Any historians here? I have a question

Why didn't mighty Romans just invade and conquer all of Africa?

Did those wh*Tes fear the black warrior?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquest_of_Egypt
youtube.com/watch?v=tJ5gJZRWmBY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romans_in_Sub-Saharan_Africa
roman-empire.net/republic/carthage.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt_(Roman_province)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because Africa is large, and traversing through miles upon miles of nothing in extreme temperatures between day and night to encounter IQ < 80 violent shitskins with no impulse control who hadn't even invented the wheel would have merited them nothing.

Blacks made them feel sick.

Because Sahara.

There was nothing in it for them

>wh*Tes were afraid of a little sand

Jungle and monkey diseases. Arab control.

wasn't this posted yesterday as well

SAGE THIS THREAD. IT WAS BORING THE FIRST 20 TIMES.

SAGE THIS THREAD. IT WAS BORING THE FIRST 20 TIMES.

SAGE THIS THREAD. IT WAS BORING THE FIRST 20 TIMES.

>why not just traverse through a thousand miles of desert with no easily attained resources, filled with tribes of dumb savages that will attack you?
I don't know why they didn't do something like expanding around Morocco, though. Had they known about it, they probably could have expanded to South America by colonizing along the Western coast of Africa, though.

SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE. SAGE.

what the fuck is wrong with roach posters lately. Approach leaf status, maybe surpassing soon

It's 1 fucking person. The same pattern. Daily.

STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S STOP GIVING (YOU)'S

It's the same roach poster that thinks he's black.

because of the huge sandy death valley in the way?

How is this about recent events or politics? Oh it isn't because you are a shitposting turk? Ok then.

>Why didn't mighty Romans just invade and conquer all of Africa?
Same as with the Northern Europe, there was nothing of value, only some useless barbarians. They conquered Egypt and the North African coast, that basically was (and still is) the only worthwhile part of that continent.

No, you idiot. The fact is that romans didn't know what there was behind the Sahara. So, why go across a desert?

Why did we dismantle your empire?

>Same as with the Northern Europe, there was nothing of value
LOL

desert is tough. You ain't very clever, aren't you... oh that flag. nvm.

AFAIK we did that in 1922
Keep trying to be relevant tho lmao, while we are beheading you on your bridges. just like in 1915

read

fuck off turkish retard, Egyptians arent black people

Why didn't the Ottoman Empire? They had that land more recently. Same reason, roach.

Because you're not worth dying for.

>HE THINKS PEOPLE LIVED IN THE PYRAMIDS
>Turk-roach Logic

A little sand? What is your problem faggot? The Sahara is 900000 km2 and one of the biggest world's desrt

Any historians here? Why do t*rks make the same posts over and over again?

sage

>The fact is that romans didn't know what there was behind the Sahara. So, why go across a desert?
gee i dunno, maybe to find out what was there?

There was nothing down there other than coons and desert.

The pyramids weren't built by black, moron

Roach you are still here ???? 4 threads already all of em low quality bait.Go and take care of your brothers.

Egyptians were Semites you ignorant fuck.

No reason to/too savage. All of the major empires had no interest in it, you could get much better resources/slaves from tribal Europe.

Islam was the first to conquer the interior but they didn't even go in that deep, they just got some salves and got out.

>white people can't go in the sun for more than a minute without getting burned alive
>were egyptians
give me a break

So, you go across with an army. After a long march you found just hostiles tribes, no resources and you have to return back. It's a very clever thing to do

Malaria simple as that

everyone says sahara but they could have sailed along the coast, a bit further every few years. just like it was done later.

>After a long march you found just hostiles tribes
right, they were frightened of African warriors. we already established that.
>no resources
africa is full of resources once you get past the sahara

The egyptians were semitic stupid. At least, the slaves were blacks

LOL that ur clue retard? we arent blacks and we can live under sun perfectly

Wasn't really worth it. People today like to think in terms of "get as much land as possible", but that simply wasn't the case back then. Land doesn't do you shit for good, if you don't have anyone to work it, and south of the dessert (which would have been hard to take a legion across) there simply wasn't much of a population to rule. This, and the fact that at almost any point in Roman history, they were at war with another nation, and couldn't spare legions for such an expedition. You, also have to remember that the Carthaginians, kept Rome out of Africa for a long time entirely.

modern egyptians (arabs) only came later, the original egyptian empire builders were actual africans
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquest_of_Egypt

Resources useless at the time.
And even the strongest army in the world loose a battle if had go across a desert and have no supplies in the future

Why would they? There's no real economic incentive to go farther than the sahara. The point of conquering north africa is to own the Mediterranean.

The Sahara was to the south, Ethiopia is mountainous as fuck and the only way into Sudan is blocked by a fuckhuge swamp.

For (you)s.

perma-ban this subhuman

you have to permaban all of us
and you don't have the balls to do it

Right. You got the point

...

...

Fuck off, Turk. Continue to suck Wahabbi dick in a country created by a secularist who reviled Islam.

read the image I put retard here , I know ur IQ level is low so I will explain it to u, the research saying that 65% of modern Egyptians are mediterraneans,18% southwest Asian,14% sub saharan african, the africans genes come from the south border immigrants and 18% arab genes come from arabs who migrated to Egypt before Islam and how came here with the islamic conquest and 65% mediterranean genes are the original Egyptian genes so fuck off retard and learn what you are talking about

you propably respond to this shitskin subhuman turkish nationalist

really makes you think

Because Arabs were conquering Africa instead.

It's because they didnt need to.
All of the valuable shit that was taken from Africa went through Egypt on its way to Arabia anyways. Not to mention that conquering the whole continent would be an enormous strain on their resources.

Scouts. You don't send armies without intelligence. Scouts and spies are how you conquer shit and learn.

No, the arabs remain in Arabia until the death of Moahmmed

They kinda were too busy running the rest of Europe.

:/

Why didn't mighty ottomans just invade and conquer all of Africa?

Did those roaches fear the black warrior?

You don't send scout to a place without reason. I have exaggerated only to explain better

youtube.com/watch?v=tJ5gJZRWmBY

kys wh*Te dog

YeahConsidering that the desert was so massive they coulda thought it was endless. The resources of Central Africa weren't known to Europe (Congo area) and it's massive. All they knew was there was a massive continent with desert. Plus it isn't very easy to invade every powerful country in Europe without reprecussions, they were probably weakened from those conquests

>without reason
the reason is the same reason you send a scout anywhere, to find out more about the area you sent him.

How else did Islam spread through the continent?

I admire your dedication

All of those massive Caliphates mang. Then it would kinda send shockwaves through more inland north africa

no the whites feared disease and niggerdom

>Finns
>white

Look, will you throw some money in the bog? The spedition of scouts cost

>map still shows Ethiopia in control of Eritrea
How fucking old is that, jesus.

After the death of mohammed, the islam spread around africa, but the western roman empire was already dead

How many times a day are you going to post this sub human?

are u afraid to reply because I destroyed ur clueless facts retard?

He doesn't have a life

Wow, such cost. Such resource. How could they ever afford to do such a thing?

/sarcasm

There's no point in arguing with a black revisionist. They're the most deluded, insecure, and pathetic sons of bitches that exist. They know deep down inside that their people haven't contributed shit to the world and were/are the most primitive race of "humans" when they were left to develop their own technology.
That's why Turks abducted ethnic European boys from the Balkans to serve in the Ottoman armies. It's because Turks are skinny, weak manlets so they stole the phenotype and genes of superior races. Turkey's greatest men were of full or partial Balkan or Slavic ancestry, including Ataturk.

They wasn't a stupid people, and they didn't throw away their money

Your timeline is off by hundreds of years

Some expeditions into subsaharian Africa indeed happened during imperial times, but they were mostly used to open new trade routes for gold and spices. Crossing the desert with an army would have been way more dangerous and costly, and frankly nobody would have deemed it a worthy thing to do.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romans_in_Sub-Saharan_Africa

>Why didn't mighty Romans just invade and conquer all of Africa?
They did as far as they were concerned.
There wasn't a rush for Lebensraum, I suppose they would've settled in lands they knew first
There was barely any contact with the handful of civilizations South of the Sahara, and no wild tales of extreme plenty, unlike other places (North Africa for that matter)
Actio radius (you have to go to high school for this one)
No massive population reserves to settle and hold down new land

Because of the sahara
The only way to cross it is through using camels which I think werent used at the time.

Yeah, but they don't settle there. And they don't found any gold or spices

Exactly

>right, they were frightened of African warriors. we already established that.
>africa is full of resources once you get past the sahara
No, you dumb nigger, they weren't scared of naked nignogs with pointy sticks. They Romans didn't just pick fights if there was nothing in it for them, and considering they had no way of knowing about the resources of the Kongolese basin or west Africa, they had no reason to go down there in the first place. And even aside from that, the only real resource they could realistically exploit would be gold, and they can just get that in Europe.

they sent exploring expeditions and decided it wasn't worth the trouble. It took future European societies almost 2000 years to come to the same conclusion.

Moar

...

There is something called "The limit of the Empire". I cant remeber who but an Emperor gave back some conquered (by his predecessor) territories because of that "limit".

Every few days you come and post this. Have you not gotten the answer you want yet?

I'm guessing you're referring to Hadrian, who relinquished Mesopotamia and built a wall in Britain several miles southward from Antonine's wall, setting the limes on his own wall.

this is why we won't allow you in our union

If I remember correctly these territories were conquered by Trajan and were in Africa or middle east, cant rememebr so...uh probably yes.

the romans conqeured carthage and the conqeared egypt.
roman-empire.net/republic/carthage.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt_(Roman_province)

ans you should ask that qeustion yourself t*rk why did the ottomas not spread islam to he whole of africa? would youre thick fur cuase overheating?

There's a huge desert there. Back then you didn't waste resources to control shit lands.

>mfw Roman but mestizo shitskin :^(

Because they didn't see the value in marching over mIles of empty dessert just to get 0 resources. It's easier to administer a coastal empire because sailing is faster than marching