What is the Sup Forums approved bible version? Looking right now

What is the Sup Forums approved bible version? Looking right now
>inb4 mudslime flags saying quran

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FAgDXZfOfx0
bibleprotector.com/index.htm
m.youtube.com/watch?v=tFtFUX10oZw
worldhistory.biz/download567/The_Orthodox_Study_Bible_-_St.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

quran XD

RSV
Douais-Rheim
Vulgate

Anything else is pure, intravenous heresy

The original latin and greek versions.

>not ESV

all heathens must burn

quran

King James in English
Luther in German
Reina Valera in Spanish

When I was in Catholic school 30 years ago they gave us KJV so that

pic related

>approved bible version
>being this deluded

KJV

Old Testament: Brenton Septuagint
>using anything based on (((hebrew)))
New Testament: KJV

Eastern orthodox bible EOB. It is the most recent and best English literal translation written by the orthodox church in Erica's clergy and theologians. It has the stamp of approval of the orthodox church and good cross examination with different base texts where differences arise.

America not erica

ESV
NASB
KJV

Don't let the drama of translation get in the way of your study.
Keep in mind the fact that there are different views of Biblical transmission, translation, canon, authority and sufficiency.

The Book of Mormon.

EOB

King James Bible. God bless, user.

youtube.com/watch?v=FAgDXZfOfx0

KJV ONLY

mudslime flag checks out

I would try KJV, and if your really into studying it look into getting something like a concordance Youngs is a good one

Alexandrian or Vaticanus? Wescott and Hort developed a test to determine which version was the most correct. They used the older manuscripts, however there are parts missing and different verbal when translated into english. The KJV and the NKJV are the Vaticanus text and are traditionally recognized as the correct version. The Alexandrian text is the versions Westcott and Hort worked with and are the basis for all of the other versions like the NIV and the ESV. Personally, I use a KJV, however even it has gone through revisions. A 1611 KJV, which is the original, is readable but difficult to understand at times.

There is the Church's view and heresy.

KJV. Anything else is a meme.

only the action matters for the crusade

bibleprotector.com/index.htm

According to this website not even KJV (due to probable twisting of verses or mis-use of typo corrections), but the "Authorized King James Bible 1611 edition" is the pure Word of God. It went through 7 sword upgrades to become the perfected "Pure Cambridge Edition" and is suppose to be the final authority. The only thing that's kinda strange is, publishers don't produce the PCE anymore, but rather promote other bible translations that have missing essential verses on about like repentence and not mentioning the Father's real name (aka Jehova), etc.

The Quran is redpilled

Károli Gáspár translation, kek

This one

Lol the vulgate is Catholic garbage

>word of god
>written by man
How about none?

m.youtube.com/watch?v=tFtFUX10oZw

DOUAY

RHEIMS

Wescot and hort were doing their (((translations))) just to subvert Christianity they even admit to it in their journals.

I heard KJV is worth a shot

Turns out KJV is a Quran. Thanks based brownman

The one that's in the trash

The Quran is the best version of the bible. It takes all areas of life into account.

You chose the right thread to post this in

Get this pagan bullshit outta here

The problem with the Quran is that it is a gnostic text. It is all about the secret revelation of one man from god. How can you trust it also considering he often gets things wrong like thinking Mary was a part of the trinity. The bible is the collection of hundreds and thousands of eye witness accounts of Jesus and his miracles including resurrection and Jesus also said that many fake prophets would come after him. Why do you trust the Quran?

King James is the only correct answer

AV (KJV)

Strong's Concordance
Matthew Henry's Commentary

except for maybe the CSB (HCSB) you'll seriously want to stay away from all the other >1920+ versions that utilize catholic forgeries as sources and texts influenced by marxist critical theory

>Bible
is it 1017 or what?

You're too cool for the Bible?

Meditations by Marcus Aurelius

Maybe. Anyway, why would I be intrested in reading ancient jewish mythology? It's boring t b h.

>he is not reading the original scrollz
when will you grow up?

Someone link me a proper KJV on Bookdepository dot calm. I'm going to order another bundle of books soon so I might as well start reading the bible too.

I trust it because it was this successful despite the fact that that one man didn't need miracles and had converted the entire country by the time of his death in the span of 23 years.

Was Mary never part of the trinity? The Holy spirit wasn't her?
Maybe it was at one point.

No we didn't do anything.

>spread by force of conquest, not potency of message
>successful
In the terms of a barbarian, perhaps. Unfortunately for you we operate on the free market of ideas and in that free market your book hasn't taken foothold by any other means than, again, force. The state forcing taxation to pay welfare is not a measure of the charitability of the people.

>was Mary never part of the holy trinity?
No.

"Commie's way of preserving the human race (+bonus le epick side stories and incest porn)"

Qu'ran

Lamsa

Quran (unironically)

dead sea scrolls

In order
NRSV
ESV
RSV

How can you suggest an Anglican Bible translation and then say that everything outside of the Church is heretical?

the message

The Zhuangzi

Orthodox study bible

worldhistory.biz/download567/The_Orthodox_Study_Bible_-_St.pdf

Link I got from the christian general threads

KJV is the best version of the Bible to read.

It's also worth occasionally dipping into the Koran as some of the pedo anons are suggesting, just to see how shit, inferior and shallow it is in comparison to the KJV.

The Koran is very repetitive and formulaic, it's literally a handful of pages of copy pasta being repeated with only slight variations. It is also incredibly dry, and has nothing interesting to say. Even the Mohamedans don't like reading it, and unlike Christians they never quote anything from it, there are no interesting or compelling verses that stand out.

A lot of Mohamedan faggots in this thread are butthurt about this, that nobody (not even they) want to read the shitty rants of their camel-piss drinking gay prophet. They claim it is great or "redpilled" but see if they ever bother to post any quotes from it. They won't, because there is nothing in there worth quoting.

>translation from another translation
protties, not even once

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

>heresy

pro tip: you can always tell the LARP autists from genuine christians because they treat religion like its a Console vs PC war, and miss the forest for the trees. Many of them even resort to arguing over history, politics and literal interpretations to prove their point.

I will simply tell you, KJV because you'll remember the verses easier when it comes time to discuss

Das fucking rite shinji

every fucking time, don't forget to enter that 4 letter word in the options field

I want to hear some defenses on this one specifically. let me throw a quick hypothetical to the christcucks in the house. say evolution is proven to be real, (as if it hasn't already) and there is literal seeing is believing proof to it, it's right there in your face. you'd be considered to be mentally retarded to keep denying it( as if you guys arn't already) how would you keep living with yourself? to have your idea, your faith just completely thrown out the window, to have what you lived for your entire life to be a lie, to have what you live for turn out to be living for nothing and that death is the end...well how could you react to that? how could you than believe anything after? this one thing you thought was true is now a lie...well what would you guys do? would you kill yourselves? I think you would. see, as an atheist, if god proved himself to be real by showing himself, I can than say "my life for christ" and that It's ok for me to follow because now I know that death isn't the end, but for YOU, the christcucks, who literally suck an imaginary dudes dick everyday, for you to find out it was a lie. well, shit, why take that chance? when so many things prove that it just isn't real. I just want to know, what would you christcucks do if it turned out to all be a lie?

Yet not as successful as catholicism. Also look at the comparative wealth of Muslim countries to Christian ones. And consider how the most wealthy powerful and technologically superior countries (middle east Persia and Egypt) stagnated once Islam took full hold and the dhimmis began to die out.

Mohammed was also bankrolled initially by Jews obviously looking for a way to destroy the catholic church and he converted by threat of death and the sword not by peace like Christianity did.

If your reason for faith in the Quran is success then I think you need to look at the more successful religion for your faith.

Mary was never at any point a part of the trinity. She was and is not the holy spirit. She isn't and never was god, only the mother of god hence why Mohammed was mistaken

Uses KJV for nt. Use eob instead for nt. Osbs ot is best though

Only right answer is the Kybalion

King James

Catholic doctrine accepts evolution. Only retarded proddies dont

You need to read about the history of Christian scholars, and very sorely I might add. Your conception of Christianity and science is entirely wrong; the product of anti-theologian propaganda.

the king james version.

>my religion says it's right
>this other religon which is a branch, or branched off, or my religion branched off of says it's not
>it's my reliigon it's RIGHT
ok, I don't care what your religion says, I just want to know if you can imagine your life without god.

Oh, I thought that must have been copypasta.

So bear in mind that you have to understand how science works well enough to know that evolution is not proven but rather a theory. And then you have to understand that this theory isn't really all that compatible unless you want to get doctrinaire about particular bible passages you like.

And then from there it's pretty easy to accept that either or both might be wrong. But I would feel bad for any Christian who hadn't at some point doubted the existence of God enough to be unable to imagine an alternative.

*isn't really all that incompatible

kjv

>implying that i'm not lurking and actually reading the suggestions and posts
why would I post anything else when I know next to nothing about it, but want to learn you retard

>reading torah fanfiction
>reading it after it's been retranslated and transcribed and altered for thousands of years
There is no accurate bible in your language. It doesn't exist.

rip fucking id i was phonefagging before

well thats hell of a sperging

Ask for a recommendation for a study bible.

Even if your translation is better than somebody else's, and even if it's quite entirely a good idea to flip through it even arbitrarily to see what it says, interpreting it as a whole will still be the main barrier.

Neon Genesis

>Maybe it was at one point.

No mary was never part of the trinity , not even in the 2500 denominations , its probably because christians called her mother of god , and muhamad was not that well teached in the doctrine and fucked up the quran with a lie

Skeptics Annotated

How is it any different from Templarpers posting massive, wordy screenshots to "BTFO ATHEISTS" in religion threads?

NASB (for accuracy)
NKJV (for aesthetics, poetry and ease of memorization)