UK rules to pull the plug of baby defying parents' will

>Charlie Gard was born normal but developed a very rare, serious disease 8 weeks in that affects his brain and mitochondria
>gets hospitalized and needs help to breathe
>parents hear there's some experimental treatment in the USA
>medical establishment wants to kill the baby because muh fee-fees
>parents disagree with this and want to get the baby to the US
>UK justice system thinks the doctors are right
>parents managed to get £1.4million with crowdfunding
>isn't much for continued treatment but they still want to use it to bring the baby aboard for the treatment
>UK courts rule against it, muh fee-fees and suffering, better pull the plug
>they managed to get 110,000 signatures asking the Prime Minister to release the baby from the NHS hospital
>pleading falls on deaf ears
>EU courts are totally siding with the doctors and UK courts on killing the baby

nationalreview.com/article/449079/charlie-gard-united-kingdom-court-defies-parents-wishes-rare-disease-die

Some orwellian shit, you have full permission of the government to kill your kid but need to fight them tooth and nail to pay for treatment elsewhere.

isn't it just unbelievably sickening that the British government INSISTS on murdering this white baby, but meanwhile thousands and thousands of white british girls are raped by muslim grooming gangs and no one gives a single fuck.

this abominable nation of reprobates and warped freaks shall feel the punishment of ALMIGHTY GOD one day and it won't be pretty. sick fucks.

and yes, sweden is a trash heap too.

I don't agree with it either but the bairn has severe brain damage and will have no quality of life even if the treatment helps.

Wasn't the UK gov, EU court ruled it.

You clearly know absolutely fuck all about clinical trials, just like the parents.

That statement presupposes the existence of God

AMEN

if it was a muslim baby the UK courts would fund the council-house welfare family a first-class trip to the United States for the best treatment

if the courts refused they'd get fire-bombed by the muslim community

as for op's white family - nobody cares, in fact i bet there's a liberal out there glad a white peerson died.

I hope the state wins and kill the baby. It is but one of many sacrifices required for the return of Evropa.

Stfu Mahmood, that baby deserves to live more than your leechy gay ass

>Give birth to a vegetable
>Ruin their marriage and lives instead of just concieving another baby.
It takes a year at most to make another, healthy, baby, for fuck's sake.

How dare they actually love their baby and don't treat it as some old flip phone, eh Ivan

Sounds harsh but you can't keep a child that has no chance of recovering in hospital for 10 months when the money could be spent on a child that can actually be saved. a machine is keeping him artificially alive so really he is already dead anyway.
Having said that if they have raised the money themselves for him to go to the US for treatment i say let them go provided the kid isnt suffering.

This. The state can kill it and redpill many people, and they can make more.

This was actually ordered by the ECHR, which is a European court.

Euros, keep posting about it on the Internet while doing nothing about it, that will solve the problem!

>gets hospitalized and needs help to breathe

No the baby is terminally ill, it will die. Almost negligible chance it will live. Parents blinded by grief want the baby to continue to suffer. Doctor's disagree. It goes to court, court agrees with doctors that the baby will suffer (UK and EU). Discontinuing treatment is not the same as killing.

I can't believe this is the best option.

Aktion T4 is alive and well, I see.

US healthcare is ba-

Brbro, you're not a vegetable, there's no reason to be agressive.
People need to understand again that sometimes babies die and you have to deal with it. Or that sometimes it's necessary to abort an abomination before it's born into a life of misery.

-ck in black? -ck in the saddle again?

So much for EU's famous healthcare benefits.

British aren't in the EU now, is the baby free to go to America?

why exactly do the parents have the right to other peoples' money? they are not paying for the treatment, the government is. Thus the government gets the call about what to do with the baby.

Cant they just take the baby to a private hospital that will keep him alive as long as they're being payed?

>the state should have the right to kill your kid without your consent
>Britfags will literally defend this

How the fuck can Europeans ever criticize America when the UK is the "most free" nation in Europe? The fucking state of your continent.

Shut up provocateur nigger, what do you expect one Swede to do? You just want him to spend his life in a ZOG jail cell.

DEATH PANELS

>thousands and thousands of white british girls are raped by muslim grooming gangs and no one gives a single fuck
because they weren't actually raped, you feminazi

And people need to understand that what a parents do with their child is their choice, and the state has no business getting involved.

Because the government taxes them for their retarded universal healthcare system so if the government is going to keep random shitskins from dying it should keep actual taxpayers from dying.

This is exactly why the government should have nothing to do with healthcare.

>Canada defending death panels without realizing it
Seems about right.

Why haven't they sterilized all the retards yet?

>British aren't in the EU now,
You know how I know you're American?

>surprise sex isn't rape

Thank you, I've been trying to get people to see it my way for years.

Britain does not leave the EU until 2019, it has a 2 year negotiating period.

This

They raised 1.4 million to go to the USA, it was going to be a private funded thing.

>get brexit
>in a state of leaving the EU
>still subject to EU courts

So what you're saying is that as an American I'm not aware of all the retarded rules binding your country and that the EU can literally fuck up as much shit as it wants before brexit is finalized?

>parents managed to get £1.4million with crowdfunding
Many people wanted this kid to have a shot.

Fuck that, send them to Canada. They have better healthcare than us anyway.

>Some orwellian shit, you have full permission of the government to kill your kid but need to fight them tooth and nail to pay for treatment elsewhere.

A severely brain damaged vegetable kid in constant pain with zero chance of recovery. Put the poor bugger out of its misery.

Who cares, they could have better spent their time and taxpayer money making a healthy baby if this one's life and suffering hadnt been prolonged. But no, lets waste huge amounts of resources on a vegetable with no chance of living a real life.
>inb4 muslimes or shitskins
Yeah, their vegetables should be put down too.
The value of human life is not infinite.

This, essentially. While I disagree with the courts having the power to command it, kid's dead or worse either way. t. medfag

>Kidnap a girl saying you're a taxi
>Take her to a shed somewhere where ten of your paki friends are waiting
>douse her in gasoline, threaten to kill her family if she doesn't fuck you

"Well, it wasn't TECHNICALLY rape because she eventually consented

it's kinda the entire point of "insurance". like, pretty much literally.

>132038744
Too bad it's not their choice how to spend government medical facility funding.
And for some reason they aren't too eager to put their own money on the line to treat their little veggie.

Socialized Healthcare, everybody

isn't Stephen Hawking ill too? Fuck that guy let's off him. What makes him worth keeping alive over that baby?

Are you saying when you go inside a hospital paid by the taxpayers money, you become a possession in the hands of the government? Either way they do have some money for treatment, I don't see why the EU or anyone else should overrule the parents.

They raised 1.4 million to go to the USA. They were going to pay for it all. Read the article.

>UK
>private hospitals

lel

Don't they have a fucking monarch in the UK? Why can't the parents go to her?

>implying women can't withdraw consent for any reason, at any time.

Unless the kidnapper is a Muzzie, then she's fucked, literally and figuratively

I didn't get this at all, like why would the UK courts object to this?

I mean the baby is dying regardless, so even if the treatment fails, then it doesn't really change much. Obviously the parents are still devastated, but at least they know they had a real long shot at it and tried.

So really, what did the court see in this that was so objectionable?

did this happen thousands of times? or did this happen thousands of times:
paki: whore yourself out and i'll give you stuff
"victim": okay

Probably in my country parents would have been able to send the kid in america for the experimental treatment (without involving EU).

The parents will never find closure now. It's cruel.

1) It was the ECHR which is an EU court.

2) They rejected it on the grounds that the Doctors know better than the parents. So if the doctors say the baby should die it should die.

I 100% guarantee you know nothing about insurance or how it works.

>They raised
>They were going to pay
So they cheated gullible retards out of their money to make themselves feel as good parents instead of being responsible and humane?

but who claimed it is "infinite", they have 1.4 million pounds to keep their baby alive, I don't see why they have to obey you or the EU orders to kill the baby. Did you or the EU hand them that money?

>UK rules to pull the plug of baby defying parents' will
That would be enough for me to leave the country. I am a father, and the only thing I can do for these parents is pray for them and their child. God knows if it was me, there would be a hit list created and I guarantee I would get part of the way down the list before they got me. Hopefully they have enough sense to get out before the insanity hits, and they get real help.

If gullible retards want to waste their money, who am I to judge?

The US Doctor said he had an experimental treatment which might work, any parent would jump at that opportunity even if it was a remote chance.

weird stuff really

Why don't the EU have these experimental treatments???

hey some people donate money to videogames, other to hear a feminist babble shit people have said since forever, some donate money to keep a baby alive, to each his own priorities

European healthcare is generally of a low quality because it is all socialised so there is little incentive to experiment.

It's P.K. Dick The Prepersons in developing. I'm kind of scared that I'm not even surprised anymore

>let's spend millions upon millions just to keep a vegetable baby "alive"

Best case scenario, what, you keep it alive and then spend literally the rest of your life housing and caring for a vegetable?

I'm not some hyperational utilitarian nihilistic atheist that places no value on a human life but holy shit

>eu court

I bet this is doing wonders for the anti-Brexit crowd. Now they all get to have a child's death looming over their heads.

Because the EU is garbage for most medical research (UK sometimes excepted). Why do you think the US pays so much for drugs m8?

wait is the kid brain dead or is the kid in constant pain?
Pick a narrative, I assume you mean brain dead Charlie's brain doesn't work anymore? So how is he feeling pain?

Sounds like you're making shit up just to off this kid ASAP, NHS employee.

...

I thought they did have private hospitals ?

Is the baby still alive?

Someone should break in and rescue that poor child. Doubt the hospital has ANY guards.

People being gullible retards was not the point. Wasting resources to make themselves feel god instead of dealing with the problem directly is the issue.
For some reason i'm willing to bet that the US doctor with an 'experemental treatment' was Jewish.
What do you think? I'm thinking 80% chance.

B-BUT BRITBONGS KEEP TELLING ME THAT THEIR SOCIALIZED MEDICAL CARE IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD, HOW COULD THIS BE???

We do, but the court said the parents were not allowed to remove the child from the hospital.

Then why not just kill all the retards that are alive today? The state should get involved with these people. I honestly believe that if you're retarded you shouldn't be allowed to reproduce or have a child. It would literally solve so many problems today but we can't do that because "muh disabled represent diversity." No one wants a retard to give birth to another retard, that would make things only worse.

I just see people posting about it on facebook.

50/50 from personal experience, Rusbro.

>The US Doctor said he had an experimental treatment which might work, any parent would jump at that opportunity even if it was a remote chance.
The treatment for the illness might work but it's not a treatment that will return brain function.

They might fix the underlying cause, but the damage can't be reversed. The kid is already brain dead. It will never recover and will always need life support.

Just have another non retard baby. It only likes on average 10 months.

she's an antiquated prop with no real power

Why are you so upset? Nobody was talking about culling.

imagine if this had happened to mr and mrs Ahmed and their baby
god they'd be off to the states with all expenses paid in less than a fucking day

The treatment will only prolong the suffering of the child. It won't save his life.

>brain dead
that's not the same as brain damage, retard

>It only likes on average 10 months.
Give it a few months there, champ. Don't stick your pee pee into a loose emotional wreck.

This is incredibly stuipid, I think I would try to kill my own child if it would be permanently ill

I'm pretty certain that the decision to terminate the kid was not based upon "Fee-fees."
However, the decision to try to keep it alive and set up a gofuckme for the tot, most certainly were.

When there is profit incentive attached to a field because it's privatized, that incentivizes innovation because the first to innovate get big bucks from it

On the one hand there is cash value attached to life saving material (which can be seen as immoral), but on the other hand it probably wouldn't exist if it weren't for that cash incentive. This is really the core of the debate between private vs public healthcare, but not only that, private vs public for any sector.

It doesn't matter because people already gave money to make it so. The argument given for why this money, which has already been raised, should not be used to attempt it is:
>meh
Are we on the same page now?

They can't throw every single swede in "zog jail". But yes Swedes, keep being pussies. Your government will make it all better.

They are still young. After this one is put out of his misery they need to have two more and they can use that £1.4 million to pay for them in their first years of life. That is the solution to white genocide. They've already showed a willingness and the ability to reproduce. Now they will be free to start over. Should they spend the last of her fertile years spending money on a lost cause or should they start over and replace him with two more viable offspring to contribute to the continuation of western civilization? We're going to have to be more cold and ruthless if we want to win the clash of civilizations.

Goodbye autists

Because the US actually has money to experiment, the EU doesn't since they socialized everything. They wouldn't have much medicine if not for America's capitalism.

EU was always a globalist idea which subscribes to the euthanasia agenda. According to them not pulling the plug is "inhumane treatment".