PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP
whitehouse.gov
donaldjtrump.com
DAILY SCHEDULE (WH Press Corps)
publicpool.kinja.com
WH PRESS BRIEFINGS
pastebin.com
APPEARANCES
>Pres Trump Weekly Address #23 6/30/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump admonishes the press 6/30/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump signs Space Council EO 6/30/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump bilateral meet w/Moon Leader 6/30/17
youtu.be
>Victims of Illegal Immigration 6/30/17
youtu.be
>Victims of Illigal Immigration - Juan Pina's story 6/30/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump joint statement w/Moon Leader 6/30/17
youtu.be
>Pres Trump meets w/Moon Leader 6/30/17
youtu.be
>VP Pence/Moon Leader Wreath Laying Ceremony for korean war 6/30/17
youtu.be
>WH Press Brief (Sarah, audio only) 6/30/17
youtu.be
>State Dept FPC Brief - US leadership in Energy 6/30/17
youtu.be
NEWTRUMP NIGHTLY NEWS
pastebin.com
PREV APPEARANCES
pastebin.com
FUN STUFF
Trump Playlist
pastebin.com
>Trump SwordDancing to Shadilay
youtu.be
>AF1 Takeoff in the rain
youtu.be
>Donald Trump Emperor of America
youtu.be
>TrumpBot vs Mexico
youtu.be
>Shadilay
youtu.be
INSPIRATION
>Trump Triumphant
www.dailymotion.com/video/x4ulway
>MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
youtu.be
>Hold Back The Night
youtu.be
>Inauguration of Fire
youtu.be
>#TrumpTheEstablishement
youtu.be
>American Hero
youtu.be
>TRUMP - MAGA
youtu.be
OP pastebin: pastebin.com
prev
/ptg/ PRESIDENT TRUMP GENERAL - HOW IT USED TO BE AND HOW IT COULD BE EDITION
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
zerohedge.com
breitbart.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
imgur.com
mega.nz
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
twitter.com
MAGA
AWOO~!
MILLER STRIKES AGAIN
I love Kellyanne.
And I can't sleep.
Be aware Sup Forums server are experiencing speed and connection issues right now. Posting will be slowed. Posting without an image is easier due to low bandwith needs. Thank you for your attention.
JUST
Disavow civcucks.
Prove you all care about your race and culture.
If you are not right of Trump, you are the enemy
>youtube.com
NRA ad, pretty good with personal commentary.
>zerohedge.com
The cze wants freedom, in the process of getting the best amendment, will compete with burgers on the "SHALL NOT" deparment.
Awo you too.
Real gookmoot server hours suck. They commonly are aleviated by 4am some rare times longer.
>gookmoot's fault?
Yes. 3am-4am. Real gookmoot server hours.
...
Have a webm pig.
>not having exactly the same political positions as Trump
EAT LEAD, COMMIE!
I don't know where you're getting your information from, but I don't think anyone here is actually a Civic Nationalist.
If you're going to shill, at least post something relevant to us. Then you may get a few (You)s
Earlier there were a shit ton of civcucks.
They are the cucks of the right.
WTF I HATE BACON NOW
>drumpf supporters
There's a middle ground. Only accept immigration from white nations and encourage white birthrates while not wanting to go full genocide on the shitskins.
>used the template, and now it's properly hatted
Take muh (you)
Well, at least you tried on the hat
>a Canadian
Is Trump only accepting white immigration?
No, he's saying
>I only support LEGAL immigration!
>I want America to become Mexico but LEGALLY!!!!!!
Euros aren't moving here.
Browns are, illegally and legally. Legal spics still have 10 kids a couple. Becky has a dog or Jamal's kid. It starts with culture. Fix it, then change the government.
BASED NIGGER bullshit isn't fixing anything. Pandering to minorities is shit no matter what your political party is.
I'm just listening to a podcast to pass the time.
>Earlier there were a shit ton of civcucks
We're on multiple layers of irony, trolls, and sarcasm here. Sup Forums made the Hillpepes for laughs. So I wouldn't take anyone claiming to be a "civcuck" seriously.
Without DACA and refugee programs mexicans and africans are too stupid to even get a working visa
>breitbart.com
>An illegal alien is one of three teenagers who are accused of scalding a Georgia woman with hot water and raping her in her home near her children.
You`re preaching to the choir.
I didn't mention Trump, but the obvious argument against you on that is that there is no way in hell he can just come out and do that. Needs to be a slow burn and this is how you start.
I think the pandering to minority thing is trying to get the 10% or so who aren't human waste to actually vote. It's not like he's changing his policies for them.
post itt if you love president trump
Sorting the archive is so enjoyable.
youtube.com
...
...
why do you faggots larp for trump
this is my only single question
is it because you hate your existence and are too weak you kill yourselves so you want the world to do it for you faggots?
What's good fellow based black guys? Yo, they can call me an Uncle Tom, but I just want to MAGA. You feel me?
And the people that feed the folks that afterwards they claim the only solution for real help is sending them to your country, everything taxpayer expenses, obviously.
wat
So what Discord are you faggots on?
>larp
>implying
Yoyoyo my biggas, I just met the stepfather of my son he is like he don't want no mo kids with my sidebitch, how is he gon save the white race?
Anyone else still find it hard to believe this is actually happening?
I mean who would have ever expected that Donald fucking Trump would ever become President?
Reminder to report shitposters
Reminder to report those that respond to shitposters
>The nativist parties that had flared up in the early 1840s died back to embers after the elections of 1844. Recovery from the depression mitigated the tensions between native and foreign-born workers which had sparked the riots of that year. Even as the volume of immigration quadrupled following the European potato blight of the mid-forties, the accelerating American economy seemed able to absorb all who came. The Mexican War and the ensuing controversy over slavery focused political energy on those issues. War against a Catholic nation might have been expected to fan anti-Roman sentiments—except that the Democratic war party was also the party of immigrants, while the Whigs, who had earlier dallied with nativism, opposed the war.
>In the 1852 presidential election the Whigs, led by anti-nativist William H. Seward, tried to appeal for the Irish and Catholic vote. General Scott, Whig presidential candidate, was a high-church Episcopalian who had educated his daughters in a convent. As commander of American forces in Mexico he had protected Church property. In 1852 the Whigs planted friendly Irish questioners in audiences addressed by Scott, giving the candidate a chance to declare how much he "loved to hear that rich Irish brogue." But this clumsy effort backfired, for while Irish Americans as usual voted Democratic, many Whigs were offended by the appeal to "paddies" and stayed home on election day. As the slavery issue knocked southern Whigs loose from their party, a renewal of ethnic hostilities did the same in a number of northern states.
...
Haram
so report leafs?
Yeah I don't know how can anyone can defend this
>Several causes contributed to this revival of nativism. Immigration during the first five years of the 1850s reached a level five times greater than a decade earlier. Most of the new arrivals were poor Catholic peasants or laborers from Ireland and Germany who crowded into the tenements of large cities. Crime and welfare costs soared. Cincinnati's crime rate, for example, tripled between 1846 and 1853 and its murder rate increased sevenfold. Boston's expenditures for poor relief rose threefold during the same period.
>Native-born Americans attributed these increases to immigrants, especially the Irish, whose arrest rate and share of relief funds were several times their percentage of the population. Natives were not necessarily the most nativist. Earlier Protestant immigrants from England, Scotland, and especially Ulster had brought their anti-Catholic sentiments with them and often formed the vanguard of anti-Irish rioters and voters in the United States. Radicals and agnostics among the Forty-eighters who had fled Germany after suppression of the 1848 revolutions carried to America a bitter enmity toward the Catholic Church which had sided with the forces of counterrevolution.
>Indeed, the Church entered a period of reaction during the papacy of Pius IX (1846–78). The 1848–49 revolutions and wars of unification in Italy made Pius "a violent enemy of liberalism and social reform." He subsequently proclaimed the doctrine of papal infallibility and issued his Syllabus of Errors condemning socialism, public education, rationalism, and other such iniquities. "It is an error," declared the Pope, "to believe that the Roman Pontiff can and ought to reconcile himself to, and agree with, progress, liberalism, and modern civilization." The American Catholic hierarchy took its cue from the Pope. Archbishop John Hughes of New York attacked abolitionists, Free Soilers, and various Protestant reform movements as kin to the "Red Republicanism" of Europe.
Does anyone have a link to the montage of libtards chimping out, with this as the music?
Feels great. Still have a bit to do before we hit the memescape though.
I think you described a democrat by accident. Might want to revise.
Feels good, man.
Happiest I've been in my life.
>Immigration had caused Catholic church membership to grow three times faster than Protestant membership in the 1840s. Pointing with pride to this fact (which Protestants viewed with alarm), Archbishop Hughes in 1850 delivered a well-publicized address The Decline of Protestantism and Its Causes. "The object we hope to accomplish," said Hughes, "is to convert all Pagan nations, and all Protestant nations. . . . There is no secrecy in all this. . . . Our mission [is] to convert the world—including the inhabitants of the United States—the people of the cities, and the people of the country . . . the Legislatures, the Senate, the Cabinet, the President, and all!" The archbishopric's newspaper proclaimed that "Protestantism is effete, powerless, dying out . . . and conscious that its last moment is come when it is fairly set, face to face, with Catholic truth."
>Such words fanned the embers of anti-Catholicism. Folk memories of Bloody Mary, the Spanish Armada, the Gunpowder Plot, the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and Foxe's Book of Martyrs were part of the Anglo-American Protestant consciousness. The Puritan war against popery had gone on for two and one-half centuries and was not over yet. In 1852 the first Plenary Council of American bishops, meeting in Baltimore, attacked the godlessness of public education and decided to seek tax support for Catholic schools or tax relief for parents who sent their children to such schools. During 1852–53 this effort set off bitter campaigns in a dozen northern cities and states (including Maryland). "Free School" tickets drawn from both major parties, but especially from the Whigs, won several elections on the platform of defending public schools as the nursery of republicanism against the "bold effort" of this "despotic faith" to "substitute the mitre for our liberty cap." Archbishop Hughes replied, branding public schools as wellsprings of "Socialism, Red Republicanism, Universalism, Infidelity, Deism, Atheism, and Pantheism."
Merry Christmas
Lewd awoo collection for real wolf hours. Very lewd.
imgur.com
Trump never said 2 genders and he lets Trannys shit in his toilets.
>In the midst of these school campaigns, Hughes threw the hierarchy into another emotional struggle, this one over control of church property. Catholic churches in many areas were owned by a lay board of trustees representing the congregation. This accorded with Protestant practice but defied Catholic tradition. Attempts by the clergy to gain control of church property reached into several state legislatures, which refused after acrimonious debates to sanction clerical control—and indeed, in some cases tried to mandate lay control. In July 1853 Monsignor Gaetano Bedini arrived in the United States as a papal nuncio to adjudicate the property dispute in certain dioceses. After doing so in favor of the clergy, Bedini toured the country to bestow the papal blessing on American Catholics. Much of the Protestant and nativist press erupted in frenzy. "He is here," exclaimed one journal, "to find the best way to rivet Italian chains upon us which will bind us as slaves to the throne of the most fierce tyranny the world knows." The Church's role in suppressing Italian nationalist uprisings in 1848–49 also aroused radical expatriates from several Catholic countries against Bedini, whom they labeled the "Butcher of Bologna." As Bedini's tour continued, riots broke out in several cities that he visited, and upon his departure for Italy in February 1854 he had to be smuggled aboard a ship in the New York harbor to escape a mob.
Oy vey you filthy anti-irite, this is like another Gorta Mór
These hours are the worst
I hate timezones
Man, this is a long list. It'll take me a couple hours to sort through this.
The temperance movement also exacerbated ethnic tensions. Before 1850 this movement had been primarily one of self-denial and moral suasion aimed at persuading the Protestant middle and working classes to cast out demon rum and become sober, hard-working, upward-striving citizens. As such it had enjoyed an astonishing success. But conspicuous holdouts against this dry crusade were Irish and German immigrants, for whom taverns and beer gardens were centers of social and political life. A perceived rise of drunkenness, brawling, and crime especially among the Irish population helped turn temperance reform into a coercive movement aimed at this recalcitrant element. Believing that liquor was a cause of social disorder, prohibitionists sought passage of state laws to ban the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages. They achieved their first major victory in Maine in 1851. This success set off a wave of "Maine law" debates in other legislatures. The Democratic party generally opposed temperance laws while the Whigs were divided. Fearful of alienating "wet" voters, Whigs refused to take a stand and thereby estranged the large temperance component in their ranks. Coalitions of drys from all parties captured control of enough legislatures from 1852 to 1855 to enact Maine laws in a dozen additional states including all of New England, New York and Delaware, and several midwestern states.
that's a lot of lewd wolfgirls
Makes the happenings feel great though.
There are 10 House Reps and both Senators that are Republicans for Georgia. They all should be sent this report so that they can speak about it when they come back from the July 4th holiday recess during the time when Congressman can speak to any topic they wish during sessions
i think a lot of us are """"civic nationalists""""
BLOWOUT CALENDAR
WEEK 23 OF TRUMP'S REIGN
GET ME PAST THE THUMBNAIL
When you lose, you win.
Archive: mega.nz
===========================
MONDAY JUNE 26TH
#1. 9TH CIRCUS ___DESTROYED___!!!!!: MUSLIM BAN APPROVED: archive.is
#2. 3 CNN REPORTERS RESIGN: archive.is
#3. CNN ___DESTROYED___!!!!!: PROJECT VERITAS DROPS BOMBSHELL VIDEO: archive.is
#4. ACOSTA BTFO: archive.is
TUESDAY JUNE 27TH
#1. CNN DISGRACE TO ALL MEDIA: archive.is
#2. WATCHA GONNA DO: archive.is
#3. CLINTON CRONY MCCABE BTFO: archive.is
#4. ANOTHER LIB RUSSIA HYPOCRITE: archive.is
WEDNESDAY JUNE 28TH
#1. WATERGATE REPORTER SCOLDS PRESS: archive.is
#2. MUH ISLAMOPHOBIA NARRATIVE BTFO: archive.is
#3. CNN TWITTER FAKE AS WELL: archive.is
#4. RUSSIA = NOTHINGBURGER: archive.is
THURSDAY JUNE 29TH
#1. MUH 17 AGENCIES BTFO: archive.is
#2. DACA ON THE BTFOING BLOCK: archive.is
#3. OBONGO GREEN ENERGY LEGACY BTFO: archive.is
#4. HOUSE PASSES ILLEGAL-IMMIGRATION BILLS: archive.is
FRIDAY JUNE 30TH
#1. JOE BTFO: archive.is
#2. WE SPACE NOW (AGAIN): archive.is
#3. AP BTFO: archive.is
#4. TRANNIES BTFO: archive.is
BONUS:
TRUMP NATO DEMANDS MET: archive.is
I feel like letting you in on this. The state of Sup Forums is just business as usual despite constant (((shill attacks))) and (((the_donald))) coming over and fucking about. It's all a ruse. It's so elaborate. There's a third group somewhat pulling the strings if you would, and these are the trolls who leave behind red herrings to send wandering eyes wandering.
It's just trolling. Most of it. There's liberals and conservatives that take it seriously, but their taking the ultimate bait.
I don't think so
Exhibit A: Look, cartoons you can masturbate your tiny drumpflet penis to
After all have to relax after a long day of flailing around an EPIC Sargon of akkad kekistan flag
I can see it in my head - can't find it.
I even have it saved somewhere on my hard drive.
>These laws, like Prohibition in a later generation, were frequently honored in the breach. Nonenforcement was widespread; legislatures or courts in several states subsequently repealed the laws or restricted their scope. Those who wanted to drink could continue to do so; those who did not had stopped doing so under the influence of the earlier moral-suasion phase of the crusade. By 1861 only three of the thirteen states that had legislated prohibition were still dry. The larger significance of the prohibition movement in the 1850s was not the laws it enacted but the impetus it gave to nativism. A Catholic newspaper classified prohibition with "State Education Systems, Infidelity, Pantheism," abolitionism, socialism, women's rights, and "European Red Republicanism" as "parts of a great whole, at war with God." Temperance advocates replied in kind. "It is liquor which fills so many Catholic (as well as other) homes with discord and violence . . . fills our prisons with Irish culprits, and makes the gallows hideous with so many Catholic murderers," declared Horace Greeley's New York Tribune. "The fact that the Catholics of this country keep a great many more grog shops and sell more liquor in proportion to their number than any other denomination, creates and keeps alive a strong prejudice against them."
I like to think that /ptg/ is made up of mostly low-key ethnonationalists who are using a civic nationalist playbook.
Stormfags and outspoken white nationalist agendas aren't viable and practical options (yet). We have to take a page out of Alinsky and get things done in quiet increments. That's what has been proven to work.
You can tell who the unironic autists are when they cry about t_d. As though pol has ever accomplished anything without a normier mouthpiece.
>Trump never said 2 genders and he lets Trannys shit in his toilets.
God forbid. I am voting democrat next time.
It has only been like this for a week or so. Prior to that these were comfy hours.
> being this triggered by literal cartoons
>Buffeted by the winds of anti-Nebraska, anti-liquor, anti-Catholic, and anti-immigrant, the two-party system in the North was ready for collapse by 1854. And it was not only the antislavery Republicans who picked up the pieces. In several states a new and powerful nativist party seemed to glean even more from the wreckage. A number of secret fraternal societies restricted in membership to native-born Protestants had sprung up by the 1850s. Two of them in New York, the Order of United Americans and the Order of the Star Spangled Banner, had merged in 1852 under the leadership of James Barker. Against the background of Protestant-Catholic clashes over public schools, the Bedini visit, and temperance campaigns, the dynamic Barker organized hundreds of lodges all over the country with an estimated membership ranging up to a million or more. Members were pledged to vote for no one except native-born Protestants for public office. In secret councils the Order endorsed certain candidates or nominated its own. When asked by outsiders about the Order, members were to respond "I know nothing." Because of their secrecy and tight-knit organization, these "Know Nothings" became a potentially powerful voting bloc.
>They drew their membership mainly from young men in white-collar and skilled blue-collar occupations. A good many of them were new voters. One analysis showed that men in their twenties were twice as likely to vote Know Nothing as men over thirty. Their leaders were also "new men" in politics who reflected the social backgrounds of their constituency. In Pittsburgh more than half of the Know-Nothing leaders were under thirty-five and nearly half were artisans and clerks. Know Nothings elected to the Massachusetts legislature in 1854 consisted mainly of skilled workers, rural clergymen, and clerks in various enterprises. Maryland's leaders were younger and less affluent than their Democratic counterparts.
Why is some guy spamming a history less on now? Are these guys retarded?
>As a political movement, the Know Nothings had a platform as well as prejudices. They generally favored temperance and always opposed tax support for parochial schools. Their main goal was to reduce the power of foreign-born voters in politics. Under federal law, immigrants could become naturalized citizens after five years in the United States. In a few large cities Democratic judges obligingly issued naturalization papers almost as soon as immigrants got off the boat. Most states limited the vote to citizens, though several allowed immigrants to vote within a year of establishing residence. By the early 1850s the heavy wave of immigration that had begun in 1846 was showing up in voting rolls. Since immigrants were preponderantly young adults, the number of foreign-born voters grew faster than their proportion of the population. In Boston, for example, immigrant voters increased by 195 percent from 1850 to 1855 while the native-born vote rose only 14 percent. Because this "foreign" vote was mainly Democratic, Catholic, and wet, its rapid growth had alarming implications to Whigs, Protestants, and temperance reformers—and even to some native-born Democrats of the working class who found themselves competing with foreign-born laborers willing to work for lower wages. Rural residents also resented the growing power of the immigrant vote in the cities. The Know Nothings called for an increase of the waiting period for naturalization to twenty-one years. In some states they wished to restrict officeholding to native-born citizens and to impose a waiting period of several years after naturalization before immigrants could vote. They did not propose limits on immigration per se, though some Know Nothings probably hoped that by making citizenship and political rights more difficult to obtain they might discourage immigrants from coming to the United States.
Thanks, Sir Roger Scruton.
The RAISE act, which Trump supports, would make immigration merit based again. Aka 95% white instead of 95% shitskins
>Most Know Nothings in northern states also opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In some areas they joined anti-Nebraska coalitions in 1854. This raised the complex question of the relationship between Know Nothings and the new Republican party. The antislavery movement grew from the same cultural soil of evangelical Protestanism as temperance and nativism. Some free soilers viewed slavery and Catholicism alike as repressive institutions. Both were "founded and supported on the basis of ignorance and tyranny," resolved a Know-Nothing lodge in Massachusetts, and thus "there can exist no real hostility to Roman Catholicism which does not embrace slavery, its natural co-worker in opposition to freedom and republican institutions." The support of immigrant Catholic voters for the proslavery "Hunker" wing of the Democratic party cemented this perceived identity of slavery and Catholicism. So did frequent editorials in the Catholic press branding the free-soil movement as "wild, lawless, destructive fanaticism." Competing with free blacks at the bottom of the social order, Irish Americans were intensely anti-Negro and frequently rioted against black people in northern cities. In 1846 a solid Irish vote had helped defeat a referendum to grant equal voting rights to blacks in New York state. "No other class of our citizens was so zealous, so unanimous in its hostility to Equal Suffrage without regard to color," commented the New York Tribune bitterly. " 'Would you have your daughter marry a naygur?' was their standing flout at the champions of democracy irrespective of race and color." In 1854 a Massachusetts free soiler summarized the issues in the forthcoming elections as "freedom, temperance, and Protestantism against slavery, rum, and Romanism."
I tried finding it on youtube, but to no avail.
Maybe it was deleted from there?
I think it was called "Night of the Walking Liberals" or something like that. Mind reuploading it to something like vidme or something like that, if you find it?
>On the other hand, many antislavery leaders recognized the incongruity of nativism with their own ideology. "I do not perceive," wrote Abraham Lincoln, "how any one professing to be sensitive to the wrongs of the negroes, can join in a league to degrade a class of white men." William H. Seward had battled the nativists in his state for more than a decade. The New York Republican platform in 1855 declared that "we repudiate and condemn the proscriptive and anti-republican doctrines of the order of Know-Nothings." An "anti-slavery man," said George W. Julian, founder of the Republican party in Indiana, "is, of necessity, the enemy of [this] organized scheme of bigotry and proscription, which can only be remembered as the crowning and indelible shame of our politics." Since "we are against Black Slavery, because the slaves are deprived of human rights," declared other Republicans, "we are also against . . . [ this] system of Northern Slavery to be created by disfranchising the Irish and Germans."
>Genuine free soilers also deplored the Know-Nothing craze as a red herring that diverted attention from "the real question of the age," slavery. "Neither the Pope nor the foreigners ever can govern the country or endanger its liberties," wrote Charles A. Dana, managing editor of Greeley's New York Tribune, "but the slavebreeders and slavetraders do govern it." Dana vowed in 1854 never to mention the Know Nothings in the Tribune "except to give 'em a devil of a whale." George Julian even suspected that this "distracting crusade against the Pope and foreigners" was a "cunning" scheme of proslavery interests "to divide the people of the free states upon trifles and side issues, while the South remained a unit in defense of its great interest."
It was the timing, couple lefty fags on some discord.
The_donald doesn't come here and do anything, that was pol user's project and the faggotry that is reddit comes here in the form of the litany of anti-trump subreddits that know pol behind that knife in their backs.
Not really. Just nigger faggots like you.
How many times will you post that strawman drawing?
Exactly my thinking on the matter.
>Nevertheless, as a matter of political expediency, free-soil leaders in several states formed alliances with the Know Nothings in 1854 and 1855. In some cases they did so with the intention of taking over the movement in order to channel it in an antislavery direction. Massachusetts provided the clearest example of this. In that state the issues of the Mexican War and Wilmot Proviso had reshuffled political alignments so that a coalition of Free Soilers (including Conscience Whigs) and Democrats had gained control of the legislature from 1850 to 1852. The coalition elected Charles Sumner to the Senate and proposed or passed a number of reforms: a mechanic's lien law, a ten-hour law for laborers, general banking and incorporation laws, prohibition legislation, and re-apportionment of the legislature to shift some power from Boston (with its Cotton Whigs and its large Irish vote) to central and western Massachusetts. The conservative Whig and Boston vote narrowly defeated re-apportionment in a referendum in 1853. This provided the main spark for the Know-Nothing fire of 1854 that swept out of western Massachusetts and kindled the whole state, electing the governor, an overwhelming majority of the legislature, and all of the congressmen. The Whig establishment was traumatized by this conflagration. "I no more suspected the impending result," wrote a Whig journalist, "than I looked for an earthquake which would level the State House and reduce Fa-neuil Hall to a heap of ruins."
If I find it I'll upload it under that title.
...
...
I love that our little colony triggered Reddit's ownership so badly that they permanently compromised the site's reputation by doing manual database edits of comments and votes.
Until you provide a counterargument or show me a WN LARPer who actually helped the white race in any way.
>Free Soil/Republican leaders like Charles Francis Adams and Charles Sumner were taken equally by surprise. But that was not true of all free soilers. Indeed one of them, Henry Wilson, had much to do with the outcome. Like many of the younger Know-Nothing voters, Wilson had been an apprentice and journeyman shoemaker in his youth. The "Natick Cobbler," as he was called, became a shoe manufacturer, went into politics as a Whig, and in 1848 helped found the Free Soil party. In 1854 the new Republican party nominated Wilson for governor. Whigs, Democrats, and Know Nothings also nominated candidates. Shrewdly perceiving that the nativist frenzy would overwhelm the other parties, Wilson joined the Know-Nothing movement in the hope of controlling it. Some free soilers expressed disgust with this strategy. "When the freedom of an empire is at issue," wrote one of them, "Wilson runs off to chase a paddy!" Wilson remained on the ticket as Republican candidate but came in a distant fourth, having persuaded most of his free-soil followers to vote Know Nothing.
Thank you.
What white people are moving to the US in large numbers?
WHY DID AMERICAN JUDGES BETRAYED US
THIS MAKES ME SICK
DELET THIS
>There was method in Wilson's apparent madness, as a choleric Cotton Whig recognized. The Know Nothings, he wrote, "have been controlled by the most desperate sort of Free Soil adventurers. Henry Wilson and Anson Burlingame have ruled the hour. . . . Our members of Congress are one and all of the ultra-agitation Anti-Slavery Stamp." The Know-Nothing legislature elected Wilson to the Senate, where he did nothing for nativism but much for the antislavery cause. The only nativist laws passed by this legislature were a literacy qualification for voting and a measure disbanding several Irish militia companies—and the latter was in part an antislavery gesture, since these companies had provided much of the manpower that returned Anthony Burns to bondage. The legislature also enacted a new personal liberty law and a bill forbidding racial segregation in public schools—the first such law ever passed. In addition, these Know-Nothing lawmakers passed a series of reform measures that earned them an ironic reputation as one of the most progressive legislatures in the state's history: abolition of imprisonment for debt, a married women's property act, creation of an insurance commission, compulsory vaccination of school children, expansion of the power of juries, and homestead exemption from seizure for debt.
What the fuck is up with all the "I'm gay why do you hate me Sup Forums" threads?
>strawman
quit shilling for a few minutes and disprove the CORE of the argument, which is that it is better to pretend to be for equality, while making changes to your benefit
Why is Sup Forums so slow lately? Did everyone go somewhere else?
Show me how letting your daughter fuck a BASED BLACK MAN helps the white race.
People still care about you user, it's never too late to turn your life around. You won't ever succeed if you spend all your time here projecting.
Think of how happy it would make everyone else to see you being happy? You're hurting, and robbing the people you love out of the chance to see what they love, *you* being joyful and happy.
Bots and shills, just like the last two years.