*Sips paint thinner.*

*Sips paint thinner.*
Sup Forums can't refute this.

OP cannot refute him being a faggot.

- doesn't take into account the left's embrace of Islam in recent years.
- doesn't take into account strong anti-vaccine sentiment on the right
- scientific literacy and secularism can't be defined as largely a centrist phenomenon
- liberalism should be like 10 o'clock, not 12 o'clock
- hedonism looks woefully out of place and shouldn't even be on the image at all
- corporatism is placed well if it's granted that the Clintons and Obama are actually center-right pols
- I think the feminism placements fail to account for the fact that feminism, at least in terms of its most vocal proponents, is largely just a Democratic manipulation game -- otherwise, feminists would be screeching for Bill Clinton's head on a stick. The two feminism labels are placed in a way that fails to account for Bill Clinton getting a free pass, because centrists wouldn't exhibit such partisanship and the blue area is actually hostile to Democrats.

No Horse Shoe. Full Circle. The gap is National Socialism.

It's individualism and everything else. Fuck all other ideology breakdowns.

staring at this picture is turning me retarded

Center -- Liberalism

Anarchism is a political ideology in the same way that atheism is a religion. Anarchism is the denial of political authority.

>islamism
made by a retard
>catholicism
not a political stance but anyway if you want to suck the popes dick i guarantee you the Vatican 2 is closer to the commies than anything on the right wing

Notice the 2 extremes are not very far from each other. A little closer, and they begin to merge.

No spectrum that doesn't include liberty has any validity whatsoever.

I was gonna say, where is libertarianism

I honestly don't understand why most people are mentally confined to visualizing politics as a contiguous line on a two-dimensional plane from left to right. Just because NatSoc and, say, Stalinists share parallel beliefs about the organization of the state that are contrary to LibDem values - doesn't mean that they were formulated from the same or even remotely similar logical processes. Same for those programs considered to be "in the center". The political spectrum is a concept for people with the same intellectual depth of an AJ+ video on facebook.

>nationalism
>EXTREME FAR RIGHT LUNATIC FRINGE

lel

I think it's implied that the giant "liberalism" in the dead center is meant to refer to general/typical forms of "libertarianism". /polsci/ still commonly uses 'liberalism' in the classical sense of it.

i don't see fascism as being at all "right-wing" though because "right-wing" generally means smaller government, and fascism is essentially the ultimate big government philosophy. it's really a left-wing thing, that's why hitler was really left-wing. he loved big government, was a socialist, openly detested capitalism, created a welfare state, pushed the idea of equality and classless society, anti-gun, vegan, atheist, failed artist, set up nature preserves, drug user, wanted socializd medicine, every earmark of the modern day SJW. he was a massive left-winger and fascism really is ultimately a left-wing philosophy. it's just been branded as "right-wing" by left-wing socialist professors in an attempt to distance themselves from the nazi regime. they all know he was really a socialist in every sense of the word, but they try to tell people he wasn't because it would obviously reflect badly on their broken and fallible ideology.

> I WONDER WHO COULD BE BEHIND THIS

It's true though. I'm sorry Sup Forums gaslighting got you so badly.

Honestly it is pretty fascinating that Sup Forums simultaneously embraces how 'not mainstream' and 'incorrect' it is in contrast to the 'liberal masses', and yet insists that 'everyone is secretly a white nationalist it's actually super normie'

Exactly zero academic political theorist takes 'Horseshoe Theory' seriously. It requires oversimplifying political positions to the point of complete worthlessness in order to make its case. If you ignore what's different about two things, then they're the same!

Right-wing does not necessarily mean smaller government.

True bro, Saudi Arabia is basically an anarchist society if you really think about it.

>nationalism
>far right

>male chauvanism

Ok now I'm noticing too many things to continue