>New meta-analysis has emerged from a document published today by an independent researcher known as The Forensicator, which suggests that files eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona were likely initially downloaded by a person with physical access to a computer possibly connected to the internal DNC network. The individual most likely used a USB drive to copy the information. The groundbreaking new analysis irrevocably destroys the Russian hacking narrative, and calls the actions of Crowdstrike and the DNC into question.
>The document supplied to Disobedient Media via Adam Carter was authored by an individual known as The Forensicator. The full document referenced here has been published on their blog. Their analysis indicates the data was almost certainly not accessed initially by a remote hacker, much less one in Russia. If true, this analysis obliterates the Russian hacking narrative completely.
>The Forensicator specifically discusses the data that was eventually published by Guccifer 2.0 under the title “NGP-VAN.” This should not be confused with the separate publication of the DNC emails by Wikileaks. This article focuses solely on evidence stemming from the files published by Guccifer 2.0, which were previously discussed in depth by Adam Carter.
ugh sounds like he came up with that when he was 12 and just stuck with it
regardless very interesting
Hudson Wilson
not since Khe Sahn has there been an opposition so strong
Cameron Harris
tech nerds have a way of doing that
Grayson Butler
looks like this needs bumping
Jose Wright
This is kinda funny. All this talk of high profile international hacking and it was an inside man fucking USB drive all along.
Jason Williams
haha digits
Samuel Barnes
Ok so I'm a leaf who drinks tap water with no filter. What does this all mean for Clinton and the dnc? Was pushing this fake news all this time illegal?
Grayson Cox
It means they can't pretend muhrussia rigged the election, it means flynn should never have been fired, and on, and on...
We all paid for investgations of trump-russia based on lies.
They wanted to start WW3 based on lies.
That's our ruling oligarchy for you.
David Thompson
Doesn't rule out that the Russians didn't hire someone to take it or pay someone off, but makes the Russian narrative a lot less compelling.
Only boomers think "hacking" is like the movies, most people in IT know that most hackers just copy the files on a USB stick because building security is often worse than IT security.
Camden Morgan
Bump and Slide is the new Shuck and Jive
Wyatt Adams
bump!
Still with you Seth, even after your own "family" sold you out.
F
Dylan Brown
Alright, now, back to my question:
Couldn't timestamps be altered?
Adrian Wilson
how do you see when threads are created?
Asher Robinson
>bix nood
wut
Austin Cruz
So that's what they're gonna go with? >Was the individual who removed the information from DNC computers a Russian spy with connections to Trump? >Our sources say: Yes!
Dylan Cox
I was wondering that too. Complain that the thread keeps sliding, use the most bland generic .jpg in the world. Here I'll leave this for you OP
Easton Green
guccimayne.exe
Oliver Foster
Are youniggers retarded? >Sort by >Creation date
Isaiah Price
Bump
Austin Evans
bump
Evan King
>Doesn't rule out that the Russians didn't hire someone to do what,exactly? WHAT could "russians" do to help Trump if not directly hack unhackable manual ballot boxes?
Hillary had every media outlet, comedian, actor and recording artist vilifying Trump. The FBI director she then blamed the election on has been proven to have colluded with the DNC to pin Guccifier on the russians.
Nolan Gomez
HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH
HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH
Julian Cook
like over 9 goirllion
Mason Reyes
He did it for his country.
His name was Seth Rich.
Nathaniel Sanchez
Guccifer 2.0 was CIA false info. Fuck off, that's why 60% of the comments in here are from bots.
Considering that this analysis blows the guccifer story out of the water, I don't see how what you're saying and what the OP posted are at odds.
Gavin Martin
So... any legit sources?
David Morales
explain user, is it possible or not
Isaac James
The evidence is internally consistent and the work is shown. Credibility isn't much of a factor here because the data on the files itself is the source.
Jaxson Baker
...
Oliver Nguyen
>legit sources
Like CNN? I am skeptical this is true (see my issues with timestamp credibility), but you niggers aren't helping by trying to bury these threads
Levi Torres
Its not even a timestamp its just a 'last modified' value.
Logan Robinson
There must be a way to see signatures of tampering on timestamps. I'm not a file expert, though.
Xavier Perry
but Russia!
Adam Morgan
Seems like it is? I know exactly jack shit about the way timestamps work, but after deleting Cortana through laborious fuckery with privileges and registry and task manager anything seems possible lol
Brandon Moore
The day Trump drops the SethPill on the masses will be the day of true happening
fuck i hope it happens
Eli Watson
Fucking this. The source is an INDIPENDANT RESEARCHER. Im an indipendent researcher. So is anyone who follows news, checks sources and posts an analysis of it. Anyone can make claims, it just means nothing without hard proof.
Henry Bailey
bump
Adam Gutierrez
Editing it would be trivial. It's stored in a standard format which is documented on the format's homepage.
So while it technically doesn't prove anything, it's still more dirt in the mountain of evidence against the Russia narrative. And considering the "intelligence" agencies have literally nothing and have changed their story a few times already...
Samuel Ward
first, sieg heil
second, CNN hires researchers who are not independent. I'll take an indy any day
Logan Scott
Bamping
Matthew Davis
You retarded? He shows all the steps he made to reach the conclusion. It's not like he's just saying that's what it is. He also shows how he got to there.
Fuckin read.
Dominic Walker
> The Forensicator stated in their analysis that a USB drive was most likely used to boot Linux OS onto a computer that either contained the alleged DNC files or had direct access to them. They also explained to us that in this situation one would simply plug a USB drive with the LinuxOS into a computer and reboot it; after restarting, the computer would boot from the USB drive and load Linux instead of its normal OS.
This assumes a lot. It assumes Secure Boot isn't enabled (which if true, fire your IT dept). It also assumes that the BIOS isn't at least locked down to prevent a boot to anything other than the primary drive (again, fire IT dept if they're not at least password protecting the BIOS). It also assumes that the drive isn't encrypted. If this is a false story, it should be easy enough for the IT team to prove it by simply stating they use encryption or bitlocker or something, like a normal company.
Luke Diaz
>Mueller met with Trump before the investigation started. Mueller will bring down the democrats, not Trump.
This has all be a set up by Trump since the beginning. Just like the Mueller investigation, he hires all democrats, so people on the left trusts them, think they are going to bust Trump. However, they are going to bust the DNC, Obama, Hillary all of them. Leaking, Wiretapping, Unmasking etc. Trump and Mueller are bringing them all down
>Comey memos leaked - illegal (All setup with Trump / Comey) Comey leaks, illegal....rats out all the corruption, used as a witness
>Guccifer was inside the DNC, it was not hacked, but copied from their computers
Seth Rich was involved, Seth Rich got the DNC / Podesta emails, leaked them to Wikileaks. They had him killed
This has all been a setup ever since Mike Rogers met with Trump at Trump Tower after the election. Rogers told Trump what was going on. Everything Trump does, even tweets are traps. Everything Trump says are traps.
Trump is bringing down the entire corrupt establishment.
I think we can conclude from everything we've learned about the DNC that they don't take security seriously enough. Podesta was using gmail and had "password" as his email password.
Noah Hughes
They were copied by Seth Rich obviously. He was the Dems' IT guy during the campaign. His conscience got the better of him, so the DNC disposed of him.
Samuel Baker
Can't you get past the bios by resetting the jumper?
Blake Collins
Absolute bullshit, they were copied over a network share to a locally mounted Dropbox folder using webDAV.
Cooper Stewart
The DNC's bullshit 'Russian Hacking' narrative was designed to deflect attention away from Seth Rich's leak. They knew there was no hacking from the very start.
Dylan Gray
How exactly does this obliterate Russian hackers narrative? The guy who copied the data could have been Russian. The guy pulling the strings could have been Russian
Caleb Cook
Your sources?
>Podesta was using gmail and had "password" as his email password
Plausible deniability, possibly?
>It's stored in a standard format which is documented on the format's homepage
Link?
Samuel Young
Nobody believes the 'Russian Hacking' propaganda stories except the far left. Sane people know it was Seth Rich who leaked the DNC emails.
Nolan Parker
I would expect that a company should be a bit better, since people are being paid to do better than that.
Thomas Hall
>The Forensicator Who are they and why is their blogspot page considered a reputable source?
Elijah Jackson
...
Josiah James
>The guy pulling the strings could have been Russian
Dems vigilante nao Yeah, no, Putin paying Seth Rich to do it wouldn't justify taking him out without trial
Camden Sullivan
I think so, but that's why the drive would still use encryption. Even if it gets loaded from a liveCD, they won't be able to access the files. It's literally best practices for sysadmins.
Hunter Campbell
John Podesta literally had password as the password to the email account that got compromised. The DNC's IT guys are in fact that stupid.
Jaxson Sullivan
>Only boomers think "hacking" is like the movies You mean it's not like this?
>why is their blogspot page considered a reputable source
What if I told that no source is reputable? Either you participate in the factual debate on the evidence or you gtfo. Logos, never ethos
Jaxson Howard
Hillary's team started the Russia shit. It's been her legal defense strategy from the start. She's an evil bitch, but she's smart. She also knows DJT and knew he'd go after her.
Elijah Martin
bump for Justice
Bentley Baker
Bump
Mason Garcia
Give me the tl;dr version of this.
Boil it down to what matters.
Hunter Long
JUSTICE FOR SETH RICH
JUSTICE FOR DNC CAMPAIGN FRAUD
JUSTICE FOR DEMOCRAT VOTER FRAUD
Levi King
...
Hunter Phillips
He means WaPo link
John Morris
>mfw The Forensicator is with us in this thread right now
Daniel Wright
Lol. drive encryption, bios security. Are we talking about the same DNC? Hillary Clinton had a homebrew email server in her bathroom. She bought Blackberries for use by Sec. of State off of ebay. These people are fucking maroons. Also note that most business security isn't that top-notch because they don't value it. You'll find the stuff you include at say a financial firm but not at most medium sized businesses. Trump probably had finance people to do his IT.
Anthony Johnson
We use them at my job, and we're a SMB. The stuff is free, so there's really no excuse for businesses not to use it imo. Also, Trump is allowed to use his personal Samsung Galaxy, so his IT team can't be THAT strict desu
Henry Gonzalez
i think they had file and printer sharing open on windows pc's. As they were sloppy with password security someone got one that allowed them to access user directories across the share. This would let you copy basically anything, such as a .pst folder, which they did. The DNC didn't actually have an IT department - this is why their security is dogshit.
Josiah Rodriguez
tl;dr
You're a fucking moron if you can't understand his post.
>american flag
It all makes sense.
Justin Morris
HIS NAME
Joshua Fisher
i'd hate fuck her
Camden Scott
you are clueless about the larger world outside your SMB
Jonathan Adams
>all for pirating some movies
Copyright lobby is the most powerful, ruthless, and idiotic force in the world.
And this just helps show that those people were right all along. They do a good job of stopping where the data ends though, and not drawing the connection themselves.
Nicholas Richardson
Because it was vetted by other sources.
The data should stand on its own if it is correct. If all the shills can do is make fun of name choice, .... then there is probably not a lot of factual info they can argue with.
Ian Cruz
I hear Donna Brazille is also a russian, and Putin controlled her mind and made her give those questions to CNN.
Adrian Jones
Oh my god you're right 0_0 We are in the presence of greatness.
Sebastian Rivera
>The Forensicator >literally pointed out in the first thread that all he even claims to prove is the time zone setting on the originating computer