Refute this, Sup Forums

Refute this, Sup Forums.

Protip: You can't.

>stopped at 'racist'

Lmao. How do anscos justify having your own toothbrush, assuming an ansoc society would even produce them.

Also: sage

>being trans is normal
>primitivists are trans phobic
pick one

Thanks for reposting my image. Mutualism FTW.

Hi my American friend,

a toothbrush, just like your own house, your personnal car and the painting your great-uncle painted and gave to you is not part of the means production.

Why would i want to take your toothbrush ? You worked to have it and you use it every morning to brush your teeth. In contrast, why would the shareholders want a part of what i produce ? I never saw them the morning at office / factory.

Well, technically they are transphobic, that's not a lie.

>private tyranny
Hahahaha what

>mutalism
>anti-capitalist

>here you can see 4 types of shit
anarchy is a mental illness

Mutualism is at least kind of internally consistent and morally defensible. Ancoms and ansyns should be helicopter'd. (((Ancaps))) are of course always faggots.

OP didn't provide any support or real arguments so I'm not going to either.

Anarcho-capitalism is at least somewhat redpilled, the rest are helicopter-tier

Serious question.

How do you maintain order in a truly anarchist society? How are lawbreakers punished? How do you even have something resembling law? Wouldn't a justice system/system of law imply a hierarchical society and therefore be incompatible with anarchy? Would people be lynched in the street or something?

>Anti-capitalist market economy

what the fuck does this even mean?

>Only arguments against ancap are 'not REAL anarchism' and 'racist!'
Ancap is anarchy because there is no state. True, a business can easily become a practical state, but then it's not ancap anymore. There are plenty of reasons it doesn't work, but you can't say them because they hold true to all anarchy, and you are literally retarded.

It truly is the most delusional political theory ever conceived. The truth is that technologically advanced economic activity and the complex post-industrial society we live in today require a hierarchical structure in order to function. Anarcho-primitivists are honest enough to admit this, but they overlook the fact that even our ancestors lived in hierarchical tribes with a clear leadership caste. Man is a social creature and this inevitably requires political order.

what do you think of distributism?

law is the white mans tool of oppression

It's probably just them saying you can't build corporations, everything has to be a mom and pop shop so they can mutually masturbate themselves about how "the man" can't keep them down anymore

>common ownership is anarchism
>private ownership isnt
uhh

What do all these mean?

Anarchists are equal in faggotry.

Oh boy an image with a bunch of opinionated shit. I can tell you're here for a great discussion about how you think we're all idiots and won't listen to anything we say anyway.

>Queer anarchism

Literally how would your society survive longer than a single generation when literally the only thing it's built upon is homosexuality?

Maybe they have slaves to impregnate.

>forgetting the best

wow, ancaps may be retards but compared to you guys they are great. What a bunch of faggot leddit-tier shit.

Usually laws and an authority is more relaxed or more "liberal" when the recent history of the society has been peaceful with very little immoral crime and don't see a need to have stick rules governing how people should live.
In the case where there is a lot of crime, recent conflict or perhaps an aggressive populous exists, there are usually more rules, and people to enforce those rules.

My opinion, is that in this day in age we need laws and authorities to ensure our cities and countries aren't being destroyed by raids from shit groups of people. And also so that a level of morality is maintained in those areas (not going out and murdering people because they insulted their honor or some shit).

As for the distribution of wealth, that should be to the individual as it stimulates lazy people to become somewhat useful in order to survive. The need to have ownership of assets or a sum of money.
There are people in this world that will do a job on the basis of their own enjoyment. But they are rare.
Most Humans need a reason to get out of bed and leave their room every. Hunger and feeling uncomfortable is a big motivator.

Because the shareholders provided your office and equipment you use in production.

Don't want shareholders? Easy. Buy all your own stuff, build your own office, your own factory, and you don't have to pay any such shareholders.

Not true, I do not wear a fedora.

>Don't know what is anarcho-individualism
>Don't understand basic economics

1, 2 and 5 are duplicates, and are wrong
3, 4 and 5 aren't bad

"Anarcho" Communism- For everyone to commonly own something, there needs to be a huge government to enforce it, and even then it's bound to fail thus it isn't even anarchism
2. You can't even reach Socialism successfully, you want to reach Anarcho-Communism?
3. Nope
4. Because no one would even manufacture them in that society.
5, 6 and 7 are useless.

>Man uses car to race and make money
>car becomes means of production
>car is seized.

>Man gets paid for using a toothbrush to clean a toilet
>Toothbrush becomes means of production
>Toothbrush is stolen

>Man rents out his own house
>house becomes means of production
>house is seized

How exactly is personal property different from private property?

ancoms are retards

you still need to leave though

>the ones i dont like are racist and hate trannies
there isn't even a point to refute

Refute this
Protip: You're an idiot

>implying gommies would read more about distributism than the first half-sentence of the Wikipedia article before closing the tab and claiming to have invented it

>shit written by some socialist SJW scum

Kill yourself faggot. Libertarianism all the way, none of your retarded shit.

Saw

>Protip: You can't

Stopped reading and lost interest Sage and die

>libertarianism
>not retarded
how about you acknowledge the power and utility of hierarchy in social animals you colossal faggot

I keked.

Hierarchy is inherent in libertarianism.

>hates trans-women
Wtf I love anarcho primitivism now.

Not worth even trying to refute these descriptions and definitions when they're all meme ideologies anyway and don't deserve even a second of consideration one way or another.