Men: WTF happened?

>60 years of liberal indoctrination has brought us to pic related

>1517
>20 years of Father Luther's new doctrines gave rise to 40 new sects
>Christendom fractured into theological rivalry via theological liberalism, aka protestantism
>200 years later
>hundreds of individual Christian sects all claiming to be the true Christian sect
>protestant principle of private interpretation infects all streams of thought, seeps into philosophy
>protestants disillusioned with the sectarian and subjective nature of protestantism begin a humanist philosophical revolution
>1717
>Masonic lodge founded in London based upon the egalitarian, Judaizing principles of Anabaptists and Jacobite/Whig revolutionaries
>Quickly abandon religious foundations and promote secularism and overthrow of authority, namely the authority of the Catholic Church and the Monarch
>Masonry uses Protestantism as a weapon against the foundational principles of Christendom: Catholicism
>Secularism rises
>1776
>America founded
>First secular, godless nation on planet earth in recorded human history
>1789, French revolution
>Protestant private interpretation altered philosophy and manifested itself in political realm in the actual overthrow of altar and throne
>Christendom destroyed
>Today
>American Protestants hail the rise of the secular republics as the "best government on earth" and "protected by God"
>200 years of secularism has led to children confused as to which bathroom to use
>Classical liberalism has spread into all facets of the world stage, including the hierarchy of its natural enemy: the Catholic Church
>"Conservatives" wonder how we got here, but still say "We need to get back to the Constitution and everything will be ok"

Remember, there is no slippery slope.

...

Don't worry Frog. There are hundreds of prophecies about France retaking the throne and chasing out the Mahometans, crushing the republics, re-establishing Monarchy throughout Europe, and restoring Christendom.

Your time will come.

Last Roman Emperor will be in our lifetime.

you're a dumb fucking faggot

fashion shows aren't about setting trends or showing what people are into nowadays

they're about making rich asses who watch them go "Oh my!". It's purely about shock value and extravaganza. It has nothing to do with politics whatsoever.

We'll see. I'm banking more on chastisement in our lifetime than witnessing the restoration. Perhaps my children will see it.

dont reply to op he is a datamining NSA nigger. many of these replies are bots using replies from previous threads. dont divulge anything more than you would on FB or in person you are not truly anonymous here. Hurpp

...

And people wonder why muzzies think we're ripe for conquest

I RARELY post or reply anything but you made me screencap this!

Feminism
Women are controlled by their feelings.

the faggotization happened

Did they Jews also create modern fashion ? Because most of the shit you see is super expensive and looks degenerate as hell like OP pic

the cure is death

Too many beta males that care about being kind hearted empathetic pussies reproduced while the alpha mean jerks died off in wars leading to the white race having a testosterone decline.

nay, it shall be reborn as the horde kills itself off as per usual.

We already had this post this morning. Turned into a suit discussion/recommendations.

And no, this won't be mainstream, it's just autistic designers in a peacock competition.

The sodomite crisis began with the normalization of contraception
>1930, Anglican Lambeth Conference
>Allowed limited contraception between married couples in opposition to 1,900 years of Christian teaching and tradition
>Secular, Catholic, and Protestant world protested that it would lower general morality across nation
>Contraception use was not limited, because when the exception becomes the rule, there are no more exceptions
>Entire secular and Protestant world capitulated within 10 years
>1960
>Sexual revolution. Free-sex requires a disconnect between the natural result of the sexual act
>Humanae Vitae, Pope Paul VI, reaffirms the traditional teaching concerning contraception and procreation
>Canadian Bishops officially rebel; Many American Bishops officially rebel; Control Notre Dame was given over to a council of laity so they could push contraception
>Individual Catholics get involved with the hedonist lifestyle in the same proportion as Protestants and secularists
>The connection between procreation and sex is frayed from a young age with parental behavior ("family planning") and sex-ed
>Sex becomes all about pleasure
>When the measure of the goodness of the act is merely pleasure, who is to say what pleasure can be extracted
>Sodomitical behavior and contraceptive behavior are philosophically the same, as both are sterile
>Homosexuality becomes more acceptable in the minds of the young, since most heterosexual sex is sterile anyway and sex is all about pleasure
>OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, sodomite union SCOTUS decision
>Dissenting Judge Alito
>"If this traditional understanding of the purpose of marriage does not ring true to all ears today, that is probably because the tie between marriage and procreation has frayed"

This is how we arrived at faggotry..

We're trapped in the belly of this horrible machine, and the machine is bleeding to death

Fuck.

>Abortion
>Planned Parenthood vs Casey, 1992
>Judge Kennedy
>At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life…. people have organized intimate relationships and made choices that define their views of themselves and their places in society, in reliance on the availability of abortion in the event that contraception should fail..."
>Abortion justified by the use of contraception and the contraceptive mindset

>"At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence" ...
>Kennedy makes the philosophical blunder of classical liberalism
>"Reality" to classical liberals, is relative. The conception of existence is not one's own conception
Thus Kennedy lays the framework for transgender ideology.

It's all connected, folks.

My forward sinuses literally began to burn with rage. I couldn't help but stare, and get furious.

It won't go on forever. Civilization will regain its sanity; the solution is one that no one, not even those a part of the solution, is prepared to accept right now.
After complete collapse, it will be apparent.

There's many anthropological points you have made that retain merit, but this is one I cannot allow to persist in your own mind. The judge's words ring true in the most base concept of justice in our world. His words hold the reasoning that a person who values, holds, and is deserving of liberty will be mentally capable of discerning the rational from it's opposite. Nearly every person befitting these conditions considers transgendered people a form of mentally ill, at least the ones who do not have a wholly passive mindset based in decadence.

>implying US is "godless"
Seriously fuck you. You're judging all of the country by the actions of two cities: NYC and LA. Most of the country, albeit not giant population centers, have great, Christian based communities.

Degeneracy is a less pressing threat than black violence. All of the reports of degeneracy are meant to pull in more democrat voters who love fighting for "progress" (most of whom live in large population, minority cities) and to make retards like you who love traditionalism hate America.

In context, he is speaking to the "right" to define one's own conception of life, existing, of its meaning, of the greatest philosophical questions, and the mystery of human life (in relation to the case's subject matter, abortion; such as when life begins).
There is no objectivity here, and is making the argument that Reality proper is made up between the walls of one's skull. Therefore, he says, true liberty of an individual is the right to hold the most pernicious of errors as "their truth".
The problem here is that private behavior has public consequences. Ridiculously illogical conceptions of one's own existence, such as transgenderism, has very real public consequences.

No, I'm not. If I were, then perhaps you ought to read a bit of history.
Why did the Protestants in the 19th century form a group called the National Reform Association, calling for an amendment to the Constitution, saying that its "original sin" was that it failed to mention Jesus Christ or even God? Their amendment failed and was called unconstitutional--because it was. We're a secular nation with a majority population of Christians.

John Adams was asked why God wasn't mentioned in the Constitution once, and he replied, "I say, sir, we forgot!" These men knew precisely what they were doing; as he knew what he was saying when he wrote the Treaty of Tripoli, Article 13.

American religious freedom is nowhere to be found in Christian Scripture or Tradition. In fact, the religious freedom that we have resembles the religious tolerance law that Julian the Apostate instituted among the Roman Empire in a bid to destroy Christianity. Let heretical sects flourish so that the true Christian Church gets smothered in error.

We are the first nation in recorded human history that is not officially dedicated to a god or gods, much less the true God. We afford the same rights to Buddha, Krishna, Mahomet, and even Satan as we do Jesus Christ. The government cares not if Christians are in society--Christians have a place in the American Pantheon... for now.

I disagree entirely. His words merely reinforce the concept of liberty.

You have to keep something important in mind here. The most innate aspect of liberty, and its place in relation to the philosophical singularity of humanity, is that of progression. Progression in its truest sense, a moving forward of accepted ideals. It's much more likely than not we will see more self awareness in the years to come, and a rejection of the postmodernism that is the basis of modern reassignment of terms (by that I mean "progressives" "liberals" "national socialists" and every other current farce of a term applied to nonsensical and uninformed ideologies.).

Think of the judge's words as an avocation of the potential for logical thinking and humanity's capabilities of determining how it feels about things. In that intent, it quite dissuades illogical thinking patterns such as denying reality (transgendereds, liberal political ideals).

>First secular, godless nation on planet earth in recorded human history
WRONG

The first secular state is Duchal Prussia iirc

Apologies, brother. I'd like to continue this discussion but I have to run an errand. No easy task with five little ones.

How about this--I'll start a thread at 11pm tonight with pic related?

11 Central, that is.

I'm sorry - ROYAL Prussia

>for now
You put all of this faith in "what if" scenarios. America put her faith in the Christians who founded it

Is it a corruptible system? Yes. Are parts of America whorish? Yes. Are some Christians morally imbalanced? Absolutely, especially on the coasts

This does not mean what you think it means though. You are looking at the image projected from America and not actual Americans. The noisiest freaks, like the person in OP, are not rampant.

I say this as a descendent of Andrew Jackson with several Masons in the family. America has a moral center and it's the average, everyday Christian who lives in the heart of it

All that aside, do I believe these freaks should be removed? Yes. Should voting be restricted to white men again? Yes.

NO, I was right with the first post - It was Ducal Prussia that has become the first secular state in the world, without the consent of the Emperor and the Pope

I'm merely a lurker. I might notice it. I'm not religious, let alone orthodox, but its place in humanity's progression and what it represents in our minds is absolutely vital to understanding our place. In that regard, I'll likely avoid religious discussion outside of direct anthropological relation, but am happy to chide on that.