Really activates your almonds
huffingtonpost.com
Really activates your almonds
huffingtonpost.com
...
And thanks to the bill, we can make sure it stays that way.
>Saudi Arabia/Qatar not on the list
Reminder that the 7 countries were determined by the Obama administration.
Good, and I hope they expand the ban to even more countries. Never a shitlib has explained how letting muslims in benefits the US in any way.
>no fatal attacks
>ignore the rapes and killings done by (((migrants))) all the time
k
Except there was that Somali kid who ran over and then hacked up students at Ohio State last year.
Have you really forgotten already? Literally a Somali refugee for whom the university was bending over backwards and it still wasn't enough.
>pissing off the countries that back the petrodollar
So they want the list expanded then? Good libbies good.
why are the faggot mods letting slide threads like these stay up all the time
fuck all of you fucking useless morons
Weren't there a dozen religiously inspired knife attacks from Somalis last year?
Also, the 9/11 terrorists spent time in Sudan and Afghanistan training before they came here. Also other jihados are going to the banned countries for training with the intent of coming here.
There was the Somali refugee guy.
cool beans. thanks to this fantastic EO by president trump, we'll make sure it stays that way. also,
>huffingshitpost
LMAO. they still think they're a "real" news site.
I don't need a terror attack to be fatal to not want them period. What the fuck is wrong with the world?
I heard this guy loved Amedica though, wtf?
Wasn't it 6 then Trump added a 7th one because he's a Zionist puppet controlled by his son in law
how about that Somali guy who went on a stabbing spree.. How quickly the libs forget
This shows the ban is working.
>Wanting to support the petrodollar
We're not obligated to allow anyone into our country. If we don't want muzzies, that's our prerogative.
Partial credit
Syria was added becuase it's now a wartorn shithole, kikes or no kikes.
everyone knows your sposed to take action after your people are killed preemptive action just makes u racist
He took off Iraq for whatever reason so it's 6 again, unless a 7th got added just now
Probably an old article
um he didn't actually kill anyone because refugees aren't trained by ISIS you fucking bigot
I make the best deals
why not banning the one muslim country that deadass did 9/11
>wanting our currency to immediately collapse without a secondary plan in place
>in the US
ok
hmmm what about in europe?
isnt islamic terror like a weekly fucking cycle their now.
>he's the president of the flat earth
Ok
Obama did good keeping muslims out, theres no reason to stop now.
>fag flag
>nonsense post
ok
>Not preparing for a happening.
how does letting in Muslims help the country?
protip it doesn't
>suckin on vaginas
>having a functioning cerebellum
Pretty much this.We would be in a heap of trouble without it right now.
>fatal
>Terror attacks
>US
>Immigrants
>Banned countries
They need all those qualifiers to make their point
Amusingly enough, the only reason the attackers in the US haven't been more fatal is literally because someone on site had a gun every time. Something these same people who oppose the travel ban do want to ban.
I really hope your just b8ing for (you)'s.
Ok
I guess 9/11 just didn't happen.
Wow, more fake news.
en.m.wikipedia.org
A Somali refuge runs over people and then stabs students.
...
It's like leftists want people to die.
PREVENTION
He didn't pick and choose 7 random countries, if he did those ban it's because he had intel
Yes, and there will be no atack by immigrants from the 7 countries, because they are banned.
>will be
>(((in the us))))
man i wonder whats going on in those countries tho
yeah like that's fuckin possible unless obama had started preparing for that shit (which was never gonna happen)
But he wasn't able to kill anyone, hence their headline qualifier "fatal".
The claim they would like to make is "No one from any of the ban countries has ever committed a crime." But they can't so they load up on all those caveats in the title.
Since Norway bot is asleep,
archive.is
Blatant lie. There have been many. Somalis are constantly killing people.
Yeah, because extreme vetting has been happening under the radar since day 1. All the leftards were too busy shrieking about a travel """""ban""""" to notice that there's zero difference between the travel restriction and his extreme vetting, only now his constitutional power to restrict immigration has been put on full display for all the gloating little retards courtesy of the supreme court.
and now the chances are less that there ever will be. tragic huh?
then why did obama impose exactly the same ban?
This. "Fatal" is the qualifier
They know. That is why they worded the headline the way they did.
If it wasn't a confirmed terror attack, it didn't count.
If it was a terror attack but no one but the perpetrator died, it didn't count.
If there was a fatal terror attack but it occurred outside the US, it didn't count.
Still the wrong seven either way.
>What is green energy revolution
Seems like the ban has been working then.