"Right-to-carry" states PROVED to experience higher rates of violent crime. Fucking KEK
>"Examining four decades of crime data, a team of Stanford researchers found that states that have enacted so-called ‘right to carry’ (RTC) concealed handgun laws experience higher rates of violent crime than states where these laws have not been adopted. The findings are among the most powerful evidence in a growing line of research refuting the claim that arming more citizens enhances public safety." >“There is not even the slightest hint in the data that RTC laws reduce overall violent crime,” Stanford Law Professor John Donohue and colleagues concluded in the new study. >“We estimate that the adoption of RTC laws substantially elevates violent crime rates,” the Stanford researchers concluded in a working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research. “Ten years after the adoption of RTC laws, violent crime [in RTC states] is estimated to be 13–15 percent higher than it would have been without the RTC law.” >“All this work is based on statistical models,” Donohue said. “When the models all generate similar estimates, it increases your confidence that you have captured the true effect.” >These findings are particularly notable given that RTC states were found to have increased rates of incarceration and hiring of law enforcement personnel—factors that would usually be associated with less violent crime, not more. >“This suggested that RTC states were not simply experiencing higher crime because they decided to lock up fewer criminals and hire fewer police,” Donohue said. “The relatively greater increases in incarceration and police in RTC states implies that, if anything, our synthetic controls estimates may be understating the increase in violent crime, which was pretty persuasive to me.” >“For each percentage point increase in gun ownership the firearm homicide rate increased by 0.9 percent,”
>based on statistical models tl;dr facts didn't work, so we cooked the numbers
Henry Sanchez
>“All this work is based on statistical models,”
So nothing
Isaiah Turner
>statistical models The numbers real life gave us didn't work so we had to make up our own in order to get the results we wanted.
Jayden Sanders
As a non stats nerd, how do "statistical models" differ from actual statistics?
Juan Howard
notice that these states also have a lot of blacks. /thread boys
Anthony Hill
>Gun ownership meaning legal. I wondered if someone would have been as much of a mong to try this response. I thought not, I was wrong
now you're not wrong, but there are far more efficient ways
>Examining four decades of crime data selective reading comprehension, aint that a beauty
Dominic Parker
>“For each percentage point increase in gun ownership the firearm homicide rate increased by 0.9 percent,”
Oh wow its fucking nothing.
Josiah Howard
>selective reading comprehension, aint that a beauty Fudging 40 years of numbers to get the outcome you want is equally as dishonest. Violent crime has plummeted in those 40 years, and notice how the study doesnt try to separate those who have permits form common niggers?
William Morales
Shall not be infringed Sweetie...
Carson Jones
Correlation is not causation, ffs
Camden Jenkins
>analyzing is fudgin if I dont like the data they did, they analyzed legal gun owners. so low energy >While violent crime rates fell nationwide as many states adopted right-to-carry (RTC) laws, the drop was four times greater in states that did not enact RTC
Jeremiah Wright
This is exactly what a blue pill study looks like. Anybody that is not retarded knows how retarded that shit is. Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota has the highest gun ownership in the world. They also have some of the lower crime rate in the western world. 60% of people in Wyoming owns a gun and their murder rate is lower than basically every country in Europe.
If you remove the nigs from gun crime stats how does the US copare with the rest of the world
Jonathan Jenkins
>still ignoring that the driving force of homocide isnt gun ownership
Of course, you're unwilling to address such things as
Daniel Peterson
...
Ryder Thompson
(((stanford)))?
Ryan Fisher
>Stanford
Fake research.
Alexander Miller
Maybe those "RTC states" were more violent anyways that lead to the adoption of RTC.
>>“We estimate that the adoption of RTC laws substantially elevates violent crime rates,” the Stanford researchers concluded in a working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research. “Ten years after the adoption of RTC laws, violent crime [in RTC states] is estimated to be 13–15 percent higher than it would have been without the RTC law.”
That is just statistical comparison and expection that crime would have lowered uniformly everywhere. It could be that crime is not lowered same amount because of RTC, but it could be something else, like demography, population count etc. Correlation is not causality.
Easton Cooper
>>“All this work is based on statistical models,” Donohue said.
Translation: "We manipulated the data to get the result we wanted," said Don-a-Jew.
Eli Perez
>>“All this work is based on statistical models,” El oh el
Henry Gomez
Basically same as Finland.
Elijah Bell
Show me the data. I want to know which states were studied.
>states were found to have increased rates of incarceration and hiring of law enforcement personnel—factors that would usually be associated with less violent crime, not more. >The level of stupid in this statement ... "factors that would usually be associated with less violent crime" Why would a city or state hire more cops and spend more money on cops, courts and corrections if crime rates were low ??
Matthew Martinez
Yea, Imma got say thats some skewed research.....
0/10 bad shill....
We will never willingly cede power that the government has no dispensation to give or take away.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
Camden Richardson
where are the 40 years of numbers?
Chase Young
So let me guess, they look at states full of blacks with already high crime rates where right to carry exists for protection from ferals, and then they compare those states to the most white and homogenous noguns states and declare the problem is guns while ignoring the blatant and easily observable race issues.
Ethan Baker
OP is a faggot and a shitty troll declaring teh neanderthal cave painting or rocks and sticks barter clans on 4chins blown the fuck out. Where's your data or even the original article you're referencing noob? This is shit work son and you'd best step up your game or prepare to get your ass spanked again.
Isaiah Clark
US whites have gun homicide rates on par with Norway and Belgium. US blacks have have gun homicide rates on par with the Congo.
Evan Davis
>“We estimate that the adoption of RTC laws substantially elevates violent crime rates,” the Stanford researchers concluded in a working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research. “Ten years after the adoption of RTC laws, violent crime [in RTC states] is estimated to be 13–15 percent higher than it would have been without the RTC law.”
How does a Stanford study conclude with estimates and assumptions.
What are the facts?!? A study group at Stanford looked on wiki and estimated that crime rates would be different based on a different set of laws.
ooo ground breaking
im sure if the law said no drinking and driving the would prevent drunk driving road deaths. right?
Cause Mommy & Daddy Clinton said you cant drive drunk, right? That made all the drunk drivers disappear overnight, right?
The worlds a safer place now? Gee, I was so MADD..
Is MAGO next? Is it women and cucks bothered by violent crime in the first place? Most American men probably carry a firearm for these purposes.
Joseph Wood
"Correlation is not causation. Except when it confirms our bias."
Lucas Sanders
>In our attempt to improve (at least to a degree) on the original Lott-Mustard model, we included additional explanatory factors, such as the incarceration and police rates, and removed extraneous variables (such as unnecessary and collinear demographic measures).
Page 56
They threw out trends in demographics that were too highly correlated.
Jace Rodriguez
A team of Stanford researchers has just published a study finding that OP is a pedophile and that he sucks dick because his mother never loved him.
