This fox Article leads off with categorizing the current G20 riots as "anti-globalist".
This isn't true at all. It's the left that wants no borders and globalization.
The right, or at least the Trump/Poland supporting right does not want globalization, and they ware definitely not part of the Black Bloc, Antifa, or any of these lootyers or anarchists.
Actual fake news from Fox News, so pathetic.
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.fo
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Is this bait? You can't possibly be this retarded....
arrow came out w antifa colors, sorry, here...
Archive: archive.fo
BTW, Fox is fake news.
Go.Read.It.For.Yourself.!.
Yeah, they are wrong on this. Not sure why they would do this though.
He means you're a fucking retard because Leftists can also oppose Globalism.
> Muh capitalisms is raping them there poor chink / africans gas the rich globalists!
Are you like 12 or something dude?
I think they were just being retarded. Americans, even news people, don't fully get the state of Europe atm. They were confused as to whether or not the rioters were anarchists or what. Sean Hannity, though, absolutely knows what globalists/globalism are and uses the terms correctly.
don't be fucking donkey
These rioters are Black Bloc and Antifa,
The core of the rioters are left-wing
They are attacking right-wing individuals
That changes their stance on neo-liberal globalist capitalism how exactly?
>en.m.wikipedia.org
Nice trips!
Yeah, Juan Williams had mentioned that apparently some of the rioters were self-proclaimed protestors against shit like the TPP, so their rioting against Trump made no sense as they're on the same page with that issue.
Personally I think a number of different problem groups are rioting in Hamburg, not all for the same reasons.
Go back to fucking redit you dumb piece of shit
...
Exactly, remember how many Bernie-bots also share their opposition to trade/capitalist globalism with Trump. A weird factoid is that these otherwise warring factions do agree on the TPP--Bernie and Trump both owned that during the campaign.
Yes it is true
Standing against globalization and unity of whole world is for fucks sake nationalism or xenophobia at least
I don't know what these "anti-globalist" protesters would want different than one world communist government?
Whole world without governments? Total anarchy? Nope, that's also leads to globalization
Maybe small communes around villages that are governing themselves? Nope, if it would unite world then it would fuel xenophobia, because if for example small village from North Italy wants to separate itself from other villages and in particular those from South Italy then it leads to more conflicts between villages and even more xenophobia
Yep, that's fake news
I haven't seen nationalists in those riots
>Anti-globalization riots?
Bolsheviks are about as globalist as it gets famalan
These riots are fundamentally pro-globalist, pro-communist, pro-socialist. The majority of their signage is anti-right.
German donkey butt
can't your country allow free speech?
Yeah, you come here to speak your incorrect mind, or left-wing rioters in Hamburg would kill you.
Thank You!
>Personally I think a number of different problem groups are rioting in Hamburg, not all for the same reasons.
it's always like this
there are probably over a thousand different activist groups at work from all over europe in hamburg now.
it's not a big unified block
Thank You.
You're a fucking retard.
Globalism is not an inherent central tenet of Socialism, it can be a factor, and while popular socialist thought does advocate for a global class struggle, that doesn't mean they support current iteration of Globalism being shilled by neo-liberals and kikes.
It's entirely possible to oppose the current brand of Globalism from a leftist position while remaining ideologically consistent with leftist / socialist beliefs.
Leftists oppose international networking of corporations and banks, (globalization) not the erossion of national borders (globalism). They're still for open borders and white genocide, they just don't like rich and powerful people from different countries working together, even though that's how they get their funding and get away with their rioting and terrorism.
Either way all these riots achieve is making the locals more pssed off that their businesses have been smashed and their cars set on fire than mad about whats going on at G20. Antifaggots serve the globalist establishment they think they're fighting.
It's generally virulently left-wing
and left-wingers hate the nationalists
Their signage speaks for itself
This is Mr. Murdoch Fox shitting on nationalists.
Thank You.
That's because for a left leaning person globalization doesn't necessarily mean what it means for a right leaning person you dumb fucking retard.
Leftists hate the rich. That's globalization for them, rich people exploiting those poor Africans and Asians and getting richer. Think of 99%er protests. They aren't protesting a one-world government. Your average leftard couldn't even think that far.
Well, the short answer is that they're retarded leftists, and will march against anything their leaders tell them to like the lemmings they are.
They're technically anti-globalist in the sense that they are anti international, free market capitalism. They don't like that if they organize labor, that capital is able to move to other countries. However, they are still in favor of stronger, more centralized leftist one-world government, and hold no patriotic allegiance to their nation or their people.
The right, specifically the alt-right, is anti-globalist in the sense that we hold strong nationalist and patriotic feelings toward our people's and nation. We don't feel a oneship toward a global group of people, and don't want to be beholden to a global or trans-national authority. However, the right also tends to believe in capitalism and free enterprise. This may or may not result in protectionism; but either way international control is frowned upon.
>Lefist suddenly start calling themselves anti-globalist when they chimp out like retards
>this is totanly not supposed to mae anti-globalists look retarded and violent, i swear guize
>all ou7r lefty groups spent the last 5 decades pushing globalization like crazy, but we changed we swear! Here let me burn ths car in frnt of a camera to prove it!
Always remember, leftists operate on lies, false-flags and subvertion. When feminists say equality, they mean supremacy, when communists say freedom, they mean opression, when antifa says anti-globalist, they fight for globalism, and protest anti-globalist american predisents on the g20. Do not buy into their narrative, and make sure to always call them what they are. Globalist stooges, hooligans, and useful idiots.
So this is the power... Of the bluepilled right wing... woah.
>Fox News Misleading About G20 riots?
If anything, they're under-reporting it.
Yaaassssss sleigh queen
How can someone on the politics board misunderstand politics this badly?
The signage says it all.
Don't deny the obvious.
these rioters are virulent left-wing.
There is no strong anti-globalist sense with this.
The IMF is an afterthought here
Go read Fox news in your dark hole.
That is what the rioters Soros-paid handlers said.
Ah, silly German reporters. They were even telling Rioters to attack reporters.
The far left is anti globalism, you retarded plebian faggot with a double digit IQ who watched infowars.
>The far left is anti globalism
At least anti global capitalism/neoliberalism
>virulent left-wing.
For the third fucking time. That doesn't stop them from being Anti-Globalist you pea brained fuckwit.
Drowning in the irony of you obviously fucking browsing Fox News in the fucking first place to come across this bullshit and trigger your retarded redditor brain into overdrive.
They're anti globalisation because it threatens domestic jobs and because fu k muh capitalizm but they want open borders
Its true. These are anti globalist riots. You're being fake news'd into thinking its antifa. They don't want everyone joining in so they pit these riots as left vs right instead of 1% vs 99% like it really is.
the left has been redpilled about globalism before you underage cunts were even born
It's not being misunderstood you jackass butt
You can't see that Fox is taking this huge plethora and affixing an anti-globalist label to it.
The IMF is not at the center here.
// fucking retardates
# fucking shills
It's how leftists and CNN are trying to spin the "Peaceful protests" in Hamberg.
Go back to fucking reddit jesus christ.
you are an embarrassment
You're a fucking idiot
get off this board and go join the Fox News Comment threads.
They'd like you over there.
Thank You.
Fox news just can't go and say "Soros funded leftist Antifa were bussed in..." even if it is the truth.
You are misunderstanding and it is becuse you're retarded. Globalization and Globalism aren't the same thing.
Anti-Globalization = Opposing the existence of muitnational corporations and international banking networks
Anti-Globalism = Wanting to maintain distinct nations with strictly controlled borders and distinct native cultures
Also, antifaggots are retarded, US antifags are currently trying to start a meme war with a notoriously stab happy prison gang at the moment for no good reason.
...
>a notoriously stab happy prison gang
Wait, biker gangs? I thought that was a joke.
...
Your meme has a mistake
there's usually about 100 malnourished, pierced-face, drugged-up antifa members for every 5 healthy, job-holding right-wingers, and I'm not talking Nazis, i'm talking pissed off Trump Supporters.Can't wait to go at it again with Antifa. They get beat down here.
It would be pretty boss if we could convince ANTIFA to raid Sturgis this year.
antifa will get their ass kicked here
What I don't understand is why they are rioting if they are FOR globalization. That's what the G20 is all about!
go bitch in The Bay, or Oregon or Seattle.
You get your shit jacked anywhere else
this is not a lie, this is proven fact
we bash antifa
They are rioting because they were bussed to Hamberg by Soros with no place to stay, no money and no food.
Probably no way to get home, either.
Please be true
>why they are rioting if they are FOR globalization
they are anti-globalization
they're for globaism, this has been explained to you and you're ignoring it, you're trolling.
>arrow came out w antifa colors, sorry, here...
We can tell you're not from here, go back to r/anarchism poop thrower
The alt lite civic nationalists have ruined Sup Forums. It is amazing how stupid some of the people are in this thread.
Maybe. Just maybe. They see Globalism as a neo-liberal ploy to funnel money to a capitalist investor class in western society by exporting work to countries with lower safety / hiring standards (leftist position of Unionized labor forces), little environmental standards (leftist position of environmentalism) and corporate overreach / tax avoidance (leftist position of anti-capitalism).
sure, they're anti-IMF, anti-world bank, but that's an afterthought here. They are being backed by globalist money
They hate nationalists, and they're fired up on all that fake press
Yeah, you're right
I'm not from Sup Forums
I'm from a site exactly like it called Sup Forums
that doesn't have donkey butt Fox-sucking pseudo-intellectuals
These people are Bernie Sanders morons. They are against free trade, free markets etc
You're retarded
>implying these people aren't open border retards
This board is only ruined because asshats like you think you have this 'supreme' view of world events.
You don't
You simply don't understand.
here, take a red pill.
> Implying people can't have nuanced political opinions.
How fucking hard is it for you mongoloids to understand.
Jesus Christ. They want open borders because they believe they're helping muh poor impoverished niggers. They oppose globalism because it makes poor impoverished niggers work in slave conditions.
They dislike the current Neo-Liberal brand of Globalism, but support their idealized, fundamentally different version of Globalism.
> Says the Fox News watching retard who can't comprehend people agreeing on something for different reasons.
No it's not. The Social Religion Left is the literal puppet class of the Globalists. These kids have been brainwashed their ENTIRE lives to believe in open borders, high taxes, and race mixing. But that's exactly what the Globalists want.
It's not my "view" that makes you wrong. You objectively have a fundamental misunderstanding of politics.
(((((((((Simon))))))))))))
>open borders, high taxes, and race mixing.
Oh look! It's nothing to do with abusing workers rights, environmentalism and capitalism! The main reason some leftists choose to oppose the modern brand Globalism! But how could this possibly be?!
From the perspective of Leftists, Neo-Liberal Capitalist Globalism and Socialist Globalism are two entirely different beasts and are inherently incompatible.
>the far left is anti globalism
can you explain this a bit further plz?
Or try reading the second line of the fucking wikipedia article on Globalism you mongolidic swine.
>The perspective of Leftists
Leftists are children. They want globalization without ethnic conflict, pollution, hierarchy, abuse. It's like having cocaine without the comedown.
This never coming "Utopia" is their religion, and an embarrassing one at that.
global capitalism =/= globalism
communists oppose global capitalism but are still globalists who want worldwide communism
They're anti GLOBALIZATION (international networking of capitalist structures like corporations and banks) but they're pro globalism in terms of open borders and immigration. Globalization and globalism aren't the same thing.
they weren't anti globalist riots, they were anti global capitalism riots
They are against neoliberalism. They are pro open borders, which I would argue they shouldn't be because these MNCs are very much open borders, but they are definitely anti neoliberalism, which is basically global capitalism.
All major media companies in the US are fake news, Fox plays a foil to all the others, because they always say "we talk about x story but none of the other networks do." It's all part of political theater.
>global capitalism =/= globalism
Yeah you keep telling yourself that
its fucked up that women with full political rights can agitate for a war they'll never be expected to fight in
>It's the left that wants no borders and globalization
#notallleft
these fags are pro-open borders, anti-free trade (don't ask)
Yes that's what I thought, most of the people on this thread for some reason believe that globalism=globalization
which had my confused
>global capitalism =/= globalism
how can you type this out, read it, and still press post?
Fox news is owned by an globalist Australian. Its not even an American company. Its all lies and propaganda just like CNN and MSNBC, don't be fooled by the cuckservative RINO varnish.
>Leftists are children.
Where have i posted that you think i disagree with this sentiment? They want Globalization but an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT BRAND of it than the current Neo-Liberal model. How do you not fucking understand this? Do i have to fly to your country and skull fuck this information into your head?
This is like Ethno and Civic Nationalists disagreeing with one another, they still support Nationalism, but they have fundamentally different and largely OPPOSITE ideas on how it's best achieved.
The leftists who oppose Globalism in it's current form still want Globalism, just not Neo-Liberal Globalism currently being pushed and exemplified by the G20 summit.
It is essential the same thing. Globalism is the idea, globalization is the process. You guys are wrong.
>People not knowing the difference between left-wing anti-globalization and right-wing anti-globalization
Open borders without structure is a recipe for wide scale genocide and war.
The only structures leftists can provide to enforce their lack of personal freedom is totalitarian regimes.
How are totalitarian regimes going to handle tens of millions of people streaming across their borders demanding equal access to limited resources??
if you want to be pedantic about it, at least use the proper words
note that most people would disagree with everything and argue they're the same, they have a point too
globalization (economic) ⊂ globalism (socioeconomics)
>not knowing globalism =/= globalization
>using wikipedia as main source
>"they dislike the current brand of globalism, but support different version of globalism"
>not knowing that this still means they support globalism
>calling others stupid
is this bait
Care to explain? You don't actually need global capitalism for globalism, you could have global communism (theoretically as communism fails). Global capitalism is a product of a type of globalism but the two aren't the same
I understand the distinction fine. I was just pointing out how fucking insane and illogical what the left is proposing really is.
Also, the left is largely the tool of the globalist. And these kids are so fucking dumb they don't even realize it.
except they absolutely support the current iteration of globalism being shilled by neol-liberals and kikes, that is the destruction of the working class as a political demographic by flooding the labour market with 'refugees' from the third world, regardless of the damage done to all the countries left with no young men capable of working.
global capitalism is a process/product of a type of globalism, yes I agree, but they are not the same or mutually exclusive. Like I said earlier, global communism is a type of globalism that (theoretically) exists without global capitalism.
Who cares?
Average people have no ideas what the fucks in Hamburg want, because they have no Solid leadership that can sit down at a table, interview, etc and explain what they want.
Which is why they will"get" nothing except bashed in faces by "oppressive polezi".
Fuck them.
I'm glad this happened, Nazi fascicsts like Trump & Putin and all their drone supporters have no place in modern society with their backwards views.
these faggots describe themselves as anti-globalists that's why.
they also describe themselves as anarcho-communists yet do nothing but serve multi-national corporation's interests.
I used the phrase global capitalism to make a distinction between that and global communism. But yes you are correct.
Antifa till I die
As pointed out Globalization is one of the methods for achieving Globalism, specifically neo-liberal brand of Globalism centered around a deregulated global financial structure helmed by the IMF.
Proletarian internationalism is an example of a method for achieving the different brand of Globalism i'm talking about, the type of Globalism that leftists currently in Hamburg protesting the G20 support wholeheartedly.
Agreed on all points.
This is such a fucking base idea like saying all Libertarians (even open border ones) are Right Wing nationalists. You're boiling down so many shades of red, who disagree with eachother on certain aspects of policy to into one "Leftist" block it's not funny.