Would you deny women the vote?

Would you deny women the vote?
Why?

Only married women should and have the same pplitics as their husbands.

They vote for bad policies just to spite other women.

Thats a fine foot pussy

You can't force them to you nazi

they dont vote for the best interests of the nation

YOUR interests you mean

Yeah welfare and more niggers are in interest of a nation
take your belt and hang yourself

>best interests of the nation
what?
Yes
In fact I would create a test to test if people can think rationally

I wouldn't care if he is Commie,Nazi or hippie
As long as he can prove that he can think he will be able to vote.

Yes

Women make decisions based on emotion, not logic.

i'm more concerned about what that text translates to

footfags are the worst

don't use ere-chan to shitpost

The only people who should vote are those who own significant amounts of land or successful businesses, or have otherwise somehow invested in the good of the nation, as well as those with significant intellectual or cultural achievements. Or several years of work in a STEM field.
No, they vote for more government and more gibs enabling more single mothers and causing areas like Chicongo. This isn't even an american thing, they do it all over europe too.

Your just a misogynist

Women should not be allowed to vote.
Men should have as many votes as he has wife + children in his custody.

>those who own significant amounts of land or successful businesses
Chinese land sharks will love that.

explain

I don't have to explain anything to selfish men

Ah yup! We gave them a vote and just look at what we have now... gender neutral/fluid ack... ack...... ack......

You do.
You can't just call other names.
I explained myself, so you do too.

Yes and no.
1 vote per legitimately married family.

The family is the future of a nation, not the individual.
Single folks who aren't raising families can work to get in office if they want their opinions heard.

Make me

Only land owners should be able to vote, regardless of what they identify as.

Yes.
See Europe for details.

I would deny everyone the vote. One vote per family, not per person.

This means instead of the vote being self-serving, it has to take into account other people too.

Women are more emotional than men, so you can logically assume they vote based on feelings instead of money and future success. Women should only be allowed to vote if they have a husband who allows it.

there should be one vote per family

...

This is what we all talk about, you can't think.
You speak out of your emotions.

lol rectum

first of all democracy is degenerate system
second of all even if there is democracy only people with iq over 115 should be given right to vote.
Which would exclude like 99,5% of women population.

third of all, women have no mentality for politics that affects millions. since women are highly selfish beings, and are danger for higher community. Women are beings of vanity

>being nazis

Yes. Women getting a vote has ruined western civilization.

Tell me why am I "nazi"
I am waiting for your rational argument.
I am part jew btw :")

>no cute feet gf

Life is suffering.

Why am I seeing this image everywhere, can I get a quick rundown?

>being jewish

So first I am nazi, now I am filthy jew ?

>Would you deny women the vote?
Yes
>Why?
They aren't people, they're property. Would you let dogs in government? Then why would you let cunts in government?

IQ doesnt imply knowledge of topics. If you just sit around jerking off all day and only apply yourself to knowing optimal quest routes in WoW or some shit, that doesnt help in politics for voting and policy knowledge. Also, elected officials are completely pointless since we can log in for employment insurance, DMV related needs, do our taxes online, etc, yet we cant log in to a government website, read a bill and vote yes or no? We need a random elected official to do this? And they just ignore us and do what a lobbyst group or their party leader tells them? Why exactly do we need these officials today? 100+ years ago, no, we couldnt travel to parliament and listen to the motions and read the bills and come home and gather everyones opinion on it and go back and vote yes or no for everyone. THAT is what elected officials were for originally. Everyone can do that now. It would take seconds to log in with a SIN card and government ID and password and so on like we do for social programs, taxes, etc and vote on a bill. They could ask random questions as verification you understand what you are voting for (stuff like who proposed the bill, is it for or against a topic, how much it will cost, etc) and then you hit for or against. You could give tax credits or some shit for how many you log in and answer or punishments for not participating.

But we dont need elected officials today. We havent in decades. And IQ has nothing to do with this like you say. A borderline retard that follows news and politics will know more than someone that spends 16 hours doing actual research and be able to make a more informed decision.

do you not know who this guy is?

1. Politics get in between a wife and husband

2. Women are selfish and often vote for themselves. Voting for themselves would be voting for a liberal politician.

3. Destroys the family unit. The molecule is the smallest unit of matter that still acts as it's original. For example, a water molecule is the smallest unit of water that still acts like water, and is water. Conservative politicians see the smallest unit of society as the family, while the liberal sees the smallest unit of society as the individual. And how does this relate to women voting? When only men could vote, it was one vote per household. If we assume the common politician will make his policies the lowest common denominator, politicians were forced to make policies that would contribute towards the family unit. When women can vote, more liberal politicians rise up for the "individual". This is what leads to cultural Marxism and communism, socialism, and the slow breakdown of society thanks to women.

Idk if any of that makes sense. A lot of different arguments were going through my mind at the same time.

hes fuckin trollin u m8

of course they would deny the vote to women
>why
because they are christians
or muslims or jews

No because I don't believe in allowing myself more rights than others. Its the same reason I oppose the ideas of Heinlein and the idea of a technocracy being a former soldier and an engineer.

>being gay

First of all, its a fucking leaf....

Second of all, intelligence is capability to put things into context. So yea i would say it has everything to do with everything.
Human with higher intelligence is in general more than capable to tackle and reason inside different spheres of reasoning. So it really does not matter if he is a room plant or involved social being.
And this would be relevant if i was defending democracy, which i am not.

Third of all, system you are proposing (direct democracy) is exponentially more retarded than indirect democracy.
80% of population is not capable of discerning right from wrong. They are thought to act in it out of reflex. They do not know implications of moral and governance.
So no I do not think it would be remotely good thing to give power to decide to a bunch of retards.
Educate your self a bit more on how intelligence is distributed in population.

At least my moral code is consistent.

>taking nazi as an insult
ur a newfag kiddo

you're only consistent in gay

Because they vote what they feel is good, not what they think is best. Women are too concerned with their fee fees to govern. Additionally if they are allowed to vote they want to work as well, which brings the value of labour down, which means that both parents have to work for a decent living which means nobody's there to rise the kids. Or make the kids. Or be a family.
Direct democracy sounds interesting. It's a shame nobody will ever try this (unless we revolt or get a benevolent dictator).
Also this. Family is the smallest possible society. It certainly makes sense.

lewd desu

...

tits or gtfo

I never did that summerfriend no opinion's insult me.
I just asked for rational reasoning
Hi Stacy

>'
fug

>flat earth mudshit

kys pls senpai

>vote?
democracy is a failed experiment

>be male
>be from Poland
>people know you're from Poland
>get called Stacy anyway for calling people for falling for a bait
Is pic related your headwear?

Ok Stacy

Never encountered Irony haven't we ?
Who here is to kill him self?

Shutup toilet mechanic bitch

sorry Mehmet, this is a board for humans, you need not apply.

Care to explain me some things ?
Like normal healthy human.

>
also

>him

try again sweetie schnookums

Fuck woman. They think with their feelings not with their heads.

Nice attempt of drawing attention away from your mistake.
And no, actualy pure blooded Serb, sorry to disappoint.

Also why arent you washing your mans underpants ?
I meant not to take away time from other mans property.

No!

If you take federal money, you should not vote in federal elections. If you take state money, you should not vote in state elections. If you take county money, you should not vote in county elections. If you take city money, you should not vote in city elections.

Yeah I realized that after he responded to my response.

Why?
I don't care you just pretending to be retarded.
I will still speak to you as rational as I can

>claims to be Serb
>still lives in Kebabland

LOL K Mamoud keep telling yourself that

and why arnt I doing laundry? Why arnt you fucking a goat or beating your 5 sister-wives?

Am I pretty?
And in what way am I relevant to you?

Back to toilet

Yes you are Stacy.

...

Yeh thats about it, would retract women's right to vote in a heartbeat

but I actually vote for my countries best interest

>living in KebabLand
how about you try again sweetheart (advise the map)

>why arnt you fucking a goat.
I do not know, why would one indulge in sexual intercourse with a fucking animal. when there is plenty of human meat around.

>5 sister-wives
However Indulging in sexual intercourse with your relatives is bad, it produced ill relationships and degenerate offspring, also point of mating with and/or befriending another human is to chose someone out of your own free will. we can not chose family, we are born into it. I do hope u learned something sweetheart.

And i think ur man should do better than allowing his wife to go around and embarrass her self by attempting to outsmart a man that is superior to her in every single possible way.

Whatever helps you sleep at night Mehmet

>b-but im not a Muslim mudskin, I swear look at muh graphic

Im not married either but when I do it will be a man thay actually respects me unlike your barbaric desert cult.

Respecting woman is not equal to letting her to stuff her self with her vanity.
Respecting woman is to help her defects with your high points, and vice versa. Woman =/ Man

That is the point of Respect. To acknowledge truth. And cherish it like truth, not taking it as negative.
What u meant is;
>I will find a man that will feed me vanity

I and me ancestors did more to stop the Islam, than you or the likes of you ever did. Yes we are heavily scared by the process. But they are our battle scars. Those are good ones.