I'm a /k/ommando and new to Sup Forums.
From what I've seen the majority here are white supremacists. Not that I have anything against it.
I just see that many arguments are built on the premise that the white race is superior.
Now my Question: How do you factually prove that white people build more advanced civilizations than e.g. blacks?
I'd like to have hard facts not just "look at africa how shit they've been, still are and will be".
Sry for doublepost.
I forgot to ask if there is any attempt of modern science on race science.
It's all Asians and Mexicans making making fun of gringos here all in the name of a good LARP
Sanitation, agriculture and the ability to organize manpower for intricate sustained purpose. There's much more, but these seem like easy starters.
...
>I'd like to have hard facts not just "look at africa how shit they've been, still are and will be".
That literally is a hard fact.
African tribal kings and chieftans now refer to themselves almost exclusively as Presidents, traditionally a European title.
Yeah but then the people go "It's the fault of white imperialism and corporations there. They hampered the evolution of the african continent so it's no wonder the are a bit behind. We must give them some time (and money) to catch up to us."
Sorry if you see any shit right now.
Pol is in full raid mode atm.
gif related
>It's the fault of white imperialism and corporations there.
australian aboriginals
they were stagnant for at least 40,000 years, and after we came and started gifting them free shit they remained stagnant
Hm thats a good point.
>Now my Question: How do you factually prove that white people build more advanced civilizations than e.g. blacks?
By having eyes.
of course it is, nobody likes to mention it though because all of the pure-blooded aboriginals are huffing aviation fuel in the outback
qt
Fuckin boongs
Look up the haiti revolution in 1805
Proof blacks cant run a civilization
And well africa...
There isn't a great deal due to how political universities and journals are.
You do see things that are cryto on these issues though at times.
>hampered the evolution
What do you think Africa was like before colonisation? When we came over on boats with weapons and clothing and tools etc. They say around on a bountiful continent for literally hundreds of thousands of years and came up with NOTHING.
>It's the fault of white imperialism
Imperialism isn't necessarily a disadvantage. I work for Caritas and our understanding of humanitarian work shifted because of South Korea. Until 2000 it was a legitimate argument to blame colonialism for the degenerate behaviour in african countries. South Korea, however, proved that falling back on imperial structures left behind by the japanese government and their buddhist tradition of education leads to success. Culture matters is the new narrative.
You haven't spent very much time around niggers, have you?
Live around them in their natural environment for a while and you too will hate them.
>Question: How do you factually prove that white people build more advanced civilizations than e.g. blacks?
Top Kek. Germans are such retards. Go ahead and find a highly advanced black country. Once your G*rm*n genes kick in and you pretend you've found one, note how many white nations dwarf it in every single way.
>From what I've seen the majority here are white supremacists
wrong, fuck off
>spend time around niggers
I live in a small bavarian village and have seen maybe 3 niggers irl but never interacted with them. Only looked at hem from afar because it was interesting to see a live one.
Jeez no need to get hostile. I am perfectly aware that countries run by blacks are shitholes. I just ask for factual proof. Something to show to others and leave them no excuses.
This
...
Thats a good one thanks!
I've lived amongst them since I started kindergarten and they have always been overly aggressive, stupid, and unwilling to listen. The only change from childhood is that they get more aggressive and somehow more stupid, possibly due to the aggression. They get the idea that white people hate them from childhood due to their inherent stupidity displayed in school and from then on they have a chip on their shoulders for not just white people but for every race that did better than they did. It gets worse from there. That's why niggers amongst whites are shit.
The reason africa is shit is because they tend to form matriarchal societies and do everything communally which does nothing but create stagnation. They have been comfortable doing this for so long that it is ingrained in their very instincts. It makes them expect free shit. Due to the relative ease of living in Africa compared to the white and asian mountainfolk who come from colder, more desolate places they grew complacent long ago and never had reason to change. With the modern world making things easier than ever they are never going to improve.
No the majority of the board is national socialist which isn't white supremacist
As I said I'm new here. I got the impression from recent threads about white ethno states. I didn't intend to offend anyone. Just saying my opinion.
Saved that to my folder.
>I just ask for factual proof.
You can search for things like:
literacy and educational attainment rates
life expectancy and mortality rates
gdp per capita and economic mobility rates
Just use your fucking head instead of asking us to spoonfeed you.
I'm not to lazy to search but most of the search i conducted brought up ideas that build on the premise not explain it. The few that tried were simply not satisfactory so I decided to give Sup Forums a shot.
Most scientific articles I found also said that there is no essential difference between the human races and even said that all humans are too similar to make a division in different races feasible.
White nationalism is its most forms is controlled opposition
WE
Believing that the white race is superior has nothing to do with it. If you need it simplified here we go.
Why are white countries the only countries that are forced to contract non-white immigrants. Sure you may think well white are redpilled so they want diversity and the strongest minds. That argument is put to rest quickly when you see that many countries don't care what kind of minds or people they're allowing into their country as long as they're non-white. The fact is in every place in Europe and America and even Russia where there is the highest concentration of white people, there is the lest concentration of life threatening issues, the standard of living is higher, and people are generally more happy.
The opposite is true of places where there are the least concentration of non-white peoples. Mexico is a hellhole where people get killed daily over drugs, the middle east is literally independence day every day without the fireworks, Africa has little more than diamonds and ancient civilizations to contribute to the world, and China and India are the most polluted places on earth.
Mean I.Q. of the various races.
That's your starting point.
All the Marxist bullshit about the races being equal is just that - bullshit.
Start with mean I.Q. and work from there.
Here's your normie-friendly intro:
youtu.be
IQ would be a good start, it provably relates to all kinds of succes factors.
One has to be careful though, as the amount of migrants rises, accuracy of measurement decreases. What does the average IQ in the Netherlands mean when 20% of the population is a migrant?
Then there are arguments not based on our supremacy but the fact that diverse societies are bad societies to be a part of, which has been proven as well. So it would be better to have Europe for europeans and within that Germany for Germans, Sweden for the Swedish, the Netherlands for the Dutch, etc.
Sage this shit. We are being raided
>Most scientific articles I found also said that there is no essential difference between the human races and even said that all humans are too similar to make a division in different races feasible.
That's because you're asking humans about humans. Humans can't be objective about their own species. There is a level of conceit that seems to go unnoticed. Look at how they categorize and sub-categorize other species in biology textbooks and you'll find a plethora of of examples of two sub-species essentially looking the same but having slightly different eating, sleeping, or breeding patterns. If something as relatively small as eating patterns can differentiate between sub-species in the eyes of a biologist, how highly do you think a biologist would rank different physical appearance?
>How do you factually prove that white people build more advanced civilizations than e.g. blacks?
You just need to read history.
A more pressing question is why we have allowed our cultures to be overwhelmed by nonsense that tells us (white males) to abandon our own interests and to calculate the interests of others (darkies) in place of our own?
Marx would be choking on his beard if he could see what has become of both Germany and the UK. In both countries the indigenous populations have been encouraged to allow foreigners to invade and victimise them. Madness.
I have to fulfill another captcha whenever I try to include the links
Thanks for the input. I'll watch the video after I get home from work.
Also I'll look at how species are categorized.
No one likes to mention the fact that sub saharan africans and pure blooded cuckshed owners share so few genetics, they may as well be different species entirely.
I prefer the argument of the foodchain.
Life is in constant competition to survive. Including us. As Humans we engage in tribalism in all phases of life. From children we learn to pick our friends based on their similarities to us in all aspects. We then extend this all through school with cliques, up into adult life, where it explodes into towns, cities, and countries. These are all formed by and held together by tribalism and competition.
In a competition there are competitors. If this is the case, all stats and accomplishments of each competitors should and can be collected, listed, and compared. This will determine who has the advantages and disadvantages where.
Often, there are people or groups who are have overall advantageous stats to other groups or people.
This is what you could call being superior. It does not denote perfect, nor incapable of failure, or defeat. It denotes being currently more successful.
Going by this logic, one can clearly see that races and ethnicities as groups are also tribalistic. In life, survival and living is competition. Thus we can compare the stats and achievements of races and ethnicities. When we do this, we all know which races and ethnicities have more advantages overall versus weaknessess. We all know which are best and which are worst.
The reason this is demonized and called racism instead of being acknowledged and moved past, is because of feelings. No group wants to be in second or worse place. No group wants to be told or feel they are inferior to another, despite the facts. It's just how it is. So we get racism and bigotry and that's bad, despite it being common sense.
You'll also find a large part of Human mannerisms and society is playing pretend in following of social conventions. This will fall directly into place as just that.
Saved
"redpill me on x, Sup Forums"
lurkmore
pretty stupidly obvious question as well
Redpill threads are a time honored tradition. You gonna honestly argue that sharing information is a bad thing? We've got ten pages, this shit takes one slot on one. It's fine.
>humans are too similar to make a division in different races feasible
Lmao tell that to forensic biology. Races are variable at the most basic level. Blacks have denser muscles, Asians have an additional vertabrae, blah blah blah. The most undeniable features are mostly aesthetic, so they may try to weasel-word out of it, but racial dimorphism is the same thing as sexual dimorphism.
Also stop apologizing. That's the one thing I hated about germany. Everyone was way too afraid of offending others. It's OK if people around you get offended every now and again, don't take it personally you meme
>asians have an additional vertabrae
w-what
the fact that at some point almost every white and asian ethnic group in america was hated and systemically shat on, but somehow still managed to after almost 100 LESS years to develop, they were still doing better than niggers
Here's a bone density thing before I continue: depts.washington.edu
The extra vertebrae thing was an old myth I got told as a kid, I'm sure someone else will remember it. It was something like some Asians would get an extra vertebrae for some reason. Like this, but racially specific: spinalcord.com
I was mostly memeing since the actual science is more subtle.
Haiti
Zimbabwe
Look up the history of those two places, then tell us if you still have any questions.
I merely said "sorry" to be polite. I don't give a fuck about what he thinks of me or my opinion. Being polite doesn't equate to being a cuck or sissy.
>12 posts by this ID
fuck off, we don't need 100 threads about (((CNN))) all at the same time
Denying races is just a fallacy of the beard. It takes a glance to discern an African from a European human, all grounded in basic biological difference.
IQ is highly heritable (0.85-0.9), and the heritability of IQ varies with age in a way that directly contradicts environmentalist hypotheses. IQ is also the best damn measure we have, so anyone trying to brush it off is a fucking moron or a disingenuous cunt.
Haiti has a few things cucks can use to defend it, but Zimbabwe and most of post colony Africa is indefensible
Race is a taboo in modern science, if you do a science course that'll probably be mentioned in the first block of subjects.
I'd recommend a book "The State of Africa" by Martin Meredith. Good read on postcolonial Africa that's not biased against Europeans (it's just something that's appreciated) and examines the actions and events that transpired in African countries because of Africans. It's not biased against Africans either, but thanks to recognisable patterns in country over country, reading it you'll quickly notice the inherent nature of Africans and their organisational structures when left to themselves. And the common preconception that Africa is shit because of whitey will be dispelled.