong with National Socialism you judeo capitalist.

Pick one faggot:
>Nothing wrong.
>Socialism.

> shoe shortages.
> genocide

This is true, but again this problem will be fixed with deep learning.
>Computer re-writes its source code in an encryption system it invented which only it can understand.
Annnnd good luck trying to hack that (This was a bad example but i think deep learning will find away to make itself un-hackable).

This program only took input from messages from twitter, imagine if it knew the age, location, gender, profession, internet history of the poster and took that into consideration as well before adjusting it's logic.

this

also, weight it in favor of wealth. those who pay more taxes have a more important vote.

Idk what the fuck
> food shortages.

I would increase the age to 25.

Abolish the state = no need for voting.

>Non-welfare-using taxpayers?
That one. Nobody on welfare should be voting. They are takers, not givers. This would include corporate welfare, too. If you don't contribute, you don't vote.

Also removed should be anyone who has ever said or applauded "I hate America." And anyone who has anything positive to say about socialism should be lined up against a wall and permanently deported.

I feel like this is deserving of an Ancap ball but I'm a newfag without a template.

"As a National Socialist, how would you define the difference between a National Socialist and a Communist?"
americannaziparty.com/news/archives.php/
archive.is/ome51

The Differences Between Socialism and National Socialism
differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/the-differences-between-socialism-and-national-socialism/
archive.is/80pgh

How National Socialism is Different from Marxist Socialism
archive.is/7CUMq


>Holocaust
>Happened
Pick one.

Im Not a ancap im an agorist Individualist.

>Im Not a ancap im a jew.
ftfy

One vote per household

Some of these proposals are horribly convuluted, unnecessary, and would be prone as hell to corruption and backfiring
>basing power of voting on wealth
What constitutes wealth? Who decides it? Do you understand how hard and subjective it would be to track that? Just make it that you get to vote if you put in more than you take. You have skin in the game at that point, that's all that matters. You want some billionaire banker or inheritance baby wielding that much control in the voting process
>basing it on iq
Again that can get too subjective. Something like a civics test does a better job by simply removing window lickers from the equation, which is all your aimiming for anyway. Another problem is genius level people tend to be completely decoupled from the reality of the society they live in
>things like living with your parents
Some responsible younger people choose to stay with their parents to save rather than live by the skin of their teeth. Some stay to help support them for various reasons. It also imcentivizes artificially breaking up families when it doesn't warrant it.

Restrict it to property owners if we're going to have voting at all.

no because voting does not matter
even if the voting system was not rigged, mental manipulation of the public has been perfected. neuro linguistic programming is proven to be more effective on people of higher intelligence too.

Anyone who watches cable or network news constantly or reads vox or the dailycaller or any of the like would be fuckin banned. Watch this country become a utopia after 2 election cycles

Anybody who voted for Trump should lose their voting right forever. They're obviously dumb motherfuckers to the core.

> film ,evidence,bodies,camps.
>food shortages.

Look it up.

All citizens can vote.
Citizenship ala starship troopers.

Abolish the state, you should agree.

Votes should be earned on an individual basis, not a class basis.

Serve in the Military or Emergency Service for 5 years? Get to vote for life.

Work front line with the Public for a decade (DMV, teacher, OCS) get to vote for life.

Perform 160h of community service (in the community, not baking cookies for a fundraiser in your home) you get to vote for the next two years in the US.

We need a Starship Trooper type agency that will find people public service, no matter how fucked up you are, if you want to vote or do your civic duty.

If you don't have a permanent vote and you end up net negative on taxes due to welfare or some shit you can't vote, no matter how much public service you did.

Nobody needs to vote. Voting is a completely imaginary distraction.

1. No voting rights for immigrants until the second generation

2. No voting rights if you receive any public assistance.

3. No voting rights to those who receive the earned income tax credit.

4. Voting rights only to those who pay income tax (excepting legal deductions)

>1. No voting rights for immigrants until the second generation
*No voting rights for LEGAL immigrants until the second generation
(OBVIOUSLY NO VOTING RIGHTS FOR ILLEGALS, EVER)