Listen up, f*shists, politcal violence is a game you CAN'T WIN!

Listen up, f*shists, politcal violence is a game you CAN'T WIN!

>The organizational capacity required to build a new world is the same organizational capacity have Lefties built to pressure government. So who’s in a better position to shape the big moment when it comes? Hell, if tomorrow civilization goes completely Mad Max: who’s got existing local networks of people who they’re used to turning out and doing stuff with on a regular basis? Answer to both questions: not the Right.

jacobitemag.com/2017/06/14/political-violence-is-a-game-the-right-cant-win/

Other urls found in this thread:

status451.com/2017/01/20/days-of-rage/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

We have guns though. We would just shoot all of you. It would be over in a couple of days.

ok thanks for sharing your stupid opinion faggot

We can't win? You all are a bunch of children playing on the diamond before the game even starts ffs
Can't win, mother fucker y'all haven't even seen us start playing, foh

>Implying leftists who pee sitting down can fight
>Implying Nihilism and self hatred are good motivators
>Implying a man who actively works for the destruction of his own people has anything worth fighting for

hahahahahaha

just read the damn article and comment thoughtfully, ok?

>Accordingly, righties face two major challenges: building things, and understanding the strengths, weaknesses, and tactics of their Lefty opposition.
true this.

The left is more effective and organised cause it is easier for them to be. I don't see how the right overcomes this.
>The Lefties call that approach “embracing a diversity of tactics,” which, taken to its logical extent, is a weasel-worded way of saying that the lefty mainstream is comfortable with radical leftist violence. People don’t like to talk about this much. But while it’s impossible to imagine, say, an abortion clinic bomber getting a cushy job at an elite university, that’s exactly what happened to a number of alumni of the 1970s leftist terror group known as the Weather Underground. As fugitives, they were financially and operationally supported by members of the National Lawyers’ Guild; afterward, they were so normalized that the 9/11 issue of The New York Times infamously ran a profile lauding Weatherman alumnus Bill Ayres. By contrast, right-wing terrorist Eric Rudolph’s fugitive days were spent hiding in the wilderness because no one would help him. He was caught literally dumpster-diving for food. Potential right-wing extremists face opportunity costs that their left-wing counterparts do not.

I think left-wing bombers in the US went through a friendly court process and after that you can't get prosecuted twice.

AFAIK in Germany ca. 1930 the situation was different. Courts punished Communists hard and let Nazis go. It always helps to have friendly judges in the court.

>implying political violence doesn't martyr us and drive vindictive shitty women to defend the victim, thereby giving us power in a gynocentric society

Women tend to find leaders sexy. The leader's ideology does not matter. It's charisma and status.

right wingers build things as a matter of course, the left just suborns them for their own purposes, that's why they're pulling ahead, because they're eating the product of the right's inclusive society

once society disappears, so will the social left

what the fucking fuck did you just say you communist-loving retarded little shit? I can tell you two things that you will never win and that is a political war against the right, and two is you will never succeed in being against fascism when your own belief system in ANTIFA is built upon fascist ideologies adopted by communists and fascists to just like Adolf Hitler, Mao, Fidel Castro, Che Guererra, Kim Jong Un and Joseph Stalin.

As soon as your brain cell wakes up from being stuck on life support and forced to be in a coma, I'd think twice about political violencem considering your ideology is based on a failed system.

I think the stupidity of white leftists is that they want to play hippie commune with literal non-white nationalists.

You can't play the non-aggression cooperation game with those selected by nature for personal dominance games.

>Answer to both questions: not the Right.

is that why nordfront are free to hand of leaflets in every swedish city? cool beans they must be leftist then

>selected
nurture is as strong a force as the core inclinations

Politics doesn't organise everything, society does 99.99% of that itself.

>claim to be anti-fascist
>behave like fascists

I think the article has good points. The right should learn to work together and support itself. It should take advantage of right-wing support in the military, ensuring that those men fight on our side instead of sitting out the war. And it should take advantage of leftist virtue signaling. Despite what the article says, identifying a leftist is very easy. If shit hits the fan, run their name through social media, and put them down if they like Being Liberal or Occupy Democrats on Facebook.

He's not wrong, Kevin. Fuck off back to leaddit with your "incorrect opinion" horseshit, you insipid Brockpuppet. Sage and hide Brockpuppet threads, Anons.

This is the problem though as I see it. The left has plenty of fertile recruiting grounds and acceptable, feel-good causes. The right is almost entirely non-PC issues at the minute.

This, the moment the left brings out firearms, the real fringe element gun fanatics on the right will break out everything and turn those Antifa morons into Swiss Cheese.

All leftist causes are feel-good causes. All leftism is literal masturbation of several brain regions.

Conservativism and right-wing is mostly about duties and awareness of the necessity to do unpleasant things like working, saving, meritocracy, not letting invaders in, serving in the military, keeping arms in case of danger, etc.

The left always burn everything down in the revolution.

The thing that rises in its aftermath is right-wing.

Every communist state has been a totalitarian fascist state, or a poor immitation of one.

Look at China
Look at Venezuela
Look at Soviet Russia

Every single one of them turn right wing, except its not the kind of right wing we want. The communist immitation is more about power than actually doing well for your people.

Hitler actually managed to get a financially collapsed state full employment in less than 3 fucking years. The guy bred a partiotism and loyalty to his people that remains unrivalled.

How many nations today even, can boast having FULL employment? Not a single one.

The communists however just killed their workers.


The right always picks up the pieces after the left destroys everything


Remember the whole "hard times breed strong men, strong men bring good times, good times breeds weak men, weak men bring hard times" ?

Its essentially describing the cycle of the left and right. The left collapses society with their degeneracy. The right picks up the pieces and builds a new.

The longer the true right dominates, the longer that society will remain stable.

We can use this to our advantage. Because the committed right has always been driven underground, we can operate right under the left's noses. We are already used to keeping quiet and tolerating leftist bullshit. That means we can hide until we have an opportunity to hit the left where it really hurts.

Political violence is a game we've won every time we played it. I hope and pray for it to start again.

On this, I'm fairly sure almost everyone on the right agrees with and plenty in the middle and even a few on the left, though they'd be loathe to admit it.

with the shootings occurring like they are, we're really only waiting for small armed groups to start pulling these attacks instead of loners.

So pretty much the whole point of this article is that.
Lefties will beat righties because you can organize big events and you have better networks of anarchists and other groups.
And righties cant build anything because we stoopid?

no, cause we're too bothered about doing things the "right way" that we fight each other over particulars of protocol instead of just doing thug shit and getting the job done slap-dash while shooting ourselves in the foot long-term like leftists do

that's not how you use a stencil you dumb cunts
you are supposed to stick the paper on the wall, spray over it and then remove the paper
how dumb can a person be?

>If everything goes Mad Max
Just shows how fucking stupid the left are. When you strip away societal constraints and throw in a population with very limited resources. You would see how animalistic and greedy people for you are. That cunt that you made socialism signs with? He'll shiv you in the fucking kidney to take your last can of beans and bottled water. Top fucking kek @ u

So what?
If i was a fascist trying to save you from communists and muzzies would you really have a problem with that??
>B-b-b-but your a fascist
Okay then when groups like anti-fa and BLM bash down your door dont be suprised when we dont help you

Yeah they don't get it. If they're white they would either join up with white people, or they would be killed / become a bitch to the mexicans/blacks.

Just like prison.

Venezuela

This

Listened the whole article and its autistic as fuck.
Totally ignoring that even if they beat the right wingers. Next they would fight each other about communism, anarchism and other politics.
From the way its written I would guess the writer is anarcho-communist or something close to that which is completely autistic ideology.

They have a moronic view of human nature
>B-but people are intrinsically good, right guys
No. People are fucking cancer.

Hey, now, I happen to be a right-wing anarcho-communist and I'm totally- not that autistic- quite so much-

>right wingers live primarily in rural and suburban areas
>shitlibs are concentrated in cities
>we stop food shipments on the interstate
>cities are full mad max
>we don't even notice there's a habbening

>not going into the cities to wrangle up some desperate liberal uni student pussy, bring her back to your cabin and make her into a woman

I wanna suck off a fascist boy...

Is it wrong for me to say that?

This guy wrote a similar article before J20.

status451.com/2017/01/20/days-of-rage/

This one is much better at outlining everything, and is worth the read just to understand how the left operates. What he fails to realize with the one OP posted is that the left isn't some invincible beast, they like to pretend to be. He said "you do not want white people to riot" himself in Days of Rage. The right is starting to organize and actively beating the left, in the streets and with the ballot box. Now the left escalated the violence and have put themselves in an awkward position, and they don't know what to do because the right was supposed to escalate.

The best weapon the right has is the internet, and the left can't do anything about it. They can't shut it off or escape from it in this day and age. Not to sound cliche but weaponized autism and memes have really brought the hammer down on leftists. They are being ridiculed to death, in some cases exposed for who they are outside of protesting. Overnight the reputation of a college professor, bike lock guy, was ruined because some weebs went over footage for hours. The closest the left can get to interrupting it is with bad /leftypol/ shilling that is unfunny and ineffective.

What the author also fails to understand is that the network the right establishes is never pubic information. It is almost always under the radar and on a local level. It is difficult, almost impossible to pinpoint. Communist uprising moves from urban to suburban and rural? They should expect to be shot at by some farm boy and his friends who know the land, people, and are more than likely better marksman.

Don't get me wrong, I take leftist threats of violence seriously. I don't take them literally. The left isn't going to gulag anyone without a serious fight being put up.

Can we start banning facebook normies who t*pe like this?

>can't even fucking spell

Anyone else find it interesting that we seem to have multiple "rehistorical" convergence points emulating everything from the Caliph invasions of europe up through the second world war?

I know we've talked about it before, but is this how history works and we're just seeing the vast tracts of repetition and looking at it from informed eyes or is this sort of 'piling-up' of events something more unprecedented than your regular erratic upheaval?

>political violence
Says the pole shit commie rioter

that was a very good article:

All right, I’ve yammered more than that game theory guy. Let’s recap and wind up:

The Left wants to disrupt the Right’s power, organizations, celebrations.

The Right is sick of Leftist disruption and wants to punish it with force.

The hard Left has an effective infrastructure. The hard Right is looking to build one.

The hard Left will use the tactics it’s already using.

The hard Right will use Leftist tactics, at which point the Press will become very interested in denormalizing those tactics.

I’m guessing the Trump administration will try to eviscerate Lefty Institutions with budget cuts and the hard Left infrastructure with RICO.

Look for lots of property destruction, by everyone. I would not be surprised to see innovative tactics used to destroy property.

The press is a Lefty weapon and a Righty target.

Everyone will have enemies’ lists. All of us are already on somebody’s.

Effective Righty violence will be, by necessity, by loners or by really close conspiracies (think family members).

Effective Lefty violence will be by capable, fully operating cells.

If we get political violence between civilians, it’s mostly going to be low-level until it abruptly isn’t.

Some suicidal mass murder types may copycat political violence and choose political targets.

You do not want white people to riot. You Do Not. Want. White People. To Riot.

Nobody wants Civil War II. That doesn’t mean we won’t get it anyway.

>Anyone else find it interesting that we seem to have multiple "rehistorical" convergence points emulating everything from the Caliph invasions of europe up through the second world war?
It's funny you mention that. I had a history class taught by the department head and he pretty much said history is a series of loops that move forward. Not much changes other than the tools we use to influence the world around us. Our understanding of that loop can help avoid making mistakes, but most of the time people are too dumb or lazy to study it.

If anything I saw we are reaching back to the Weimar days of Germany or pre-civil war Spain. The communists are smacking people around in the streets, and are about to awaken a giant. Only this time around there isn't much to stop that giant when it goes on it's rampage.

>I’m guessing the Trump administration will try to eviscerate Lefty Institutions with budget cuts and the hard Left infrastructure with RICO.
The best part is this is exactly what is happening and why the left collectivly shits their pants over Steve Bannon having any kind of sway.

A communist revolution will never succeed in America because we'll gun them all down. We won't even need to throw the commies out of helicopters, but if the option is on the table we'll do it anyway because it's so memetastic.

You don't say, I've been speculating on what would be the hard counter to a US/NATO that goes full Empire of the Republic and manages to reinvigorate the traditionalist right, as shallow as their traditions are, and even with Russia and China and Europe forming an alliance of necessity to prevent it, the fight is still mostly going to take place in eurasia and africa, at worst a series of island-hopping campaigns and an invasion through south america and the yukon to get at the heartland. I don't see that scenario playing out well unless there's a game-changer or an outside force waiting in the wings.

Actually, the biggest thing standing in the way of an Aquila'd American Empire the fascists keep drooling over, as cool as it is- I admit, would be the typical infighting you see thanks to the disparities in the moralistic right versus the authoritarian right.

The left isn't going to do much besides give everyone a casus belli in any case; I've stopped going to events and marches and saved my money for supplies, plans, and ammunition.

Too obvious, C-, bad effort

...

>The organizational capacity required
fuck that.
Leaderless. Resistance.

I would really like to see the leftys trying to fight american citizens in a guerilla war esque scenario

I'm sure the million of american marxists will win ;^)

Here's how communism will succeed in America, without the need for a revolution:

1. Infiltrate schools.
2. Rewrite curriculum.
3. Indoctrinate 2-3 generations that:
a. Equality is the superior moral value.
b. Nationalism is the most evil sin.

The Commies are patient, they can wait decades to win.

>I don't see that scenario playing out well unless there's a game-changer or an outside force waiting in the wings.
Russia and China teaming up could give the American Reich expansion a serious run for it's money. The problem is that Russia's doctrine is based primarily on aggressive defense and China has a long history of getting its ass handed to them when they have some serious advantages. Both do not have the logistic capability to invade the mainland US either. Europe is practically useless because their armies are underfunded, anemic shells of what they once were. Unless they get a big kick in the pants they will stay that way, which is why I laugh at the EU trying to create an effective army.

>Actually, the biggest thing standing in the way of an Aquila'd American Empire the fascists keep drooling over, as cool as it is- I admit, would be the typical infighting you see thanks to the disparities in the moralistic right versus the authoritarian right.
The right is starting to overcome that squabbling. I think Trump getting elected is great evidence of that, even the neo-con faggots realized they had to bend the knee and that their time in the sun is directly linked to Trumps success as president.

>The left isn't going to do much besides give everyone a casus belli in any case; I've stopped going to events and marches and saved my money for supplies, plans, and ammunition.
Which is exactly why the left is foolish for trying to start a civil war. The right has been preparing for emergencies decades before the left and has loosely organized itself in communities across the country. The left will face stiffer and more effective resistance than they think. A network of neighbors or friends that know the area they are defending are going to be more effective than the incoming force.

>Which is exactly why the left is foolish for trying to start a civil war.
I don't get why everyone thinks they're upping their tempo, all I've seen recently is their machine backpedaling into a defensive postures, mainline insurrectionist groups folding into the common activist woodwork, and agitated lone wolves breaking off to finish fights without assistance. Where's this divide in perception of the left's current inertia coming from and what am I not seeing?

Enjoy your last moments in the death camp after the white man fashes out again.