Jewish Role in Communism

Let's discuss how Jews have been involved in the far left and why they do this.

Recommended reading:
Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6DgDTv2Safk
youtube.com/watch?v=oQoH6KOvBGA
youtube.com/watch?v=oIeYoF1VhHc
youtube.com/watch?v=BNcERXGcpEY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Was Bolshevism really Jewish or is that a David Duke fib/misquote of Solzhenytzin?

>Was Bolshevism really Jewish
Read pic related. It's the biggest redpill on the JQ you can get.

The fact is they played a big role. The predominant role one would have to say

Very informed man who explains it all quite well

youtube.com/watch?v=6DgDTv2Safk

As well as Dr. Revilo P Oliver

youtube.com/watch?v=oQoH6KOvBGA

If youre interested in the subject these are two excellent, older introductions to the hard proof of jewish influenced bolshevism, marxism and overall communism.

Marxism is lutheran. Jews only liked it because it was internationalistic

Wut?

>why they do this
It's literally "give me all your shit: the ideology"

Luther->Hegel->Marx. Luther came up with dialectics and emanationism (one substance for all beings ). To say that marxism is jewish, is to reveal only one's ignorance about philosophy

Of course it's not jewish but it plays a good role in jewish hands. They view themselves as a small collective against everyone and Europeans have become the main enemy since WW2. The effects are obvious on modern society.

What a great way to avoid talking about communism. Instead of seriously engaging with Marxist critique, you can boil everything into a boogeyman that doesn't even exist. Fuck off with your mongoloid conspiracy ideology, shill

So why do you attribute this to the Jews and not for instance freemasons and their clubs? Why should only Jews be at fault for conspiracies. It's an issue of the role that townspeople play in politics really

>Marxist critique
Oh let's talk about that. Which ethnic group made up Critical theory?

GERMAN Jews. It's the german problem, not the jewish problem

>So why do you attribute this to the Jews and not for instance freemasons and their clubs?
Read
It's not a conspiracy. Europeans are generally individualistic, low ethnocentrism, morally universalist. Jews are the opposite of everything listed and they see themselves as a small group against everyone.

>GERMAN Jews. It's the german problem, not the jewish problem
Ok now you are demonstrating absoluely no knowledge on the subject. Jews in their millenial history never assimilated they always remained jews look at every famous jew and they see themselves as jew. Einstein and Soros are good examples.

Are you too afraid of actual arguments?Afraid of actually thinking about your views? Must be amazing to be able to wander through life so unthinking that you can just look at a (((name)) to make yourself feel better.

You said:
>Marxism is Lutheran
No, Marxism is Marxist. He may have used ideas from other people, but that does not mean Marxism is not Marxist. We are talking specifically about Marxism ITT. Marx was a Jew, therefore, Marxism was created by a Jew.

Critical theory is a method the Jewish Frankfurt School used to critique Gentile culture. They viewed things like ethnic nepotism as a psychological issue, despite hypocritically maintaining cohesive bonds with their fellow Jews, as Jews are an extremely cohesive group. It can be said that Critical Theory is merely a Jewish manifestation of their criticism and disgust at gentiles. Culture of Critique explains this much better.

The point user is making is that Marx was raised Lutheran.

Can you explain, in real detail, how Judaism and "it's tricks" reveal themselves in Marxism? Especially when it's attacking a system that, historically, Jews have profited under the most?
What do Jews, often in the highest socioeconomic class, have to gain from a classless society?

>hurr durr marxism isn't being used by egalitarian jews furthering their anti-European interests
I asked if you know which ethnicity made up Critical theory? Will you answer kike?

>Was Bolshevism really Jewish

>Putin: Soviet Government Was Mostly Jewish 80-85%
youtube.com/watch?v=oIeYoF1VhHc

>Winston Churchill exposes forces behind Communism
youtube.com/watch?v=BNcERXGcpEY

The Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party:

Krylenko Russian
Lounatcharski Russian
Ulyanov (Lenin) JEW
Bronstein (Trotsky) JEW
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) JEW
Lourie (Larine) JEW
Ouritski JEW
Volodarski JEW
Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) JEW
Smidovitch JEW
Sverdlof (Yankel) JEW
Nakhamkes (Steklof) JEW

The Council of the People’s Commissars:

Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian
Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian
Agriculture Protian Armenian
Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian
Ulyanov (Lenin) JEW
Economic Council Lourie (Larine) JEW
Food Schlichter JEW
Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) JEW
State Control Lander JEW
State Lands Kauffman JEW
Works V. Schmidt JEW
Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) JEWess
Religions Spitzberg JEW
Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) JEW
Hygiene Anvelt JEW
Finance Isidore Goukovski JEW
Press Volodarski JEW
Elections Ouritski JEW
Justice I. Steinberg JEW
Refugees Fenigstein JEW
Refugees (assist.) Savitch JEW
Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski JEW

Ah, the Cultural Marxism spook.
>ethnic nepotism as a psychological issue
Ideological issue, there's a big difference buddy.
>despite hypocritically maintaining cohesive bonds with their fellow Jews
Because there's a huge difference between keeping oneself connected to cultural roots vs. promoting zionism or whatever the fuck you think Jews do.
Also, that "Identify a victim class, blame an oppressor, propose a solution" is total nonsense. That literally is not what Critical theorists do at all.

It doesn't fucking matter who made it up? Can you argue how the views themselves have to do with Demonic Jewish Tricks © Can you stop moving the goal post and explain how the process, ideas, and end-goals of Critical Theory in any way promote Judaism?
What do Jews have to gain from promoting a classless anti-capitalistic society, when clearly capitalism the most expedient means to promote (((Jewish Values))) or whatever?

"Cultural Marxism doesn't really fit critical theory well. Supposedly the term arose in the Frankfurt school of criticism. I have heard that this claim is dubious, but let's pretend that it is not. Adorno, the other members of the Frankfurt school, and their absent buddy, Walter Benjamin all started using Marxist critical discourse to discuss things outside of economics: primarily culture, and they differed from USSR Marxist theorists significantly too. In the USSR, most of what we could maybe call Marxist critical theory if we squinted focused on explaining cultural events in terms of class conflict and adherence to the party line at the time.

Anyway back to the Frankfurt school. They did justly spark a new form of cultural criticism, and there were others who later also used Marxism to talk about culture: we have Althusser, Gramsci, and contemporarily, Zizek. While some of these other Marxist philosophers may have taken some influence from Frankfurt school writers, they don't always relate heavily. Zizek for instance tends to focus on a reworked reading of ideology that combines Marxist commodity fetishism readings with lacanian dream analysis, then this all gets shoved through obscure readings of Hegel."

>Can you explain, in real detail, how Judaism and "it's tricks" reveal themselves in Marxism

Karl Marx was an ethnic jew and surrounded himself with North London and international jews. 80% of the Soviets were Jews. 90% of German Spartakusbund were Jews. Everywhere from Eastern Europe to the USA communism has been an almost exclusively Jewish conspiracy beyond any reasonable proportion.

Marxism exists for one purpose: to force equality for jews. Everything else is extraneous to that key feature. One of the first things the Soviets did was outlaw antisemitism with typically harsh punishments. As is clearly stated in the Communist Manifesto, they intended to achieve this equality by killing national elites and destroying national culture, especially Christianity (class struggle), asset stripping the economy (seizing the means of production), and replacing the nation state with one world government (workers of the world unite). Tens of millions of white Christians were murdered by communist jews last century and dozens of cultures wrecked, not least in China. It was a jew who personally murdered the Tsar and his young family.

It was invented by jews and benefits no one but jews, which is why it's almost exclusively a jewish conspiracy. It is the atheist version of jewish neoliberal globalism. It is the ideological expression of jewish racial consciousness after 2,000 years of diaspora in Europe, a reflex of the jewish survival instinct and the ultimate revenge for 2,000 years of persecution by white Christians that ended in a holocaust. Whites might feel guilt when they see holocaust propaganda. Imagine what jews feel. Pure genocidal hatred.

"Again, before I get too distracted again, these Marxist critics and philosophers represent only a small fraction of the contemporary ecosystem of critical theory, and aren't all that representative of what alt-righters generally mean when they refer to "cultural Marxists" or SJWs. Most theory that gets lumped in with this catch all term is theory that has more or less rejected the Marxist vestiges of earlier theory. Postcolonialists use Gramsci's idea of the subaltern to talk about populations marginalized by the vestiges of colonialism, but they also provide scathing critiques to Gramsci's notion that a Marxist analysis of labor relations can adequately be used to analyze the relationship between the subaltern and the dominant hegemony. They argue that Marxism takes complicated events and reductively tries to explain them through a lens that can only really be applied to labor relations of Europe in the late 19th century.

Furthermore, post-structuralist discourse rejected the Marxist and Frankfurt idea of Superstructure, the idea that you could nearly categorize all of the structural components of power. Instead, different philosophers and critics began suggesting that what Marxists thought were very sturdy structures of power were actually very fluid and indefinite. Post-structuralists generally recognize that their field and the prior critical texts with which they engaged were often Marxist texts, they reject or heavily amend the proposals of their predecessors.

Now, post-structuralist discourse itself is largely estranged too from the kind of critical theory that Alt-righters tend to label as cultural Marxism. Often, they use the term to complain about theory more deeply rooted in identity politics, such as gender or race.

"Gender or race theory. Most contemporary theorists in these fields reject not only hold Marxist critics at arm's length but are also very critical of post structuralists too. Even Judith Butler, who built off of Derrida's work on performativity in writing to postulate her theory of gender performativity is quick to remind that post structuralist discourse largely assumes a singular kind of subjectivity that marginalized the myriad of possible lived subjective experiences. Lots off race theory builds off of postcolonial theory and makes similar moves to estranged itself from earlier Marxist discourse, because Marxism and cultural Marxism assumes a colorblind stance. Gender and race theorists are now also embracing the affective turn, similarly to the performativity turn of the 80s and 90s, and affect theory makes a large point to not engage with Marxist discourse for the most part.

So to tie everything back together, the label "Cultural Marxist" is a misnomer that does not accurately describes the critical theory that the alt-right dislikes the most. They were able to imagine a connection because the world of critical theory is highly intertextual, and each group of theorists tends to respond to and criticize their predecessors. To an outside observer that isn't familiar with this discourse, it can appear to be much more harmonious than it actually is, and this is what the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theorists capitalize on."

>It doesn't fucking matter who made it up?
What a jewish thing to say.
>Can you stop moving the goal post and explain how the process, ideas, and end-goals of Critical Theory in any way promote Judaism?
>promote Judaism
Are you retarded? Judaism isn't for the unpure goyim they have satanic souls according to the Kabbalah.
>What do Jews have to gain from promoting a classless anti-capitalistic society
The main focus of the neo-marxist movement wasn't economics it was a critic of culture and everything European. The goal was to destroy racial consciousness and enforce "equality" on Europeans.

>Marxism exists for one purpose: to force equality for jews
This seems to run against the narrative that Jews are the most powerful, manipulative, and smartest race of beings on the earth, doesn't it? Why should they worry about equality when they're better off than, say, the oppressed Aryan basement dweller who can't into a gf?

Doesn't Marxism promote, well, the natural right of every man to profit off of their own labor? Instead of forfeiting their own production to people who don't do anything for a living? Isn't Marxism designed to maximize the amount of workers, and the amount of production?

Aren't the classless, borderless, nationless, anti-religion ideals designed in order to liberate each person from whatever arbitary value system they adhere to that constrain them? There isn't a single hint of Judaism in any of these ideals, given that Judaism
a) relies on ethnic solidarity
b) relies on cultural solidarity
c) relies on religious code (10 commandments) adherence
all of which are vehemently railed against in Marxism itself.

You have no fucking evidence.
Your entire argument is "muh joos".

>it was a critic of culture and everything European
It's really much more about making explicit the implicit ideology of European culture and breaking down its logic. De-constructing=/=Destroying. It sounds like you've never read a critical theory piece in your life.